diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/admin-guide/mm/userfaultfd.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/admin-guide/mm/userfaultfd.rst | 354 |
1 files changed, 354 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/userfaultfd.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/userfaultfd.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..83f31919e --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/userfaultfd.rst @@ -0,0 +1,354 @@ +.. _userfaultfd: + +=========== +Userfaultfd +=========== + +Objective +========= + +Userfaults allow the implementation of on-demand paging from userland +and more generally they allow userland to take control of various +memory page faults, something otherwise only the kernel code could do. + +For example userfaults allows a proper and more optimal implementation +of the ``PROT_NONE+SIGSEGV`` trick. + +Design +====== + +Userspace creates a new userfaultfd, initializes it, and registers one or more +regions of virtual memory with it. Then, any page faults which occur within the +region(s) result in a message being delivered to the userfaultfd, notifying +userspace of the fault. + +The ``userfaultfd`` (aside from registering and unregistering virtual +memory ranges) provides two primary functionalities: + +1) ``read/POLLIN`` protocol to notify a userland thread of the faults + happening + +2) various ``UFFDIO_*`` ioctls that can manage the virtual memory regions + registered in the ``userfaultfd`` that allows userland to efficiently + resolve the userfaults it receives via 1) or to manage the virtual + memory in the background + +The real advantage of userfaults if compared to regular virtual memory +management of mremap/mprotect is that the userfaults in all their +operations never involve heavyweight structures like vmas (in fact the +``userfaultfd`` runtime load never takes the mmap_lock for writing). +Vmas are not suitable for page- (or hugepage) granular fault tracking +when dealing with virtual address spaces that could span +Terabytes. Too many vmas would be needed for that. + +The ``userfaultfd``, once created, can also be +passed using unix domain sockets to a manager process, so the same +manager process could handle the userfaults of a multitude of +different processes without them being aware about what is going on +(well of course unless they later try to use the ``userfaultfd`` +themselves on the same region the manager is already tracking, which +is a corner case that would currently return ``-EBUSY``). + +API +=== + +Creating a userfaultfd +---------------------- + +There are two ways to create a new userfaultfd, each of which provide ways to +restrict access to this functionality (since historically userfaultfds which +handle kernel page faults have been a useful tool for exploiting the kernel). + +The first way, supported since userfaultfd was introduced, is the +userfaultfd(2) syscall. Access to this is controlled in several ways: + +- Any user can always create a userfaultfd which traps userspace page faults + only. Such a userfaultfd can be created using the userfaultfd(2) syscall + with the flag UFFD_USER_MODE_ONLY. + +- In order to also trap kernel page faults for the address space, either the + process needs the CAP_SYS_PTRACE capability, or the system must have + vm.unprivileged_userfaultfd set to 1. By default, vm.unprivileged_userfaultfd + is set to 0. + +The second way, added to the kernel more recently, is by opening +/dev/userfaultfd and issuing a USERFAULTFD_IOC_NEW ioctl to it. This method +yields equivalent userfaultfds to the userfaultfd(2) syscall. + +Unlike userfaultfd(2), access to /dev/userfaultfd is controlled via normal +filesystem permissions (user/group/mode), which gives fine grained access to +userfaultfd specifically, without also granting other unrelated privileges at +the same time (as e.g. granting CAP_SYS_PTRACE would do). Users who have access +to /dev/userfaultfd can always create userfaultfds that trap kernel page faults; +vm.unprivileged_userfaultfd is not considered. + +Initializing a userfaultfd +-------------------------- + +When first opened the ``userfaultfd`` must be enabled invoking the +``UFFDIO_API`` ioctl specifying a ``uffdio_api.api`` value set to ``UFFD_API`` (or +a later API version) which will specify the ``read/POLLIN`` protocol +userland intends to speak on the ``UFFD`` and the ``uffdio_api.features`` +userland requires. The ``UFFDIO_API`` ioctl if successful (i.e. if the +requested ``uffdio_api.api`` is spoken also by the running kernel and the +requested features are going to be enabled) will return into +``uffdio_api.features`` and ``uffdio_api.ioctls`` two 64bit bitmasks of +respectively all the available features of the read(2) protocol and +the generic ioctl available. + +The ``uffdio_api.features`` bitmask returned by the ``UFFDIO_API`` ioctl +defines what memory types are supported by the ``userfaultfd`` and what +events, except page fault notifications, may be generated: + +- The ``UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_*`` flags indicate that various other events + other than page faults are supported. These events are described in more + detail below in the `Non-cooperative userfaultfd`_ section. + +- ``UFFD_FEATURE_MISSING_HUGETLBFS`` and ``UFFD_FEATURE_MISSING_SHMEM`` + indicate that the kernel supports ``UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING`` + registrations for hugetlbfs and shared memory (covering all shmem APIs, + i.e. tmpfs, ``IPCSHM``, ``/dev/zero``, ``MAP_SHARED``, ``memfd_create``, + etc) virtual memory areas, respectively. + +- ``UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_HUGETLBFS`` indicates that the kernel supports + ``UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MINOR`` registration for hugetlbfs virtual memory + areas. ``UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_SHMEM`` is the analogous feature indicating + support for shmem virtual memory areas. + +The userland application should set the feature flags it intends to use +when invoking the ``UFFDIO_API`` ioctl, to request that those features be +enabled if supported. + +Once the ``userfaultfd`` API has been enabled the ``UFFDIO_REGISTER`` +ioctl should be invoked (if present in the returned ``uffdio_api.ioctls`` +bitmask) to register a memory range in the ``userfaultfd`` by setting the +uffdio_register structure accordingly. The ``uffdio_register.mode`` +bitmask will specify to the kernel which kind of faults to track for +the range. The ``UFFDIO_REGISTER`` ioctl will return the +``uffdio_register.ioctls`` bitmask of ioctls that are suitable to resolve +userfaults on the range registered. Not all ioctls will necessarily be +supported for all memory types (e.g. anonymous memory vs. shmem vs. +hugetlbfs), or all types of intercepted faults. + +Userland can use the ``uffdio_register.ioctls`` to manage the virtual +address space in the background (to add or potentially also remove +memory from the ``userfaultfd`` registered range). This means a userfault +could be triggering just before userland maps in the background the +user-faulted page. + +Resolving Userfaults +-------------------- + +There are three basic ways to resolve userfaults: + +- ``UFFDIO_COPY`` atomically copies some existing page contents from + userspace. + +- ``UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE`` atomically zeros the new page. + +- ``UFFDIO_CONTINUE`` maps an existing, previously-populated page. + +These operations are atomic in the sense that they guarantee nothing can +see a half-populated page, since readers will keep userfaulting until the +operation has finished. + +By default, these wake up userfaults blocked on the range in question. +They support a ``UFFDIO_*_MODE_DONTWAKE`` ``mode`` flag, which indicates +that waking will be done separately at some later time. + +Which ioctl to choose depends on the kind of page fault, and what we'd +like to do to resolve it: + +- For ``UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING`` faults, the fault needs to be + resolved by either providing a new page (``UFFDIO_COPY``), or mapping + the zero page (``UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE``). By default, the kernel would map + the zero page for a missing fault. With userfaultfd, userspace can + decide what content to provide before the faulting thread continues. + +- For ``UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MINOR`` faults, there is an existing page (in + the page cache). Userspace has the option of modifying the page's + contents before resolving the fault. Once the contents are correct + (modified or not), userspace asks the kernel to map the page and let the + faulting thread continue with ``UFFDIO_CONTINUE``. + +Notes: + +- You can tell which kind of fault occurred by examining + ``pagefault.flags`` within the ``uffd_msg``, checking for the + ``UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_*`` flags. + +- None of the page-delivering ioctls default to the range that you + registered with. You must fill in all fields for the appropriate + ioctl struct including the range. + +- You get the address of the access that triggered the missing page + event out of a struct uffd_msg that you read in the thread from the + uffd. You can supply as many pages as you want with these IOCTLs. + Keep in mind that unless you used DONTWAKE then the first of any of + those IOCTLs wakes up the faulting thread. + +- Be sure to test for all errors including + (``pollfd[0].revents & POLLERR``). This can happen, e.g. when ranges + supplied were incorrect. + +Write Protect Notifications +--------------------------- + +This is equivalent to (but faster than) using mprotect and a SIGSEGV +signal handler. + +Firstly you need to register a range with ``UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP``. +Instead of using mprotect(2) you use +``ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT, struct *uffdio_writeprotect)`` +while ``mode = UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT_MODE_WP`` +in the struct passed in. The range does not default to and does not +have to be identical to the range you registered with. You can write +protect as many ranges as you like (inside the registered range). +Then, in the thread reading from uffd the struct will have +``msg.arg.pagefault.flags & UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WP`` set. Now you send +``ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT, struct *uffdio_writeprotect)`` +again while ``pagefault.mode`` does not have ``UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT_MODE_WP`` +set. This wakes up the thread which will continue to run with writes. This +allows you to do the bookkeeping about the write in the uffd reading +thread before the ioctl. + +If you registered with both ``UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING`` and +``UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP`` then you need to think about the sequence in +which you supply a page and undo write protect. Note that there is a +difference between writes into a WP area and into a !WP area. The +former will have ``UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WP`` set, the latter +``UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WRITE``. The latter did not fail on protection but +you still need to supply a page when ``UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING`` was +used. + +QEMU/KVM +======== + +QEMU/KVM is using the ``userfaultfd`` syscall to implement postcopy live +migration. Postcopy live migration is one form of memory +externalization consisting of a virtual machine running with part or +all of its memory residing on a different node in the cloud. The +``userfaultfd`` abstraction is generic enough that not a single line of +KVM kernel code had to be modified in order to add postcopy live +migration to QEMU. + +Guest async page faults, ``FOLL_NOWAIT`` and all other ``GUP*`` features work +just fine in combination with userfaults. Userfaults trigger async +page faults in the guest scheduler so those guest processes that +aren't waiting for userfaults (i.e. network bound) can keep running in +the guest vcpus. + +It is generally beneficial to run one pass of precopy live migration +just before starting postcopy live migration, in order to avoid +generating userfaults for readonly guest regions. + +The implementation of postcopy live migration currently uses one +single bidirectional socket but in the future two different sockets +will be used (to reduce the latency of the userfaults to the minimum +possible without having to decrease ``/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem``). + +The QEMU in the source node writes all pages that it knows are missing +in the destination node, into the socket, and the migration thread of +the QEMU running in the destination node runs ``UFFDIO_COPY|ZEROPAGE`` +ioctls on the ``userfaultfd`` in order to map the received pages into the +guest (``UFFDIO_ZEROCOPY`` is used if the source page was a zero page). + +A different postcopy thread in the destination node listens with +poll() to the ``userfaultfd`` in parallel. When a ``POLLIN`` event is +generated after a userfault triggers, the postcopy thread read() from +the ``userfaultfd`` and receives the fault address (or ``-EAGAIN`` in case the +userfault was already resolved and waken by a ``UFFDIO_COPY|ZEROPAGE`` run +by the parallel QEMU migration thread). + +After the QEMU postcopy thread (running in the destination node) gets +the userfault address it writes the information about the missing page +into the socket. The QEMU source node receives the information and +roughly "seeks" to that page address and continues sending all +remaining missing pages from that new page offset. Soon after that +(just the time to flush the tcp_wmem queue through the network) the +migration thread in the QEMU running in the destination node will +receive the page that triggered the userfault and it'll map it as +usual with the ``UFFDIO_COPY|ZEROPAGE`` (without actually knowing if it +was spontaneously sent by the source or if it was an urgent page +requested through a userfault). + +By the time the userfaults start, the QEMU in the destination node +doesn't need to keep any per-page state bitmap relative to the live +migration around and a single per-page bitmap has to be maintained in +the QEMU running in the source node to know which pages are still +missing in the destination node. The bitmap in the source node is +checked to find which missing pages to send in round robin and we seek +over it when receiving incoming userfaults. After sending each page of +course the bitmap is updated accordingly. It's also useful to avoid +sending the same page twice (in case the userfault is read by the +postcopy thread just before ``UFFDIO_COPY|ZEROPAGE`` runs in the migration +thread). + +Non-cooperative userfaultfd +=========================== + +When the ``userfaultfd`` is monitored by an external manager, the manager +must be able to track changes in the process virtual memory +layout. Userfaultfd can notify the manager about such changes using +the same read(2) protocol as for the page fault notifications. The +manager has to explicitly enable these events by setting appropriate +bits in ``uffdio_api.features`` passed to ``UFFDIO_API`` ioctl: + +``UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK`` + enable ``userfaultfd`` hooks for fork(). When this feature is + enabled, the ``userfaultfd`` context of the parent process is + duplicated into the newly created process. The manager + receives ``UFFD_EVENT_FORK`` with file descriptor of the new + ``userfaultfd`` context in the ``uffd_msg.fork``. + +``UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMAP`` + enable notifications about mremap() calls. When the + non-cooperative process moves a virtual memory area to a + different location, the manager will receive + ``UFFD_EVENT_REMAP``. The ``uffd_msg.remap`` will contain the old and + new addresses of the area and its original length. + +``UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMOVE`` + enable notifications about madvise(MADV_REMOVE) and + madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) calls. The event ``UFFD_EVENT_REMOVE`` will + be generated upon these calls to madvise(). The ``uffd_msg.remove`` + will contain start and end addresses of the removed area. + +``UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_UNMAP`` + enable notifications about memory unmapping. The manager will + get ``UFFD_EVENT_UNMAP`` with ``uffd_msg.remove`` containing start and + end addresses of the unmapped area. + +Although the ``UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMOVE`` and ``UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_UNMAP`` +are pretty similar, they quite differ in the action expected from the +``userfaultfd`` manager. In the former case, the virtual memory is +removed, but the area is not, the area remains monitored by the +``userfaultfd``, and if a page fault occurs in that area it will be +delivered to the manager. The proper resolution for such page fault is +to zeromap the faulting address. However, in the latter case, when an +area is unmapped, either explicitly (with munmap() system call), or +implicitly (e.g. during mremap()), the area is removed and in turn the +``userfaultfd`` context for such area disappears too and the manager will +not get further userland page faults from the removed area. Still, the +notification is required in order to prevent manager from using +``UFFDIO_COPY`` on the unmapped area. + +Unlike userland page faults which have to be synchronous and require +explicit or implicit wakeup, all the events are delivered +asynchronously and the non-cooperative process resumes execution as +soon as manager executes read(). The ``userfaultfd`` manager should +carefully synchronize calls to ``UFFDIO_COPY`` with the events +processing. To aid the synchronization, the ``UFFDIO_COPY`` ioctl will +return ``-ENOSPC`` when the monitored process exits at the time of +``UFFDIO_COPY``, and ``-ENOENT``, when the non-cooperative process has changed +its virtual memory layout simultaneously with outstanding ``UFFDIO_COPY`` +operation. + +The current asynchronous model of the event delivery is optimal for +single threaded non-cooperative ``userfaultfd`` manager implementations. A +synchronous event delivery model can be added later as a new +``userfaultfd`` feature to facilitate multithreading enhancements of the +non cooperative manager, for example to allow ``UFFDIO_COPY`` ioctls to +run in parallel to the event reception. Single threaded +implementations should continue to use the current async event +delivery model instead. |