summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/debian/patches-rt/0139-rbtree-don-t-include-the-rcu-header.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--debian/patches-rt/0139-rbtree-don-t-include-the-rcu-header.patch175
1 files changed, 175 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/debian/patches-rt/0139-rbtree-don-t-include-the-rcu-header.patch b/debian/patches-rt/0139-rbtree-don-t-include-the-rcu-header.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e300e5d34
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches-rt/0139-rbtree-don-t-include-the-rcu-header.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+From 5bd4fe94ce198734cd4b23d3486b154486f137ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
+Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:56:02 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH 139/347] rbtree: don't include the rcu header
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.19/older/patches-4.19.246-rt110.tar.xz
+
+The RCU header pulls in spinlock.h and fails due not yet defined types:
+
+|In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:275:0,
+| from include/linux/rcupdate.h:38,
+| from include/linux/rbtree.h:34,
+| from include/linux/rtmutex.h:17,
+| from include/linux/spinlock_types.h:18,
+| from kernel/bounds.c:13:
+|include/linux/rwlock_rt.h:16:38: error: unknown type name ‘rwlock_t’
+| extern void __lockfunc rt_write_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock);
+| ^
+
+This patch moves the required RCU function from the rcupdate.h header file into
+a new header file which can be included by both users.
+
+Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
+---
+ include/linux/rbtree.h | 2 +-
+ include/linux/rcu_assign_pointer.h | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ include/linux/rcupdate.h | 49 +--------------------------
+ 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
+ create mode 100644 include/linux/rcu_assign_pointer.h
+
+diff --git a/include/linux/rbtree.h b/include/linux/rbtree.h
+index fcbeed4053ef..2aa2aec354c2 100644
+--- a/include/linux/rbtree.h
++++ b/include/linux/rbtree.h
+@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
+
+ #include <linux/kernel.h>
+ #include <linux/stddef.h>
+-#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
++#include <linux/rcu_assign_pointer.h>
+
+ struct rb_node {
+ unsigned long __rb_parent_color;
+diff --git a/include/linux/rcu_assign_pointer.h b/include/linux/rcu_assign_pointer.h
+new file mode 100644
+index 000000000000..7066962a4379
+--- /dev/null
++++ b/include/linux/rcu_assign_pointer.h
+@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
++#ifndef __LINUX_RCU_ASSIGN_POINTER_H__
++#define __LINUX_RCU_ASSIGN_POINTER_H__
++#include <linux/compiler.h>
++#include <asm/barrier.h>
++
++/**
++ * RCU_INITIALIZER() - statically initialize an RCU-protected global variable
++ * @v: The value to statically initialize with.
++ */
++#define RCU_INITIALIZER(v) (typeof(*(v)) __force __rcu *)(v)
++
++/**
++ * rcu_assign_pointer() - assign to RCU-protected pointer
++ * @p: pointer to assign to
++ * @v: value to assign (publish)
++ *
++ * Assigns the specified value to the specified RCU-protected
++ * pointer, ensuring that any concurrent RCU readers will see
++ * any prior initialization.
++ *
++ * Inserts memory barriers on architectures that require them
++ * (which is most of them), and also prevents the compiler from
++ * reordering the code that initializes the structure after the pointer
++ * assignment. More importantly, this call documents which pointers
++ * will be dereferenced by RCU read-side code.
++ *
++ * In some special cases, you may use RCU_INIT_POINTER() instead
++ * of rcu_assign_pointer(). RCU_INIT_POINTER() is a bit faster due
++ * to the fact that it does not constrain either the CPU or the compiler.
++ * That said, using RCU_INIT_POINTER() when you should have used
++ * rcu_assign_pointer() is a very bad thing that results in
++ * impossible-to-diagnose memory corruption. So please be careful.
++ * See the RCU_INIT_POINTER() comment header for details.
++ *
++ * Note that rcu_assign_pointer() evaluates each of its arguments only
++ * once, appearances notwithstanding. One of the "extra" evaluations
++ * is in typeof() and the other visible only to sparse (__CHECKER__),
++ * neither of which actually execute the argument. As with most cpp
++ * macros, this execute-arguments-only-once property is important, so
++ * please be careful when making changes to rcu_assign_pointer() and the
++ * other macros that it invokes.
++ */
++#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) \
++({ \
++ uintptr_t _r_a_p__v = (uintptr_t)(v); \
++ \
++ if (__builtin_constant_p(v) && (_r_a_p__v) == (uintptr_t)NULL) \
++ WRITE_ONCE((p), (typeof(p))(_r_a_p__v)); \
++ else \
++ smp_store_release(&p, RCU_INITIALIZER((typeof(p))_r_a_p__v)); \
++ _r_a_p__v; \
++})
++
++#endif
+diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+index 027c58cdbb6e..e6733d7911e9 100644
+--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
++++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
+ #include <linux/lockdep.h>
+ #include <asm/processor.h>
+ #include <linux/cpumask.h>
++#include <linux/rcu_assign_pointer.h>
+
+ #define ULONG_CMP_GE(a, b) (ULONG_MAX / 2 >= (a) - (b))
+ #define ULONG_CMP_LT(a, b) (ULONG_MAX / 2 < (a) - (b))
+@@ -369,54 +370,6 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void) { }
+ ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(________p1)); \
+ })
+
+-/**
+- * RCU_INITIALIZER() - statically initialize an RCU-protected global variable
+- * @v: The value to statically initialize with.
+- */
+-#define RCU_INITIALIZER(v) (typeof(*(v)) __force __rcu *)(v)
+-
+-/**
+- * rcu_assign_pointer() - assign to RCU-protected pointer
+- * @p: pointer to assign to
+- * @v: value to assign (publish)
+- *
+- * Assigns the specified value to the specified RCU-protected
+- * pointer, ensuring that any concurrent RCU readers will see
+- * any prior initialization.
+- *
+- * Inserts memory barriers on architectures that require them
+- * (which is most of them), and also prevents the compiler from
+- * reordering the code that initializes the structure after the pointer
+- * assignment. More importantly, this call documents which pointers
+- * will be dereferenced by RCU read-side code.
+- *
+- * In some special cases, you may use RCU_INIT_POINTER() instead
+- * of rcu_assign_pointer(). RCU_INIT_POINTER() is a bit faster due
+- * to the fact that it does not constrain either the CPU or the compiler.
+- * That said, using RCU_INIT_POINTER() when you should have used
+- * rcu_assign_pointer() is a very bad thing that results in
+- * impossible-to-diagnose memory corruption. So please be careful.
+- * See the RCU_INIT_POINTER() comment header for details.
+- *
+- * Note that rcu_assign_pointer() evaluates each of its arguments only
+- * once, appearances notwithstanding. One of the "extra" evaluations
+- * is in typeof() and the other visible only to sparse (__CHECKER__),
+- * neither of which actually execute the argument. As with most cpp
+- * macros, this execute-arguments-only-once property is important, so
+- * please be careful when making changes to rcu_assign_pointer() and the
+- * other macros that it invokes.
+- */
+-#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) \
+-({ \
+- uintptr_t _r_a_p__v = (uintptr_t)(v); \
+- \
+- if (__builtin_constant_p(v) && (_r_a_p__v) == (uintptr_t)NULL) \
+- WRITE_ONCE((p), (typeof(p))(_r_a_p__v)); \
+- else \
+- smp_store_release(&p, RCU_INITIALIZER((typeof(p))_r_a_p__v)); \
+- _r_a_p__v; \
+-})
+-
+ /**
+ * rcu_swap_protected() - swap an RCU and a regular pointer
+ * @rcu_ptr: RCU pointer
+--
+2.36.1
+