summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/ospfd/topologies.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/ospfd/topologies.c')
-rw-r--r--tests/ospfd/topologies.c575
1 files changed, 575 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/ospfd/topologies.c b/tests/ospfd/topologies.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2dc611c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/ospfd/topologies.c
@@ -0,0 +1,575 @@
+#include <zebra.h>
+
+#include "mpls.h"
+#include "if.h"
+
+#include "ospfd/ospfd.h"
+
+#include "common.h"
+
+/*
+ * +---------+ +---------+
+ * | | | |
+ * | RT1 |eth-rt2 eth-rt1| RT2 |
+ * | 1.1.1.1 +---------------------+ 2.2.2.2 |
+ * | | 10.0.1.0/24 | |
+ * +---------+ +---------+
+ * |eth-rt3 eth-rt3|
+ * | |
+ * |10.0.3.0/24 |
+ * | |
+ * |eth-rt1 |
+ * +---------+ |
+ * | |eth-rt2 10.0.2.0/24|
+ * | RT3 +--------------------------+
+ * | 3.3.3.3 |
+ * | |
+ * +---------+
+ *
+ * Link Protection:
+ * P and Q spaces overlap here, hence just one P/Q node regardless of which
+ * link is protected. Hence the backup label stack just has one label.
+ *
+ * Node Protection:
+ * Obviously no backup paths involved.
+ */
+struct ospf_topology topo1 = {
+ .nodes =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt1",
+ .router_id = "1.1.1.1",
+ .label = 10,
+ .adjacencies =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt2",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.1.1/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt3",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.3.1/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 2,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt2",
+ .router_id = "2.2.2.2",
+ .label = 20,
+ .adjacencies =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt1",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.1.2/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 3,
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt3",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.2.1/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 4,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt3",
+ .router_id = "3.3.3.3",
+ .label = 30,
+ .adjacencies =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt1",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.3.2/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 5,
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt2",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.2.2/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 6,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ },
+};
+
+
+/*
+ * +---------+ +---------+
+ * | | | |
+ * | RT1 |eth-rt2 eth-rt1| RT2 |
+ * | 1.1.1.1 +---------------------+ 2.2.2.2 |
+ * | | 10.0.1.0/24 (10) | |
+ * +---------+ +---------+
+ * |eth-rt3 eth-rt3|
+ * | |
+ * |10.0.3.0/24 (30) |
+ * | |
+ * |eth-rt1 |
+ * +---------+ |
+ * | |eth-rt2 10.0.2.0/24|(10)
+ * | RT3 +--------------------------+
+ * | 3.3.3.3 |
+ * | |
+ * +---------+
+ *
+ * Link Protection:
+ * Regarding the subnet 10.0.1.0/24, the P space of RT1 is just RT1 itself
+ * while the Q space of RT3 consists of RT3 and RT2. Hence the P and Q
+ * nodes are disjunct (tricky: the root node is the P node here). For the
+ * backup label stack just one label is necessary.
+ *
+ * Node Protection:
+ * For protected node RT2 and route from RT1 to RT3 there is just the backup
+ * path consisting of the label 15002.
+ */
+struct ospf_topology topo2 = {
+ .nodes =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt1",
+ .router_id = "1.1.1.1",
+ .label = 10,
+ .adjacencies =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt2",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.1.1/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt3",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.3.1/24",
+ .metric = 30,
+ .label = 2,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt2",
+ .router_id = "2.2.2.2",
+ .label = 20,
+ .adjacencies =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt1",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.1.2/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 3,
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt3",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.2.1/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 4,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt3",
+ .router_id = "3.3.3.3",
+ .label = 30,
+ .adjacencies =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt1",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.3.2/24",
+ .metric = 30,
+ .label = 5,
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt2",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.2.2/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 6,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ },
+};
+
+/*
+ * +---------+ +---------+
+ * | | | |
+ * | RT1 |eth-rt4 eth-rt1| RT4 |
+ * | 1.1.1.1 +---------------------+ 4.4.4.4 |
+ * | | 10.0.4.0/24 (10) | |
+ * +---------+ +---------+
+ * |eth-rt2 eth-rt3|
+ * | |
+ * |10.0.1.0/24 (10) |
+ * | 10.0.3.0/24 (10) |
+ * |eth-rt1 eth-rt4|
+ * +---------+ +---------+
+ * | |eth-rt3 eth-rt2| |
+ * | RT2 +---------------------+ RT3 |
+ * | 2.2.2.2 | 10.0.2.0/24 (20) | 3.3.3.3 |
+ * | | | |
+ * +---------+ +---------+
+ *
+ * Link Protection:
+ * Regarding the protected subnet 10.0.4.0/24, the P and Q spaces for root RT1
+ * and destination RT4 are disjunct and the P node is RT2 while RT3 is the Q
+ * node. Hence the backup label stack here is 16020/15004. Note that here the
+ * P and Q nodes are neither the root nor the destination nodes, so this is a
+ * case where you really need a label stack consisting of two labels.
+ *
+ * Node Protection:
+ * For the protected node RT4 and the route from RT1 to RT3 there is a backup
+ * path with the single label 15001.
+ */
+struct ospf_topology topo3 = {
+ .nodes =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt1",
+ .router_id = "1.1.1.1",
+ .label = 10,
+ .adjacencies =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt2",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.1.1/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt4",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.4.1/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 2,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt2",
+ .router_id = "2.2.2.2",
+ .label = 20,
+ .adjacencies =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt1",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.1.2/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 3,
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt3",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.2.1/24",
+ .metric = 20,
+ .label = 4,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt3",
+ .router_id = "3.3.3.3",
+ .label = 30,
+ .adjacencies =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt2",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.2.2/24",
+ .metric = 20,
+ .label = 5,
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt4",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.3.1/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 6,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt4",
+ .router_id = "4.4.4.4",
+ .label = 40,
+ .adjacencies =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt1",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.4.2/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 7,
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt3",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.3.2/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 8,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ },
+};
+
+/*
+ * +---------+ +---------+
+ * | | | |
+ * | RT1 |eth-rt4 eth-rt1| RT4 |
+ * | 1.1.1.1 +---------------------+ 4.4.4.4 |
+ * | | 10.0.4.0/24 (10) | |
+ * +---------+ +---------+
+ * |eth+rt2 eth-rt3|
+ * | |
+ * |10.0.1.0/24 (10) |
+ * | 10.0.3.0/24 (10) |
+ * |eth-rt1 eth-rt4|
+ * +---------+ +---------+
+ * | |eth-rt3 eth-rt2| |
+ * | RT2 +---------------------+ RT3 |
+ * | 2.2.2.2 | 10.0.2.0/24 (40) | 3.3.3.3 |
+ * | | | |
+ * +---------+ +---------+
+ *
+ * This case was specifically created for Node Protection with RT4 as
+ * protected node from the perspective of RT1. Note the weight of 40
+ * on the link between RT2 and RT3.
+ * The P space of RT1 is just RT2 while the Q space of RT3 is empty.
+ * This means that the P and Q spaces are disjunct and there are two
+ * labels needed to get from RT1 to RT3.
+ */
+struct ospf_topology topo4 = {
+ .nodes =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt1",
+ .router_id = "1.1.1.1",
+ .label = 10,
+ .adjacencies =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt2",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.1.1/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt4",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.4.1/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 2,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt2",
+ .router_id = "2.2.2.2",
+ .label = 20,
+ .adjacencies =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt1",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.1.2/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 3,
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt3",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.2.1/24",
+ .metric = 50,
+ .label = 4,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt3",
+ .router_id = "3.3.3.3",
+ .label = 30,
+ .adjacencies =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt2",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.2.2/24",
+ .metric = 50,
+ .label = 5,
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt4",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.3.1/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 6,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt4",
+ .router_id = "4.4.4.4",
+ .label = 40,
+ .adjacencies =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt3",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.3.2/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 7,
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt1",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.4.2/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 8,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ },
+};
+
+/*
+ * +---------+ +---------+
+ * | | | |
+ * | RT1 |eth-rt4 eth-rt1| RT4 |
+ * | 1.1.1.1 +---------------------+ 4.4.4.4 |
+ * | | 10.0.4.0/24 | |
+ * +---------+ +---------+
+ * |eth+rt2 eth-rt3|
+ * | |
+ * |10.0.1.0/24 |
+ * | 10.0.3.0/24|
+ * |eth-rt1 eth-rt4|
+ * +---------+ +---------+
+ * | |eth-rt3 eth-rt2| |
+ * | RT2 +---------------------+ RT3 |
+ * | 2.2.2.2 | 10.0.2.0/24 | 3.3.3.3 |
+ * | | | |
+ * +---------+ +---------+
+ *
+ * Weights:
+ * - clockwise: 10
+ * - counterclockwise: 40
+ *
+ * This is an example where 3 (!) labels are needed for the protected
+ * link RT1<->RT2, e.g. the subnet 10.0.1.0/24, to reach RT4.
+ *
+ * Because the initial P and Q spaces will not be overlapping or
+ * adjacent for this case the TI-LFA will be applied recursively.
+ */
+struct ospf_topology topo5 = {
+ .nodes =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt1",
+ .router_id = "1.1.1.1",
+ .label = 10,
+ .adjacencies =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt2",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.1.1/24",
+ .metric = 40,
+ .label = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt4",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.4.1/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 2,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt2",
+ .router_id = "2.2.2.2",
+ .label = 20,
+ .adjacencies =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt1",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.1.2/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 3,
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt3",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.2.1/24",
+ .metric = 40,
+ .label = 4,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt3",
+ .router_id = "3.3.3.3",
+ .label = 30,
+ .adjacencies =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt2",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.2.2/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 5,
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt4",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.3.1/24",
+ .metric = 40,
+ .label = 6,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt4",
+ .router_id = "4.4.4.4",
+ .label = 40,
+ .adjacencies =
+ {
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt3",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.3.2/24",
+ .metric = 10,
+ .label = 7,
+ },
+ {
+ .hostname = "rt1",
+ .network =
+ "10.0.4.2/24",
+ .metric = 40,
+ .label = 8,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ },
+};
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-10-25 08:38:53 +0000