Adding debian version 4.19.260-1.debian/4.19.260-1

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 51 deletions

diff --git a/debian/patches-rt/0264-drm-i915-Don-t-disable-interrupts-independently-of-t.patch b/debian/patches-rt/0264-drm-i915-Don-t-disable-interrupts-independently-of-t.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index e95fb336e..000000000
--- a/debian/patches-rt/0264-drm-i915-Don-t-disable-interrupts-independently-of-t.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
-From 31ae53586975d39dd03dabf5c944b498dcc73289 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:01:37 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH 264/347] drm/i915: Don't disable interrupts independently of
- the lock
-Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.19/older/patches-4.19.246-rt110.tar.xz
-
-The locks (timeline->lock and rq->lock) need to be taken with disabled
-interrupts. This is done in __retire_engine_request() by disabling the
-interrupts independently of the locks itself.
-While local_irq_disable()+spin_lock() equals spin_lock_irq() on vanilla
-it does not on RT. Also, it is not obvious if there is a special reason
-to why the interrupts are disabled independently of the lock.
-
-Enable/disable interrupts as part of the locking instruction.
-
-Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
-Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
----
- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 8 ++------
- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
-index 5c2c93cbab12..7124510b9131 100644
---- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
-+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
-@@ -356,9 +356,7 @@ static void __retire_engine_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
- 
- 	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_completed(rq));
- 
--	local_irq_disable();
--
--	spin_lock(&engine->timeline.lock);
-+	spin_lock_irq(&engine->timeline.lock);
- 	GEM_BUG_ON(!list_is_first(&rq->link, &engine->timeline.requests));
- 	list_del_init(&rq->link);
- 	spin_unlock(&engine->timeline.lock);
-@@ -372,9 +370,7 @@ static void __retire_engine_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
- 		GEM_BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&rq->i915->gt_pm.rps.num_waiters));
- 		atomic_dec(&rq->i915->gt_pm.rps.num_waiters);
- 	}
--	spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
--
--	local_irq_enable();
-+	spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
- 
- 	/*
- 	 * The backing object for the context is done after switching to the
--- 
-2.36.1
-