From a175314c3e5827eb193872241446f2f8f5c9d33c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 20:07:14 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 1:10.5.12. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- sql-bench/Comments/Informix.crash-me | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) create mode 100644 sql-bench/Comments/Informix.crash-me (limited to 'sql-bench/Comments/Informix.crash-me') diff --git a/sql-bench/Comments/Informix.crash-me b/sql-bench/Comments/Informix.crash-me new file mode 100644 index 00000000..557db012 --- /dev/null +++ b/sql-bench/Comments/Informix.crash-me @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +***************************************************************** +NOTE: +I, Monty, pulled this comment out from the public mail I got from +Honza when he published the first crash-me run on Informix +***************************************************************** + +Also attached are diffs from server-cfg and crash-me -- some of +them are actual bugs in the code, some add extensions for Informix, +some of the comment-outs were necessary to finish the test. Some of +the problematic pieces that are commented out sent Informix to +veeeery long load 1 on the machine (max_conditions for example), so +could be considered crashes, but I'd prefer that someone checks the +code before giving out such a conclusion. + +Some of the code that is commented out failed with some other SQL +error message which might mean a problem with the sequence of commands +in crash-me. Interesting thing, some of the tests failed for the +first time but in the next or third run went OK, so the results are +results of more iterations (like column doesn't exist in the first +try but the second pass goes OK). + +I'd like to hear your comments on the bug fixes and Informix specific +code before we go into debugging the problems. + +Yours, + Honza Pazdziora -- cgit v1.2.3