summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/main/auth.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/main/auth.c')
-rw-r--r--src/main/auth.c890
1 files changed, 890 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/main/auth.c b/src/main/auth.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..76f87b7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/main/auth.c
@@ -0,0 +1,890 @@
+/*
+ * auth.c User authentication.
+ *
+ * Version: $Id$
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ * (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+ * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA
+ *
+ * Copyright 2000,2006 The FreeRADIUS server project
+ * Copyright 2000 Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>
+ * Copyright 2000 Jeff Carneal <jeff@apex.net>
+ */
+RCSID("$Id$")
+
+#include <freeradius-devel/radiusd.h>
+#include <freeradius-devel/modules.h>
+#include <freeradius-devel/state.h>
+#include <freeradius-devel/rad_assert.h>
+
+#include <ctype.h>
+
+/*
+ * Return a short string showing the terminal server, port
+ * and calling station ID.
+ */
+char *auth_name(char *buf, size_t buflen, REQUEST *request, bool do_cli)
+{
+ VALUE_PAIR *cli;
+ VALUE_PAIR *pair;
+ uint32_t port = 0; /* RFC 2865 NAS-Port is 4 bytes */
+ char const *tls = "";
+
+ if ((cli = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->packet->vps, PW_CALLING_STATION_ID, 0, TAG_ANY)) == NULL) {
+ do_cli = false;
+ }
+
+ if ((pair = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->packet->vps, PW_NAS_PORT, 0, TAG_ANY)) != NULL) {
+ port = pair->vp_integer;
+ }
+
+ if (request->packet->dst_port == 0) {
+ if (fr_pair_find_by_num(request->packet->vps, PW_FREERADIUS_PROXIED_TO, 0, TAG_ANY)) {
+ tls = " via TLS tunnel";
+ } else {
+ tls = " via proxy to virtual server";
+ }
+ }
+
+ snprintf(buf, buflen, "from client %.128s port %u%s%.128s%s",
+ request->client->shortname, port,
+ (do_cli ? " cli " : ""), (do_cli ? cli->vp_strvalue : ""),
+ tls);
+
+ return buf;
+}
+
+
+
+/*
+ * Make sure user/pass are clean
+ * and then log them
+ */
+static int rad_authlog(char const *msg, REQUEST *request, int goodpass)
+{
+ int logit;
+ char const *extra_msg = NULL;
+ char clean_password[1024];
+ char clean_username[1024];
+ char buf[1024];
+ char extra[1024];
+ char *p;
+ VALUE_PAIR *username = NULL;
+
+ if ((request->reply->code == PW_CODE_ACCESS_ACCEPT) && !request->root->log_accept) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if ((request->reply->code == PW_CODE_ACCESS_REJECT) && !request->root->log_reject) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Get the correct username based on the configured value
+ */
+ if (!log_stripped_names) {
+ username = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->packet->vps, PW_USER_NAME, 0, TAG_ANY);
+ } else {
+ username = request->username;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Clean up the username
+ */
+ if (username == NULL) {
+ strcpy(clean_username, "<no User-Name attribute>");
+ } else {
+ fr_prints(clean_username, sizeof(clean_username), username->vp_strvalue, username->vp_length, '\0');
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Clean up the password
+ */
+ if (request->root->log_auth_badpass || request->root->log_auth_goodpass) {
+ if (!request->password) {
+ VALUE_PAIR *auth_type;
+
+ auth_type = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->config, PW_AUTH_TYPE, 0, TAG_ANY);
+ if (auth_type) {
+ snprintf(clean_password, sizeof(clean_password),
+ "<via Auth-Type = %s>",
+ dict_valnamebyattr(PW_AUTH_TYPE, 0,
+ auth_type->vp_integer));
+ } else {
+ strcpy(clean_password, "<no User-Password attribute>");
+ }
+ } else if (fr_pair_find_by_num(request->packet->vps, PW_CHAP_PASSWORD, 0, TAG_ANY)) {
+ strcpy(clean_password, "<CHAP-Password>");
+ } else {
+ fr_prints(clean_password, sizeof(clean_password),
+ request->password->vp_strvalue, request->password->vp_length, '\0');
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (goodpass) {
+ logit = request->root->log_auth_goodpass;
+ extra_msg = request->root->auth_goodpass_msg;
+ } else {
+ logit = request->root->log_auth_badpass;
+ extra_msg = request->root->auth_badpass_msg;
+ }
+
+ if (extra_msg) {
+ extra[0] = ' ';
+ p = extra + 1;
+ if (radius_xlat(p, sizeof(extra) - 1, request, extra_msg, NULL, NULL) < 0) {
+ return -1;
+ }
+ } else {
+ *extra = '\0';
+ }
+
+ RAUTH("%s: [%s%s%s] (%s)%s",
+ msg,
+ clean_username,
+ logit ? "/" : "",
+ logit ? clean_password : "",
+ auth_name(buf, sizeof(buf), request, 1),
+ extra);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check password.
+ *
+ * Returns: 0 OK
+ * -1 Password fail
+ * -2 Rejected (Auth-Type = Reject, send Port-Message back)
+ * 1 End check & return, don't reply
+ *
+ * NOTE: NOT the same as the RLM_ values !
+ */
+static int CC_HINT(nonnull) rad_check_password(REQUEST *request)
+{
+ vp_cursor_t cursor;
+ VALUE_PAIR *auth_type_pair;
+ int auth_type = -1;
+ int result;
+ int auth_type_count = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Look for matching check items. We skip the whole lot
+ * if the authentication type is PW_AUTH_TYPE_ACCEPT or
+ * PW_AUTH_TYPE_REJECT.
+ */
+ fr_cursor_init(&cursor, &request->config);
+ while ((auth_type_pair = fr_cursor_next_by_num(&cursor, PW_AUTH_TYPE, 0, TAG_ANY))) {
+ auth_type = auth_type_pair->vp_integer;
+ auth_type_count++;
+
+ RDEBUG2("Found Auth-Type = %s", dict_valnamebyattr(PW_AUTH_TYPE, 0, auth_type));
+ if (auth_type == PW_AUTH_TYPE_REJECT) {
+ RDEBUG2("Auth-Type = Reject, rejecting user");
+
+ return -2;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Warn if more than one Auth-Type was found, because only the last
+ * one found will actually be used.
+ */
+ if ((auth_type_count > 1) && (rad_debug_lvl) && request->username) {
+ RERROR("Warning: Found %d auth-types on request for user '%s'",
+ auth_type_count, request->username->vp_strvalue);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * This means we have a proxy reply or an accept and it wasn't
+ * rejected in the above loop. So that means it is accepted and we
+ * do no further authentication.
+ */
+ if ((auth_type == PW_AUTH_TYPE_ACCEPT)
+#ifdef WITH_PROXY
+ || (request->proxy)
+#endif
+ ) {
+ RDEBUG2("Auth-Type = Accept, accepting the user");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Check that Auth-Type has been set, and reject if not.
+ *
+ * Do quick checks to see if Cleartext-Password or Crypt-Password have
+ * been set, and complain if so.
+ */
+ if (auth_type < 0) {
+ if (fr_pair_find_by_num(request->config, PW_CRYPT_PASSWORD, 0, TAG_ANY) != NULL) {
+ RWDEBUG2("No module configured to handle comparisons with &control:Crypt-Password");
+ RWDEBUG2("Add pap to the authorize { ... } and authenticate { ... } sections of this "
+ "virtual server to handle this \"known good\" password type");
+ }
+ else if (fr_pair_find_by_num(request->config, PW_CLEARTEXT_PASSWORD, 0, TAG_ANY) != NULL) {
+ RWDEBUG2("No module configured to handle comparisons with &control:Cleartext-Password");
+ RWDEBUG2("Add pap or chap to the authorize { ... } and authenticate { ... } sections "
+ "of this virtual server to handle this \"known good\" password type");
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * The admin hasn't told us how to
+ * authenticate the user, so we reject them!
+ *
+ * This is fail-safe.
+ */
+
+ REDEBUG2("No Auth-Type found: rejecting the user via Post-Auth-Type = Reject");
+ return -2;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * See if there is a module that handles
+ * this Auth-Type, and turn the RLM_ return
+ * status into the values as defined at
+ * the top of this function.
+ */
+ result = process_authenticate(auth_type, request);
+ switch (result) {
+ /*
+ * An authentication module FAIL
+ * return code, or any return code that
+ * is not expected from authentication,
+ * is the same as an explicit REJECT!
+ */
+ case RLM_MODULE_FAIL:
+ case RLM_MODULE_INVALID:
+ case RLM_MODULE_NOOP:
+ case RLM_MODULE_NOTFOUND:
+ case RLM_MODULE_REJECT:
+ case RLM_MODULE_UPDATED:
+ case RLM_MODULE_USERLOCK:
+ default:
+ result = -1;
+ break;
+
+ case RLM_MODULE_OK:
+ result = 0;
+ break;
+
+ case RLM_MODULE_HANDLED:
+ result = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return result;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Post-authentication step processes the response before it is
+ * sent to the NAS. It can receive both Access-Accept and Access-Reject
+ * replies.
+ */
+int rad_postauth(REQUEST *request)
+{
+ int result;
+ int postauth_type = 0;
+ VALUE_PAIR *vp;
+
+ if (request->reply->code == PW_CODE_ACCESS_CHALLENGE) {
+ fr_pair_delete_by_num(&request->config, PW_POST_AUTH_TYPE, 0, TAG_ANY);
+ vp = pair_make_config("Post-Auth-Type", "Challenge", T_OP_SET);
+ if (!vp) return RLM_MODULE_OK;
+
+ } else if (request->reply->code == PW_CODE_ACCESS_REJECT) {
+ fr_pair_delete_by_num(&request->config, PW_POST_AUTH_TYPE, 0, TAG_ANY);
+ vp = pair_make_config("Post-Auth-Type", "Reject", T_OP_SET);
+ if (!vp) return RLM_MODULE_OK;
+
+ } else {
+ vp = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->config, PW_POST_AUTH_TYPE, 0, TAG_ANY);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If a method was chosen, use that.
+ */
+ if (vp) {
+ postauth_type = vp->vp_integer;
+ RDEBUG2("Using Post-Auth-Type %s",
+ dict_valnamebyattr(PW_POST_AUTH_TYPE, 0, postauth_type));
+ }
+
+ result = process_post_auth(postauth_type, request);
+ switch (result) {
+ /*
+ * The module failed, or said to reject the user: Do so.
+ */
+ case RLM_MODULE_FAIL:
+ case RLM_MODULE_INVALID:
+ case RLM_MODULE_REJECT:
+ case RLM_MODULE_USERLOCK:
+ default:
+ /*
+ * We WERE going to have a nice reply, but
+ * something went wrong. So we've got to run
+ * Post-Auth-Type Reject.
+ */
+ if (request->reply->code != PW_CODE_ACCESS_REJECT) {
+ RDEBUG("Using Post-Auth-Type Reject");
+
+ request->reply->code = PW_CODE_ACCESS_REJECT;
+ process_post_auth(PW_POST_AUTH_TYPE_REJECT, request);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Only discard session state when we're sending
+ * packets to the network. The State attribute
+ * is use both for the outer session and copied
+ * to the inner-tunnel session for (e.g.) PEAP.
+ * So we don't want to delete the information in
+ * the inner tunnel, and then have it no longer
+ * accessible from the outer session.
+ */
+ if (!request->parent) fr_state_discard(request, request->packet);
+ result = RLM_MODULE_REJECT;
+ break;
+ /*
+ * The module handled the request, cancel the reply.
+ */
+ case RLM_MODULE_HANDLED:
+ /* FIXME */
+ break;
+ /*
+ * The module had a number of OK return codes.
+ */
+ case RLM_MODULE_NOOP:
+ case RLM_MODULE_NOTFOUND:
+ case RLM_MODULE_OK:
+ case RLM_MODULE_UPDATED:
+ result = RLM_MODULE_OK;
+
+ if (request->reply->code == PW_CODE_ACCESS_CHALLENGE) {
+ fr_state_put_vps(request, request->packet, request->reply);
+
+ } else {
+ fr_state_discard(request, request->packet);
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Rejects during authorize, etc. are handled by the
+ * earlier code, which logs a reason for the rejection.
+ * If the packet is rejected in post-auth, we need to log
+ * that as a separate reason.
+ */
+ if (result == RLM_MODULE_REJECT) {
+ if (request->reply->code != RLM_MODULE_REJECT) {
+ rad_authlog("Rejected in post-auth", request, 0);
+ }
+ request->reply->code = PW_CODE_ACCESS_REJECT;
+ }
+
+ if (request->reply->code == PW_CODE_ACCESS_REJECT) {
+ if ((vp = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->packet->vps, PW_MODULE_FAILURE_MESSAGE, 0, TAG_ANY)) != NULL) {
+ char msg[MAX_STRING_LEN+19];
+
+ snprintf(msg, sizeof(msg), "Login incorrect (%s)",
+ vp->vp_strvalue);
+ rad_authlog(msg, request, 0);
+ } else {
+ rad_authlog("Login incorrect", request, 0);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If we're still accepting the user, say so.
+ */
+ if (request->reply->code == PW_CODE_ACCESS_ACCEPT) {
+ if ((vp = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->packet->vps, PW_MODULE_SUCCESS_MESSAGE, 0, TAG_ANY)) != NULL) {
+ char msg[MAX_STRING_LEN+12];
+
+ snprintf(msg, sizeof(msg), "Login OK (%s)",
+ vp->vp_strvalue);
+ rad_authlog(msg, request, 1);
+ } else {
+ rad_authlog("Login OK", request, 1);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return result;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Process and reply to an authentication request
+ *
+ * The return value of this function isn't actually used right now, so
+ * it's not entirely clear if it is returning the right things. --Pac.
+ */
+int rad_authenticate(REQUEST *request)
+{
+#ifdef WITH_SESSION_MGMT
+ VALUE_PAIR *check_item;
+#endif
+ VALUE_PAIR *module_msg;
+ VALUE_PAIR *tmp = NULL;
+ int result;
+ char autz_retry = 0;
+ int autz_type = 0;
+
+#ifdef WITH_PROXY
+ /*
+ * If this request got proxied to another server, we need
+ * to check whether it authenticated the request or not.
+ *
+ * request->proxy gets set only AFTER authorization, so
+ * it's safe to check it here. If it exists, it means
+ * we're doing a second pass through rad_authenticate().
+ */
+ if (request->proxy) {
+ int code = 0;
+
+ if (request->proxy_reply) code = request->proxy_reply->code;
+
+ switch (code) {
+ /*
+ * Reply of ACCEPT means accept, thus set Auth-Type
+ * accordingly.
+ */
+ case PW_CODE_ACCESS_ACCEPT:
+ tmp = radius_pair_create(request,
+ &request->config,
+ PW_AUTH_TYPE, 0);
+ if (tmp) tmp->vp_integer = PW_AUTH_TYPE_ACCEPT;
+ goto authenticate;
+
+ /*
+ * Challenges are punted back to the NAS without any
+ * further processing.
+ */
+ case PW_CODE_ACCESS_CHALLENGE:
+ request->reply->code = PW_CODE_ACCESS_CHALLENGE;
+ fr_state_put_vps(request, request->packet, request->reply);
+ return RLM_MODULE_OK;
+
+ /*
+ * ALL other replies mean reject. (this is fail-safe)
+ *
+ * Do NOT do any authorization or authentication. They
+ * are being rejected, so we minimize the amount of work
+ * done by the server, by rejecting them here.
+ */
+ case PW_CODE_ACCESS_REJECT:
+ request->reply->code = PW_CODE_ACCESS_REJECT;
+ rad_authlog("Login incorrect (Home Server says so)",
+ request, 0);
+ return RLM_MODULE_REJECT;
+
+ default:
+ rad_authlog("Login incorrect (Home Server failed to respond)",
+ request, 0);
+ return RLM_MODULE_REJECT;
+ }
+ }
+#endif
+ /*
+ * Look for, and cache, passwords.
+ */
+ if (!request->password) {
+ request->password = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->packet->vps, PW_USER_PASSWORD, 0, TAG_ANY);
+ }
+ if (!request->password) {
+ request->password = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->packet->vps, PW_CHAP_PASSWORD, 0, TAG_ANY);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Grab the VPS associated with the State attribute.
+ */
+ fr_state_get_vps(request, request->packet);
+
+ /*
+ * Get the user's authorization information from the database
+ */
+autz_redo:
+ result = process_authorize(autz_type, request);
+ switch (result) {
+ case RLM_MODULE_NOOP:
+ case RLM_MODULE_NOTFOUND:
+ case RLM_MODULE_OK:
+ case RLM_MODULE_UPDATED:
+ break;
+ case RLM_MODULE_HANDLED:
+ return result;
+ case RLM_MODULE_FAIL:
+ case RLM_MODULE_INVALID:
+ case RLM_MODULE_REJECT:
+ case RLM_MODULE_USERLOCK:
+ default:
+ request->reply->code = PW_CODE_ACCESS_REJECT;
+ if ((module_msg = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->packet->vps, PW_MODULE_FAILURE_MESSAGE, 0, TAG_ANY)) != NULL) {
+ char msg[MAX_STRING_LEN + 16];
+ snprintf(msg, sizeof(msg), "Invalid user (%s)",
+ module_msg->vp_strvalue);
+ rad_authlog(msg,request,0);
+ } else {
+ rad_authlog("Invalid user", request, 0);
+ }
+ return result;
+ }
+ if (!autz_retry) {
+ tmp = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->config, PW_AUTZ_TYPE, 0, TAG_ANY);
+ if (tmp) {
+ autz_type = tmp->vp_integer;
+ RDEBUG2("Using Autz-Type %s",
+ dict_valnamebyattr(PW_AUTZ_TYPE, 0, autz_type));
+ autz_retry = 1;
+ goto autz_redo;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If we haven't already proxied the packet, then check
+ * to see if we should. Maybe one of the authorize
+ * modules has decided that a proxy should be used. If
+ * so, get out of here and send the packet.
+ */
+#ifdef WITH_PROXY
+ if (request->proxy == NULL)
+#endif
+ {
+ if ((tmp = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->config, PW_PROXY_TO_REALM, 0, TAG_ANY)) != NULL) {
+ REALM *realm;
+
+ realm = realm_find2(tmp->vp_strvalue);
+
+ /*
+ * Don't authenticate, as the request is going to
+ * be proxied.
+ */
+ if (realm && realm->auth_pool) {
+ return RLM_MODULE_OK;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Catch users who set Proxy-To-Realm to a LOCAL
+ * realm (sigh). But don't complain if it is
+ * *the* LOCAL realm.
+ */
+ if (realm && (strcmp(realm->name, "LOCAL") != 0)) {
+ RWDEBUG2("You set Proxy-To-Realm = %s, but it is a LOCAL realm! Cancelling proxy request.", realm->name);
+ }
+
+ if (!realm) {
+ RWDEBUG2("You set Proxy-To-Realm = %s, but the realm does not exist! Cancelling invalid proxy request.", tmp->vp_strvalue);
+ }
+ } else if (((tmp = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->config, PW_HOME_SERVER_POOL, 0, TAG_ANY)) != NULL) ||
+ ((tmp = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->config, PW_PACKET_DST_IP_ADDRESS, 0, TAG_ANY)) != NULL) ||
+ ((tmp = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->config, PW_PACKET_DST_IPV6_ADDRESS, 0, TAG_ANY)) != NULL) ||
+ ((tmp = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->config, PW_HOME_SERVER_NAME, 0, TAG_ANY)) != NULL)) {
+ RDEBUG("Proxying due to %s", tmp->da->name);
+ return RLM_MODULE_OK;
+ }
+ }
+
+#ifdef WITH_PROXY
+authenticate:
+#endif
+
+ /*
+ * Validate the user
+ */
+ do {
+ result = rad_check_password(request);
+ if (result > 0) {
+ return RLM_MODULE_HANDLED;
+ }
+
+ } while(0);
+
+ /*
+ * Failed to validate the user.
+ *
+ * We PRESUME that the code which failed will clean up
+ * request->reply->vps, to be ONLY the reply items it
+ * wants to send back.
+ */
+ if (result < 0) {
+ RDEBUG2("Failed to authenticate the user");
+ request->reply->code = PW_CODE_ACCESS_REJECT;
+
+ if (request->password) {
+ VERIFY_VP(request->password);
+ /* double check: maybe the secret is wrong? */
+ if ((rad_debug_lvl > 1) && (request->password->da->attr == PW_USER_PASSWORD)) {
+ uint8_t const *p;
+
+ p = (uint8_t const *) request->password->vp_strvalue;
+ while (*p) {
+ int size;
+
+ size = fr_utf8_char(p, -1);
+ if (!size) {
+ RWDEBUG("Unprintable characters in the password. Double-check the "
+ "shared secret on the server and the NAS!");
+ break;
+ }
+ p += size;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+#ifdef WITH_SESSION_MGMT
+ if (result >= 0 &&
+ (check_item = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->config, PW_SIMULTANEOUS_USE, 0, TAG_ANY)) != NULL) {
+ int r, session_type = 0;
+ char logstr[1024];
+ char umsg[MAX_STRING_LEN + 1];
+
+ tmp = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->config, PW_SESSION_TYPE, 0, TAG_ANY);
+ if (tmp) {
+ session_type = tmp->vp_integer;
+ RDEBUG2("Using Session-Type %s",
+ dict_valnamebyattr(PW_SESSION_TYPE, 0, session_type));
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * User authenticated O.K. Now we have to check
+ * for the Simultaneous-Use parameter.
+ */
+ if (request->username &&
+ (r = process_checksimul(session_type, request, check_item->vp_integer)) != 0) {
+ char mpp_ok = 0;
+
+ if (r == 2){
+ /* Multilink attempt. Check if port-limit > simultaneous-use */
+ VALUE_PAIR *port_limit;
+
+ if ((port_limit = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->reply->vps, PW_PORT_LIMIT, 0, TAG_ANY)) != NULL &&
+ port_limit->vp_integer > check_item->vp_integer){
+ RDEBUG2("MPP is OK");
+ mpp_ok = 1;
+ }
+ }
+ if (!mpp_ok){
+ if (check_item->vp_integer > 1) {
+ snprintf(umsg, sizeof(umsg), "%s (%u)", main_config.denied_msg,
+ check_item->vp_integer);
+ } else {
+ strlcpy(umsg, main_config.denied_msg, sizeof(umsg));
+ }
+
+ request->reply->code = PW_CODE_ACCESS_REJECT;
+
+ /*
+ * They're trying to log in too many times.
+ * Remove ALL reply attributes.
+ */
+ fr_pair_list_free(&request->reply->vps);
+ pair_make_reply("Reply-Message", umsg, T_OP_SET);
+
+ snprintf(logstr, sizeof(logstr), "Multiple logins (max %d) %s",
+ check_item->vp_integer,
+ r == 2 ? "[MPP attempt]" : "");
+ rad_authlog(logstr, request, 1);
+
+ result = -1;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+#endif
+
+ /*
+ * Result should be >= 0 here - if not, it means the user
+ * is rejected, so we just process post-auth and return.
+ */
+ if (result < 0) {
+ return RLM_MODULE_REJECT;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Set the reply to Access-Accept, if it hasn't already
+ * been set to something. (i.e. Access-Challenge)
+ */
+ if (request->reply->code == 0) {
+ request->reply->code = PW_CODE_ACCESS_ACCEPT;
+ }
+
+ return result;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Run a virtual server auth and postauth
+ *
+ */
+int rad_virtual_server(REQUEST *request)
+{
+ VALUE_PAIR *vp;
+ int result;
+
+ RDEBUG("Virtual server %s received request", request->server);
+ rdebug_pair_list(L_DBG_LVL_1, request, request->packet->vps, NULL);
+
+ if (!request->username) {
+ request->username = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->packet->vps, PW_USER_NAME, 0, TAG_ANY);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Complain about possible issues related to tunnels.
+ */
+ if (request->parent && request->parent->username && request->username) {
+ /*
+ * Look at the full User-Name with realm.
+ */
+ if (request->parent->username->da->attr == PW_STRIPPED_USER_NAME) {
+ vp = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->parent->packet->vps, PW_USER_NAME, 0, TAG_ANY);
+ rad_assert(vp != NULL);
+ } else {
+ vp = request->parent->username;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If the names aren't identical, we do some detailed checks.
+ */
+ if (strcmp(vp->vp_strvalue, request->username->vp_strvalue) != 0) {
+ char const *outer, *inner;
+
+ outer = strchr(vp->vp_strvalue, '@');
+
+ /*
+ * If there's no realm, or there's a user identifier before
+ * the realm name, check the user identifier.
+ *
+ * It SHOULD be "anonymous", or "anonymous@realm"
+ */
+ if (outer) {
+ if ((outer != vp->vp_strvalue) &&
+ ((vp->vp_length < 10) || (memcmp(vp->vp_strvalue, "anonymous@", 10) != 0))) {
+ RWDEBUG("Outer User-Name is not anonymized. User privacy is compromised.");
+ } /* else it is anonymized */
+
+ /*
+ * Check when there's no realm, and without the trailing '@'
+ */
+ } else if ((vp->vp_length < 9) || (memcmp(vp->vp_strvalue, "anonymous", 9) != 0)) {
+ RWDEBUG("Outer User-Name is not anonymized. User privacy is compromised.");
+
+ } /* else the user identifier is anonymized */
+
+ /*
+ * Look for an inner realm, which may or may not exist.
+ */
+ inner = strchr(request->username->vp_strvalue, '@');
+ if (outer && inner) {
+ outer++;
+ inner++;
+
+ /*
+ * The realms are different, do
+ * more detailed checks.
+ */
+ if (strcmp(outer, inner) != 0) {
+ size_t outer_len, inner_len;
+
+ outer_len = vp->vp_length;
+ outer_len -= (outer - vp->vp_strvalue);
+
+ inner_len = request->username->vp_length;
+ inner_len -= (inner - request->username->vp_strvalue);
+
+ /*
+ * Inner: secure.example.org
+ * Outer: example.org
+ */
+ if (inner_len > outer_len) {
+ char const *suffix;
+
+ suffix = inner + (inner_len - outer_len) - 1;
+
+ if ((*suffix != '.') ||
+ (strcmp(suffix + 1, outer) != 0)) {
+ RWDEBUG("Possible spoofing: Inner realm '%s' is not a subdomain of the outer realm '%s'", inner, outer);
+ }
+
+ } else {
+ RWDEBUG("Possible spoofing: Inner realm and outer realms are different");
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ } else {
+ RWDEBUG("Outer and inner identities are the same. User privacy is compromised.");
+ }
+ }
+
+ RDEBUG("server %s {", request->server);
+ RINDENT();
+
+ /*
+ * We currently only handle AUTH packets here.
+ * This could be expanded to handle other packets as well if required.
+ */
+ rad_assert(request->packet->code == PW_CODE_ACCESS_REQUEST);
+
+ result = rad_authenticate(request);
+
+ /*
+ * Allow bare "accept" and "reject" policies in the inner
+ * tunnel.
+ */
+ if (!request->reply->code &&
+ (vp = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->config, PW_AUTH_TYPE, 0, TAG_ANY)) != NULL) {
+ switch (vp->vp_integer) {
+ case PW_AUTH_TYPE_ACCEPT:
+ request->reply->code = PW_CODE_ACCESS_ACCEPT;
+ break;
+
+ case PW_AUTH_TYPE_REJECT:
+ request->reply->code = PW_CODE_ACCESS_REJECT;
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (request->reply->code == PW_CODE_ACCESS_REJECT) {
+ fr_pair_delete_by_num(&request->config, PW_POST_AUTH_TYPE, 0, TAG_ANY);
+ vp = pair_make_config("Post-Auth-Type", "Reject", T_OP_SET);
+ if (vp) rad_postauth(request);
+ }
+
+ if (request->reply->code == PW_CODE_ACCESS_ACCEPT) {
+ /*
+ * Check that there is a name which can be used
+ * to identify the user. The configuration
+ * depends on User-Name or Stripped-User-Name
+ * existing, and being (mostly) unique to that
+ * user.
+ */
+ if (!request->parent && request->username &&
+ (request->username->da->attr == PW_USER_NAME) &&
+ (request->username->vp_strvalue[0] == '@') &&
+ !fr_pair_find_by_num(request->packet->vps, PW_STRIPPED_USER_NAME, 0, TAG_ANY)) {
+ RWDEBUG("User-Name is anonymized, and no Stripped-User-Name exists.");
+ RWDEBUG("It may be difficult or impossible to identify the user");
+ RWDEBUG("Please update Stripped-User-Name with information which identifies the user");
+ }
+
+ rad_postauth(request);
+ }
+
+ REXDENT();
+ RDEBUG("} # server %s", request->server);
+
+ RDEBUG("Virtual server sending reply");
+ rdebug_pair_list(L_DBG_LVL_1, request, request->reply->vps, NULL);
+
+ return result;
+}