Adding debian version 4.92-8+deb10u6.debian/4.92-8+deb10u6debian

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 74 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/debian/patches/79_01-Fix-SPA-authenticator-checking-client-supplied-data-.patch b/debian/patches/79_01-Fix-SPA-authenticator-checking-client-supplied-data-.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f0688bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/79_01-Fix-SPA-authenticator-checking-client-supplied-data-.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+From 6a7edbf6608d10ef0c707c426511e667849518d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jeremy Harris <jgh146exb@wizmail.org>
+Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 21:15:34 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fix SPA authenticator, checking client-supplied data
+ before using it.  Bug 2571
+
+(cherry picked from commit 57aa14b216432be381b6295c312065b2fd034f86)
+---
+ doc/ChangeLog |  5 +++++
+ src/auths/spa.c   | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
+ 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/doc/ChangeLog
++++ b/doc/ChangeLog
+@@ -62,6 +62,11 @@ JH/28 Fix the timeout on smtp response t
+ [from GIT master]
+ 
+ 
++JH/41 Bug 2571: Fix SPA authenticator.  Running as a server, an offset supplied
++      by the client was not checked as pointing within response data before
++      being used.  A malicious client could thus cause an out-of-bounds read and
++      possibly gain authentication.  Fix by adding the check.
++
+ 
+ Exim version 4.92
+ -----------------
+--- a/src/auths/spa.c
++++ b/src/auths/spa.c
+@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ SPAAuthChallenge challenge;
+ SPAAuthResponse  response;
+ SPAAuthResponse  *responseptr = &response;
+ uschar msgbuf[2048];
+-uschar *clearpass;
++uschar *clearpass, *s;
+ 
+ /* send a 334, MS Exchange style, and grab the client's request,
+ unless we already have it via an initial response. */
+@@ -197,6 +197,13 @@ that causes failure if the size of msgbu
+   char *p = ((char*)responseptr) + IVAL(&responseptr->uUser.offset,0);
+   int len = SVAL(&responseptr->uUser.len,0)/2;
+ 
++  if (p + len*2 >= CS (responseptr+1))
++    {
++    DEBUG(D_auth)
++      debug_printf("auth_spa_server(): bad uUser spec in response\n");
++    return FAIL;
++    }
++
+   if (len + 1 >= sizeof(msgbuf)) return FAIL;
+   for (i = 0; i < len; ++i)
+     {
+@@ -245,14 +252,17 @@ spa_smb_nt_encrypt (clearpass, challenge
+ 
+ /* compare NT hash (LM may not be available) */
+ 
+-if (memcmp(ntRespData,
+-      ((unsigned char*)responseptr)+IVAL(&responseptr->ntResponse.offset,0),
+-      24) == 0)
+-  /* success. we have a winner. */
++s = (US responseptr) + IVAL(&responseptr->ntResponse.offset,0);
++if (s + 24 >= US (responseptr+1))
+   {
+-  return auth_check_serv_cond(ablock);
++  DEBUG(D_auth)
++    debug_printf("auth_spa_server(): bad ntRespData spec in response\n");
++  return FAIL;
+   }
+ 
++if (memcmp(ntRespData, s, 24) == 0)
++  return auth_check_serv_cond(ablock);	/* success. we have a winner. */
++
+   /* Expand server_condition as an authorization check (PH) */
+ 
+ return FAIL;