summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/doc/developer/scripting.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-28 09:53:30 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-28 09:53:30 +0000
commit2c7cac91ed6e7db0f6937923d2b57f97dbdbc337 (patch)
treec05dc0f8e6aa3accc84e3e5cffc933ed94941383 /doc/developer/scripting.rst
parentInitial commit. (diff)
downloadfrr-upstream/8.4.4.tar.xz
frr-upstream/8.4.4.zip
Adding upstream version 8.4.4.upstream/8.4.4upstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/developer/scripting.rst')
-rw-r--r--doc/developer/scripting.rst628
1 files changed, 628 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/developer/scripting.rst b/doc/developer/scripting.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..202f003
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/developer/scripting.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,628 @@
+.. _scripting:
+
+Scripting
+=========
+
+.. seealso:: User docs for scripting
+
+Overview
+--------
+
+FRR has the ability to call Lua scripts to perform calculations, make
+decisions, or otherwise extend builtin behavior with arbitrary user code. This
+is implemented using the standard Lua C bindings. The supported version of Lua
+is 5.3.
+
+C objects may be passed into Lua and Lua objects may be retrieved by C code via
+a encoding/decoding system. In this way, arbitrary data from FRR may be passed to
+scripts.
+
+The Lua environment is isolated from the C environment; user scripts cannot
+access FRR's address space unless explicitly allowed by FRR.
+
+For general information on how Lua is used to extend C, refer to Part IV of
+"Programming in Lua".
+
+https://www.lua.org/pil/contents.html#24
+
+
+Design
+------
+
+Why Lua
+^^^^^^^
+
+Lua is designed to be embedded in C applications. It is very small; the
+standard library is 220K. It is relatively fast. It has a simple, minimal
+syntax that is relatively easy to learn and can be understood by someone with
+little to no programming experience. Moreover it is widely used to add
+scripting capabilities to applications. In short it is designed for this task.
+
+Reasons against supporting multiple scripting languages:
+
+- Each language would require different FFI methods, and specifically
+ different object encoders; a lot of code
+- Languages have different capabilities that would have to be brought to
+ parity with each other; a lot of work
+- Languages have vastly different performance characteristics; this would
+ create alot of basically unfixable issues, and result in a single de facto
+ standard scripting language (the fastest)
+- Each language would need a dedicated maintainer for the above reasons;
+ this is pragmatically difficult
+- Supporting multiple languages fractures the community and limits the audience
+ with which a given script can be shared
+
+General
+-------
+
+FRR's scripting functionality is provided in the form of Lua functions in Lua
+scripts (``.lua`` files). One Lua script may contain many Lua functions. These
+are respectively encapsulated in the following structures:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ struct frrscript {
+ /* Lua file name */
+ char *name;
+
+ /* hash of lua_function_states */
+ struct hash *lua_function_hash;
+ };
+
+ struct lua_function_state {
+ /* Lua function name */
+ char *name;
+
+ lua_State *L;
+ };
+
+
+`struct frrscript`: Since all Lua functions are contained within scripts, the
+following APIs manipulates this structure. ``name`` contains the
+Lua script name and a hash of Lua functions to their function names.
+
+`struct lua_function_state` is an internal structure, but it essentially contains
+the name of the Lua function and its state (a stack), which is run using Lua
+library functions.
+
+In general, to run a Lua function, these steps must take place:
+
+- Initialization
+- Load
+- Call
+- Delete
+
+Initialization
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+The ``frrscript`` object encapsulates the Lua function state(s) from
+one Lua script file. To create, use ``frrscript_new()`` which takes the
+name of the Lua script.
+The string ".lua" is appended to the script name, and the resultant filename
+will be used to look for the script when we want to load a Lua function from it.
+
+For example, to create ``frrscript`` for ``/etc/frr/scripts/bingus.lua``:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ struct frrscript *fs = frrscript_new("bingus");
+
+
+The script is *not* read at this stage.
+This function cannot be used to test for a script's presence.
+
+Load
+^^^^
+
+The function to be called must first be loaded. Use ``frrscript_load()``
+which takes a ``frrscript`` object, the name of the Lua function
+and a callback function.
+The script file will be read to load and compile the function.
+
+For example, to load the Lua function ``on_foo``
+in ``/etc/frr/scripts/bingus.lua``:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ int ret = frrscript_load(fs, "on_foo", NULL);
+
+
+This function returns 0 if and only if the Lua function was successfully loaded.
+A non-zero return could indicate either a missing Lua script, a missing
+Lua function, or an error when loading the function.
+
+During loading the script is validated for syntax and its environment
+is set up. By default this does not include the Lua standard library; there are
+security issues to consider, though for practical purposes untrusted users
+should not be able to write the scripts directory anyway.
+
+Call
+^^^^
+
+After loading, a Lua function can be called any number of times.
+
+Input
+"""""
+
+Inputs to the Lua script should be given by providing a list of parenthesized
+pairs,
+where the first and second field identify the name of the variable and the
+value it is bound to, respectively.
+The types of the values must have registered encoders (more below); the compiler
+will warn you otherwise.
+
+These variables are first encoded in-order, then provided as arguments
+to the Lua function. In the example, note that ``c`` is passed in as a value
+while ``a`` and ``b`` are passed in as pointers.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ int a = 100, b = 200, c = 300;
+ frrscript_call(fs, "on_foo", ("a", &a), ("b", &b), ("c", c));
+
+
+.. code-block:: lua
+
+ function on_foo(a, b, c)
+ -- a is 100, b is 200, c is 300
+ ...
+
+
+Output
+""""""
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ int a = 100, b = 200, c = 300;
+ frrscript_call(fs, "on_foo", ("a", &a), ("b", &b), ("c", c));
+ // a is 500, b is 200, c is 300
+
+ int* d = frrscript_get_result(fs, "on_foo", "d", lua_tointegerp);
+ // d is 800
+
+
+.. code-block:: lua
+
+ function on_foo(a, b, c)
+ b = 600
+ return { ["a"] = 500, ["c"] = 700, ["d"] = 800 }
+ end
+
+
+**Lua functions being called must return a single table of string names to
+values.**
+(Lua functions should return an empty table if there is no output.)
+The keys of the table are mapped back to names of variables in C. Note that
+the values in the table can also be tables. Since tables are Lua's primary
+data structure, this design lets us return any Lua value.
+
+After the Lua function returns, the names of variables to ``frrscript_call()``
+are matched against keys of the returned table, and then decoded. The types
+being decoded must have registered decoders (more below); the compiler will
+warn you otherwise.
+
+In the example, since ``a`` was in the returned table and ``b`` was not,
+``a`` was decoded and its value modified, while ``b`` was not decoded.
+``c`` was decoded as well, but its decoder is a noop.
+What modifications happen given a variable depends whether its name was
+in the returned table and the decoder's implementation.
+
+.. warning::
+ Always keep in mind that non const-qualified pointers in
+ ``frrscript_call()`` may be modified - this may be a source of bugs.
+ On the other hand, const-qualified pointers and other values cannot
+ be modified.
+
+
+.. tip::
+ You can make a copy of a data structure and pass that in instead,
+ so that modifications only happen to that copy.
+
+``frrscript_call()`` returns 0 if and only if the Lua function was successfully
+called. A non-zero return could indicate either a missing Lua script, a missing
+Lua function, or an error from the Lua interpreter.
+
+In the above example, ``d`` was not an input to ``frrscript_call()``, so its
+value must be explicitly retrieved with ``frrscript_get_result``.
+
+``frrscript_get_result()`` takes a
+decoder and string name which is used as a key to search the returned table.
+Returns the pointer to the decoded value, or NULL if it was not found.
+In the example, ``d`` is a "new" value in C space,
+so memory allocation might take place. Hence the caller is
+responsible for memory deallocation.
+
+``frrscript_call()`` may be called multiple times without re-loading with
+``frrscript_load()``. Results are not preserved between consecutive calls.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ frrscript_load(fs, "on_foo");
+
+ frrscript_call(fs, "on_foo");
+ frrscript_get_result(fs, "on_foo", ...);
+ frrscript_call(fs, "on_foo");
+ frrscript_get_result(fs, "on_foo", ...);
+
+
+Delete
+^^^^^^
+
+To delete a script and the all Lua states associated with it:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ frrscript_delete(fs);
+
+
+A complete example
+""""""""""""""""""
+
+So, a typical execution call, with error checking, looks something like this:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ struct frrscript *fs = frrscript_new("my_script"); // name *without* .lua
+
+ int ret = frrscript_load(fs, "on_foo", NULL);
+ if (ret != 0)
+ goto DONE; // Lua script or function might have not been found
+
+ int a = 100, b = 200, c = 300;
+ ret = frrscript_call(fs, "on_foo", ("a", &a), ("b", &b), ("c", c));
+ if (ret != 0)
+ goto DONE; // Lua function might have not successfully run
+
+ // a and b might be modified
+ assert(a == 500);
+ assert(b == 200);
+
+ // c could not have been modified
+ assert(c == 300);
+
+ // d is new
+ int* d = frrscript_get_result(fs, "on_foo", "d", lua_tointegerp);
+
+ if (!d)
+ goto DONE; // "d" might not have been in returned table
+
+ assert(*d == 800);
+ XFREE(MTYPE_SCRIPT_RES, d); // caller responsible for free
+
+ DONE:
+ frrscript_delete(fs);
+
+
+.. code-block:: lua
+
+ function on_foo(a, b, c)
+ b = 600
+ return { a = 500, c = 700, d = 800 }
+ end
+
+
+Note that ``{ a = ...`` is same as ``{ ["a"] = ...``; it is Lua shorthand to
+use the variable name as the key in a table.
+
+Encoding and Decoding
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+Earlier sections glossed over the types of values that can be passed into
+``frrscript_call()`` and how data is passed between C and Lua. Lua, as a
+dynamically typed, garbage collected language, cannot directly use C values
+without some kind of encoding / decoding system to
+translate types between the two runtimes.
+
+Lua communicates with C code using a stack. C code wishing to provide data to
+Lua scripts must provide a function that encodes the C data into a Lua
+representation and pushes it on the stack. C code wishing to retrieve data from
+Lua must provide a corresponding decoder function that retrieves a Lua
+value from the stack and converts it to the corresponding C type.
+
+Encoders and decoders are provided for common data types.
+Developers wishing to pass their own data structures between C and Lua need to
+create encoders and decoders for that data type.
+
+We try to keep them named consistently.
+There are three kinds of encoders and decoders:
+
+1. lua_push*: encodes a value onto the Lua stack.
+ Required for ``frrscript_call``.
+
+2. lua_decode*: decodes a value from the Lua stack.
+ Required for ``frrscript_call``.
+ Only non const-qualified pointers may be actually decoded (more below).
+
+3. lua_to*: allocates memory and decodes a value from the Lua stack.
+ Required for ``frrscript_get_result``.
+
+This design allows us to combine typesafe *modification* of C values as well as
+*allocation* of new C values.
+
+In the following sections, we will use the encoders/decoders for ``struct prefix`` as an example.
+
+Encoding
+""""""""
+
+An encoder function takes a ``lua_State *``, a C type and pushes that value onto
+the Lua state (a stack).
+For C structs, the usual case,
+this will typically be encoded to a Lua table, then pushed onto the Lua stack.
+
+Here is the encoder function for ``struct prefix``:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ void lua_pushprefix(lua_State *L, struct prefix *prefix)
+ {
+ char buffer[PREFIX_STRLEN];
+
+ lua_newtable(L);
+ lua_pushstring(L, prefix2str(prefix, buffer, PREFIX_STRLEN));
+ lua_setfield(L, -2, "network");
+ lua_pushinteger(L, prefix->prefixlen);
+ lua_setfield(L, -2, "length");
+ lua_pushinteger(L, prefix->family);
+ lua_setfield(L, -2, "family");
+ }
+
+This function pushes a single value, a table, onto the Lua stack, whose
+equivalent in Lua is:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ { ["network"] = "1.2.3.4/24", ["prefixlen"] = 24, ["family"] = 2 }
+
+
+Decoding
+""""""""
+
+Decoders are a bit more involved. They do the reverse; a decoder function takes
+a ``lua_State *``, pops a value off the Lua stack and converts it back into its
+C type.
+
+There are two: ``lua_decode*`` and ``lua_to*``. The former does no mememory
+allocation and is needed for ``frrscript_call``.
+The latter performs allocation and is optional.
+
+A ``lua_decode_*`` function takes a ``lua_State*``, an index, and a pointer
+to a C data structure, and directly modifies the structure with values from the
+Lua stack. Note that only non const-qualified pointers may be modified;
+``lua_decode_*`` for other types will be noops.
+
+Again, for ``struct prefix *``:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ void lua_decode_prefix(lua_State *L, int idx, struct prefix *prefix)
+ {
+ lua_getfield(L, idx, "network");
+ (void)str2prefix(lua_tostring(L, -1), prefix);
+ /* pop the network string */
+ lua_pop(L, 1);
+ /* pop the prefix table */
+ lua_pop(L, 1);
+ }
+
+
+Note:
+ - Before ``lua_decode*`` is run, the "prefix" table is already on the top of
+ the stack. ``frrscript_call`` does this for us.
+ - However, at the end of ``lua_decode*``, the "prefix" table should be popped.
+ - The other two fields in the "network" table are disregarded, meaning that any
+ modification to them is discarded in C space. In this case, this is desired
+ behavior.
+
+.. warning::
+
+ ``lua_decode*`` functions should pop all values that ``lua_to*`` pushed onto
+ the Lua stack.
+ For encoders that pushed a table, its decoder should pop the table at the end.
+ The above is an example.
+
+
+
+``int`` is not a non const-qualified pointer, so for ``int``:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ void lua_decode_int_noop(lua_State *L, int idx, int i)
+ { //noop
+ }
+
+
+A ``lua_to*`` function provides identical functionality except that it first
+allocates memory for the new C type before decoding the value from the Lua stack,
+then returns a pointer to the newly allocated C type. You only need to implement
+this function to use with ``frrscript_get_result`` to retrieve a result of
+this type.
+
+This function can and should be implemented using ``lua_decode_*``:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ void *lua_toprefix(lua_State *L, int idx)
+ {
+ struct prefix *p = XCALLOC(MTYPE_SCRIPT_RES, sizeof(struct prefix));
+
+ lua_decode_prefix(L, idx, p);
+ return p;
+ }
+
+
+The returned data must always be copied off the stack and the copy must be
+allocated with ``MTYPE_SCRIPT_RES``. This way it is possible to unload the script
+(destroy the state) without invalidating any references to values stored in it.
+Note that it is the caller's responsibility to free the data.
+
+
+Registering encoders and decoders for frrscript_call
+""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
+
+To register a new type with its ``lua_push*`` and ``lua_decode*`` functions,
+add the mapping in the following macros in ``frrscript.h``:
+
+.. code-block:: diff
+
+ #define ENCODE_ARGS_WITH_STATE(L, value) \
+ _Generic((value), \
+ ...
+ - struct peer * : lua_pushpeer \
+ + struct peer * : lua_pushpeer, \
+ + struct prefix * : lua_pushprefix \
+ )((L), (value))
+
+ #define DECODE_ARGS_WITH_STATE(L, value) \
+ _Generic((value), \
+ ...
+ - struct peer * : lua_decode_peer \
+ + struct peer * : lua_decode_peer, \
+ + struct prefix * : lua_decode_prefix \
+ )((L), -1, (value))
+
+
+At compile time, the compiler will search for encoders/decoders for the type of
+each value passed in via ``frrscript_call``. If a encoder/decoder cannot be
+found, it will appear as a compile warning. Note that the types must
+match *exactly*.
+In the above example, we defined encoders/decoders for a value of
+``struct prefix *``, but not ``struct prefix`` or ``const struct prefix *``.
+
+``const`` values are a special case. We want to use them in our Lua scripts
+but not modify them, so creating a decoder for them would be meaningless.
+But we still need a decoder for the type of value so that the compiler will be
+satisfied.
+For that, use ``lua_decode_noop``:
+
+.. code-block:: diff
+
+ #define DECODE_ARGS_WITH_STATE(L, value) \
+ _Generic((value), \
+ ...
+ + const struct prefix * : lua_decode_noop \
+ )(L, -1, value)
+
+
+.. note::
+
+ Encodable/decodable types are not restricted to simple values like integers,
+ strings and tables.
+ It is possible to encode a type such that the resultant object in Lua
+ is an actual object-oriented object, complete with methods that call
+ back into defined C functions. See the Lua manual for how to do this;
+ for a code example, look at how zlog is exported into the script environment.
+
+
+Script Environment
+------------------
+
+Logging
+^^^^^^^
+
+For convenience, script environments are populated by default with a ``log``
+object which contains methods corresponding to each of the ``zlog`` levels:
+
+.. code-block:: lua
+
+ log.info("info")
+ log.warn("warn")
+ log.error("error")
+ log.notice("notice")
+ log.debug("debug")
+
+The log messages will show up in the daemon's log output.
+
+
+Examples
+--------
+
+For a complete code example involving passing custom types, retrieving results,
+and doing complex calculations in Lua, look at the implementation of the
+``match script SCRIPT`` command for BGP routemaps. This example calls into a
+script with a function named ``route_match``,
+provides route prefix and attributes received from a peer and expects the
+function to return a match / no match / match and update result.
+
+An example script to use with this follows. This function matches, does not match
+or updates a route depending on how many BGP UPDATE messages the peer has
+received when the script is called, simply as a demonstration of what can be
+accomplished with scripting.
+
+.. code-block:: lua
+
+
+ -- Example route map matching
+ -- author: qlyoung
+ --
+ -- The following variables are available in the global environment:
+ -- log
+ -- logging library, with the usual functions
+ --
+ -- route_match arguments:
+ -- table prefix
+ -- the route under consideration
+ -- table attributes
+ -- the route's attributes
+ -- table peer
+ -- the peer which received this route
+ -- integer RM_FAILURE
+ -- status code in case of failure
+ -- integer RM_NOMATCH
+ -- status code for no match
+ -- integer RM_MATCH
+ -- status code for match
+ -- integer RM_MATCH_AND_CHANGE
+ -- status code for match-and-set
+ --
+ -- route_match returns table with following keys:
+ -- integer action, required
+ -- resultant status code. Should be one of RM_*
+ -- table attributes, optional
+ -- updated route attributes
+ --
+
+ function route_match(prefix, attributes, peer,
+ RM_FAILURE, RM_NOMATCH, RM_MATCH, RM_MATCH_AND_CHANGE)
+
+ log.info("Evaluating route " .. prefix.network .. " from peer " .. peer.remote_id.string)
+
+ function on_match (prefix, attributes)
+ log.info("Match")
+ return {
+ attributes = RM_MATCH
+ }
+ end
+
+ function on_nomatch (prefix, attributes)
+ log.info("No match")
+ return {
+ action = RM_NOMATCH
+ }
+ end
+
+ function on_match_and_change (prefix, attributes)
+ log.info("Match and change")
+ attributes["metric"] = attributes["metric"] + 7
+ return {
+ action = RM_MATCH_AND_CHANGE,
+ attributes = attributes
+ }
+ end
+
+ special_routes = {
+ ["172.16.10.4/24"] = on_match,
+ ["172.16.13.1/8"] = on_nomatch,
+ ["192.168.0.24/8"] = on_match_and_change,
+ }
+
+
+ if special_routes[prefix.network] then
+ return special_routes[prefix.network](prefix, attributes)
+ elseif peer.stats.update_in % 3 == 0 then
+ return on_match(prefix, attributes)
+ elseif peer.stats.update_in % 2 == 0 then
+ return on_nomatch(prefix, attributes)
+ else
+ return on_match_and_change(prefix, attributes)
+ end
+ end