diff options
Diffstat (limited to 't/lib-unicode-nfc-nfd.sh')
| -rwxr-xr-x | t/lib-unicode-nfc-nfd.sh | 162 |
1 files changed, 162 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/t/lib-unicode-nfc-nfd.sh b/t/lib-unicode-nfc-nfd.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..2223224 --- /dev/null +++ b/t/lib-unicode-nfc-nfd.sh @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +# Help detect how Unicode NFC and NFD are handled on the filesystem. + +# A simple character that has a NFD form. +# +# NFC: U+00e9 LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH ACUTE +# UTF8(NFC): \xc3 \xa9 +# +# NFD: U+0065 LATIN SMALL LETTER E +# U+0301 COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT +# UTF8(NFD): \x65 + \xcc \x81 +# +utf8_nfc=$(printf "\xc3\xa9") +utf8_nfd=$(printf "\x65\xcc\x81") + +# Is the OS or the filesystem "Unicode composition sensitive"? +# +# That is, does the OS or the filesystem allow files to exist with +# both the NFC and NFD spellings? Or, does the OS/FS lie to us and +# tell us that the NFC and NFD forms are equivalent. +# +# This is or may be independent of what type of filesystem we have, +# since it might be handled by the OS at a layer above the FS. +# Testing shows on MacOS using APFS, HFS+, and FAT32 reports a +# collision, for example. +# +# This does not tell us how the Unicode pathname will be spelled +# on disk, but rather only that the two spelling "collide". We +# will examine the actual on disk spelling in a later prereq. +# +test_lazy_prereq UNICODE_COMPOSITION_SENSITIVE ' + mkdir trial_${utf8_nfc} && + mkdir trial_${utf8_nfd} +' + +# Is the spelling of an NFC pathname preserved on disk? +# +# On MacOS with HFS+ and FAT32, NFC paths are converted into NFD +# and on APFS, NFC paths are preserved. As we have established +# above, this is independent of "composition sensitivity". +# +test_lazy_prereq UNICODE_NFC_PRESERVED ' + mkdir c_${utf8_nfc} && + ls | test-tool hexdump >dump && + grep "63 5f c3 a9" dump +' + +# Is the spelling of an NFD pathname preserved on disk? +# +test_lazy_prereq UNICODE_NFD_PRESERVED ' + mkdir d_${utf8_nfd} && + ls | test-tool hexdump >dump && + grep "64 5f 65 cc 81" dump +' + +# The following _DOUBLE_ forms are more for my curiosity, +# but there may be quirks lurking when there are multiple +# combining characters in non-canonical order. + +# Unicode also allows multiple combining characters +# that can be decomposed in pieces. +# +# NFC: U+1f67 GREEK SMALL LETTER OMEGA WITH DASIA AND PERISPOMENI +# UTF8(NFC): \xe1 \xbd \xa7 +# +# NFD1: U+1f61 GREEK SMALL LETTER OMEGA WITH DASIA +# U+0342 COMBINING GREEK PERISPOMENI +# UTF8(NFD1): \xe1 \xbd \xa1 + \xcd \x82 +# +# But U+1f61 decomposes into +# NFD2: U+03c9 GREEK SMALL LETTER OMEGA +# U+0314 COMBINING REVERSED COMMA ABOVE +# UTF8(NFD2): \xcf \x89 + \xcc \x94 +# +# Yielding: \xcf \x89 + \xcc \x94 + \xcd \x82 +# +# Note that I've used the canonical ordering of the +# combinining characters. It is also possible to +# swap them. My testing shows that that non-standard +# ordering also causes a collision in mkdir. However, +# the resulting names don't draw correctly on the +# terminal (implying that the on-disk format also has +# them out of order). +# +greek_nfc=$(printf "\xe1\xbd\xa7") +greek_nfd1=$(printf "\xe1\xbd\xa1\xcd\x82") +greek_nfd2=$(printf "\xcf\x89\xcc\x94\xcd\x82") + +# See if a double decomposition also collides. +# +test_lazy_prereq UNICODE_DOUBLE_COMPOSITION_SENSITIVE ' + mkdir trial_${greek_nfc} && + mkdir trial_${greek_nfd2} +' + +# See if the NFC spelling appears on the disk. +# +test_lazy_prereq UNICODE_DOUBLE_NFC_PRESERVED ' + mkdir c_${greek_nfc} && + ls | test-tool hexdump >dump && + grep "63 5f e1 bd a7" dump +' + +# See if the NFD spelling appears on the disk. +# +test_lazy_prereq UNICODE_DOUBLE_NFD_PRESERVED ' + mkdir d_${greek_nfd2} && + ls | test-tool hexdump >dump && + grep "64 5f cf 89 cc 94 cd 82" dump +' + +# The following is for debugging. I found it useful when +# trying to understand the various (OS, FS) quirks WRT +# Unicode and how composition/decomposition is handled. +# For example, when trying to understand how (macOS, APFS) +# and (macOS, HFS) and (macOS, FAT32) compare. +# +# It is rather noisy, so it is disabled by default. +# +if test "$unicode_debug" = "true" +then + if test_have_prereq UNICODE_COMPOSITION_SENSITIVE + then + echo NFC and NFD are distinct on this OS/filesystem. + else + echo NFC and NFD are aliases on this OS/filesystem. + fi + + if test_have_prereq UNICODE_NFC_PRESERVED + then + echo NFC maintains original spelling. + else + echo NFC is modified. + fi + + if test_have_prereq UNICODE_NFD_PRESERVED + then + echo NFD maintains original spelling. + else + echo NFD is modified. + fi + + if test_have_prereq UNICODE_DOUBLE_COMPOSITION_SENSITIVE + then + echo DOUBLE NFC and NFD are distinct on this OS/filesystem. + else + echo DOUBLE NFC and NFD are aliases on this OS/filesystem. + fi + + if test_have_prereq UNICODE_DOUBLE_NFC_PRESERVED + then + echo Double NFC maintains original spelling. + else + echo Double NFC is modified. + fi + + if test_have_prereq UNICODE_DOUBLE_NFD_PRESERVED + then + echo Double NFD maintains original spelling. + else + echo Double NFD is modified. + fi +fi |