diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-07 14:47:53 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-07 14:47:53 +0000 |
commit | c8bae7493d2f2910b57f13ded012e86bdcfb0532 (patch) | |
tree | 24e09d9f84dec336720cf393e156089ca2835791 /t/t3204-branch-name-interpretation.sh | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | git-upstream.tar.xz git-upstream.zip |
Adding upstream version 1:2.39.2.upstream/1%2.39.2upstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rwxr-xr-x | t/t3204-branch-name-interpretation.sh | 160 |
1 files changed, 160 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/t/t3204-branch-name-interpretation.sh b/t/t3204-branch-name-interpretation.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..793bf4d --- /dev/null +++ b/t/t3204-branch-name-interpretation.sh @@ -0,0 +1,160 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='interpreting exotic branch name arguments + +Branch name arguments are usually names which are taken to be inside of +refs/heads/, but we interpret some magic syntax like @{-1}, @{upstream}, etc. +This script aims to check the behavior of those corner cases. +' +GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main +export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME + +. ./test-lib.sh + +expect_branch() { + git log -1 --format=%s "$1" >actual && + echo "$2" >expect && + test_cmp expect actual +} + +expect_deleted() { + test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify "$1" +} + +test_expect_success 'set up repo' ' + test_commit one && + test_commit two && + git remote add origin foo.git +' + +test_expect_success 'update branch via @{-1}' ' + git branch previous one && + + git checkout previous && + git checkout main && + + git branch -f @{-1} two && + expect_branch previous two +' + +test_expect_success 'update branch via local @{upstream}' ' + git branch local one && + git branch --set-upstream-to=local && + + git branch -f @{upstream} two && + expect_branch local two +' + +test_expect_success 'disallow updating branch via remote @{upstream}' ' + git update-ref refs/remotes/origin/remote one && + git branch --set-upstream-to=origin/remote && + + test_must_fail git branch -f @{upstream} two +' + +test_expect_success 'create branch with pseudo-qualified name' ' + git branch refs/heads/qualified two && + expect_branch refs/heads/refs/heads/qualified two +' + +test_expect_success 'delete branch via @{-1}' ' + git branch previous-del && + + git checkout previous-del && + git checkout main && + + git branch -D @{-1} && + expect_deleted previous-del +' + +test_expect_success 'delete branch via local @{upstream}' ' + git branch local-del && + git branch --set-upstream-to=local-del && + + git branch -D @{upstream} && + expect_deleted local-del +' + +test_expect_success 'delete branch via remote @{upstream}' ' + git update-ref refs/remotes/origin/remote-del two && + git branch --set-upstream-to=origin/remote-del && + + git branch -r -D @{upstream} && + expect_deleted origin/remote-del +' + +# Note that we create two oddly named local branches here. We want to make +# sure that we do not accidentally delete either of them, even if +# shorten_unambiguous_ref() tweaks the name to avoid ambiguity. +test_expect_success 'delete @{upstream} expansion matches -r option' ' + git update-ref refs/remotes/origin/remote-del two && + git branch --set-upstream-to=origin/remote-del && + git update-ref refs/heads/origin/remote-del two && + git update-ref refs/heads/remotes/origin/remote-del two && + + test_must_fail git branch -D @{upstream} && + expect_branch refs/heads/origin/remote-del two && + expect_branch refs/heads/remotes/origin/remote-del two +' + +test_expect_success 'disallow deleting remote branch via @{-1}' ' + git update-ref refs/remotes/origin/previous one && + + git checkout -b origin/previous two && + git checkout main && + + test_must_fail git branch -r -D @{-1} && + expect_branch refs/remotes/origin/previous one && + expect_branch refs/heads/origin/previous two +' + +# The thing we are testing here is that "@" is the real branch refs/heads/@, +# and not refs/heads/HEAD. These tests should not imply that refs/heads/@ is a +# sane thing, but it _is_ technically allowed for now. If we disallow it, these +# can be switched to test_must_fail. +test_expect_success 'create branch named "@"' ' + git branch -f @ one && + expect_branch refs/heads/@ one +' + +test_expect_success 'delete branch named "@"' ' + git update-ref refs/heads/@ two && + git branch -D @ && + expect_deleted refs/heads/@ +' + +test_expect_success 'checkout does not treat remote @{upstream} as a branch' ' + git update-ref refs/remotes/origin/checkout one && + git branch --set-upstream-to=origin/checkout && + git update-ref refs/heads/origin/checkout two && + git update-ref refs/heads/remotes/origin/checkout two && + + git checkout @{upstream} && + expect_branch HEAD one +' + +test_expect_success 'edit-description via @{-1}' ' + git checkout -b desc-branch && + git checkout -b non-desc-branch && + write_script editor <<-\EOF && + echo "Branch description" >"$1" + EOF + EDITOR=./editor git branch --edit-description @{-1} && + test_must_fail git config branch.non-desc-branch.description && + git config branch.desc-branch.description >actual && + printf "Branch description\n\n" >expect && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'modify branch upstream via "@{-1}" and "@{-1}@{upstream}"' ' + git checkout -b upstream-branch && + git checkout -b upstream-other -t upstream-branch && + git branch --set-upstream-to upstream-other @{-1} && + git config branch.upstream-branch.merge >actual && + echo "refs/heads/upstream-other" >expect && + test_cmp expect actual && + git branch --unset-upstream @{-1}@{upstream} && + test_must_fail git config branch.upstream-other.merge +' + +test_done |