diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/vm/transhuge.rst | 197 |
1 files changed, 197 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/vm/transhuge.rst b/Documentation/vm/transhuge.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a8cf6809e --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/vm/transhuge.rst @@ -0,0 +1,197 @@ +.. _transhuge: + +============================ +Transparent Hugepage Support +============================ + +This document describes design principles Transparent Hugepage (THP) +Support and its interaction with other parts of the memory management. + +Design principles +================= + +- "graceful fallback": mm components which don't have transparent hugepage + knowledge fall back to breaking huge pmd mapping into table of ptes and, + if necessary, split a transparent hugepage. Therefore these components + can continue working on the regular pages or regular pte mappings. + +- if a hugepage allocation fails because of memory fragmentation, + regular pages should be gracefully allocated instead and mixed in + the same vma without any failure or significant delay and without + userland noticing + +- if some task quits and more hugepages become available (either + immediately in the buddy or through the VM), guest physical memory + backed by regular pages should be relocated on hugepages + automatically (with khugepaged) + +- it doesn't require memory reservation and in turn it uses hugepages + whenever possible (the only possible reservation here is kernelcore= + to avoid unmovable pages to fragment all the memory but such a tweak + is not specific to transparent hugepage support and it's a generic + feature that applies to all dynamic high order allocations in the + kernel) + +get_user_pages and follow_page +============================== + +get_user_pages and follow_page if run on a hugepage, will return the +head or tail pages as usual (exactly as they would do on +hugetlbfs). Most gup users will only care about the actual physical +address of the page and its temporary pinning to release after the I/O +is complete, so they won't ever notice the fact the page is huge. But +if any driver is going to mangle over the page structure of the tail +page (like for checking page->mapping or other bits that are relevant +for the head page and not the tail page), it should be updated to jump +to check head page instead. Taking reference on any head/tail page would +prevent page from being split by anyone. + +.. note:: + these aren't new constraints to the GUP API, and they match the + same constrains that applies to hugetlbfs too, so any driver capable + of handling GUP on hugetlbfs will also work fine on transparent + hugepage backed mappings. + +In case you can't handle compound pages if they're returned by +follow_page, the FOLL_SPLIT bit can be specified as parameter to +follow_page, so that it will split the hugepages before returning +them. Migration for example passes FOLL_SPLIT as parameter to +follow_page because it's not hugepage aware and in fact it can't work +at all on hugetlbfs (but it instead works fine on transparent +hugepages thanks to FOLL_SPLIT). migration simply can't deal with +hugepages being returned (as it's not only checking the pfn of the +page and pinning it during the copy but it pretends to migrate the +memory in regular page sizes and with regular pte/pmd mappings). + +Graceful fallback +================= + +Code walking pagetables but unaware about huge pmds can simply call +split_huge_pmd(vma, pmd, addr) where the pmd is the one returned by +pmd_offset. It's trivial to make the code transparent hugepage aware +by just grepping for "pmd_offset" and adding split_huge_pmd where +missing after pmd_offset returns the pmd. Thanks to the graceful +fallback design, with a one liner change, you can avoid to write +hundred if not thousand of lines of complex code to make your code +hugepage aware. + +If you're not walking pagetables but you run into a physical hugepage +but you can't handle it natively in your code, you can split it by +calling split_huge_page(page). This is what the Linux VM does before +it tries to swapout the hugepage for example. split_huge_page() can fail +if the page is pinned and you must handle this correctly. + +Example to make mremap.c transparent hugepage aware with a one liner +change:: + + diff --git a/mm/mremap.c b/mm/mremap.c + --- a/mm/mremap.c + +++ b/mm/mremap.c + @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static pmd_t *get_old_pmd(struct mm_stru + return NULL; + + pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr); + + split_huge_pmd(vma, pmd, addr); + if (pmd_none_or_clear_bad(pmd)) + return NULL; + +Locking in hugepage aware code +============================== + +We want as much code as possible hugepage aware, as calling +split_huge_page() or split_huge_pmd() has a cost. + +To make pagetable walks huge pmd aware, all you need to do is to call +pmd_trans_huge() on the pmd returned by pmd_offset. You must hold the +mmap_sem in read (or write) mode to be sure an huge pmd cannot be +created from under you by khugepaged (khugepaged collapse_huge_page +takes the mmap_sem in write mode in addition to the anon_vma lock). If +pmd_trans_huge returns false, you just fallback in the old code +paths. If instead pmd_trans_huge returns true, you have to take the +page table lock (pmd_lock()) and re-run pmd_trans_huge. Taking the +page table lock will prevent the huge pmd to be converted into a +regular pmd from under you (split_huge_pmd can run in parallel to the +pagetable walk). If the second pmd_trans_huge returns false, you +should just drop the page table lock and fallback to the old code as +before. Otherwise you can proceed to process the huge pmd and the +hugepage natively. Once finished you can drop the page table lock. + +Refcounts and transparent huge pages +==================================== + +Refcounting on THP is mostly consistent with refcounting on other compound +pages: + + - get_page()/put_page() and GUP operate in head page's ->_refcount. + + - ->_refcount in tail pages is always zero: get_page_unless_zero() never + succeed on tail pages. + + - map/unmap of the pages with PTE entry increment/decrement ->_mapcount + on relevant sub-page of the compound page. + + - map/unmap of the whole compound page accounted in compound_mapcount + (stored in first tail page). For file huge pages, we also increment + ->_mapcount of all sub-pages in order to have race-free detection of + last unmap of subpages. + +PageDoubleMap() indicates that the page is *possibly* mapped with PTEs. + +For anonymous pages PageDoubleMap() also indicates ->_mapcount in all +subpages is offset up by one. This additional reference is required to +get race-free detection of unmap of subpages when we have them mapped with +both PMDs and PTEs. + +This is optimization required to lower overhead of per-subpage mapcount +tracking. The alternative is alter ->_mapcount in all subpages on each +map/unmap of the whole compound page. + +For anonymous pages, we set PG_double_map when a PMD of the page got split +for the first time, but still have PMD mapping. The additional references +go away with last compound_mapcount. + +File pages get PG_double_map set on first map of the page with PTE and +goes away when the page gets evicted from page cache. + +split_huge_page internally has to distribute the refcounts in the head +page to the tail pages before clearing all PG_head/tail bits from the page +structures. It can be done easily for refcounts taken by page table +entries. But we don't have enough information on how to distribute any +additional pins (i.e. from get_user_pages). split_huge_page() fails any +requests to split pinned huge page: it expects page count to be equal to +sum of mapcount of all sub-pages plus one (split_huge_page caller must +have reference for head page). + +split_huge_page uses migration entries to stabilize page->_refcount and +page->_mapcount of anonymous pages. File pages just got unmapped. + +We safe against physical memory scanners too: the only legitimate way +scanner can get reference to a page is get_page_unless_zero(). + +All tail pages have zero ->_refcount until atomic_add(). This prevents the +scanner from getting a reference to the tail page up to that point. After the +atomic_add() we don't care about the ->_refcount value. We already known how +many references should be uncharged from the head page. + +For head page get_page_unless_zero() will succeed and we don't mind. It's +clear where reference should go after split: it will stay on head page. + +Note that split_huge_pmd() doesn't have any limitation on refcounting: +pmd can be split at any point and never fails. + +Partial unmap and deferred_split_huge_page() +============================================ + +Unmapping part of THP (with munmap() or other way) is not going to free +memory immediately. Instead, we detect that a subpage of THP is not in use +in page_remove_rmap() and queue the THP for splitting if memory pressure +comes. Splitting will free up unused subpages. + +Splitting the page right away is not an option due to locking context in +the place where we can detect partial unmap. It's also might be +counterproductive since in many cases partial unmap happens during exit(2) if +a THP crosses a VMA boundary. + +Function deferred_split_huge_page() is used to queue page for splitting. +The splitting itself will happen when we get memory pressure via shrinker +interface. |