diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/locking.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/btrfs/locking.c | 287 |
1 files changed, 287 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.c b/fs/btrfs/locking.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1da768e5e --- /dev/null +++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.c @@ -0,0 +1,287 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright (C) 2008 Oracle. All rights reserved. + */ + +#include <linux/sched.h> +#include <linux/pagemap.h> +#include <linux/spinlock.h> +#include <linux/page-flags.h> +#include <asm/bug.h> +#include "ctree.h" +#include "extent_io.h" +#include "locking.h" + +static void btrfs_assert_tree_read_locked(struct extent_buffer *eb); + +/* + * if we currently have a spinning reader or writer lock + * (indicated by the rw flag) this will bump the count + * of blocking holders and drop the spinlock. + */ +void btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw(struct extent_buffer *eb, int rw) +{ + /* + * no lock is required. The lock owner may change if + * we have a read lock, but it won't change to or away + * from us. If we have the write lock, we are the owner + * and it'll never change. + */ + if (eb->lock_nested && current->pid == eb->lock_owner) + return; + if (rw == BTRFS_WRITE_LOCK) { + if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) == 0) { + WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers) != 1); + atomic_dec(&eb->spinning_writers); + btrfs_assert_tree_locked(eb); + atomic_inc(&eb->blocking_writers); + write_unlock(&eb->lock); + } + } else if (rw == BTRFS_READ_LOCK) { + btrfs_assert_tree_read_locked(eb); + atomic_inc(&eb->blocking_readers); + WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_readers) == 0); + atomic_dec(&eb->spinning_readers); + read_unlock(&eb->lock); + } +} + +/* + * if we currently have a blocking lock, take the spinlock + * and drop our blocking count + */ +void btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_rw(struct extent_buffer *eb, int rw) +{ + /* + * no lock is required. The lock owner may change if + * we have a read lock, but it won't change to or away + * from us. If we have the write lock, we are the owner + * and it'll never change. + */ + if (eb->lock_nested && current->pid == eb->lock_owner) + return; + + if (rw == BTRFS_WRITE_LOCK_BLOCKING) { + BUG_ON(atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) != 1); + write_lock(&eb->lock); + WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers)); + atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_writers); + /* atomic_dec_and_test implies a barrier */ + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->blocking_writers)) + cond_wake_up_nomb(&eb->write_lock_wq); + } else if (rw == BTRFS_READ_LOCK_BLOCKING) { + BUG_ON(atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers) == 0); + read_lock(&eb->lock); + atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_readers); + /* atomic_dec_and_test implies a barrier */ + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->blocking_readers)) + cond_wake_up_nomb(&eb->read_lock_wq); + } +} + +/* + * take a spinning read lock. This will wait for any blocking + * writers + */ +void btrfs_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb) +{ +again: + BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) && + current->pid == eb->lock_owner); + + read_lock(&eb->lock); + if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) && + current->pid == eb->lock_owner) { + /* + * This extent is already write-locked by our thread. We allow + * an additional read lock to be added because it's for the same + * thread. btrfs_find_all_roots() depends on this as it may be + * called on a partly (write-)locked tree. + */ + BUG_ON(eb->lock_nested); + eb->lock_nested = 1; + read_unlock(&eb->lock); + return; + } + if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers)) { + read_unlock(&eb->lock); + wait_event(eb->write_lock_wq, + atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) == 0); + goto again; + } + atomic_inc(&eb->read_locks); + atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_readers); +} + +/* + * take a spinning read lock. + * returns 1 if we get the read lock and 0 if we don't + * this won't wait for blocking writers + */ +int btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic(struct extent_buffer *eb) +{ + if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers)) + return 0; + + read_lock(&eb->lock); + if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers)) { + read_unlock(&eb->lock); + return 0; + } + atomic_inc(&eb->read_locks); + atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_readers); + return 1; +} + +/* + * returns 1 if we get the read lock and 0 if we don't + * this won't wait for blocking writers + */ +int btrfs_try_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb) +{ + if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers)) + return 0; + + if (!read_trylock(&eb->lock)) + return 0; + + if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers)) { + read_unlock(&eb->lock); + return 0; + } + atomic_inc(&eb->read_locks); + atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_readers); + return 1; +} + +/* + * returns 1 if we get the read lock and 0 if we don't + * this won't wait for blocking writers or readers + */ +int btrfs_try_tree_write_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb) +{ + if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) || + atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers)) + return 0; + + write_lock(&eb->lock); + if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) || + atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers)) { + write_unlock(&eb->lock); + return 0; + } + atomic_inc(&eb->write_locks); + atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_writers); + eb->lock_owner = current->pid; + return 1; +} + +/* + * drop a spinning read lock + */ +void btrfs_tree_read_unlock(struct extent_buffer *eb) +{ + /* + * if we're nested, we have the write lock. No new locking + * is needed as long as we are the lock owner. + * The write unlock will do a barrier for us, and the lock_nested + * field only matters to the lock owner. + */ + if (eb->lock_nested && current->pid == eb->lock_owner) { + eb->lock_nested = 0; + return; + } + btrfs_assert_tree_read_locked(eb); + WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_readers) == 0); + atomic_dec(&eb->spinning_readers); + atomic_dec(&eb->read_locks); + read_unlock(&eb->lock); +} + +/* + * drop a blocking read lock + */ +void btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking(struct extent_buffer *eb) +{ + /* + * if we're nested, we have the write lock. No new locking + * is needed as long as we are the lock owner. + * The write unlock will do a barrier for us, and the lock_nested + * field only matters to the lock owner. + */ + if (eb->lock_nested && current->pid == eb->lock_owner) { + eb->lock_nested = 0; + return; + } + btrfs_assert_tree_read_locked(eb); + WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers) == 0); + /* atomic_dec_and_test implies a barrier */ + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->blocking_readers)) + cond_wake_up_nomb(&eb->read_lock_wq); + atomic_dec(&eb->read_locks); +} + +/* + * take a spinning write lock. This will wait for both + * blocking readers or writers + */ +void btrfs_tree_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb) +{ + WARN_ON(eb->lock_owner == current->pid); +again: + wait_event(eb->read_lock_wq, atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers) == 0); + wait_event(eb->write_lock_wq, atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) == 0); + write_lock(&eb->lock); + if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers)) { + write_unlock(&eb->lock); + wait_event(eb->read_lock_wq, + atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers) == 0); + goto again; + } + if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers)) { + write_unlock(&eb->lock); + wait_event(eb->write_lock_wq, + atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) == 0); + goto again; + } + WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers)); + atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_writers); + atomic_inc(&eb->write_locks); + eb->lock_owner = current->pid; +} + +/* + * drop a spinning or a blocking write lock. + */ +void btrfs_tree_unlock(struct extent_buffer *eb) +{ + int blockers = atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers); + + BUG_ON(blockers > 1); + + btrfs_assert_tree_locked(eb); + eb->lock_owner = 0; + atomic_dec(&eb->write_locks); + + if (blockers) { + WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers)); + atomic_dec(&eb->blocking_writers); + /* Use the lighter barrier after atomic */ + smp_mb__after_atomic(); + cond_wake_up_nomb(&eb->write_lock_wq); + } else { + WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers) != 1); + atomic_dec(&eb->spinning_writers); + write_unlock(&eb->lock); + } +} + +void btrfs_assert_tree_locked(struct extent_buffer *eb) +{ + BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&eb->write_locks)); +} + +static void btrfs_assert_tree_read_locked(struct extent_buffer *eb) +{ + BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&eb->read_locks)); +} |