Adding upstream version 2.14.3.upstream/2.14.3upstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/test/integration/targets/ansible-test-sanity/ansible_collections/ns/col/plugins/filter/check_pylint.py b/test/integration/targets/ansible-test-sanity/ansible_collections/ns/col/plugins/filter/check_pylint.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f1be4f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/integration/targets/ansible-test-sanity/ansible_collections/ns/col/plugins/filter/check_pylint.py
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+"""
+These test cases verify ansible-test version constraints for pylint and its dependencies across Python versions.
+The initial test cases were discovered while testing various Python versions against ansible/ansible.
+"""
+from __future__ import absolute_import, division, print_function
+__metaclass__ = type
+
+# Python 3.8 fails with astroid 2.2.5 but works on 2.3.3
+#   syntax-error: Cannot import 'string' due to syntax error 'invalid syntax (<unknown>, line 109)'
+# Python 3.9 fails with astroid 2.2.5 but works on 2.3.3
+#   syntax-error: Cannot import 'string' due to syntax error 'invalid syntax (<unknown>, line 104)'
+import string
+
+# Python 3.9 fails with pylint 2.3.1 or 2.4.4 with astroid 2.3.3 but works with pylint 2.5.0 and astroid 2.4.0
+#   'Call' object has no attribute 'value'
+result = {None: None}[{}.get('something')]
+
+# pylint 2.3.1 and 2.4.4 report the following error but 2.5.0 and 2.6.0 do not
+#   blacklisted-name: Black listed name "foo"
+# see: https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/3701
+# regression: documented as a known issue and removed from ignore.txt so pylint can be upgraded to 2.6.0
+#             if future versions of pylint fix this issue then the ignore should be restored
+foo = {}.keys()