diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/verify.h | 285 |
1 files changed, 285 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/verify.h b/lib/verify.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3b57dde --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/verify.h @@ -0,0 +1,285 @@ +/* Compile-time assert-like macros. + + Copyright (C) 2005-2006, 2009-2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. + + This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify + it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by + the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or + (at your option) any later version. + + This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + GNU General Public License for more details. + + You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License + along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */ + +/* Written by Paul Eggert, Bruno Haible, and Jim Meyering. */ + +#ifndef _GL_VERIFY_H +#define _GL_VERIFY_H + + +/* Define _GL_HAVE__STATIC_ASSERT to 1 if _Static_assert works as per C11. + This is supported by GCC 4.6.0 and later, in C mode, and its use + here generates easier-to-read diagnostics when verify (R) fails. + + Define _GL_HAVE_STATIC_ASSERT to 1 if static_assert works as per C++11. + This will likely be supported by future GCC versions, in C++ mode. + + Use this only with GCC. If we were willing to slow 'configure' + down we could also use it with other compilers, but since this + affects only the quality of diagnostics, why bother? */ +#if (4 < __GNUC__ + (6 <= __GNUC_MINOR__) \ + && (201112L <= __STDC_VERSION__ || !defined __STRICT_ANSI__) \ + && !defined __cplusplus) +# define _GL_HAVE__STATIC_ASSERT 1 +#endif +/* The condition (99 < __GNUC__) is temporary, until we know about the + first G++ release that supports static_assert. */ +#if (99 < __GNUC__) && defined __cplusplus +# define _GL_HAVE_STATIC_ASSERT 1 +#endif + +/* FreeBSD 9.1 <sys/cdefs.h>, included by <stddef.h> and lots of other + system headers, defines a conflicting _Static_assert that is no + better than ours; override it. */ +#ifndef _GL_HAVE_STATIC_ASSERT +# include <stddef.h> +# undef _Static_assert +#endif + +/* Each of these macros verifies that its argument R is nonzero. To + be portable, R should be an integer constant expression. Unlike + assert (R), there is no run-time overhead. + + If _Static_assert works, verify (R) uses it directly. Similarly, + _GL_VERIFY_TRUE works by packaging a _Static_assert inside a struct + that is an operand of sizeof. + + The code below uses several ideas for C++ compilers, and for C + compilers that do not support _Static_assert: + + * The first step is ((R) ? 1 : -1). Given an expression R, of + integral or boolean or floating-point type, this yields an + expression of integral type, whose value is later verified to be + constant and nonnegative. + + * Next this expression W is wrapped in a type + struct _gl_verify_type { + unsigned int _gl_verify_error_if_negative: W; + }. + If W is negative, this yields a compile-time error. No compiler can + deal with a bit-field of negative size. + + One might think that an array size check would have the same + effect, that is, that the type struct { unsigned int dummy[W]; } + would work as well. However, inside a function, some compilers + (such as C++ compilers and GNU C) allow local parameters and + variables inside array size expressions. With these compilers, + an array size check would not properly diagnose this misuse of + the verify macro: + + void function (int n) { verify (n < 0); } + + * For the verify macro, the struct _gl_verify_type will need to + somehow be embedded into a declaration. To be portable, this + declaration must declare an object, a constant, a function, or a + typedef name. If the declared entity uses the type directly, + such as in + + struct dummy {...}; + typedef struct {...} dummy; + extern struct {...} *dummy; + extern void dummy (struct {...} *); + extern struct {...} *dummy (void); + + two uses of the verify macro would yield colliding declarations + if the entity names are not disambiguated. A workaround is to + attach the current line number to the entity name: + + #define _GL_CONCAT0(x, y) x##y + #define _GL_CONCAT(x, y) _GL_CONCAT0 (x, y) + extern struct {...} * _GL_CONCAT (dummy, __LINE__); + + But this has the problem that two invocations of verify from + within the same macro would collide, since the __LINE__ value + would be the same for both invocations. (The GCC __COUNTER__ + macro solves this problem, but is not portable.) + + A solution is to use the sizeof operator. It yields a number, + getting rid of the identity of the type. Declarations like + + extern int dummy [sizeof (struct {...})]; + extern void dummy (int [sizeof (struct {...})]); + extern int (*dummy (void)) [sizeof (struct {...})]; + + can be repeated. + + * Should the implementation use a named struct or an unnamed struct? + Which of the following alternatives can be used? + + extern int dummy [sizeof (struct {...})]; + extern int dummy [sizeof (struct _gl_verify_type {...})]; + extern void dummy (int [sizeof (struct {...})]); + extern void dummy (int [sizeof (struct _gl_verify_type {...})]); + extern int (*dummy (void)) [sizeof (struct {...})]; + extern int (*dummy (void)) [sizeof (struct _gl_verify_type {...})]; + + In the second and sixth case, the struct type is exported to the + outer scope; two such declarations therefore collide. GCC warns + about the first, third, and fourth cases. So the only remaining + possibility is the fifth case: + + extern int (*dummy (void)) [sizeof (struct {...})]; + + * GCC warns about duplicate declarations of the dummy function if + -Wredundant-decls is used. GCC 4.3 and later have a builtin + __COUNTER__ macro that can let us generate unique identifiers for + each dummy function, to suppress this warning. + + * This implementation exploits the fact that older versions of GCC, + which do not support _Static_assert, also do not warn about the + last declaration mentioned above. + + * GCC warns if -Wnested-externs is enabled and verify() is used + within a function body; but inside a function, you can always + arrange to use verify_expr() instead. + + * In C++, any struct definition inside sizeof is invalid. + Use a template type to work around the problem. */ + +/* Concatenate two preprocessor tokens. */ +#define _GL_CONCAT(x, y) _GL_CONCAT0 (x, y) +#define _GL_CONCAT0(x, y) x##y + +/* _GL_COUNTER is an integer, preferably one that changes each time we + use it. Use __COUNTER__ if it works, falling back on __LINE__ + otherwise. __LINE__ isn't perfect, but it's better than a + constant. */ +#if defined __COUNTER__ && __COUNTER__ != __COUNTER__ +# define _GL_COUNTER __COUNTER__ +#else +# define _GL_COUNTER __LINE__ +#endif + +/* Generate a symbol with the given prefix, making it unique if + possible. */ +#define _GL_GENSYM(prefix) _GL_CONCAT (prefix, _GL_COUNTER) + +/* Verify requirement R at compile-time, as an integer constant expression + that returns 1. If R is false, fail at compile-time, preferably + with a diagnostic that includes the string-literal DIAGNOSTIC. */ + +#define _GL_VERIFY_TRUE(R, DIAGNOSTIC) \ + (!!sizeof (_GL_VERIFY_TYPE (R, DIAGNOSTIC))) + +#ifdef __cplusplus +# if !GNULIB_defined_struct__gl_verify_type +template <int w> + struct _gl_verify_type { + unsigned int _gl_verify_error_if_negative: w; + }; +# define GNULIB_defined_struct__gl_verify_type 1 +# endif +# define _GL_VERIFY_TYPE(R, DIAGNOSTIC) \ + _gl_verify_type<(R) ? 1 : -1> +#elif defined _GL_HAVE__STATIC_ASSERT +# define _GL_VERIFY_TYPE(R, DIAGNOSTIC) \ + struct { \ + _Static_assert (R, DIAGNOSTIC); \ + int _gl_dummy; \ + } +#else +# define _GL_VERIFY_TYPE(R, DIAGNOSTIC) \ + struct { unsigned int _gl_verify_error_if_negative: (R) ? 1 : -1; } +#endif + +/* Verify requirement R at compile-time, as a declaration without a + trailing ';'. If R is false, fail at compile-time, preferably + with a diagnostic that includes the string-literal DIAGNOSTIC. + + Unfortunately, unlike C11, this implementation must appear as an + ordinary declaration, and cannot appear inside struct { ... }. */ + +#ifdef _GL_HAVE__STATIC_ASSERT +# define _GL_VERIFY _Static_assert +#else +# define _GL_VERIFY(R, DIAGNOSTIC) \ + extern int (*_GL_GENSYM (_gl_verify_function) (void)) \ + [_GL_VERIFY_TRUE (R, DIAGNOSTIC)] +#endif + +/* _GL_STATIC_ASSERT_H is defined if this code is copied into assert.h. */ +#ifdef _GL_STATIC_ASSERT_H +# if !defined _GL_HAVE__STATIC_ASSERT && !defined _Static_assert +# define _Static_assert(R, DIAGNOSTIC) _GL_VERIFY (R, DIAGNOSTIC) +# endif +# if !defined _GL_HAVE_STATIC_ASSERT && !defined static_assert +# define static_assert _Static_assert /* C11 requires this #define. */ +# endif +#endif + +/* @assert.h omit start@ */ + +/* Each of these macros verifies that its argument R is nonzero. To + be portable, R should be an integer constant expression. Unlike + assert (R), there is no run-time overhead. + + There are two macros, since no single macro can be used in all + contexts in C. verify_true (R) is for scalar contexts, including + integer constant expression contexts. verify (R) is for declaration + contexts, e.g., the top level. */ + +/* Verify requirement R at compile-time, as an integer constant expression. + Return 1. This is equivalent to verify_expr (R, 1). + + verify_true is obsolescent; please use verify_expr instead. */ + +#define verify_true(R) _GL_VERIFY_TRUE (R, "verify_true (" #R ")") + +/* Verify requirement R at compile-time. Return the value of the + expression E. */ + +#define verify_expr(R, E) \ + (_GL_VERIFY_TRUE (R, "verify_expr (" #R ", " #E ")") ? (E) : (E)) + +/* Verify requirement R at compile-time, as a declaration without a + trailing ';'. */ + +#ifdef __GNUC__ +# define verify(R) _GL_VERIFY (R, "verify (" #R ")") +#else +/* PGI barfs if R is long. Play it safe. */ +# define verify(R) _GL_VERIFY (R, "verify (...)") +#endif + +#ifndef __has_builtin +# define __has_builtin(x) 0 +#endif + +/* Assume that R always holds. This lets the compiler optimize + accordingly. R should not have side-effects; it may or may not be + evaluated. Behavior is undefined if R is false. */ + +#if (__has_builtin (__builtin_unreachable) \ + || 4 < __GNUC__ + (5 <= __GNUC_MINOR__)) +# define assume(R) ((R) ? (void) 0 : __builtin_unreachable ()) +#elif 1200 <= _MSC_VER +# define assume(R) __assume (R) +#elif ((defined GCC_LINT || defined lint) \ + && (__has_builtin (__builtin_trap) \ + || 3 < __GNUC__ + (3 < __GNUC_MINOR__ + (4 <= __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__)))) + /* Doing it this way helps various packages when configured with + --enable-gcc-warnings, which compiles with -Dlint. It's nicer + when 'assume' silences warnings even with older GCCs. */ +# define assume(R) ((R) ? (void) 0 : __builtin_trap ()) +#else + /* Some tools grok NOTREACHED, e.g., Oracle Studio 12.6. */ +# define assume(R) ((R) ? (void) 0 : /*NOTREACHED*/ (void) 0) +#endif + +/* @assert.h omit end@ */ + +#endif |