summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/crypto/devel-algos.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-05-06 01:02:30 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-05-06 01:02:30 +0000
commit76cb841cb886eef6b3bee341a2266c76578724ad (patch)
treef5892e5ba6cc11949952a6ce4ecbe6d516d6ce58 /Documentation/crypto/devel-algos.rst
parentInitial commit. (diff)
downloadlinux-76cb841cb886eef6b3bee341a2266c76578724ad.tar.xz
linux-76cb841cb886eef6b3bee341a2266c76578724ad.zip
Adding upstream version 4.19.249.upstream/4.19.249upstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/crypto/devel-algos.rst')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/crypto/devel-algos.rst255
1 files changed, 255 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/crypto/devel-algos.rst b/Documentation/crypto/devel-algos.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c45c6f400
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/crypto/devel-algos.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,255 @@
+Developing Cipher Algorithms
+============================
+
+Registering And Unregistering Transformation
+--------------------------------------------
+
+There are three distinct types of registration functions in the Crypto
+API. One is used to register a generic cryptographic transformation,
+while the other two are specific to HASH transformations and
+COMPRESSion. We will discuss the latter two in a separate chapter, here
+we will only look at the generic ones.
+
+Before discussing the register functions, the data structure to be
+filled with each, struct crypto_alg, must be considered -- see below
+for a description of this data structure.
+
+The generic registration functions can be found in
+include/linux/crypto.h and their definition can be seen below. The
+former function registers a single transformation, while the latter
+works on an array of transformation descriptions. The latter is useful
+when registering transformations in bulk, for example when a driver
+implements multiple transformations.
+
+::
+
+ int crypto_register_alg(struct crypto_alg *alg);
+ int crypto_register_algs(struct crypto_alg *algs, int count);
+
+
+The counterparts to those functions are listed below.
+
+::
+
+ int crypto_unregister_alg(struct crypto_alg *alg);
+ int crypto_unregister_algs(struct crypto_alg *algs, int count);
+
+
+Notice that both registration and unregistration functions do return a
+value, so make sure to handle errors. A return code of zero implies
+success. Any return code < 0 implies an error.
+
+The bulk registration/unregistration functions register/unregister each
+transformation in the given array of length count. They handle errors as
+follows:
+
+- crypto_register_algs() succeeds if and only if it successfully
+ registers all the given transformations. If an error occurs partway
+ through, then it rolls back successful registrations before returning
+ the error code. Note that if a driver needs to handle registration
+ errors for individual transformations, then it will need to use the
+ non-bulk function crypto_register_alg() instead.
+
+- crypto_unregister_algs() tries to unregister all the given
+ transformations, continuing on error. It logs errors and always
+ returns zero.
+
+Single-Block Symmetric Ciphers [CIPHER]
+---------------------------------------
+
+Example of transformations: aes, arc4, ...
+
+This section describes the simplest of all transformation
+implementations, that being the CIPHER type used for symmetric ciphers.
+The CIPHER type is used for transformations which operate on exactly one
+block at a time and there are no dependencies between blocks at all.
+
+Registration specifics
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+The registration of [CIPHER] algorithm is specific in that struct
+crypto_alg field .cra_type is empty. The .cra_u.cipher has to be
+filled in with proper callbacks to implement this transformation.
+
+See struct cipher_alg below.
+
+Cipher Definition With struct cipher_alg
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Struct cipher_alg defines a single block cipher.
+
+Here are schematics of how these functions are called when operated from
+other part of the kernel. Note that the .cia_setkey() call might happen
+before or after any of these schematics happen, but must not happen
+during any of these are in-flight.
+
+::
+
+ KEY ---. PLAINTEXT ---.
+ v v
+ .cia_setkey() -> .cia_encrypt()
+ |
+ '-----> CIPHERTEXT
+
+
+Please note that a pattern where .cia_setkey() is called multiple times
+is also valid:
+
+::
+
+
+ KEY1 --. PLAINTEXT1 --. KEY2 --. PLAINTEXT2 --.
+ v v v v
+ .cia_setkey() -> .cia_encrypt() -> .cia_setkey() -> .cia_encrypt()
+ | |
+ '---> CIPHERTEXT1 '---> CIPHERTEXT2
+
+
+Multi-Block Ciphers
+-------------------
+
+Example of transformations: cbc(aes), ecb(arc4), ...
+
+This section describes the multi-block cipher transformation
+implementations. The multi-block ciphers are used for transformations
+which operate on scatterlists of data supplied to the transformation
+functions. They output the result into a scatterlist of data as well.
+
+Registration Specifics
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+The registration of multi-block cipher algorithms is one of the most
+standard procedures throughout the crypto API.
+
+Note, if a cipher implementation requires a proper alignment of data,
+the caller should use the functions of crypto_skcipher_alignmask() to
+identify a memory alignment mask. The kernel crypto API is able to
+process requests that are unaligned. This implies, however, additional
+overhead as the kernel crypto API needs to perform the realignment of
+the data which may imply moving of data.
+
+Cipher Definition With struct blkcipher_alg and ablkcipher_alg
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Struct blkcipher_alg defines a synchronous block cipher whereas struct
+ablkcipher_alg defines an asynchronous block cipher.
+
+Please refer to the single block cipher description for schematics of
+the block cipher usage.
+
+Specifics Of Asynchronous Multi-Block Cipher
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+There are a couple of specifics to the asynchronous interface.
+
+First of all, some of the drivers will want to use the Generic
+ScatterWalk in case the hardware needs to be fed separate chunks of the
+scatterlist which contains the plaintext and will contain the
+ciphertext. Please refer to the ScatterWalk interface offered by the
+Linux kernel scatter / gather list implementation.
+
+Hashing [HASH]
+--------------
+
+Example of transformations: crc32, md5, sha1, sha256,...
+
+Registering And Unregistering The Transformation
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+There are multiple ways to register a HASH transformation, depending on
+whether the transformation is synchronous [SHASH] or asynchronous
+[AHASH] and the amount of HASH transformations we are registering. You
+can find the prototypes defined in include/crypto/internal/hash.h:
+
+::
+
+ int crypto_register_ahash(struct ahash_alg *alg);
+
+ int crypto_register_shash(struct shash_alg *alg);
+ int crypto_register_shashes(struct shash_alg *algs, int count);
+
+
+The respective counterparts for unregistering the HASH transformation
+are as follows:
+
+::
+
+ int crypto_unregister_ahash(struct ahash_alg *alg);
+
+ int crypto_unregister_shash(struct shash_alg *alg);
+ int crypto_unregister_shashes(struct shash_alg *algs, int count);
+
+
+Cipher Definition With struct shash_alg and ahash_alg
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Here are schematics of how these functions are called when operated from
+other part of the kernel. Note that the .setkey() call might happen
+before or after any of these schematics happen, but must not happen
+during any of these are in-flight. Please note that calling .init()
+followed immediately by .finish() is also a perfectly valid
+transformation.
+
+::
+
+ I) DATA -----------.
+ v
+ .init() -> .update() -> .final() ! .update() might not be called
+ ^ | | at all in this scenario.
+ '----' '---> HASH
+
+ II) DATA -----------.-----------.
+ v v
+ .init() -> .update() -> .finup() ! .update() may not be called
+ ^ | | at all in this scenario.
+ '----' '---> HASH
+
+ III) DATA -----------.
+ v
+ .digest() ! The entire process is handled
+ | by the .digest() call.
+ '---------------> HASH
+
+
+Here is a schematic of how the .export()/.import() functions are called
+when used from another part of the kernel.
+
+::
+
+ KEY--. DATA--.
+ v v ! .update() may not be called
+ .setkey() -> .init() -> .update() -> .export() at all in this scenario.
+ ^ | |
+ '-----' '--> PARTIAL_HASH
+
+ ----------- other transformations happen here -----------
+
+ PARTIAL_HASH--. DATA1--.
+ v v
+ .import -> .update() -> .final() ! .update() may not be called
+ ^ | | at all in this scenario.
+ '----' '--> HASH1
+
+ PARTIAL_HASH--. DATA2-.
+ v v
+ .import -> .finup()
+ |
+ '---------------> HASH2
+
+Note that it is perfectly legal to "abandon" a request object:
+- call .init() and then (as many times) .update()
+- _not_ call any of .final(), .finup() or .export() at any point in future
+
+In other words implementations should mind the resource allocation and clean-up.
+No resources related to request objects should remain allocated after a call
+to .init() or .update(), since there might be no chance to free them.
+
+
+Specifics Of Asynchronous HASH Transformation
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Some of the drivers will want to use the Generic ScatterWalk in case the
+implementation needs to be fed separate chunks of the scatterlist which
+contains the input data. The buffer containing the resulting hash will
+always be properly aligned to .cra_alignmask so there is no need to
+worry about this.