diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/lockup-watchdogs.txt | 83 |
1 files changed, 83 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/lockup-watchdogs.txt b/Documentation/lockup-watchdogs.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000..290840c16 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/lockup-watchdogs.txt @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ +=============================================================== +Softlockup detector and hardlockup detector (aka nmi_watchdog) +=============================================================== + +The Linux kernel can act as a watchdog to detect both soft and hard +lockups. + +A 'softlockup' is defined as a bug that causes the kernel to loop in +kernel mode for more than 20 seconds (see "Implementation" below for +details), without giving other tasks a chance to run. The current +stack trace is displayed upon detection and, by default, the system +will stay locked up. Alternatively, the kernel can be configured to +panic; a sysctl, "kernel.softlockup_panic", a kernel parameter, +"softlockup_panic" (see "Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst" for +details), and a compile option, "BOOTPARAM_SOFTLOCKUP_PANIC", are +provided for this. + +A 'hardlockup' is defined as a bug that causes the CPU to loop in +kernel mode for more than 10 seconds (see "Implementation" below for +details), without letting other interrupts have a chance to run. +Similarly to the softlockup case, the current stack trace is displayed +upon detection and the system will stay locked up unless the default +behavior is changed, which can be done through a sysctl, +'hardlockup_panic', a compile time knob, "BOOTPARAM_HARDLOCKUP_PANIC", +and a kernel parameter, "nmi_watchdog" +(see "Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst" for details). + +The panic option can be used in combination with panic_timeout (this +timeout is set through the confusingly named "kernel.panic" sysctl), +to cause the system to reboot automatically after a specified amount +of time. + +Implementation +============== + +The soft and hard lockup detectors are built on top of the hrtimer and +perf subsystems, respectively. A direct consequence of this is that, +in principle, they should work in any architecture where these +subsystems are present. + +A periodic hrtimer runs to generate interrupts and kick the watchdog +task. An NMI perf event is generated every "watchdog_thresh" +(compile-time initialized to 10 and configurable through sysctl of the +same name) seconds to check for hardlockups. If any CPU in the system +does not receive any hrtimer interrupt during that time the +'hardlockup detector' (the handler for the NMI perf event) will +generate a kernel warning or call panic, depending on the +configuration. + +The watchdog task is a high priority kernel thread that updates a +timestamp every time it is scheduled. If that timestamp is not updated +for 2*watchdog_thresh seconds (the softlockup threshold) the +'softlockup detector' (coded inside the hrtimer callback function) +will dump useful debug information to the system log, after which it +will call panic if it was instructed to do so or resume execution of +other kernel code. + +The period of the hrtimer is 2*watchdog_thresh/5, which means it has +two or three chances to generate an interrupt before the hardlockup +detector kicks in. + +As explained above, a kernel knob is provided that allows +administrators to configure the period of the hrtimer and the perf +event. The right value for a particular environment is a trade-off +between fast response to lockups and detection overhead. + +By default, the watchdog runs on all online cores. However, on a +kernel configured with NO_HZ_FULL, by default the watchdog runs only +on the housekeeping cores, not the cores specified in the "nohz_full" +boot argument. If we allowed the watchdog to run by default on +the "nohz_full" cores, we would have to run timer ticks to activate +the scheduler, which would prevent the "nohz_full" functionality +from protecting the user code on those cores from the kernel. +Of course, disabling it by default on the nohz_full cores means that +when those cores do enter the kernel, by default we will not be +able to detect if they lock up. However, allowing the watchdog +to continue to run on the housekeeping (non-tickless) cores means +that we will continue to detect lockups properly on those cores. + +In either case, the set of cores excluded from running the watchdog +may be adjusted via the kernel.watchdog_cpumask sysctl. For +nohz_full cores, this may be useful for debugging a case where the +kernel seems to be hanging on the nohz_full cores. |