diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/damon/vaddr-test.h')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/damon/vaddr-test.h | 316 |
1 files changed, 316 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e939598af --- /dev/null +++ b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h @@ -0,0 +1,316 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * Data Access Monitor Unit Tests + * + * Copyright 2019 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved. + * + * Author: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de> + */ + +#ifdef CONFIG_DAMON_VADDR_KUNIT_TEST + +#ifndef _DAMON_VADDR_TEST_H +#define _DAMON_VADDR_TEST_H + +#include <kunit/test.h> + +static void __link_vmas(struct maple_tree *mt, struct vm_area_struct *vmas, + ssize_t nr_vmas) +{ + int i; + MA_STATE(mas, mt, 0, 0); + + if (!nr_vmas) + return; + + mas_lock(&mas); + for (i = 0; i < nr_vmas; i++) + vma_mas_store(&vmas[i], &mas); + mas_unlock(&mas); +} + +/* + * Test __damon_va_three_regions() function + * + * In case of virtual memory address spaces monitoring, DAMON converts the + * complex and dynamic memory mappings of each target task to three + * discontiguous regions which cover every mapped areas. However, the three + * regions should not include the two biggest unmapped areas in the original + * mapping, because the two biggest areas are normally the areas between 1) + * heap and the mmap()-ed regions, and 2) the mmap()-ed regions and stack. + * Because these two unmapped areas are very huge but obviously never accessed, + * covering the region is just a waste. + * + * '__damon_va_three_regions() receives an address space of a process. It + * first identifies the start of mappings, end of mappings, and the two biggest + * unmapped areas. After that, based on the information, it constructs the + * three regions and returns. For more detail, refer to the comment of + * 'damon_init_regions_of()' function definition in 'mm/damon.c' file. + * + * For example, suppose virtual address ranges of 10-20, 20-25, 200-210, + * 210-220, 300-305, and 307-330 (Other comments represent this mappings in + * more short form: 10-20-25, 200-210-220, 300-305, 307-330) of a process are + * mapped. To cover every mappings, the three regions should start with 10, + * and end with 305. The process also has three unmapped areas, 25-200, + * 220-300, and 305-307. Among those, 25-200 and 220-300 are the biggest two + * unmapped areas, and thus it should be converted to three regions of 10-25, + * 200-220, and 300-330. + */ +static void damon_test_three_regions_in_vmas(struct kunit *test) +{ + static struct mm_struct mm; + struct damon_addr_range regions[3] = {0,}; + /* 10-20-25, 200-210-220, 300-305, 307-330 */ + struct vm_area_struct vmas[] = { + (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 10, .vm_end = 20}, + (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 20, .vm_end = 25}, + (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 200, .vm_end = 210}, + (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 210, .vm_end = 220}, + (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 300, .vm_end = 305}, + (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 307, .vm_end = 330}, + }; + + mt_init_flags(&mm.mm_mt, MM_MT_FLAGS); + __link_vmas(&mm.mm_mt, vmas, ARRAY_SIZE(vmas)); + + __damon_va_three_regions(&mm, regions); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 10ul, regions[0].start); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 25ul, regions[0].end); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 200ul, regions[1].start); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 220ul, regions[1].end); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 300ul, regions[2].start); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 330ul, regions[2].end); +} + +static struct damon_region *__nth_region_of(struct damon_target *t, int idx) +{ + struct damon_region *r; + unsigned int i = 0; + + damon_for_each_region(r, t) { + if (i++ == idx) + return r; + } + + return NULL; +} + +/* + * Test 'damon_set_regions()' + * + * test kunit object + * regions an array containing start/end addresses of current + * monitoring target regions + * nr_regions the number of the addresses in 'regions' + * three_regions The three regions that need to be applied now + * expected start/end addresses of monitoring target regions that + * 'three_regions' are applied + * nr_expected the number of addresses in 'expected' + * + * The memory mapping of the target processes changes dynamically. To follow + * the change, DAMON periodically reads the mappings, simplifies it to the + * three regions, and updates the monitoring target regions to fit in the three + * regions. The update of current target regions is the role of + * 'damon_set_regions()'. + * + * This test passes the given target regions and the new three regions that + * need to be applied to the function and check whether it updates the regions + * as expected. + */ +static void damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(struct kunit *test, + unsigned long *regions, int nr_regions, + struct damon_addr_range *three_regions, + unsigned long *expected, int nr_expected) +{ + struct damon_target *t; + struct damon_region *r; + int i; + + t = damon_new_target(); + for (i = 0; i < nr_regions / 2; i++) { + r = damon_new_region(regions[i * 2], regions[i * 2 + 1]); + damon_add_region(r, t); + } + + damon_set_regions(t, three_regions, 3); + + for (i = 0; i < nr_expected / 2; i++) { + r = __nth_region_of(t, i); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, expected[i * 2]); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, expected[i * 2 + 1]); + } + + damon_destroy_target(t); +} + +/* + * This function test most common case where the three big regions are only + * slightly changed. Target regions should adjust their boundary (10-20-30, + * 50-55, 70-80, 90-100) to fit with the new big regions or remove target + * regions (57-79) that now out of the three regions. + */ +static void damon_test_apply_three_regions1(struct kunit *test) +{ + /* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */ + unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59, + 70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100}; + /* 5-27, 45-55, 73-104 */ + struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = { + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 27}, + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 45, .end = 55}, + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 73, .end = 104} }; + /* 5-20-27, 45-55, 73-80-90-104 */ + unsigned long expected[] = {5, 20, 20, 27, 45, 55, + 73, 80, 80, 90, 90, 104}; + + damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions), + new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected)); +} + +/* + * Test slightly bigger change. Similar to above, but the second big region + * now require two target regions (50-55, 57-59) to be removed. + */ +static void damon_test_apply_three_regions2(struct kunit *test) +{ + /* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */ + unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59, + 70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100}; + /* 5-27, 56-57, 65-104 */ + struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = { + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 27}, + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 56, .end = 57}, + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 65, .end = 104} }; + /* 5-20-27, 56-57, 65-80-90-104 */ + unsigned long expected[] = {5, 20, 20, 27, 56, 57, + 65, 80, 80, 90, 90, 104}; + + damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions), + new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected)); +} + +/* + * Test a big change. The second big region has totally freed and mapped to + * different area (50-59 -> 61-63). The target regions which were in the old + * second big region (50-55-57-59) should be removed and new target region + * covering the second big region (61-63) should be created. + */ +static void damon_test_apply_three_regions3(struct kunit *test) +{ + /* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */ + unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59, + 70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100}; + /* 5-27, 61-63, 65-104 */ + struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = { + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 27}, + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 61, .end = 63}, + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 65, .end = 104} }; + /* 5-20-27, 61-63, 65-80-90-104 */ + unsigned long expected[] = {5, 20, 20, 27, 61, 63, + 65, 80, 80, 90, 90, 104}; + + damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions), + new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected)); +} + +/* + * Test another big change. Both of the second and third big regions (50-59 + * and 70-100) has totally freed and mapped to different area (30-32 and + * 65-68). The target regions which were in the old second and third big + * regions should now be removed and new target regions covering the new second + * and third big regions should be created. + */ +static void damon_test_apply_three_regions4(struct kunit *test) +{ + /* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */ + unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59, + 70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100}; + /* 5-7, 30-32, 65-68 */ + struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = { + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 7}, + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 30, .end = 32}, + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 65, .end = 68} }; + /* expect 5-7, 30-32, 65-68 */ + unsigned long expected[] = {5, 7, 30, 32, 65, 68}; + + damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions), + new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected)); +} + +static void damon_test_split_evenly_fail(struct kunit *test, + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, unsigned int nr_pieces) +{ + struct damon_target *t = damon_new_target(); + struct damon_region *r = damon_new_region(start, end); + + damon_add_region(r, t); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, + damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, nr_pieces), -EINVAL); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 1u); + + damon_for_each_region(r, t) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, start); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, end); + } + + damon_free_target(t); +} + +static void damon_test_split_evenly_succ(struct kunit *test, + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, unsigned int nr_pieces) +{ + struct damon_target *t = damon_new_target(); + struct damon_region *r = damon_new_region(start, end); + unsigned long expected_width = (end - start) / nr_pieces; + unsigned long i = 0; + + damon_add_region(r, t); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, + damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, nr_pieces), 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), nr_pieces); + + damon_for_each_region(r, t) { + if (i == nr_pieces - 1) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, + r->ar.start, start + i * expected_width); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, end); + break; + } + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, + r->ar.start, start + i++ * expected_width); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, start + i * expected_width); + } + damon_free_target(t); +} + +static void damon_test_split_evenly(struct kunit *test) +{ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(NULL, NULL, 5), + -EINVAL); + + damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 0, 100, 0); + damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 0, 100, 10); + damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 5, 59, 5); + damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 5, 6, 2); +} + +static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_three_regions_in_vmas), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions1), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions2), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions3), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions4), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_split_evenly), + {}, +}; + +static struct kunit_suite damon_test_suite = { + .name = "damon-operations", + .test_cases = damon_test_cases, +}; +kunit_test_suite(damon_test_suite); + +#endif /* _DAMON_VADDR_TEST_H */ + +#endif /* CONFIG_DAMON_VADDR_KUNIT_TEST */ |