blob: 66133c2afac466b805968fac4d041ca1385fef68 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
|
From 7e9203de23a787ac491b8114acaf5a8c37f60d36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:24:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 295/347] hrtimer: Prevent using hrtimer_grab_expiry_lock() on
migration_base
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.19/older/patches-4.19.246-rt110.tar.xz
[ Upstream commit cef1b87f98823af923a386f3f69149acb212d4a1 ]
As tglx puts it:
|If base == migration_base then there is no point to lock soft_expiry_lock
|simply because the timer is not executing the callback in soft irq context
|and the whole lock/unlock dance can be avoided.
Furthermore, all the path leading to hrtimer_grab_expiry_lock() assumes
timer->base and timer->base->cpu_base are always non-NULL. So it is safe
to remove the NULL checks here.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1908211557420.2223@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
[bigeasy: rewrite changelog]
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index 24bfae0e92e2..3f9d156c36f1 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -961,7 +961,7 @@ void hrtimer_grab_expiry_lock(const struct hrtimer *timer)
{
struct hrtimer_clock_base *base = READ_ONCE(timer->base);
- if (timer->is_soft && base && base->cpu_base) {
+ if (timer->is_soft && base != &migration_base) {
spin_lock(&base->cpu_base->softirq_expiry_lock);
spin_unlock(&base->cpu_base->softirq_expiry_lock);
}
--
2.36.1
|
