From 73df946d56c74384511a194dd01dbe099584fd1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 15:14:23 +0200
Subject: Adding upstream version 1.16.10.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
---
 test/fixedbugs/issue14164.dir/a.go | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 test/fixedbugs/issue14164.dir/a.go

(limited to 'test/fixedbugs/issue14164.dir/a.go')

diff --git a/test/fixedbugs/issue14164.dir/a.go b/test/fixedbugs/issue14164.dir/a.go
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bf03051
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/fixedbugs/issue14164.dir/a.go
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+// Copyright 2016 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
+// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
+
+package a
+
+// F is an exported function, small enough to be inlined.
+// It defines a local interface with an unexported method
+// f, which will appear with a package-qualified method
+// name in the export data.
+func F(x interface{}) bool {
+	_, ok := x.(interface {
+		f()
+	})
+	return ok
+}
+
+// Like F but with the unexported interface method f
+// defined via an embedded interface t. The compiler
+// always flattens embedded interfaces so there should
+// be no difference between F and G. Alas, currently
+// G is not inlineable (at least via export data), so
+// the issue is moot, here.
+func G(x interface{}) bool {
+	type t0 interface {
+		f()
+	}
+	_, ok := x.(interface {
+		t0
+	})
+	return ok
+}
+
+// Like G but now the embedded interface is declared
+// at package level. This function is inlineable via
+// export data. The export data representation is like
+// for F.
+func H(x interface{}) bool {
+	_, ok := x.(interface {
+		t1
+	})
+	return ok
+}
+
+type t1 interface {
+	f()
+}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3