diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-05-06 01:23:53 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-05-06 01:23:53 +0000 |
commit | c000cad09d0b54c455c99271bfb996c2dfe13073 (patch) | |
tree | e47ca809ed512d7fb43ec3d555753b1b658e9819 /doc/guide/admin/appendix-changes.sdf | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | openldap-c000cad09d0b54c455c99271bfb996c2dfe13073.tar.xz openldap-c000cad09d0b54c455c99271bfb996c2dfe13073.zip |
Adding upstream version 2.4.47+dfsg.upstream/2.4.47+dfsgupstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/guide/admin/appendix-changes.sdf')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/guide/admin/appendix-changes.sdf | 219 |
1 files changed, 219 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/guide/admin/appendix-changes.sdf b/doc/guide/admin/appendix-changes.sdf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b3f8bdc --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/guide/admin/appendix-changes.sdf @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@ +# $OpenLDAP$ +# Copyright 2007-2018 The OpenLDAP Foundation, All Rights Reserved. +# COPYING RESTRICTIONS APPLY, see COPYRIGHT. + +H1: Changes Since Previous Release + +The following sections attempt to summarize the new features and changes in OpenLDAP +software since the 2.3.x release and the OpenLDAP Admin Guide. + +H2: New Guide Sections + +In order to make the Admin Guide more thorough and cover the majority of questions +asked on the OpenLDAP mailing lists and scenarios discussed there, we have added the following new sections: + +* {{SECT:When should I use LDAP?}} +* {{SECT:When should I not use LDAP?}} +* {{SECT:LDAP vs RDBMS}} +* {{SECT:Access Control}} +* {{SECT:Backends}} +* {{SECT:Overlays}} +* {{SECT:Replication}} +* {{SECT:Maintenance}} +* {{SECT:Monitoring}} +* {{SECT:Tuning}} +* {{SECT:Troubleshooting}} +* {{SECT:Changes Since Previous Release}} +* {{SECT:Upgrading from 2.3.x}} +* {{SECT:Common errors encountered when using OpenLDAP Software}} +* {{SECT:Recommended OpenLDAP Software Dependency Versions}} +* {{SECT:Real World OpenLDAP Deployments and Examples}} +* {{SECT:OpenLDAP Software Contributions}} +* {{SECT:Configuration File Examples}} +* {{SECT:LDAP Result Codes}} +* {{SECT:Glossary}} + +Also, the table of contents is now 3 levels deep to ease navigation. + + +H2: New Features and Enhancements in 2.4 + +H3: Better {{B:cn=config}} functionality + +There is a new slapd-config(5) manpage for the {{B:cn=config}} backend. The +original design called for auto-renaming of config entries when you insert or +delete entries with ordered names, but that was not implemented in 2.3. It is +now in 2.4. This means, e.g., if you have + +> olcDatabase={1}mdb,cn=config +> olcSuffix: dc=example,dc=com + +and you want to add a new subordinate, now you can ldapadd: + +> olcDatabase={1}mdb,cn=config +> olcSuffix: dc=foo,dc=example,dc=com + +This will insert a new back-mdb database in slot 1 and bump all following databases + down one, so the original back-mdb database will now be named: + +> olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config +> olcSuffix: dc=example,dc=com + +H3: Better {{B:cn=schema}} functionality + +In 2.3 you were only able to add new schema elements, not delete or modify +existing elements. In 2.4 you can modify schema at will. (Except for the +hardcoded system schema, of course.) + +H3: More sophisticated Syncrepl configurations + +The original implementation of Syncrepl in OpenLDAP 2.2 was intended to support +multiple consumers within the same database, but that feature never worked and +was removed from OpenLDAP 2.3; you could only configure a single consumer in +any database. + +In 2.4 you can configure multiple consumers in a single database. The configuration +possibilities here are quite complex and numerous. You can configure consumers +over arbitrary subtrees of a database (disjoint or overlapping). Any portion +of the database may in turn be provided to other consumers using the Syncprov +overlay. The Syncprov overlay works with any number of consumers over a single +database or over arbitrarily many glued databases. + +H3: N-Way Multimaster Replication + +As a consequence of the work to support multiple consumer contexts, the syncrepl +system now supports full N-Way multimaster replication with entry-level conflict +resolution. There are some important constraints, of course: In order to maintain +consistent results across all servers, you must maintain tightly synchronized +clocks across all participating servers (e.g., you must use NTP on all servers). + +The entryCSNs used for replication now record timestamps with microsecond resolution, +instead of just seconds. The delta-syncrepl code has not been updated to support +multimaster usage yet, that will come later in the 2.4 cycle. + +H3: Replicating {{slapd}} Configuration (syncrepl and {{B:cn=config}}) + +Syncrepl was explicitly disabled on cn=config in 2.3. It is now fully supported +in 2.4; you can use syncrepl to replicate an entire server configuration from +one server to arbitrarily many other servers. It's possible to clone an entire +running slapd using just a small (less than 10 lines) seed configuration, or +you can just replicate the schema subtrees, etc. Tests 049 and 050 in the test +suite provide working examples of these capabilities. + + +H3: Push-Mode Replication + +In 2.3 you could configure syncrepl as a full push-mode replicator by using it +in conjunction with a back-ldap pointed at the target server. But because the +back-ldap database needs to have a suffix corresponding to the target's suffix, +you could only configure one instance per slapd. + +In 2.4 you can define a database to be "hidden", which means that its suffix is +ignored when checking for name collisions, and the database will never be used +to answer requests received by the frontend. Using this "hidden" database feature +allows you to configure multiple databases with the same suffix, allowing you to +set up multiple back-ldap instances for pushing replication of a single database +to multiple targets. There may be other uses for hidden databases as well (e.g., +using a syncrepl consumer to maintain a *local* mirror of a database on a separate filesystem). + + +H3: More extensive TLS configuration control + +In 2.3, the TLS configuration in slapd was only used by the slapd listeners. For +outbound connections used by e.g. back-ldap or syncrepl their TLS parameters came +from the system's ldap.conf file. + +In 2.4 all of these sessions inherit their settings from the main slapd configuration, +but settings can be individually overridden on a per-config-item basis. This is +particularly helpful if you use certificate-based authentication and need to use a +different client certificate for different destinations. + + +H3: Performance enhancements + +Too many to list. Some notable changes - ldapadd used to be a couple of orders +of magnitude slower than "slapadd -q". It's now at worst only about half the +speed of slapadd -q. Some comparisons of all the 2.x OpenLDAP releases are available +at {{URL:http://www.openldap.org/pub/hyc/scale2007.pdf}} + +That compared 2.0.27, 2.1.30, 2.2.30, 2.3.33, and CVS HEAD). Toward the latter end +of the "Cached Search Performance" chart it gets hard to see the difference +because the run times are so small, but the new code is about 25% faster than 2.3, +which was about 20% faster than 2.2, which was about 100% faster than 2.1, which +was about 100% faster than 2.0, in that particular search scenario. That test +basically searched a 1.3GB DB of 380836 entries (all in the slapd entry cache) +in under 1 second. i.e., on a 2.4GHz CPU with DDR400 ECC/Registered RAM we can +search over 500 thousand entries per second. The search was on an unindexed +attribute using a filter that would not match any entry, forcing slapd to examine +every entry in the DB, testing the filter for a match. + +Essentially the slapd entry cache in back-bdb/back-hdb is so efficient the search +processing time is almost invisible; the runtime is limited only by the memory +bandwidth of the machine. (The search data rate corresponds to about 3.5GB/sec; +the memory bandwidth on the machine is only about 4GB/sec due to ECC and register latency.) + +H3: New overlays + +* slapo-constraint (Attribute value constraints) +* slapo-dds (Dynamic Directory Services, RFC 2589) +* slapo-memberof (reverse group membership maintenance) + +H3: New features in existing Overlays + +* slapo-pcache + - Inspection/Maintenance + -- the cache database can be directly accessed via + LDAP by adding a specific control to each LDAP request; a specific + extended operation allows to consistently remove cached entries and entire + cached queries + - Hot Restart + -- cached queries are saved on disk at shutdown, and reloaded if + not expired yet at subsequent restart + +* slapo-rwm can safely interoperate with other overlays +* Dyngroup/Dynlist merge, plus security enhancements + - added dgIdentity support (draft-haripriya-dynamicgroup) + +H3: New features in slapd + +* monitoring of back-{b,h}db: cache fill-in, non-indexed searches, +* session tracking control (draft-wahl-ldap-session) +* subtree delete in back-sql (draft-armijo-ldap-treedelete) +* sorted values in multivalued attributes for faster matching +* lightweight dispatcher for greater throughput under heavy load and on +multiprocessor machines. (33% faster than 2.3 on AMD quad-socket dual-core server.) + + +H3: New features in libldap + +* ldap_sync client API (LDAP Content Sync Operation, RFC 4533) + +H3: New clients, tools and tool enhancements + +* ldapexop for arbitrary extended operations +* Complete support of controls in request/response for all clients +* LDAP Client tools now honor SRV records + +H3: New build options + +* Support for building against GnuTLS + + +H2: Obsolete Features Removed From 2.4 + +These features were strongly deprecated in 2.3 and removed in 2.4. + +H3: Slurpd + +Please read the {{SECT:Replication}} section as to why this is no longer in +OpenLDAP + +H3: back-ldbm + +back-ldbm was both slow and unreliable. Its byzantine indexing code was +prone to spontaneous corruption, as were the underlying database libraries +that were commonly used (e.g. GDBM or NDBM). back-bdb and back-hdb are +superior in every aspect, with simplified indexing to avoid index corruption, +fine-grained locking for greater concurrency, hierarchical caching for +greater performance, streamlined on-disk format for greater efficiency +and portability, and full transaction support for greater reliability. |