summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/debian/patches-rt/0130-futex-Fix-bug-on-when-a-requeued-RT-task-times-out.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'debian/patches-rt/0130-futex-Fix-bug-on-when-a-requeued-RT-task-times-out.patch')
-rw-r--r--debian/patches-rt/0130-futex-Fix-bug-on-when-a-requeued-RT-task-times-out.patch121
1 files changed, 121 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/debian/patches-rt/0130-futex-Fix-bug-on-when-a-requeued-RT-task-times-out.patch b/debian/patches-rt/0130-futex-Fix-bug-on-when-a-requeued-RT-task-times-out.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1b73b4e00
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches-rt/0130-futex-Fix-bug-on-when-a-requeued-RT-task-times-out.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+From e4bd34c056ee1cfe80dbe490977b5496ba5eeb70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
+Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 14:26:34 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH 130/347] futex: Fix bug on when a requeued RT task times out
+Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.19/older/patches-4.19.246-rt110.tar.xz
+
+Requeue with timeout causes a bug with PREEMPT_RT_FULL.
+
+The bug comes from a timed out condition.
+
+
+ TASK 1 TASK 2
+ ------ ------
+ futex_wait_requeue_pi()
+ futex_wait_queue_me()
+ <timed out>
+
+ double_lock_hb();
+
+ raw_spin_lock(pi_lock);
+ if (current->pi_blocked_on) {
+ } else {
+ current->pi_blocked_on = PI_WAKE_INPROGRESS;
+ run_spin_unlock(pi_lock);
+ spin_lock(hb->lock); <-- blocked!
+
+
+ plist_for_each_entry_safe(this) {
+ rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock();
+ task_blocks_on_rt_mutex();
+ BUG_ON(task->pi_blocked_on)!!!!
+
+The BUG_ON() actually has a check for PI_WAKE_INPROGRESS, but the
+problem is that, after TASK 1 sets PI_WAKE_INPROGRESS, it then tries to
+grab the hb->lock, which it fails to do so. As the hb->lock is a mutex,
+it will block and set the "pi_blocked_on" to the hb->lock.
+
+When TASK 2 goes to requeue it, the check for PI_WAKE_INPROGESS fails
+because the task1's pi_blocked_on is no longer set to that, but instead,
+set to the hb->lock.
+
+The fix:
+
+When calling rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() a check is made to see
+if the proxy tasks pi_blocked_on is set. If so, exit out early.
+Otherwise set it to a new flag PI_REQUEUE_INPROGRESS, which notifies
+the proxy task that it is being requeued, and will handle things
+appropriately.
+
+
+Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
+Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
+---
+ kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
+ kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 1 +
+ 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+index 9d472eb48ba7..069f025180b8 100644
+--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
++++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+@@ -137,7 +137,8 @@ static void fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+
+ static int rt_mutex_real_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
+ {
+- return waiter && waiter != PI_WAKEUP_INPROGRESS;
++ return waiter && waiter != PI_WAKEUP_INPROGRESS &&
++ waiter != PI_REQUEUE_INPROGRESS;
+ }
+
+ /*
+@@ -1783,6 +1784,34 @@ int __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+ if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, task, NULL))
+ return 1;
+
++#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
++ /*
++ * In PREEMPT_RT there's an added race.
++ * If the task, that we are about to requeue, times out,
++ * it can set the PI_WAKEUP_INPROGRESS. This tells the requeue
++ * to skip this task. But right after the task sets
++ * its pi_blocked_on to PI_WAKEUP_INPROGRESS it can then
++ * block on the spin_lock(&hb->lock), which in RT is an rtmutex.
++ * This will replace the PI_WAKEUP_INPROGRESS with the actual
++ * lock that it blocks on. We *must not* place this task
++ * on this proxy lock in that case.
++ *
++ * To prevent this race, we first take the task's pi_lock
++ * and check if it has updated its pi_blocked_on. If it has,
++ * we assume that it woke up and we return -EAGAIN.
++ * Otherwise, we set the task's pi_blocked_on to
++ * PI_REQUEUE_INPROGRESS, so that if the task is waking up
++ * it will know that we are in the process of requeuing it.
++ */
++ raw_spin_lock(&task->pi_lock);
++ if (task->pi_blocked_on) {
++ raw_spin_unlock(&task->pi_lock);
++ return -EAGAIN;
++ }
++ task->pi_blocked_on = PI_REQUEUE_INPROGRESS;
++ raw_spin_unlock(&task->pi_lock);
++#endif
++
+ /* We enforce deadlock detection for futexes */
+ ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task,
+ RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
+diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+index 8f39bc139735..202e2b0d1251 100644
+--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
++++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ enum rtmutex_chainwalk {
+ * PI-futex support (proxy locking functions, etc.):
+ */
+ #define PI_WAKEUP_INPROGRESS ((struct rt_mutex_waiter *) 1)
++#define PI_REQUEUE_INPROGRESS ((struct rt_mutex_waiter *) 2)
+
+ extern struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock);
+ extern void rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+--
+2.36.1
+