diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/admin-guide/pm/suspend-flows.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/admin-guide/pm/suspend-flows.rst | 270 |
1 files changed, 270 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/suspend-flows.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/suspend-flows.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c479d7462 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/suspend-flows.rst @@ -0,0 +1,270 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +.. include:: <isonum.txt> + +========================= +System Suspend Code Flows +========================= + +:Copyright: |copy| 2020 Intel Corporation + +:Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> + +At least one global system-wide transition needs to be carried out for the +system to get from the working state into one of the supported +:doc:`sleep states <sleep-states>`. Hibernation requires more than one +transition to occur for this purpose, but the other sleep states, commonly +referred to as *system-wide suspend* (or simply *system suspend*) states, need +only one. + +For those sleep states, the transition from the working state of the system into +the target sleep state is referred to as *system suspend* too (in the majority +of cases, whether this means a transition or a sleep state of the system should +be clear from the context) and the transition back from the sleep state into the +working state is referred to as *system resume*. + +The kernel code flows associated with the suspend and resume transitions for +different sleep states of the system are quite similar, but there are some +significant differences between the :ref:`suspend-to-idle <s2idle>` code flows +and the code flows related to the :ref:`suspend-to-RAM <s2ram>` and +:ref:`standby <standby>` sleep states. + +The :ref:`suspend-to-RAM <s2ram>` and :ref:`standby <standby>` sleep states +cannot be implemented without platform support and the difference between them +boils down to the platform-specific actions carried out by the suspend and +resume hooks that need to be provided by the platform driver to make them +available. Apart from that, the suspend and resume code flows for these sleep +states are mostly identical, so they both together will be referred to as +*platform-dependent suspend* states in what follows. + + +.. _s2idle_suspend: + +Suspend-to-idle Suspend Code Flow +================================= + +The following steps are taken in order to transition the system from the working +state to the :ref:`suspend-to-idle <s2idle>` sleep state: + + 1. Invoking system-wide suspend notifiers. + + Kernel subsystems can register callbacks to be invoked when the suspend + transition is about to occur and when the resume transition has finished. + + That allows them to prepare for the change of the system state and to clean + up after getting back to the working state. + + 2. Freezing tasks. + + Tasks are frozen primarily in order to avoid unchecked hardware accesses + from user space through MMIO regions or I/O registers exposed directly to + it and to prevent user space from entering the kernel while the next step + of the transition is in progress (which might have been problematic for + various reasons). + + All user space tasks are intercepted as though they were sent a signal and + put into uninterruptible sleep until the end of the subsequent system resume + transition. + + The kernel threads that choose to be frozen during system suspend for + specific reasons are frozen subsequently, but they are not intercepted. + Instead, they are expected to periodically check whether or not they need + to be frozen and to put themselves into uninterruptible sleep if so. [Note, + however, that kernel threads can use locking and other concurrency controls + available in kernel space to synchronize themselves with system suspend and + resume, which can be much more precise than the freezing, so the latter is + not a recommended option for kernel threads.] + + 3. Suspending devices and reconfiguring IRQs. + + Devices are suspended in four phases called *prepare*, *suspend*, + *late suspend* and *noirq suspend* (see :ref:`driverapi_pm_devices` for more + information on what exactly happens in each phase). + + Every device is visited in each phase, but typically it is not physically + accessed in more than two of them. + + The runtime PM API is disabled for every device during the *late* suspend + phase and high-level ("action") interrupt handlers are prevented from being + invoked before the *noirq* suspend phase. + + Interrupts are still handled after that, but they are only acknowledged to + interrupt controllers without performing any device-specific actions that + would be triggered in the working state of the system (those actions are + deferred till the subsequent system resume transition as described + `below <s2idle_resume_>`_). + + IRQs associated with system wakeup devices are "armed" so that the resume + transition of the system is started when one of them signals an event. + + 4. Freezing the scheduler tick and suspending timekeeping. + + When all devices have been suspended, CPUs enter the idle loop and are put + into the deepest available idle state. While doing that, each of them + "freezes" its own scheduler tick so that the timer events associated with + the tick do not occur until the CPU is woken up by another interrupt source. + + The last CPU to enter the idle state also stops the timekeeping which + (among other things) prevents high resolution timers from triggering going + forward until the first CPU that is woken up restarts the timekeeping. + That allows the CPUs to stay in the deep idle state relatively long in one + go. + + From this point on, the CPUs can only be woken up by non-timer hardware + interrupts. If that happens, they go back to the idle state unless the + interrupt that woke up one of them comes from an IRQ that has been armed for + system wakeup, in which case the system resume transition is started. + + +.. _s2idle_resume: + +Suspend-to-idle Resume Code Flow +================================ + +The following steps are taken in order to transition the system from the +:ref:`suspend-to-idle <s2idle>` sleep state into the working state: + + 1. Resuming timekeeping and unfreezing the scheduler tick. + + When one of the CPUs is woken up (by a non-timer hardware interrupt), it + leaves the idle state entered in the last step of the preceding suspend + transition, restarts the timekeeping (unless it has been restarted already + by another CPU that woke up earlier) and the scheduler tick on that CPU is + unfrozen. + + If the interrupt that has woken up the CPU was armed for system wakeup, + the system resume transition begins. + + 2. Resuming devices and restoring the working-state configuration of IRQs. + + Devices are resumed in four phases called *noirq resume*, *early resume*, + *resume* and *complete* (see :ref:`driverapi_pm_devices` for more + information on what exactly happens in each phase). + + Every device is visited in each phase, but typically it is not physically + accessed in more than two of them. + + The working-state configuration of IRQs is restored after the *noirq* resume + phase and the runtime PM API is re-enabled for every device whose driver + supports it during the *early* resume phase. + + 3. Thawing tasks. + + Tasks frozen in step 2 of the preceding `suspend <s2idle_suspend_>`_ + transition are "thawed", which means that they are woken up from the + uninterruptible sleep that they went into at that time and user space tasks + are allowed to exit the kernel. + + 4. Invoking system-wide resume notifiers. + + This is analogous to step 1 of the `suspend <s2idle_suspend_>`_ transition + and the same set of callbacks is invoked at this point, but a different + "notification type" parameter value is passed to them. + + +Platform-dependent Suspend Code Flow +==================================== + +The following steps are taken in order to transition the system from the working +state to platform-dependent suspend state: + + 1. Invoking system-wide suspend notifiers. + + This step is the same as step 1 of the suspend-to-idle suspend transition + described `above <s2idle_suspend_>`_. + + 2. Freezing tasks. + + This step is the same as step 2 of the suspend-to-idle suspend transition + described `above <s2idle_suspend_>`_. + + 3. Suspending devices and reconfiguring IRQs. + + This step is analogous to step 3 of the suspend-to-idle suspend transition + described `above <s2idle_suspend_>`_, but the arming of IRQs for system + wakeup generally does not have any effect on the platform. + + There are platforms that can go into a very deep low-power state internally + when all CPUs in them are in sufficiently deep idle states and all I/O + devices have been put into low-power states. On those platforms, + suspend-to-idle can reduce system power very effectively. + + On the other platforms, however, low-level components (like interrupt + controllers) need to be turned off in a platform-specific way (implemented + in the hooks provided by the platform driver) to achieve comparable power + reduction. + + That usually prevents in-band hardware interrupts from waking up the system, + which must be done in a special platform-dependent way. Then, the + configuration of system wakeup sources usually starts when system wakeup + devices are suspended and is finalized by the platform suspend hooks later + on. + + 4. Disabling non-boot CPUs. + + On some platforms the suspend hooks mentioned above must run in a one-CPU + configuration of the system (in particular, the hardware cannot be accessed + by any code running in parallel with the platform suspend hooks that may, + and often do, trap into the platform firmware in order to finalize the + suspend transition). + + For this reason, the CPU offline/online (CPU hotplug) framework is used + to take all of the CPUs in the system, except for one (the boot CPU), + offline (typically, the CPUs that have been taken offline go into deep idle + states). + + This means that all tasks are migrated away from those CPUs and all IRQs are + rerouted to the only CPU that remains online. + + 5. Suspending core system components. + + This prepares the core system components for (possibly) losing power going + forward and suspends the timekeeping. + + 6. Platform-specific power removal. + + This is expected to remove power from all of the system components except + for the memory controller and RAM (in order to preserve the contents of the + latter) and some devices designated for system wakeup. + + In many cases control is passed to the platform firmware which is expected + to finalize the suspend transition as needed. + + +Platform-dependent Resume Code Flow +=================================== + +The following steps are taken in order to transition the system from a +platform-dependent suspend state into the working state: + + 1. Platform-specific system wakeup. + + The platform is woken up by a signal from one of the designated system + wakeup devices (which need not be an in-band hardware interrupt) and + control is passed back to the kernel (the working configuration of the + platform may need to be restored by the platform firmware before the + kernel gets control again). + + 2. Resuming core system components. + + The suspend-time configuration of the core system components is restored and + the timekeeping is resumed. + + 3. Re-enabling non-boot CPUs. + + The CPUs disabled in step 4 of the preceding suspend transition are taken + back online and their suspend-time configuration is restored. + + 4. Resuming devices and restoring the working-state configuration of IRQs. + + This step is the same as step 2 of the suspend-to-idle suspend transition + described `above <s2idle_resume_>`_. + + 5. Thawing tasks. + + This step is the same as step 3 of the suspend-to-idle suspend transition + described `above <s2idle_resume_>`_. + + 6. Invoking system-wide resume notifiers. + + This step is the same as step 4 of the suspend-to-idle suspend transition + described `above <s2idle_resume_>`_. |