summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/debian/patches/BUG-MINOR-h1-do-not-accept-as-part-of-the-URI-compon.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-28 09:35:12 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-28 09:35:12 +0000
commit89057599f4791f03c1ee5de836fbe2b5ea434aa9 (patch)
tree09ef6df146509f94541c1afe9cbd78b7f75e81e7 /debian/patches/BUG-MINOR-h1-do-not-accept-as-part-of-the-URI-compon.patch
parentAdding upstream version 2.6.12. (diff)
downloadhaproxy-debian.tar.xz
haproxy-debian.zip
Adding debian version 2.6.12-1+deb12u1.debian/2.6.12-1+deb12u1debian
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--debian/patches/BUG-MINOR-h1-do-not-accept-as-part-of-the-URI-compon.patch118
1 files changed, 118 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/debian/patches/BUG-MINOR-h1-do-not-accept-as-part-of-the-URI-compon.patch b/debian/patches/BUG-MINOR-h1-do-not-accept-as-part-of-the-URI-compon.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..02d1e74
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/BUG-MINOR-h1-do-not-accept-as-part-of-the-URI-compon.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
+Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 16:17:22 +0200
+Subject: BUG/MINOR: h1: do not accept '#' as part of the URI component
+Origin: https://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy-2.6.git;a=commit;h=832b672eee54866c7a42a1d46078cc9ae0d544d9
+Bug-Debian-Security: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-45539
+
+Seth Manesse and Paul Plasil reported that the "path" sample fetch
+function incorrectly accepts '#' as part of the path component. This
+can in some cases lead to misrouted requests for rules that would apply
+on the suffix:
+
+ use_backend static if { path_end .png .jpg .gif .css .js }
+
+Note that this behavior can be selectively configured using
+"normalize-uri fragment-encode" and "normalize-uri fragment-strip".
+
+The problem is that while the RFC says that this '#' must never be
+emitted, as often it doesn't suggest how servers should handle it. A
+diminishing number of servers still do accept it and trim it silently,
+while others are rejecting it, as indicated in the conversation below
+with other implementers:
+
+ https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2023JulSep/0070.html
+
+Looking at logs from publicly exposed servers, such requests appear at
+a rate of roughly 1 per million and only come from attacks or poorly
+written web crawlers incorrectly following links found on various pages.
+
+Thus it looks like the best solution to this problem is to simply reject
+such ambiguous requests by default, and include this in the list of
+controls that can be disabled using "option accept-invalid-http-request".
+
+We're already rejecting URIs containing any control char anyway, so we
+should also reject '#'.
+
+In the H1 parser for the H1_MSG_RQURI state, there is an accelerated
+parser for bytes 0x21..0x7e that has been tightened to 0x24..0x7e (it
+should not impact perf since 0x21..0x23 are not supposed to appear in
+a URI anyway). This way '#' falls through the fine-grained filter and
+we can add the special case for it also conditionned by a check on the
+proxy's option "accept-invalid-http-request", with no overhead for the
+vast majority of valid URIs. Here this information is available through
+h1m->err_pos that's set to -2 when the option is here (so we don't need
+to change the API to expose the proxy). Example with a trivial GET
+through netcat:
+
+ [08/Aug/2023:16:16:52.651] frontend layer1 (#2): invalid request
+ backend <NONE> (#-1), server <NONE> (#-1), event #0, src 127.0.0.1:50812
+ buffer starts at 0 (including 0 out), 16361 free,
+ len 23, wraps at 16336, error at position 7
+ H1 connection flags 0x00000000, H1 stream flags 0x00000810
+ H1 msg state MSG_RQURI(4), H1 msg flags 0x00001400
+ H1 chunk len 0 bytes, H1 body len 0 bytes :
+
+ 00000 GET /aa#bb HTTP/1.0\r\n
+ 00021 \r\n
+
+This should be progressively backported to all stable versions along with
+the following patch:
+
+ REGTESTS: http-rules: add accept-invalid-http-request for normalize-uri tests
+
+Similar fixes for h2 and h3 will come in followup patches.
+
+Thanks to Seth Manesse and Paul Plasil for reporting this problem with
+detailed explanations.
+
+(cherry picked from commit 2eab6d354322932cfec2ed54de261e4347eca9a6)
+Signed-off-by: Amaury Denoyelle <adenoyelle@haproxy.com>
+(cherry picked from commit 9bf75c8e22a8f2537f27c557854a8803087046d0)
+Signed-off-by: Amaury Denoyelle <adenoyelle@haproxy.com>
+(cherry picked from commit 9facd01c9ac85fe9bcb331594b80fa08e7406552)
+Signed-off-by: Amaury Denoyelle <adenoyelle@haproxy.com>
+---
+ src/h1.c | 15 +++++++++++----
+ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/src/h1.c b/src/h1.c
+index 126f23cc7376..92ec96bfe19e 100644
+--- a/src/h1.c
++++ b/src/h1.c
+@@ -565,13 +565,13 @@ int h1_headers_to_hdr_list(char *start, const char *stop,
+ case H1_MSG_RQURI:
+ http_msg_rquri:
+ #ifdef HA_UNALIGNED_LE
+- /* speedup: skip bytes not between 0x21 and 0x7e inclusive */
++ /* speedup: skip bytes not between 0x24 and 0x7e inclusive */
+ while (ptr <= end - sizeof(int)) {
+- int x = *(int *)ptr - 0x21212121;
++ int x = *(int *)ptr - 0x24242424;
+ if (x & 0x80808080)
+ break;
+
+- x -= 0x5e5e5e5e;
++ x -= 0x5b5b5b5b;
+ if (!(x & 0x80808080))
+ break;
+
+@@ -583,8 +583,15 @@ int h1_headers_to_hdr_list(char *start, const char *stop,
+ goto http_msg_ood;
+ }
+ http_msg_rquri2:
+- if (likely((unsigned char)(*ptr - 33) <= 93)) /* 33 to 126 included */
++ if (likely((unsigned char)(*ptr - 33) <= 93)) { /* 33 to 126 included */
++ if (*ptr == '#') {
++ if (h1m->err_pos < -1) /* PR_O2_REQBUG_OK not set */
++ goto invalid_char;
++ if (h1m->err_pos == -1) /* PR_O2_REQBUG_OK set: just log */
++ h1m->err_pos = ptr - start + skip;
++ }
+ EAT_AND_JUMP_OR_RETURN(ptr, end, http_msg_rquri2, http_msg_ood, state, H1_MSG_RQURI);
++ }
+
+ if (likely(HTTP_IS_SPHT(*ptr))) {
+ sl.rq.u.len = ptr - sl.rq.u.ptr;
+--
+2.43.0
+