diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/futex/pi.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/futex/pi.c | 1233 |
1 files changed, 1233 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/futex/pi.c b/kernel/futex/pi.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ce2889f12 --- /dev/null +++ b/kernel/futex/pi.c @@ -0,0 +1,1233 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later + +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/sched/task.h> + +#include "futex.h" +#include "../locking/rtmutex_common.h" + +/* + * PI code: + */ +int refill_pi_state_cache(void) +{ + struct futex_pi_state *pi_state; + + if (likely(current->pi_state_cache)) + return 0; + + pi_state = kzalloc(sizeof(*pi_state), GFP_KERNEL); + + if (!pi_state) + return -ENOMEM; + + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pi_state->list); + /* pi_mutex gets initialized later */ + pi_state->owner = NULL; + refcount_set(&pi_state->refcount, 1); + pi_state->key = FUTEX_KEY_INIT; + + current->pi_state_cache = pi_state; + + return 0; +} + +static struct futex_pi_state *alloc_pi_state(void) +{ + struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = current->pi_state_cache; + + WARN_ON(!pi_state); + current->pi_state_cache = NULL; + + return pi_state; +} + +static void pi_state_update_owner(struct futex_pi_state *pi_state, + struct task_struct *new_owner) +{ + struct task_struct *old_owner = pi_state->owner; + + lockdep_assert_held(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); + + if (old_owner) { + raw_spin_lock(&old_owner->pi_lock); + WARN_ON(list_empty(&pi_state->list)); + list_del_init(&pi_state->list); + raw_spin_unlock(&old_owner->pi_lock); + } + + if (new_owner) { + raw_spin_lock(&new_owner->pi_lock); + WARN_ON(!list_empty(&pi_state->list)); + list_add(&pi_state->list, &new_owner->pi_state_list); + pi_state->owner = new_owner; + raw_spin_unlock(&new_owner->pi_lock); + } +} + +void get_pi_state(struct futex_pi_state *pi_state) +{ + WARN_ON_ONCE(!refcount_inc_not_zero(&pi_state->refcount)); +} + +/* + * Drops a reference to the pi_state object and frees or caches it + * when the last reference is gone. + */ +void put_pi_state(struct futex_pi_state *pi_state) +{ + if (!pi_state) + return; + + if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&pi_state->refcount)) + return; + + /* + * If pi_state->owner is NULL, the owner is most probably dying + * and has cleaned up the pi_state already + */ + if (pi_state->owner) { + unsigned long flags; + + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock, flags); + pi_state_update_owner(pi_state, NULL); + rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock, flags); + } + + if (current->pi_state_cache) { + kfree(pi_state); + } else { + /* + * pi_state->list is already empty. + * clear pi_state->owner. + * refcount is at 0 - put it back to 1. + */ + pi_state->owner = NULL; + refcount_set(&pi_state->refcount, 1); + current->pi_state_cache = pi_state; + } +} + +/* + * We need to check the following states: + * + * Waiter | pi_state | pi->owner | uTID | uODIED | ? + * + * [1] NULL | --- | --- | 0 | 0/1 | Valid + * [2] NULL | --- | --- | >0 | 0/1 | Valid + * + * [3] Found | NULL | -- | Any | 0/1 | Invalid + * + * [4] Found | Found | NULL | 0 | 1 | Valid + * [5] Found | Found | NULL | >0 | 1 | Invalid + * + * [6] Found | Found | task | 0 | 1 | Valid + * + * [7] Found | Found | NULL | Any | 0 | Invalid + * + * [8] Found | Found | task | ==taskTID | 0/1 | Valid + * [9] Found | Found | task | 0 | 0 | Invalid + * [10] Found | Found | task | !=taskTID | 0/1 | Invalid + * + * [1] Indicates that the kernel can acquire the futex atomically. We + * came here due to a stale FUTEX_WAITERS/FUTEX_OWNER_DIED bit. + * + * [2] Valid, if TID does not belong to a kernel thread. If no matching + * thread is found then it indicates that the owner TID has died. + * + * [3] Invalid. The waiter is queued on a non PI futex + * + * [4] Valid state after exit_robust_list(), which sets the user space + * value to FUTEX_WAITERS | FUTEX_OWNER_DIED. + * + * [5] The user space value got manipulated between exit_robust_list() + * and exit_pi_state_list() + * + * [6] Valid state after exit_pi_state_list() which sets the new owner in + * the pi_state but cannot access the user space value. + * + * [7] pi_state->owner can only be NULL when the OWNER_DIED bit is set. + * + * [8] Owner and user space value match + * + * [9] There is no transient state which sets the user space TID to 0 + * except exit_robust_list(), but this is indicated by the + * FUTEX_OWNER_DIED bit. See [4] + * + * [10] There is no transient state which leaves owner and user space + * TID out of sync. Except one error case where the kernel is denied + * write access to the user address, see fixup_pi_state_owner(). + * + * + * Serialization and lifetime rules: + * + * hb->lock: + * + * hb -> futex_q, relation + * futex_q -> pi_state, relation + * + * (cannot be raw because hb can contain arbitrary amount + * of futex_q's) + * + * pi_mutex->wait_lock: + * + * {uval, pi_state} + * + * (and pi_mutex 'obviously') + * + * p->pi_lock: + * + * p->pi_state_list -> pi_state->list, relation + * pi_mutex->owner -> pi_state->owner, relation + * + * pi_state->refcount: + * + * pi_state lifetime + * + * + * Lock order: + * + * hb->lock + * pi_mutex->wait_lock + * p->pi_lock + * + */ + +/* + * Validate that the existing waiter has a pi_state and sanity check + * the pi_state against the user space value. If correct, attach to + * it. + */ +static int attach_to_pi_state(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, + struct futex_pi_state *pi_state, + struct futex_pi_state **ps) +{ + pid_t pid = uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK; + u32 uval2; + int ret; + + /* + * Userspace might have messed up non-PI and PI futexes [3] + */ + if (unlikely(!pi_state)) + return -EINVAL; + + /* + * We get here with hb->lock held, and having found a + * futex_top_waiter(). This means that futex_lock_pi() of said futex_q + * has dropped the hb->lock in between futex_queue() and futex_unqueue_pi(), + * which in turn means that futex_lock_pi() still has a reference on + * our pi_state. + * + * The waiter holding a reference on @pi_state also protects against + * the unlocked put_pi_state() in futex_unlock_pi(), futex_lock_pi() + * and futex_wait_requeue_pi() as it cannot go to 0 and consequently + * free pi_state before we can take a reference ourselves. + */ + WARN_ON(!refcount_read(&pi_state->refcount)); + + /* + * Now that we have a pi_state, we can acquire wait_lock + * and do the state validation. + */ + raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); + + /* + * Since {uval, pi_state} is serialized by wait_lock, and our current + * uval was read without holding it, it can have changed. Verify it + * still is what we expect it to be, otherwise retry the entire + * operation. + */ + if (futex_get_value_locked(&uval2, uaddr)) + goto out_efault; + + if (uval != uval2) + goto out_eagain; + + /* + * Handle the owner died case: + */ + if (uval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED) { + /* + * exit_pi_state_list sets owner to NULL and wakes the + * topmost waiter. The task which acquires the + * pi_state->rt_mutex will fixup owner. + */ + if (!pi_state->owner) { + /* + * No pi state owner, but the user space TID + * is not 0. Inconsistent state. [5] + */ + if (pid) + goto out_einval; + /* + * Take a ref on the state and return success. [4] + */ + goto out_attach; + } + + /* + * If TID is 0, then either the dying owner has not + * yet executed exit_pi_state_list() or some waiter + * acquired the rtmutex in the pi state, but did not + * yet fixup the TID in user space. + * + * Take a ref on the state and return success. [6] + */ + if (!pid) + goto out_attach; + } else { + /* + * If the owner died bit is not set, then the pi_state + * must have an owner. [7] + */ + if (!pi_state->owner) + goto out_einval; + } + + /* + * Bail out if user space manipulated the futex value. If pi + * state exists then the owner TID must be the same as the + * user space TID. [9/10] + */ + if (pid != task_pid_vnr(pi_state->owner)) + goto out_einval; + +out_attach: + get_pi_state(pi_state); + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); + *ps = pi_state; + return 0; + +out_einval: + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out_error; + +out_eagain: + ret = -EAGAIN; + goto out_error; + +out_efault: + ret = -EFAULT; + goto out_error; + +out_error: + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); + return ret; +} + +static int handle_exit_race(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, + struct task_struct *tsk) +{ + u32 uval2; + + /* + * If the futex exit state is not yet FUTEX_STATE_DEAD, tell the + * caller that the alleged owner is busy. + */ + if (tsk && tsk->futex_state != FUTEX_STATE_DEAD) + return -EBUSY; + + /* + * Reread the user space value to handle the following situation: + * + * CPU0 CPU1 + * + * sys_exit() sys_futex() + * do_exit() futex_lock_pi() + * futex_lock_pi_atomic() + * exit_signals(tsk) No waiters: + * tsk->flags |= PF_EXITING; *uaddr == 0x00000PID + * mm_release(tsk) Set waiter bit + * exit_robust_list(tsk) { *uaddr = 0x80000PID; + * Set owner died attach_to_pi_owner() { + * *uaddr = 0xC0000000; tsk = get_task(PID); + * } if (!tsk->flags & PF_EXITING) { + * ... attach(); + * tsk->futex_state = } else { + * FUTEX_STATE_DEAD; if (tsk->futex_state != + * FUTEX_STATE_DEAD) + * return -EAGAIN; + * return -ESRCH; <--- FAIL + * } + * + * Returning ESRCH unconditionally is wrong here because the + * user space value has been changed by the exiting task. + * + * The same logic applies to the case where the exiting task is + * already gone. + */ + if (futex_get_value_locked(&uval2, uaddr)) + return -EFAULT; + + /* If the user space value has changed, try again. */ + if (uval2 != uval) + return -EAGAIN; + + /* + * The exiting task did not have a robust list, the robust list was + * corrupted or the user space value in *uaddr is simply bogus. + * Give up and tell user space. + */ + return -ESRCH; +} + +static void __attach_to_pi_owner(struct task_struct *p, union futex_key *key, + struct futex_pi_state **ps) +{ + /* + * No existing pi state. First waiter. [2] + * + * This creates pi_state, we have hb->lock held, this means nothing can + * observe this state, wait_lock is irrelevant. + */ + struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = alloc_pi_state(); + + /* + * Initialize the pi_mutex in locked state and make @p + * the owner of it: + */ + rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(&pi_state->pi_mutex, p); + + /* Store the key for possible exit cleanups: */ + pi_state->key = *key; + + WARN_ON(!list_empty(&pi_state->list)); + list_add(&pi_state->list, &p->pi_state_list); + /* + * Assignment without holding pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock is safe + * because there is no concurrency as the object is not published yet. + */ + pi_state->owner = p; + + *ps = pi_state; +} +/* + * Lookup the task for the TID provided from user space and attach to + * it after doing proper sanity checks. + */ +static int attach_to_pi_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, union futex_key *key, + struct futex_pi_state **ps, + struct task_struct **exiting) +{ + pid_t pid = uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK; + struct task_struct *p; + + /* + * We are the first waiter - try to look up the real owner and attach + * the new pi_state to it, but bail out when TID = 0 [1] + * + * The !pid check is paranoid. None of the call sites should end up + * with pid == 0, but better safe than sorry. Let the caller retry + */ + if (!pid) + return -EAGAIN; + p = find_get_task_by_vpid(pid); + if (!p) + return handle_exit_race(uaddr, uval, NULL); + + if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) { + put_task_struct(p); + return -EPERM; + } + + /* + * We need to look at the task state to figure out, whether the + * task is exiting. To protect against the change of the task state + * in futex_exit_release(), we do this protected by p->pi_lock: + */ + raw_spin_lock_irq(&p->pi_lock); + if (unlikely(p->futex_state != FUTEX_STATE_OK)) { + /* + * The task is on the way out. When the futex state is + * FUTEX_STATE_DEAD, we know that the task has finished + * the cleanup: + */ + int ret = handle_exit_race(uaddr, uval, p); + + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock); + /* + * If the owner task is between FUTEX_STATE_EXITING and + * FUTEX_STATE_DEAD then store the task pointer and keep + * the reference on the task struct. The calling code will + * drop all locks, wait for the task to reach + * FUTEX_STATE_DEAD and then drop the refcount. This is + * required to prevent a live lock when the current task + * preempted the exiting task between the two states. + */ + if (ret == -EBUSY) + *exiting = p; + else + put_task_struct(p); + return ret; + } + + __attach_to_pi_owner(p, key, ps); + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock); + + put_task_struct(p); + + return 0; +} + +static int lock_pi_update_atomic(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, u32 newval) +{ + int err; + u32 curval; + + if (unlikely(should_fail_futex(true))) + return -EFAULT; + + err = futex_cmpxchg_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, newval); + if (unlikely(err)) + return err; + + /* If user space value changed, let the caller retry */ + return curval != uval ? -EAGAIN : 0; +} + +/** + * futex_lock_pi_atomic() - Atomic work required to acquire a pi aware futex + * @uaddr: the pi futex user address + * @hb: the pi futex hash bucket + * @key: the futex key associated with uaddr and hb + * @ps: the pi_state pointer where we store the result of the + * lookup + * @task: the task to perform the atomic lock work for. This will + * be "current" except in the case of requeue pi. + * @exiting: Pointer to store the task pointer of the owner task + * which is in the middle of exiting + * @set_waiters: force setting the FUTEX_WAITERS bit (1) or not (0) + * + * Return: + * - 0 - ready to wait; + * - 1 - acquired the lock; + * - <0 - error + * + * The hb->lock must be held by the caller. + * + * @exiting is only set when the return value is -EBUSY. If so, this holds + * a refcount on the exiting task on return and the caller needs to drop it + * after waiting for the exit to complete. + */ +int futex_lock_pi_atomic(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, + union futex_key *key, + struct futex_pi_state **ps, + struct task_struct *task, + struct task_struct **exiting, + int set_waiters) +{ + u32 uval, newval, vpid = task_pid_vnr(task); + struct futex_q *top_waiter; + int ret; + + /* + * Read the user space value first so we can validate a few + * things before proceeding further. + */ + if (futex_get_value_locked(&uval, uaddr)) + return -EFAULT; + + if (unlikely(should_fail_futex(true))) + return -EFAULT; + + /* + * Detect deadlocks. + */ + if ((unlikely((uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK) == vpid))) + return -EDEADLK; + + if ((unlikely(should_fail_futex(true)))) + return -EDEADLK; + + /* + * Lookup existing state first. If it exists, try to attach to + * its pi_state. + */ + top_waiter = futex_top_waiter(hb, key); + if (top_waiter) + return attach_to_pi_state(uaddr, uval, top_waiter->pi_state, ps); + + /* + * No waiter and user TID is 0. We are here because the + * waiters or the owner died bit is set or called from + * requeue_cmp_pi or for whatever reason something took the + * syscall. + */ + if (!(uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK)) { + /* + * We take over the futex. No other waiters and the user space + * TID is 0. We preserve the owner died bit. + */ + newval = uval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED; + newval |= vpid; + + /* The futex requeue_pi code can enforce the waiters bit */ + if (set_waiters) + newval |= FUTEX_WAITERS; + + ret = lock_pi_update_atomic(uaddr, uval, newval); + if (ret) + return ret; + + /* + * If the waiter bit was requested the caller also needs PI + * state attached to the new owner of the user space futex. + * + * @task is guaranteed to be alive and it cannot be exiting + * because it is either sleeping or waiting in + * futex_requeue_pi_wakeup_sync(). + * + * No need to do the full attach_to_pi_owner() exercise + * because @task is known and valid. + */ + if (set_waiters) { + raw_spin_lock_irq(&task->pi_lock); + __attach_to_pi_owner(task, key, ps); + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&task->pi_lock); + } + return 1; + } + + /* + * First waiter. Set the waiters bit before attaching ourself to + * the owner. If owner tries to unlock, it will be forced into + * the kernel and blocked on hb->lock. + */ + newval = uval | FUTEX_WAITERS; + ret = lock_pi_update_atomic(uaddr, uval, newval); + if (ret) + return ret; + /* + * If the update of the user space value succeeded, we try to + * attach to the owner. If that fails, no harm done, we only + * set the FUTEX_WAITERS bit in the user space variable. + */ + return attach_to_pi_owner(uaddr, newval, key, ps, exiting); +} + +/* + * Caller must hold a reference on @pi_state. + */ +static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_pi_state *pi_state) +{ + struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter; + struct task_struct *new_owner; + bool postunlock = false; + DEFINE_RT_WAKE_Q(wqh); + u32 curval, newval; + int ret = 0; + + top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(&pi_state->pi_mutex); + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!top_waiter)) { + /* + * As per the comment in futex_unlock_pi() this should not happen. + * + * When this happens, give up our locks and try again, giving + * the futex_lock_pi() instance time to complete, either by + * waiting on the rtmutex or removing itself from the futex + * queue. + */ + ret = -EAGAIN; + goto out_unlock; + } + + new_owner = top_waiter->task; + + /* + * We pass it to the next owner. The WAITERS bit is always kept + * enabled while there is PI state around. We cleanup the owner + * died bit, because we are the owner. + */ + newval = FUTEX_WAITERS | task_pid_vnr(new_owner); + + if (unlikely(should_fail_futex(true))) { + ret = -EFAULT; + goto out_unlock; + } + + ret = futex_cmpxchg_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, newval); + if (!ret && (curval != uval)) { + /* + * If a unconditional UNLOCK_PI operation (user space did not + * try the TID->0 transition) raced with a waiter setting the + * FUTEX_WAITERS flag between get_user() and locking the hash + * bucket lock, retry the operation. + */ + if ((FUTEX_TID_MASK & curval) == uval) + ret = -EAGAIN; + else + ret = -EINVAL; + } + + if (!ret) { + /* + * This is a point of no return; once we modified the uval + * there is no going back and subsequent operations must + * not fail. + */ + pi_state_update_owner(pi_state, new_owner); + postunlock = __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex, &wqh); + } + +out_unlock: + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); + + if (postunlock) + rt_mutex_postunlock(&wqh); + + return ret; +} + +static int __fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, + struct task_struct *argowner) +{ + struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = q->pi_state; + struct task_struct *oldowner, *newowner; + u32 uval, curval, newval, newtid; + int err = 0; + + oldowner = pi_state->owner; + + /* + * We are here because either: + * + * - we stole the lock and pi_state->owner needs updating to reflect + * that (@argowner == current), + * + * or: + * + * - someone stole our lock and we need to fix things to point to the + * new owner (@argowner == NULL). + * + * Either way, we have to replace the TID in the user space variable. + * This must be atomic as we have to preserve the owner died bit here. + * + * Note: We write the user space value _before_ changing the pi_state + * because we can fault here. Imagine swapped out pages or a fork + * that marked all the anonymous memory readonly for cow. + * + * Modifying pi_state _before_ the user space value would leave the + * pi_state in an inconsistent state when we fault here, because we + * need to drop the locks to handle the fault. This might be observed + * in the PID checks when attaching to PI state . + */ +retry: + if (!argowner) { + if (oldowner != current) { + /* + * We raced against a concurrent self; things are + * already fixed up. Nothing to do. + */ + return 0; + } + + if (__rt_mutex_futex_trylock(&pi_state->pi_mutex)) { + /* We got the lock. pi_state is correct. Tell caller. */ + return 1; + } + + /* + * The trylock just failed, so either there is an owner or + * there is a higher priority waiter than this one. + */ + newowner = rt_mutex_owner(&pi_state->pi_mutex); + /* + * If the higher priority waiter has not yet taken over the + * rtmutex then newowner is NULL. We can't return here with + * that state because it's inconsistent vs. the user space + * state. So drop the locks and try again. It's a valid + * situation and not any different from the other retry + * conditions. + */ + if (unlikely(!newowner)) { + err = -EAGAIN; + goto handle_err; + } + } else { + WARN_ON_ONCE(argowner != current); + if (oldowner == current) { + /* + * We raced against a concurrent self; things are + * already fixed up. Nothing to do. + */ + return 1; + } + newowner = argowner; + } + + newtid = task_pid_vnr(newowner) | FUTEX_WAITERS; + /* Owner died? */ + if (!pi_state->owner) + newtid |= FUTEX_OWNER_DIED; + + err = futex_get_value_locked(&uval, uaddr); + if (err) + goto handle_err; + + for (;;) { + newval = (uval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED) | newtid; + + err = futex_cmpxchg_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, newval); + if (err) + goto handle_err; + + if (curval == uval) + break; + uval = curval; + } + + /* + * We fixed up user space. Now we need to fix the pi_state + * itself. + */ + pi_state_update_owner(pi_state, newowner); + + return argowner == current; + + /* + * In order to reschedule or handle a page fault, we need to drop the + * locks here. In the case of a fault, this gives the other task + * (either the highest priority waiter itself or the task which stole + * the rtmutex) the chance to try the fixup of the pi_state. So once we + * are back from handling the fault we need to check the pi_state after + * reacquiring the locks and before trying to do another fixup. When + * the fixup has been done already we simply return. + * + * Note: we hold both hb->lock and pi_mutex->wait_lock. We can safely + * drop hb->lock since the caller owns the hb -> futex_q relation. + * Dropping the pi_mutex->wait_lock requires the state revalidate. + */ +handle_err: + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); + spin_unlock(q->lock_ptr); + + switch (err) { + case -EFAULT: + err = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr); + break; + + case -EAGAIN: + cond_resched(); + err = 0; + break; + + default: + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + break; + } + + spin_lock(q->lock_ptr); + raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); + + /* + * Check if someone else fixed it for us: + */ + if (pi_state->owner != oldowner) + return argowner == current; + + /* Retry if err was -EAGAIN or the fault in succeeded */ + if (!err) + goto retry; + + /* + * fault_in_user_writeable() failed so user state is immutable. At + * best we can make the kernel state consistent but user state will + * be most likely hosed and any subsequent unlock operation will be + * rejected due to PI futex rule [10]. + * + * Ensure that the rtmutex owner is also the pi_state owner despite + * the user space value claiming something different. There is no + * point in unlocking the rtmutex if current is the owner as it + * would need to wait until the next waiter has taken the rtmutex + * to guarantee consistent state. Keep it simple. Userspace asked + * for this wreckaged state. + * + * The rtmutex has an owner - either current or some other + * task. See the EAGAIN loop above. + */ + pi_state_update_owner(pi_state, rt_mutex_owner(&pi_state->pi_mutex)); + + return err; +} + +static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, + struct task_struct *argowner) +{ + struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = q->pi_state; + int ret; + + lockdep_assert_held(q->lock_ptr); + + raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); + ret = __fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, argowner); + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); + return ret; +} + +/** + * fixup_pi_owner() - Post lock pi_state and corner case management + * @uaddr: user address of the futex + * @q: futex_q (contains pi_state and access to the rt_mutex) + * @locked: if the attempt to take the rt_mutex succeeded (1) or not (0) + * + * After attempting to lock an rt_mutex, this function is called to cleanup + * the pi_state owner as well as handle race conditions that may allow us to + * acquire the lock. Must be called with the hb lock held. + * + * Return: + * - 1 - success, lock taken; + * - 0 - success, lock not taken; + * - <0 - on error (-EFAULT) + */ +int fixup_pi_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, int locked) +{ + if (locked) { + /* + * Got the lock. We might not be the anticipated owner if we + * did a lock-steal - fix up the PI-state in that case: + * + * Speculative pi_state->owner read (we don't hold wait_lock); + * since we own the lock pi_state->owner == current is the + * stable state, anything else needs more attention. + */ + if (q->pi_state->owner != current) + return fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, current); + return 1; + } + + /* + * If we didn't get the lock; check if anybody stole it from us. In + * that case, we need to fix up the uval to point to them instead of + * us, otherwise bad things happen. [10] + * + * Another speculative read; pi_state->owner == current is unstable + * but needs our attention. + */ + if (q->pi_state->owner == current) + return fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, NULL); + + /* + * Paranoia check. If we did not take the lock, then we should not be + * the owner of the rt_mutex. Warn and establish consistent state. + */ + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rt_mutex_owner(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex) == current)) + return fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, current); + + return 0; +} + +/* + * Userspace tried a 0 -> TID atomic transition of the futex value + * and failed. The kernel side here does the whole locking operation: + * if there are waiters then it will block as a consequence of relying + * on rt-mutexes, it does PI, etc. (Due to races the kernel might see + * a 0 value of the futex too.). + * + * Also serves as futex trylock_pi()'ing, and due semantics. + */ +int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, ktime_t *time, int trylock) +{ + struct hrtimer_sleeper timeout, *to; + struct task_struct *exiting = NULL; + struct rt_mutex_waiter rt_waiter; + struct futex_hash_bucket *hb; + struct futex_q q = futex_q_init; + int res, ret; + + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUTEX_PI)) + return -ENOSYS; + + if (refill_pi_state_cache()) + return -ENOMEM; + + to = futex_setup_timer(time, &timeout, flags, 0); + +retry: + ret = get_futex_key(uaddr, flags & FLAGS_SHARED, &q.key, FUTEX_WRITE); + if (unlikely(ret != 0)) + goto out; + +retry_private: + hb = futex_q_lock(&q); + + ret = futex_lock_pi_atomic(uaddr, hb, &q.key, &q.pi_state, current, + &exiting, 0); + if (unlikely(ret)) { + /* + * Atomic work succeeded and we got the lock, + * or failed. Either way, we do _not_ block. + */ + switch (ret) { + case 1: + /* We got the lock. */ + ret = 0; + goto out_unlock_put_key; + case -EFAULT: + goto uaddr_faulted; + case -EBUSY: + case -EAGAIN: + /* + * Two reasons for this: + * - EBUSY: Task is exiting and we just wait for the + * exit to complete. + * - EAGAIN: The user space value changed. + */ + futex_q_unlock(hb); + /* + * Handle the case where the owner is in the middle of + * exiting. Wait for the exit to complete otherwise + * this task might loop forever, aka. live lock. + */ + wait_for_owner_exiting(ret, exiting); + cond_resched(); + goto retry; + default: + goto out_unlock_put_key; + } + } + + WARN_ON(!q.pi_state); + + /* + * Only actually queue now that the atomic ops are done: + */ + __futex_queue(&q, hb); + + if (trylock) { + ret = rt_mutex_futex_trylock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex); + /* Fixup the trylock return value: */ + ret = ret ? 0 : -EWOULDBLOCK; + goto no_block; + } + + rt_mutex_init_waiter(&rt_waiter); + + /* + * On PREEMPT_RT, when hb->lock becomes an rt_mutex, we must not + * hold it while doing rt_mutex_start_proxy(), because then it will + * include hb->lock in the blocking chain, even through we'll not in + * fact hold it while blocking. This will lead it to report -EDEADLK + * and BUG when futex_unlock_pi() interleaves with this. + * + * Therefore acquire wait_lock while holding hb->lock, but drop the + * latter before calling __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(). This + * interleaves with futex_unlock_pi() -- which does a similar lock + * handoff -- such that the latter can observe the futex_q::pi_state + * before __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() is done. + */ + raw_spin_lock_irq(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); + spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr); + /* + * __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() unconditionally enqueues the @rt_waiter + * such that futex_unlock_pi() is guaranteed to observe the waiter when + * it sees the futex_q::pi_state. + */ + ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, &rt_waiter, current); + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); + + if (ret) { + if (ret == 1) + ret = 0; + goto cleanup; + } + + if (unlikely(to)) + hrtimer_sleeper_start_expires(to, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS); + + ret = rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter); + +cleanup: + spin_lock(q.lock_ptr); + /* + * If we failed to acquire the lock (deadlock/signal/timeout), we must + * first acquire the hb->lock before removing the lock from the + * rt_mutex waitqueue, such that we can keep the hb and rt_mutex wait + * lists consistent. + * + * In particular; it is important that futex_unlock_pi() can not + * observe this inconsistency. + */ + if (ret && !rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, &rt_waiter)) + ret = 0; + +no_block: + /* + * Fixup the pi_state owner and possibly acquire the lock if we + * haven't already. + */ + res = fixup_pi_owner(uaddr, &q, !ret); + /* + * If fixup_pi_owner() returned an error, propagate that. If it acquired + * the lock, clear our -ETIMEDOUT or -EINTR. + */ + if (res) + ret = (res < 0) ? res : 0; + + futex_unqueue_pi(&q); + spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr); + goto out; + +out_unlock_put_key: + futex_q_unlock(hb); + +out: + if (to) { + hrtimer_cancel(&to->timer); + destroy_hrtimer_on_stack(&to->timer); + } + return ret != -EINTR ? ret : -ERESTARTNOINTR; + +uaddr_faulted: + futex_q_unlock(hb); + + ret = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr); + if (ret) + goto out; + + if (!(flags & FLAGS_SHARED)) + goto retry_private; + + goto retry; +} + +/* + * Userspace attempted a TID -> 0 atomic transition, and failed. + * This is the in-kernel slowpath: we look up the PI state (if any), + * and do the rt-mutex unlock. + */ +int futex_unlock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags) +{ + u32 curval, uval, vpid = task_pid_vnr(current); + union futex_key key = FUTEX_KEY_INIT; + struct futex_hash_bucket *hb; + struct futex_q *top_waiter; + int ret; + + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUTEX_PI)) + return -ENOSYS; + +retry: + if (get_user(uval, uaddr)) + return -EFAULT; + /* + * We release only a lock we actually own: + */ + if ((uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK) != vpid) + return -EPERM; + + ret = get_futex_key(uaddr, flags & FLAGS_SHARED, &key, FUTEX_WRITE); + if (ret) + return ret; + + hb = futex_hash(&key); + spin_lock(&hb->lock); + + /* + * Check waiters first. We do not trust user space values at + * all and we at least want to know if user space fiddled + * with the futex value instead of blindly unlocking. + */ + top_waiter = futex_top_waiter(hb, &key); + if (top_waiter) { + struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = top_waiter->pi_state; + + ret = -EINVAL; + if (!pi_state) + goto out_unlock; + + /* + * If current does not own the pi_state then the futex is + * inconsistent and user space fiddled with the futex value. + */ + if (pi_state->owner != current) + goto out_unlock; + + get_pi_state(pi_state); + /* + * By taking wait_lock while still holding hb->lock, we ensure + * there is no point where we hold neither; and therefore + * wake_futex_p() must observe a state consistent with what we + * observed. + * + * In particular; this forces __rt_mutex_start_proxy() to + * complete such that we're guaranteed to observe the + * rt_waiter. Also see the WARN in wake_futex_pi(). + */ + raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); + spin_unlock(&hb->lock); + + /* drops pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock */ + ret = wake_futex_pi(uaddr, uval, pi_state); + + put_pi_state(pi_state); + + /* + * Success, we're done! No tricky corner cases. + */ + if (!ret) + return ret; + /* + * The atomic access to the futex value generated a + * pagefault, so retry the user-access and the wakeup: + */ + if (ret == -EFAULT) + goto pi_faulted; + /* + * A unconditional UNLOCK_PI op raced against a waiter + * setting the FUTEX_WAITERS bit. Try again. + */ + if (ret == -EAGAIN) + goto pi_retry; + /* + * wake_futex_pi has detected invalid state. Tell user + * space. + */ + return ret; + } + + /* + * We have no kernel internal state, i.e. no waiters in the + * kernel. Waiters which are about to queue themselves are stuck + * on hb->lock. So we can safely ignore them. We do neither + * preserve the WAITERS bit not the OWNER_DIED one. We are the + * owner. + */ + if ((ret = futex_cmpxchg_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, 0))) { + spin_unlock(&hb->lock); + switch (ret) { + case -EFAULT: + goto pi_faulted; + + case -EAGAIN: + goto pi_retry; + + default: + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + return ret; + } + } + + /* + * If uval has changed, let user space handle it. + */ + ret = (curval == uval) ? 0 : -EAGAIN; + +out_unlock: + spin_unlock(&hb->lock); + return ret; + +pi_retry: + cond_resched(); + goto retry; + +pi_faulted: + + ret = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr); + if (!ret) + goto retry; + + return ret; +} + |