diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/driver-api/pm/devices.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/driver-api/pm/devices.rst | 827 |
1 files changed, 827 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/pm/devices.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/pm/devices.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1128705a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/pm/devices.rst @@ -0,0 +1,827 @@ +.. |struct dev_pm_ops| replace:: :c:type:`struct dev_pm_ops <dev_pm_ops>` +.. |struct dev_pm_domain| replace:: :c:type:`struct dev_pm_domain <dev_pm_domain>` +.. |struct bus_type| replace:: :c:type:`struct bus_type <bus_type>` +.. |struct device_type| replace:: :c:type:`struct device_type <device_type>` +.. |struct class| replace:: :c:type:`struct class <class>` +.. |struct wakeup_source| replace:: :c:type:`struct wakeup_source <wakeup_source>` +.. |struct device| replace:: :c:type:`struct device <device>` + +============================== +Device Power Management Basics +============================== + +:: + + Copyright (c) 2010-2011 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>, Novell Inc. + Copyright (c) 2010 Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> + Copyright (c) 2016 Intel Corp., Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> + +Most of the code in Linux is device drivers, so most of the Linux power +management (PM) code is also driver-specific. Most drivers will do very +little; others, especially for platforms with small batteries (like cell +phones), will do a lot. + +This writeup gives an overview of how drivers interact with system-wide +power management goals, emphasizing the models and interfaces that are +shared by everything that hooks up to the driver model core. Read it as +background for the domain-specific work you'd do with any specific driver. + + +Two Models for Device Power Management +====================================== + +Drivers will use one or both of these models to put devices into low-power +states: + + System Sleep model: + + Drivers can enter low-power states as part of entering system-wide + low-power states like "suspend" (also known as "suspend-to-RAM"), or + (mostly for systems with disks) "hibernation" (also known as + "suspend-to-disk"). + + This is something that device, bus, and class drivers collaborate on + by implementing various role-specific suspend and resume methods to + cleanly power down hardware and software subsystems, then reactivate + them without loss of data. + + Some drivers can manage hardware wakeup events, which make the system + leave the low-power state. This feature may be enabled or disabled + using the relevant :file:`/sys/devices/.../power/wakeup` file (for + Ethernet drivers the ioctl interface used by ethtool may also be used + for this purpose); enabling it may cost some power usage, but let the + whole system enter low-power states more often. + + Runtime Power Management model: + + Devices may also be put into low-power states while the system is + running, independently of other power management activity in principle. + However, devices are not generally independent of each other (for + example, a parent device cannot be suspended unless all of its child + devices have been suspended). Moreover, depending on the bus type the + device is on, it may be necessary to carry out some bus-specific + operations on the device for this purpose. Devices put into low power + states at run time may require special handling during system-wide power + transitions (suspend or hibernation). + + For these reasons not only the device driver itself, but also the + appropriate subsystem (bus type, device type or device class) driver and + the PM core are involved in runtime power management. As in the system + sleep power management case, they need to collaborate by implementing + various role-specific suspend and resume methods, so that the hardware + is cleanly powered down and reactivated without data or service loss. + +There's not a lot to be said about those low-power states except that they are +very system-specific, and often device-specific. Also, that if enough devices +have been put into low-power states (at runtime), the effect may be very similar +to entering some system-wide low-power state (system sleep) ... and that +synergies exist, so that several drivers using runtime PM might put the system +into a state where even deeper power saving options are available. + +Most suspended devices will have quiesced all I/O: no more DMA or IRQs (except +for wakeup events), no more data read or written, and requests from upstream +drivers are no longer accepted. A given bus or platform may have different +requirements though. + +Examples of hardware wakeup events include an alarm from a real time clock, +network wake-on-LAN packets, keyboard or mouse activity, and media insertion +or removal (for PCMCIA, MMC/SD, USB, and so on). + +Interfaces for Entering System Sleep States +=========================================== + +There are programming interfaces provided for subsystems (bus type, device type, +device class) and device drivers to allow them to participate in the power +management of devices they are concerned with. These interfaces cover both +system sleep and runtime power management. + + +Device Power Management Operations +---------------------------------- + +Device power management operations, at the subsystem level as well as at the +device driver level, are implemented by defining and populating objects of type +|struct dev_pm_ops| defined in :file:`include/linux/pm.h`. The roles of the +methods included in it will be explained in what follows. For now, it should be +sufficient to remember that the last three methods are specific to runtime power +management while the remaining ones are used during system-wide power +transitions. + +There also is a deprecated "old" or "legacy" interface for power management +operations available at least for some subsystems. This approach does not use +|struct dev_pm_ops| objects and it is suitable only for implementing system +sleep power management methods in a limited way. Therefore it is not described +in this document, so please refer directly to the source code for more +information about it. + + +Subsystem-Level Methods +----------------------- + +The core methods to suspend and resume devices reside in +|struct dev_pm_ops| pointed to by the :c:member:`ops` member of +|struct dev_pm_domain|, or by the :c:member:`pm` member of |struct bus_type|, +|struct device_type| and |struct class|. They are mostly of interest to the +people writing infrastructure for platforms and buses, like PCI or USB, or +device type and device class drivers. They also are relevant to the writers of +device drivers whose subsystems (PM domains, device types, device classes and +bus types) don't provide all power management methods. + +Bus drivers implement these methods as appropriate for the hardware and the +drivers using it; PCI works differently from USB, and so on. Not many people +write subsystem-level drivers; most driver code is a "device driver" that builds +on top of bus-specific framework code. + +For more information on these driver calls, see the description later; +they are called in phases for every device, respecting the parent-child +sequencing in the driver model tree. + + +:file:`/sys/devices/.../power/wakeup` files +------------------------------------------- + +All device objects in the driver model contain fields that control the handling +of system wakeup events (hardware signals that can force the system out of a +sleep state). These fields are initialized by bus or device driver code using +:c:func:`device_set_wakeup_capable()` and :c:func:`device_set_wakeup_enable()`, +defined in :file:`include/linux/pm_wakeup.h`. + +The :c:member:`power.can_wakeup` flag just records whether the device (and its +driver) can physically support wakeup events. The +:c:func:`device_set_wakeup_capable()` routine affects this flag. The +:c:member:`power.wakeup` field is a pointer to an object of type +|struct wakeup_source| used for controlling whether or not the device should use +its system wakeup mechanism and for notifying the PM core of system wakeup +events signaled by the device. This object is only present for wakeup-capable +devices (i.e. devices whose :c:member:`can_wakeup` flags are set) and is created +(or removed) by :c:func:`device_set_wakeup_capable()`. + +Whether or not a device is capable of issuing wakeup events is a hardware +matter, and the kernel is responsible for keeping track of it. By contrast, +whether or not a wakeup-capable device should issue wakeup events is a policy +decision, and it is managed by user space through a sysfs attribute: the +:file:`power/wakeup` file. User space can write the "enabled" or "disabled" +strings to it to indicate whether or not, respectively, the device is supposed +to signal system wakeup. This file is only present if the +:c:member:`power.wakeup` object exists for the given device and is created (or +removed) along with that object, by :c:func:`device_set_wakeup_capable()`. +Reads from the file will return the corresponding string. + +The initial value in the :file:`power/wakeup` file is "disabled" for the +majority of devices; the major exceptions are power buttons, keyboards, and +Ethernet adapters whose WoL (wake-on-LAN) feature has been set up with ethtool. +It should also default to "enabled" for devices that don't generate wakeup +requests on their own but merely forward wakeup requests from one bus to another +(like PCI Express ports). + +The :c:func:`device_may_wakeup()` routine returns true only if the +:c:member:`power.wakeup` object exists and the corresponding :file:`power/wakeup` +file contains the "enabled" string. This information is used by subsystems, +like the PCI bus type code, to see whether or not to enable the devices' wakeup +mechanisms. If device wakeup mechanisms are enabled or disabled directly by +drivers, they also should use :c:func:`device_may_wakeup()` to decide what to do +during a system sleep transition. Device drivers, however, are not expected to +call :c:func:`device_set_wakeup_enable()` directly in any case. + +It ought to be noted that system wakeup is conceptually different from "remote +wakeup" used by runtime power management, although it may be supported by the +same physical mechanism. Remote wakeup is a feature allowing devices in +low-power states to trigger specific interrupts to signal conditions in which +they should be put into the full-power state. Those interrupts may or may not +be used to signal system wakeup events, depending on the hardware design. On +some systems it is impossible to trigger them from system sleep states. In any +case, remote wakeup should always be enabled for runtime power management for +all devices and drivers that support it. + + +:file:`/sys/devices/.../power/control` files +-------------------------------------------- + +Each device in the driver model has a flag to control whether it is subject to +runtime power management. This flag, :c:member:`runtime_auto`, is initialized +by the bus type (or generally subsystem) code using :c:func:`pm_runtime_allow()` +or :c:func:`pm_runtime_forbid()`; the default is to allow runtime power +management. + +The setting can be adjusted by user space by writing either "on" or "auto" to +the device's :file:`power/control` sysfs file. Writing "auto" calls +:c:func:`pm_runtime_allow()`, setting the flag and allowing the device to be +runtime power-managed by its driver. Writing "on" calls +:c:func:`pm_runtime_forbid()`, clearing the flag, returning the device to full +power if it was in a low-power state, and preventing the +device from being runtime power-managed. User space can check the current value +of the :c:member:`runtime_auto` flag by reading that file. + +The device's :c:member:`runtime_auto` flag has no effect on the handling of +system-wide power transitions. In particular, the device can (and in the +majority of cases should and will) be put into a low-power state during a +system-wide transition to a sleep state even though its :c:member:`runtime_auto` +flag is clear. + +For more information about the runtime power management framework, refer to +:file:`Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt`. + + +Calling Drivers to Enter and Leave System Sleep States +====================================================== + +When the system goes into a sleep state, each device's driver is asked to +suspend the device by putting it into a state compatible with the target +system state. That's usually some version of "off", but the details are +system-specific. Also, wakeup-enabled devices will usually stay partly +functional in order to wake the system. + +When the system leaves that low-power state, the device's driver is asked to +resume it by returning it to full power. The suspend and resume operations +always go together, and both are multi-phase operations. + +For simple drivers, suspend might quiesce the device using class code +and then turn its hardware as "off" as possible during suspend_noirq. The +matching resume calls would then completely reinitialize the hardware +before reactivating its class I/O queues. + +More power-aware drivers might prepare the devices for triggering system wakeup +events. + + +Call Sequence Guarantees +------------------------ + +To ensure that bridges and similar links needing to talk to a device are +available when the device is suspended or resumed, the device hierarchy is +walked in a bottom-up order to suspend devices. A top-down order is +used to resume those devices. + +The ordering of the device hierarchy is defined by the order in which devices +get registered: a child can never be registered, probed or resumed before +its parent; and can't be removed or suspended after that parent. + +The policy is that the device hierarchy should match hardware bus topology. +[Or at least the control bus, for devices which use multiple busses.] +In particular, this means that a device registration may fail if the parent of +the device is suspending (i.e. has been chosen by the PM core as the next +device to suspend) or has already suspended, as well as after all of the other +devices have been suspended. Device drivers must be prepared to cope with such +situations. + + +System Power Management Phases +------------------------------ + +Suspending or resuming the system is done in several phases. Different phases +are used for suspend-to-idle, shallow (standby), and deep ("suspend-to-RAM") +sleep states and the hibernation state ("suspend-to-disk"). Each phase involves +executing callbacks for every device before the next phase begins. Not all +buses or classes support all these callbacks and not all drivers use all the +callbacks. The various phases always run after tasks have been frozen and +before they are unfrozen. Furthermore, the ``*_noirq`` phases run at a time +when IRQ handlers have been disabled (except for those marked with the +IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag). + +All phases use PM domain, bus, type, class or driver callbacks (that is, methods +defined in ``dev->pm_domain->ops``, ``dev->bus->pm``, ``dev->type->pm``, +``dev->class->pm`` or ``dev->driver->pm``). These callbacks are regarded by the +PM core as mutually exclusive. Moreover, PM domain callbacks always take +precedence over all of the other callbacks and, for example, type callbacks take +precedence over bus, class and driver callbacks. To be precise, the following +rules are used to determine which callback to execute in the given phase: + + 1. If ``dev->pm_domain`` is present, the PM core will choose the callback + provided by ``dev->pm_domain->ops`` for execution. + + 2. Otherwise, if both ``dev->type`` and ``dev->type->pm`` are present, the + callback provided by ``dev->type->pm`` will be chosen for execution. + + 3. Otherwise, if both ``dev->class`` and ``dev->class->pm`` are present, + the callback provided by ``dev->class->pm`` will be chosen for + execution. + + 4. Otherwise, if both ``dev->bus`` and ``dev->bus->pm`` are present, the + callback provided by ``dev->bus->pm`` will be chosen for execution. + +This allows PM domains and device types to override callbacks provided by bus +types or device classes if necessary. + +The PM domain, type, class and bus callbacks may in turn invoke device- or +driver-specific methods stored in ``dev->driver->pm``, but they don't have to do +that. + +If the subsystem callback chosen for execution is not present, the PM core will +execute the corresponding method from the ``dev->driver->pm`` set instead if +there is one. + + +Entering System Suspend +----------------------- + +When the system goes into the freeze, standby or memory sleep state, +the phases are: ``prepare``, ``suspend``, ``suspend_late``, ``suspend_noirq``. + + 1. The ``prepare`` phase is meant to prevent races by preventing new + devices from being registered; the PM core would never know that all the + children of a device had been suspended if new children could be + registered at will. [By contrast, from the PM core's perspective, + devices may be unregistered at any time.] Unlike the other + suspend-related phases, during the ``prepare`` phase the device + hierarchy is traversed top-down. + + After the ``->prepare`` callback method returns, no new children may be + registered below the device. The method may also prepare the device or + driver in some way for the upcoming system power transition, but it + should not put the device into a low-power state. Moreover, if the + device supports runtime power management, the ``->prepare`` callback + method must not update its state in case it is necessary to resume it + from runtime suspend later on. + + For devices supporting runtime power management, the return value of the + prepare callback can be used to indicate to the PM core that it may + safely leave the device in runtime suspend (if runtime-suspended + already), provided that all of the device's descendants are also left in + runtime suspend. Namely, if the prepare callback returns a positive + number and that happens for all of the descendants of the device too, + and all of them (including the device itself) are runtime-suspended, the + PM core will skip the ``suspend``, ``suspend_late`` and + ``suspend_noirq`` phases as well as all of the corresponding phases of + the subsequent device resume for all of these devices. In that case, + the ``->complete`` callback will be invoked directly after the + ``->prepare`` callback and is entirely responsible for putting the + device into a consistent state as appropriate. + + Note that this direct-complete procedure applies even if the device is + disabled for runtime PM; only the runtime-PM status matters. It follows + that if a device has system-sleep callbacks but does not support runtime + PM, then its prepare callback must never return a positive value. This + is because all such devices are initially set to runtime-suspended with + runtime PM disabled. + + This feature also can be controlled by device drivers by using the + ``DPM_FLAG_NEVER_SKIP`` and ``DPM_FLAG_SMART_PREPARE`` driver power + management flags. [Typically, they are set at the time the driver is + probed against the device in question by passing them to the + :c:func:`dev_pm_set_driver_flags` helper function.] If the first of + these flags is set, the PM core will not apply the direct-complete + procedure described above to the given device and, consequenty, to any + of its ancestors. The second flag, when set, informs the middle layer + code (bus types, device types, PM domains, classes) that it should take + the return value of the ``->prepare`` callback provided by the driver + into account and it may only return a positive value from its own + ``->prepare`` callback if the driver's one also has returned a positive + value. + + 2. The ``->suspend`` methods should quiesce the device to stop it from + performing I/O. They also may save the device registers and put it into + the appropriate low-power state, depending on the bus type the device is + on, and they may enable wakeup events. + + However, for devices supporting runtime power management, the + ``->suspend`` methods provided by subsystems (bus types and PM domains + in particular) must follow an additional rule regarding what can be done + to the devices before their drivers' ``->suspend`` methods are called. + Namely, they can only resume the devices from runtime suspend by + calling :c:func:`pm_runtime_resume` for them, if that is necessary, and + they must not update the state of the devices in any other way at that + time (in case the drivers need to resume the devices from runtime + suspend in their ``->suspend`` methods). + + 3. For a number of devices it is convenient to split suspend into the + "quiesce device" and "save device state" phases, in which cases + ``suspend_late`` is meant to do the latter. It is always executed after + runtime power management has been disabled for the device in question. + + 4. The ``suspend_noirq`` phase occurs after IRQ handlers have been disabled, + which means that the driver's interrupt handler will not be called while + the callback method is running. The ``->suspend_noirq`` methods should + save the values of the device's registers that weren't saved previously + and finally put the device into the appropriate low-power state. + + The majority of subsystems and device drivers need not implement this + callback. However, bus types allowing devices to share interrupt + vectors, like PCI, generally need it; otherwise a driver might encounter + an error during the suspend phase by fielding a shared interrupt + generated by some other device after its own device had been set to low + power. + +At the end of these phases, drivers should have stopped all I/O transactions +(DMA, IRQs), saved enough state that they can re-initialize or restore previous +state (as needed by the hardware), and placed the device into a low-power state. +On many platforms they will gate off one or more clock sources; sometimes they +will also switch off power supplies or reduce voltages. [Drivers supporting +runtime PM may already have performed some or all of these steps.] + +If :c:func:`device_may_wakeup(dev)` returns ``true``, the device should be +prepared for generating hardware wakeup signals to trigger a system wakeup event +when the system is in the sleep state. For example, :c:func:`enable_irq_wake()` +might identify GPIO signals hooked up to a switch or other external hardware, +and :c:func:`pci_enable_wake()` does something similar for the PCI PME signal. + +If any of these callbacks returns an error, the system won't enter the desired +low-power state. Instead, the PM core will unwind its actions by resuming all +the devices that were suspended. + + +Leaving System Suspend +---------------------- + +When resuming from freeze, standby or memory sleep, the phases are: +``resume_noirq``, ``resume_early``, ``resume``, ``complete``. + + 1. The ``->resume_noirq`` callback methods should perform any actions + needed before the driver's interrupt handlers are invoked. This + generally means undoing the actions of the ``suspend_noirq`` phase. If + the bus type permits devices to share interrupt vectors, like PCI, the + method should bring the device and its driver into a state in which the + driver can recognize if the device is the source of incoming interrupts, + if any, and handle them correctly. + + For example, the PCI bus type's ``->pm.resume_noirq()`` puts the device + into the full-power state (D0 in the PCI terminology) and restores the + standard configuration registers of the device. Then it calls the + device driver's ``->pm.resume_noirq()`` method to perform device-specific + actions. + + 2. The ``->resume_early`` methods should prepare devices for the execution + of the resume methods. This generally involves undoing the actions of + the preceding ``suspend_late`` phase. + + 3. The ``->resume`` methods should bring the device back to its operating + state, so that it can perform normal I/O. This generally involves + undoing the actions of the ``suspend`` phase. + + 4. The ``complete`` phase should undo the actions of the ``prepare`` phase. + For this reason, unlike the other resume-related phases, during the + ``complete`` phase the device hierarchy is traversed bottom-up. + + Note, however, that new children may be registered below the device as + soon as the ``->resume`` callbacks occur; it's not necessary to wait + until the ``complete`` phase with that. + + Moreover, if the preceding ``->prepare`` callback returned a positive + number, the device may have been left in runtime suspend throughout the + whole system suspend and resume (the ``suspend``, ``suspend_late``, + ``suspend_noirq`` phases of system suspend and the ``resume_noirq``, + ``resume_early``, ``resume`` phases of system resume may have been + skipped for it). In that case, the ``->complete`` callback is entirely + responsible for putting the device into a consistent state after system + suspend if necessary. [For example, it may need to queue up a runtime + resume request for the device for this purpose.] To check if that is + the case, the ``->complete`` callback can consult the device's + ``power.direct_complete`` flag. Namely, if that flag is set when the + ``->complete`` callback is being run, it has been called directly after + the preceding ``->prepare`` and special actions may be required + to make the device work correctly afterward. + +At the end of these phases, drivers should be as functional as they were before +suspending: I/O can be performed using DMA and IRQs, and the relevant clocks are +gated on. + +However, the details here may again be platform-specific. For example, +some systems support multiple "run" states, and the mode in effect at +the end of resume might not be the one which preceded suspension. +That means availability of certain clocks or power supplies changed, +which could easily affect how a driver works. + +Drivers need to be able to handle hardware which has been reset since all of the +suspend methods were called, for example by complete reinitialization. +This may be the hardest part, and the one most protected by NDA'd documents +and chip errata. It's simplest if the hardware state hasn't changed since +the suspend was carried out, but that can only be guaranteed if the target +system sleep entered was suspend-to-idle. For the other system sleep states +that may not be the case (and usually isn't for ACPI-defined system sleep +states, like S3). + +Drivers must also be prepared to notice that the device has been removed +while the system was powered down, whenever that's physically possible. +PCMCIA, MMC, USB, Firewire, SCSI, and even IDE are common examples of busses +where common Linux platforms will see such removal. Details of how drivers +will notice and handle such removals are currently bus-specific, and often +involve a separate thread. + +These callbacks may return an error value, but the PM core will ignore such +errors since there's nothing it can do about them other than printing them in +the system log. + + +Entering Hibernation +-------------------- + +Hibernating the system is more complicated than putting it into sleep states, +because it involves creating and saving a system image. Therefore there are +more phases for hibernation, with a different set of callbacks. These phases +always run after tasks have been frozen and enough memory has been freed. + +The general procedure for hibernation is to quiesce all devices ("freeze"), +create an image of the system memory while everything is stable, reactivate all +devices ("thaw"), write the image to permanent storage, and finally shut down +the system ("power off"). The phases used to accomplish this are: ``prepare``, +``freeze``, ``freeze_late``, ``freeze_noirq``, ``thaw_noirq``, ``thaw_early``, +``thaw``, ``complete``, ``prepare``, ``poweroff``, ``poweroff_late``, +``poweroff_noirq``. + + 1. The ``prepare`` phase is discussed in the "Entering System Suspend" + section above. + + 2. The ``->freeze`` methods should quiesce the device so that it doesn't + generate IRQs or DMA, and they may need to save the values of device + registers. However the device does not have to be put in a low-power + state, and to save time it's best not to do so. Also, the device should + not be prepared to generate wakeup events. + + 3. The ``freeze_late`` phase is analogous to the ``suspend_late`` phase + described earlier, except that the device should not be put into a + low-power state and should not be allowed to generate wakeup events. + + 4. The ``freeze_noirq`` phase is analogous to the ``suspend_noirq`` phase + discussed earlier, except again that the device should not be put into + a low-power state and should not be allowed to generate wakeup events. + +At this point the system image is created. All devices should be inactive and +the contents of memory should remain undisturbed while this happens, so that the +image forms an atomic snapshot of the system state. + + 5. The ``thaw_noirq`` phase is analogous to the ``resume_noirq`` phase + discussed earlier. The main difference is that its methods can assume + the device is in the same state as at the end of the ``freeze_noirq`` + phase. + + 6. The ``thaw_early`` phase is analogous to the ``resume_early`` phase + described above. Its methods should undo the actions of the preceding + ``freeze_late``, if necessary. + + 7. The ``thaw`` phase is analogous to the ``resume`` phase discussed + earlier. Its methods should bring the device back to an operating + state, so that it can be used for saving the image if necessary. + + 8. The ``complete`` phase is discussed in the "Leaving System Suspend" + section above. + +At this point the system image is saved, and the devices then need to be +prepared for the upcoming system shutdown. This is much like suspending them +before putting the system into the suspend-to-idle, shallow or deep sleep state, +and the phases are similar. + + 9. The ``prepare`` phase is discussed above. + + 10. The ``poweroff`` phase is analogous to the ``suspend`` phase. + + 11. The ``poweroff_late`` phase is analogous to the ``suspend_late`` phase. + + 12. The ``poweroff_noirq`` phase is analogous to the ``suspend_noirq`` phase. + +The ``->poweroff``, ``->poweroff_late`` and ``->poweroff_noirq`` callbacks +should do essentially the same things as the ``->suspend``, ``->suspend_late`` +and ``->suspend_noirq`` callbacks, respectively. The only notable difference is +that they need not store the device register values, because the registers +should already have been stored during the ``freeze``, ``freeze_late`` or +``freeze_noirq`` phases. + + +Leaving Hibernation +------------------- + +Resuming from hibernation is, again, more complicated than resuming from a sleep +state in which the contents of main memory are preserved, because it requires +a system image to be loaded into memory and the pre-hibernation memory contents +to be restored before control can be passed back to the image kernel. + +Although in principle the image might be loaded into memory and the +pre-hibernation memory contents restored by the boot loader, in practice this +can't be done because boot loaders aren't smart enough and there is no +established protocol for passing the necessary information. So instead, the +boot loader loads a fresh instance of the kernel, called "the restore kernel", +into memory and passes control to it in the usual way. Then the restore kernel +reads the system image, restores the pre-hibernation memory contents, and passes +control to the image kernel. Thus two different kernel instances are involved +in resuming from hibernation. In fact, the restore kernel may be completely +different from the image kernel: a different configuration and even a different +version. This has important consequences for device drivers and their +subsystems. + +To be able to load the system image into memory, the restore kernel needs to +include at least a subset of device drivers allowing it to access the storage +medium containing the image, although it doesn't need to include all of the +drivers present in the image kernel. After the image has been loaded, the +devices managed by the boot kernel need to be prepared for passing control back +to the image kernel. This is very similar to the initial steps involved in +creating a system image, and it is accomplished in the same way, using +``prepare``, ``freeze``, and ``freeze_noirq`` phases. However, the devices +affected by these phases are only those having drivers in the restore kernel; +other devices will still be in whatever state the boot loader left them. + +Should the restoration of the pre-hibernation memory contents fail, the restore +kernel would go through the "thawing" procedure described above, using the +``thaw_noirq``, ``thaw_early``, ``thaw``, and ``complete`` phases, and then +continue running normally. This happens only rarely. Most often the +pre-hibernation memory contents are restored successfully and control is passed +to the image kernel, which then becomes responsible for bringing the system back +to the working state. + +To achieve this, the image kernel must restore the devices' pre-hibernation +functionality. The operation is much like waking up from a sleep state (with +the memory contents preserved), although it involves different phases: +``restore_noirq``, ``restore_early``, ``restore``, ``complete``. + + 1. The ``restore_noirq`` phase is analogous to the ``resume_noirq`` phase. + + 2. The ``restore_early`` phase is analogous to the ``resume_early`` phase. + + 3. The ``restore`` phase is analogous to the ``resume`` phase. + + 4. The ``complete`` phase is discussed above. + +The main difference from ``resume[_early|_noirq]`` is that +``restore[_early|_noirq]`` must assume the device has been accessed and +reconfigured by the boot loader or the restore kernel. Consequently, the state +of the device may be different from the state remembered from the ``freeze``, +``freeze_late`` and ``freeze_noirq`` phases. The device may even need to be +reset and completely re-initialized. In many cases this difference doesn't +matter, so the ``->resume[_early|_noirq]`` and ``->restore[_early|_norq]`` +method pointers can be set to the same routines. Nevertheless, different +callback pointers are used in case there is a situation where it actually does +matter. + + +Power Management Notifiers +========================== + +There are some operations that cannot be carried out by the power management +callbacks discussed above, because the callbacks occur too late or too early. +To handle these cases, subsystems and device drivers may register power +management notifiers that are called before tasks are frozen and after they have +been thawed. Generally speaking, the PM notifiers are suitable for performing +actions that either require user space to be available, or at least won't +interfere with user space. + +For details refer to :doc:`notifiers`. + + +Device Low-Power (suspend) States +================================= + +Device low-power states aren't standard. One device might only handle +"on" and "off", while another might support a dozen different versions of +"on" (how many engines are active?), plus a state that gets back to "on" +faster than from a full "off". + +Some buses define rules about what different suspend states mean. PCI +gives one example: after the suspend sequence completes, a non-legacy +PCI device may not perform DMA or issue IRQs, and any wakeup events it +issues would be issued through the PME# bus signal. Plus, there are +several PCI-standard device states, some of which are optional. + +In contrast, integrated system-on-chip processors often use IRQs as the +wakeup event sources (so drivers would call :c:func:`enable_irq_wake`) and +might be able to treat DMA completion as a wakeup event (sometimes DMA can stay +active too, it'd only be the CPU and some peripherals that sleep). + +Some details here may be platform-specific. Systems may have devices that +can be fully active in certain sleep states, such as an LCD display that's +refreshed using DMA while most of the system is sleeping lightly ... and +its frame buffer might even be updated by a DSP or other non-Linux CPU while +the Linux control processor stays idle. + +Moreover, the specific actions taken may depend on the target system state. +One target system state might allow a given device to be very operational; +another might require a hard shut down with re-initialization on resume. +And two different target systems might use the same device in different +ways; the aforementioned LCD might be active in one product's "standby", +but a different product using the same SOC might work differently. + + +Device Power Management Domains +=============================== + +Sometimes devices share reference clocks or other power resources. In those +cases it generally is not possible to put devices into low-power states +individually. Instead, a set of devices sharing a power resource can be put +into a low-power state together at the same time by turning off the shared +power resource. Of course, they also need to be put into the full-power state +together, by turning the shared power resource on. A set of devices with this +property is often referred to as a power domain. A power domain may also be +nested inside another power domain. The nested domain is referred to as the +sub-domain of the parent domain. + +Support for power domains is provided through the :c:member:`pm_domain` field of +|struct device|. This field is a pointer to an object of type +|struct dev_pm_domain|, defined in :file:`include/linux/pm.h`, providing a set +of power management callbacks analogous to the subsystem-level and device driver +callbacks that are executed for the given device during all power transitions, +instead of the respective subsystem-level callbacks. Specifically, if a +device's :c:member:`pm_domain` pointer is not NULL, the ``->suspend()`` callback +from the object pointed to by it will be executed instead of its subsystem's +(e.g. bus type's) ``->suspend()`` callback and analogously for all of the +remaining callbacks. In other words, power management domain callbacks, if +defined for the given device, always take precedence over the callbacks provided +by the device's subsystem (e.g. bus type). + +The support for device power management domains is only relevant to platforms +needing to use the same device driver power management callbacks in many +different power domain configurations and wanting to avoid incorporating the +support for power domains into subsystem-level callbacks, for example by +modifying the platform bus type. Other platforms need not implement it or take +it into account in any way. + +Devices may be defined as IRQ-safe which indicates to the PM core that their +runtime PM callbacks may be invoked with disabled interrupts (see +:file:`Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt` for more information). If an +IRQ-safe device belongs to a PM domain, the runtime PM of the domain will be +disallowed, unless the domain itself is defined as IRQ-safe. However, it +makes sense to define a PM domain as IRQ-safe only if all the devices in it +are IRQ-safe. Moreover, if an IRQ-safe domain has a parent domain, the runtime +PM of the parent is only allowed if the parent itself is IRQ-safe too with the +additional restriction that all child domains of an IRQ-safe parent must also +be IRQ-safe. + + +Runtime Power Management +======================== + +Many devices are able to dynamically power down while the system is still +running. This feature is useful for devices that are not being used, and +can offer significant power savings on a running system. These devices +often support a range of runtime power states, which might use names such +as "off", "sleep", "idle", "active", and so on. Those states will in some +cases (like PCI) be partially constrained by the bus the device uses, and will +usually include hardware states that are also used in system sleep states. + +A system-wide power transition can be started while some devices are in low +power states due to runtime power management. The system sleep PM callbacks +should recognize such situations and react to them appropriately, but the +necessary actions are subsystem-specific. + +In some cases the decision may be made at the subsystem level while in other +cases the device driver may be left to decide. In some cases it may be +desirable to leave a suspended device in that state during a system-wide power +transition, but in other cases the device must be put back into the full-power +state temporarily, for example so that its system wakeup capability can be +disabled. This all depends on the hardware and the design of the subsystem and +device driver in question. + +If it is necessary to resume a device from runtime suspend during a system-wide +transition into a sleep state, that can be done by calling +:c:func:`pm_runtime_resume` for it from the ``->suspend`` callback (or its +couterpart for transitions related to hibernation) of either the device's driver +or a subsystem responsible for it (for example, a bus type or a PM domain). +That is guaranteed to work by the requirement that subsystems must not change +the state of devices (possibly except for resuming them from runtime suspend) +from their ``->prepare`` and ``->suspend`` callbacks (or equivalent) *before* +invoking device drivers' ``->suspend`` callbacks (or equivalent). + +Some bus types and PM domains have a policy to resume all devices from runtime +suspend upfront in their ``->suspend`` callbacks, but that may not be really +necessary if the driver of the device can cope with runtime-suspended devices. +The driver can indicate that by setting ``DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND`` in +:c:member:`power.driver_flags` at the probe time, by passing it to the +:c:func:`dev_pm_set_driver_flags` helper. That also may cause middle-layer code +(bus types, PM domains etc.) to skip the ``->suspend_late`` and +``->suspend_noirq`` callbacks provided by the driver if the device remains in +runtime suspend at the beginning of the ``suspend_late`` phase of system-wide +suspend (or in the ``poweroff_late`` phase of hibernation), when runtime PM +has been disabled for it, under the assumption that its state should not change +after that point until the system-wide transition is over (the PM core itself +does that for devices whose "noirq", "late" and "early" system-wide PM callbacks +are executed directly by it). If that happens, the driver's system-wide resume +callbacks, if present, may still be invoked during the subsequent system-wide +resume transition and the device's runtime power management status may be set +to "active" before enabling runtime PM for it, so the driver must be prepared to +cope with the invocation of its system-wide resume callbacks back-to-back with +its ``->runtime_suspend`` one (without the intervening ``->runtime_resume`` and +so on) and the final state of the device must reflect the "active" runtime PM +status in that case. + +During system-wide resume from a sleep state it's easiest to put devices into +the full-power state, as explained in :file:`Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt`. +[Refer to that document for more information regarding this particular issue as +well as for information on the device runtime power management framework in +general.] + +However, it often is desirable to leave devices in suspend after system +transitions to the working state, especially if those devices had been in +runtime suspend before the preceding system-wide suspend (or analogous) +transition. Device drivers can use the ``DPM_FLAG_LEAVE_SUSPENDED`` flag to +indicate to the PM core (and middle-layer code) that they prefer the specific +devices handled by them to be left suspended and they have no problems with +skipping their system-wide resume callbacks for this reason. Whether or not the +devices will actually be left in suspend may depend on their state before the +given system suspend-resume cycle and on the type of the system transition under +way. In particular, devices are not left suspended if that transition is a +restore from hibernation, as device states are not guaranteed to be reflected +by the information stored in the hibernation image in that case. + +The middle-layer code involved in the handling of the device is expected to +indicate to the PM core if the device may be left in suspend by setting its +:c:member:`power.may_skip_resume` status bit which is checked by the PM core +during the "noirq" phase of the preceding system-wide suspend (or analogous) +transition. The middle layer is then responsible for handling the device as +appropriate in its "noirq" resume callback, which is executed regardless of +whether or not the device is left suspended, but the other resume callbacks +(except for ``->complete``) will be skipped automatically by the PM core if the +device really can be left in suspend. + +For devices whose "noirq", "late" and "early" driver callbacks are invoked +directly by the PM core, all of the system-wide resume callbacks are skipped if +``DPM_FLAG_LEAVE_SUSPENDED`` is set and the device is in runtime suspend during +the ``suspend_noirq`` (or analogous) phase or the transition under way is a +proper system suspend (rather than anything related to hibernation) and the +device's wakeup settings are suitable for runtime PM (that is, it cannot +generate wakeup signals at all or it is allowed to wake up the system from +sleep). |