summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/test/regress/expected/select.out
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--src/test/regress/expected/select.out966
1 files changed, 966 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/select.out b/src/test/regress/expected/select.out
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c441049
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/select.out
@@ -0,0 +1,966 @@
+--
+-- SELECT
+--
+-- btree index
+-- awk '{if($1<10){print;}else{next;}}' onek.data | sort +0n -1
+--
+SELECT * FROM onek
+ WHERE onek.unique1 < 10
+ ORDER BY onek.unique1;
+ unique1 | unique2 | two | four | ten | twenty | hundred | thousand | twothousand | fivethous | tenthous | odd | even | stringu1 | stringu2 | string4
+---------+---------+-----+------+-----+--------+---------+----------+-------------+-----------+----------+-----+------+----------+----------+---------
+ 0 | 998 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | AAAAAA | KMBAAA | OOOOxx
+ 1 | 214 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | BAAAAA | GIAAAA | OOOOxx
+ 2 | 326 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | CAAAAA | OMAAAA | OOOOxx
+ 3 | 431 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 7 | DAAAAA | PQAAAA | VVVVxx
+ 4 | 833 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 9 | EAAAAA | BGBAAA | HHHHxx
+ 5 | 541 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 11 | FAAAAA | VUAAAA | HHHHxx
+ 6 | 978 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 13 | GAAAAA | QLBAAA | OOOOxx
+ 7 | 647 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 15 | HAAAAA | XYAAAA | VVVVxx
+ 8 | 653 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 17 | IAAAAA | DZAAAA | HHHHxx
+ 9 | 49 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 19 | JAAAAA | XBAAAA | HHHHxx
+(10 rows)
+
+--
+-- awk '{if($1<20){print $1,$14;}else{next;}}' onek.data | sort +0nr -1
+--
+SELECT onek.unique1, onek.stringu1 FROM onek
+ WHERE onek.unique1 < 20
+ ORDER BY unique1 using >;
+ unique1 | stringu1
+---------+----------
+ 19 | TAAAAA
+ 18 | SAAAAA
+ 17 | RAAAAA
+ 16 | QAAAAA
+ 15 | PAAAAA
+ 14 | OAAAAA
+ 13 | NAAAAA
+ 12 | MAAAAA
+ 11 | LAAAAA
+ 10 | KAAAAA
+ 9 | JAAAAA
+ 8 | IAAAAA
+ 7 | HAAAAA
+ 6 | GAAAAA
+ 5 | FAAAAA
+ 4 | EAAAAA
+ 3 | DAAAAA
+ 2 | CAAAAA
+ 1 | BAAAAA
+ 0 | AAAAAA
+(20 rows)
+
+--
+-- awk '{if($1>980){print $1,$14;}else{next;}}' onek.data | sort +1d -2
+--
+SELECT onek.unique1, onek.stringu1 FROM onek
+ WHERE onek.unique1 > 980
+ ORDER BY stringu1 using <;
+ unique1 | stringu1
+---------+----------
+ 988 | AMAAAA
+ 989 | BMAAAA
+ 990 | CMAAAA
+ 991 | DMAAAA
+ 992 | EMAAAA
+ 993 | FMAAAA
+ 994 | GMAAAA
+ 995 | HMAAAA
+ 996 | IMAAAA
+ 997 | JMAAAA
+ 998 | KMAAAA
+ 999 | LMAAAA
+ 981 | TLAAAA
+ 982 | ULAAAA
+ 983 | VLAAAA
+ 984 | WLAAAA
+ 985 | XLAAAA
+ 986 | YLAAAA
+ 987 | ZLAAAA
+(19 rows)
+
+--
+-- awk '{if($1>980){print $1,$16;}else{next;}}' onek.data |
+-- sort +1d -2 +0nr -1
+--
+SELECT onek.unique1, onek.string4 FROM onek
+ WHERE onek.unique1 > 980
+ ORDER BY string4 using <, unique1 using >;
+ unique1 | string4
+---------+---------
+ 999 | AAAAxx
+ 995 | AAAAxx
+ 983 | AAAAxx
+ 982 | AAAAxx
+ 981 | AAAAxx
+ 998 | HHHHxx
+ 997 | HHHHxx
+ 993 | HHHHxx
+ 990 | HHHHxx
+ 986 | HHHHxx
+ 996 | OOOOxx
+ 991 | OOOOxx
+ 988 | OOOOxx
+ 987 | OOOOxx
+ 985 | OOOOxx
+ 994 | VVVVxx
+ 992 | VVVVxx
+ 989 | VVVVxx
+ 984 | VVVVxx
+(19 rows)
+
+--
+-- awk '{if($1>980){print $1,$16;}else{next;}}' onek.data |
+-- sort +1dr -2 +0n -1
+--
+SELECT onek.unique1, onek.string4 FROM onek
+ WHERE onek.unique1 > 980
+ ORDER BY string4 using >, unique1 using <;
+ unique1 | string4
+---------+---------
+ 984 | VVVVxx
+ 989 | VVVVxx
+ 992 | VVVVxx
+ 994 | VVVVxx
+ 985 | OOOOxx
+ 987 | OOOOxx
+ 988 | OOOOxx
+ 991 | OOOOxx
+ 996 | OOOOxx
+ 986 | HHHHxx
+ 990 | HHHHxx
+ 993 | HHHHxx
+ 997 | HHHHxx
+ 998 | HHHHxx
+ 981 | AAAAxx
+ 982 | AAAAxx
+ 983 | AAAAxx
+ 995 | AAAAxx
+ 999 | AAAAxx
+(19 rows)
+
+--
+-- awk '{if($1<20){print $1,$16;}else{next;}}' onek.data |
+-- sort +0nr -1 +1d -2
+--
+SELECT onek.unique1, onek.string4 FROM onek
+ WHERE onek.unique1 < 20
+ ORDER BY unique1 using >, string4 using <;
+ unique1 | string4
+---------+---------
+ 19 | OOOOxx
+ 18 | VVVVxx
+ 17 | HHHHxx
+ 16 | OOOOxx
+ 15 | VVVVxx
+ 14 | AAAAxx
+ 13 | OOOOxx
+ 12 | AAAAxx
+ 11 | OOOOxx
+ 10 | AAAAxx
+ 9 | HHHHxx
+ 8 | HHHHxx
+ 7 | VVVVxx
+ 6 | OOOOxx
+ 5 | HHHHxx
+ 4 | HHHHxx
+ 3 | VVVVxx
+ 2 | OOOOxx
+ 1 | OOOOxx
+ 0 | OOOOxx
+(20 rows)
+
+--
+-- awk '{if($1<20){print $1,$16;}else{next;}}' onek.data |
+-- sort +0n -1 +1dr -2
+--
+SELECT onek.unique1, onek.string4 FROM onek
+ WHERE onek.unique1 < 20
+ ORDER BY unique1 using <, string4 using >;
+ unique1 | string4
+---------+---------
+ 0 | OOOOxx
+ 1 | OOOOxx
+ 2 | OOOOxx
+ 3 | VVVVxx
+ 4 | HHHHxx
+ 5 | HHHHxx
+ 6 | OOOOxx
+ 7 | VVVVxx
+ 8 | HHHHxx
+ 9 | HHHHxx
+ 10 | AAAAxx
+ 11 | OOOOxx
+ 12 | AAAAxx
+ 13 | OOOOxx
+ 14 | AAAAxx
+ 15 | VVVVxx
+ 16 | OOOOxx
+ 17 | HHHHxx
+ 18 | VVVVxx
+ 19 | OOOOxx
+(20 rows)
+
+--
+-- test partial btree indexes
+--
+-- As of 7.2, planner probably won't pick an indexscan without stats,
+-- so ANALYZE first. Also, we want to prevent it from picking a bitmapscan
+-- followed by sort, because that could hide index ordering problems.
+--
+ANALYZE onek2;
+SET enable_seqscan TO off;
+SET enable_bitmapscan TO off;
+SET enable_sort TO off;
+--
+-- awk '{if($1<10){print $0;}else{next;}}' onek.data | sort +0n -1
+--
+SELECT onek2.* FROM onek2 WHERE onek2.unique1 < 10;
+ unique1 | unique2 | two | four | ten | twenty | hundred | thousand | twothousand | fivethous | tenthous | odd | even | stringu1 | stringu2 | string4
+---------+---------+-----+------+-----+--------+---------+----------+-------------+-----------+----------+-----+------+----------+----------+---------
+ 0 | 998 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | AAAAAA | KMBAAA | OOOOxx
+ 1 | 214 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | BAAAAA | GIAAAA | OOOOxx
+ 2 | 326 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | CAAAAA | OMAAAA | OOOOxx
+ 3 | 431 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 7 | DAAAAA | PQAAAA | VVVVxx
+ 4 | 833 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 9 | EAAAAA | BGBAAA | HHHHxx
+ 5 | 541 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 11 | FAAAAA | VUAAAA | HHHHxx
+ 6 | 978 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 13 | GAAAAA | QLBAAA | OOOOxx
+ 7 | 647 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 15 | HAAAAA | XYAAAA | VVVVxx
+ 8 | 653 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 17 | IAAAAA | DZAAAA | HHHHxx
+ 9 | 49 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 19 | JAAAAA | XBAAAA | HHHHxx
+(10 rows)
+
+--
+-- awk '{if($1<20){print $1,$14;}else{next;}}' onek.data | sort +0nr -1
+--
+SELECT onek2.unique1, onek2.stringu1 FROM onek2
+ WHERE onek2.unique1 < 20
+ ORDER BY unique1 using >;
+ unique1 | stringu1
+---------+----------
+ 19 | TAAAAA
+ 18 | SAAAAA
+ 17 | RAAAAA
+ 16 | QAAAAA
+ 15 | PAAAAA
+ 14 | OAAAAA
+ 13 | NAAAAA
+ 12 | MAAAAA
+ 11 | LAAAAA
+ 10 | KAAAAA
+ 9 | JAAAAA
+ 8 | IAAAAA
+ 7 | HAAAAA
+ 6 | GAAAAA
+ 5 | FAAAAA
+ 4 | EAAAAA
+ 3 | DAAAAA
+ 2 | CAAAAA
+ 1 | BAAAAA
+ 0 | AAAAAA
+(20 rows)
+
+--
+-- awk '{if($1>980){print $1,$14;}else{next;}}' onek.data | sort +1d -2
+--
+SELECT onek2.unique1, onek2.stringu1 FROM onek2
+ WHERE onek2.unique1 > 980;
+ unique1 | stringu1
+---------+----------
+ 981 | TLAAAA
+ 982 | ULAAAA
+ 983 | VLAAAA
+ 984 | WLAAAA
+ 985 | XLAAAA
+ 986 | YLAAAA
+ 987 | ZLAAAA
+ 988 | AMAAAA
+ 989 | BMAAAA
+ 990 | CMAAAA
+ 991 | DMAAAA
+ 992 | EMAAAA
+ 993 | FMAAAA
+ 994 | GMAAAA
+ 995 | HMAAAA
+ 996 | IMAAAA
+ 997 | JMAAAA
+ 998 | KMAAAA
+ 999 | LMAAAA
+(19 rows)
+
+RESET enable_seqscan;
+RESET enable_bitmapscan;
+RESET enable_sort;
+SELECT two, stringu1, ten, string4
+ INTO TABLE tmp
+ FROM onek;
+--
+-- awk '{print $1,$2;}' person.data |
+-- awk '{if(NF!=2){print $3,$2;}else{print;}}' - emp.data |
+-- awk '{if(NF!=2){print $3,$2;}else{print;}}' - student.data |
+-- awk 'BEGIN{FS=" ";}{if(NF!=2){print $4,$5;}else{print;}}' - stud_emp.data
+--
+-- SELECT name, age FROM person*; ??? check if different
+SELECT p.name, p.age FROM person* p;
+ name | age
+---------+-----
+ mike | 40
+ joe | 20
+ sally | 34
+ sandra | 19
+ alex | 30
+ sue | 50
+ denise | 24
+ sarah | 88
+ teresa | 38
+ nan | 28
+ leah | 68
+ wendy | 78
+ melissa | 28
+ joan | 18
+ mary | 8
+ jane | 58
+ liza | 38
+ jean | 28
+ jenifer | 38
+ juanita | 58
+ susan | 78
+ zena | 98
+ martie | 88
+ chris | 78
+ pat | 18
+ zola | 58
+ louise | 98
+ edna | 18
+ bertha | 88
+ sumi | 38
+ koko | 88
+ gina | 18
+ rean | 48
+ sharon | 78
+ paula | 68
+ julie | 68
+ belinda | 38
+ karen | 48
+ carina | 58
+ diane | 18
+ esther | 98
+ trudy | 88
+ fanny | 8
+ carmen | 78
+ lita | 25
+ pamela | 48
+ sandy | 38
+ trisha | 88
+ uma | 78
+ velma | 68
+ sharon | 25
+ sam | 30
+ bill | 20
+ fred | 28
+ larry | 60
+ jeff | 23
+ cim | 30
+ linda | 19
+(58 rows)
+
+--
+-- awk '{print $1,$2;}' person.data |
+-- awk '{if(NF!=2){print $3,$2;}else{print;}}' - emp.data |
+-- awk '{if(NF!=2){print $3,$2;}else{print;}}' - student.data |
+-- awk 'BEGIN{FS=" ";}{if(NF!=1){print $4,$5;}else{print;}}' - stud_emp.data |
+-- sort +1nr -2
+--
+SELECT p.name, p.age FROM person* p ORDER BY age using >, name;
+ name | age
+---------+-----
+ esther | 98
+ louise | 98
+ zena | 98
+ bertha | 88
+ koko | 88
+ martie | 88
+ sarah | 88
+ trisha | 88
+ trudy | 88
+ carmen | 78
+ chris | 78
+ sharon | 78
+ susan | 78
+ uma | 78
+ wendy | 78
+ julie | 68
+ leah | 68
+ paula | 68
+ velma | 68
+ larry | 60
+ carina | 58
+ jane | 58
+ juanita | 58
+ zola | 58
+ sue | 50
+ karen | 48
+ pamela | 48
+ rean | 48
+ mike | 40
+ belinda | 38
+ jenifer | 38
+ liza | 38
+ sandy | 38
+ sumi | 38
+ teresa | 38
+ sally | 34
+ alex | 30
+ cim | 30
+ sam | 30
+ fred | 28
+ jean | 28
+ melissa | 28
+ nan | 28
+ lita | 25
+ sharon | 25
+ denise | 24
+ jeff | 23
+ bill | 20
+ joe | 20
+ linda | 19
+ sandra | 19
+ diane | 18
+ edna | 18
+ gina | 18
+ joan | 18
+ pat | 18
+ fanny | 8
+ mary | 8
+(58 rows)
+
+--
+-- Test some cases involving whole-row Var referencing a subquery
+--
+select foo from (select 1 offset 0) as foo;
+ foo
+-----
+ (1)
+(1 row)
+
+select foo from (select null offset 0) as foo;
+ foo
+-----
+ ()
+(1 row)
+
+select foo from (select 'xyzzy',1,null offset 0) as foo;
+ foo
+------------
+ (xyzzy,1,)
+(1 row)
+
+--
+-- Test VALUES lists
+--
+select * from onek, (values(147, 'RFAAAA'), (931, 'VJAAAA')) as v (i, j)
+ WHERE onek.unique1 = v.i and onek.stringu1 = v.j;
+ unique1 | unique2 | two | four | ten | twenty | hundred | thousand | twothousand | fivethous | tenthous | odd | even | stringu1 | stringu2 | string4 | i | j
+---------+---------+-----+------+-----+--------+---------+----------+-------------+-----------+----------+-----+------+----------+----------+---------+-----+--------
+ 147 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 47 | 147 | 147 | 147 | 14 | 15 | RFAAAA | AAAAAA | AAAAxx | 147 | RFAAAA
+ 931 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 31 | 131 | 431 | 931 | 2 | 3 | VJAAAA | BAAAAA | HHHHxx | 931 | VJAAAA
+(2 rows)
+
+-- a more complex case
+-- looks like we're coding lisp :-)
+select * from onek,
+ (values ((select i from
+ (values(10000), (2), (389), (1000), (2000), ((select 10029))) as foo(i)
+ order by i asc limit 1))) bar (i)
+ where onek.unique1 = bar.i;
+ unique1 | unique2 | two | four | ten | twenty | hundred | thousand | twothousand | fivethous | tenthous | odd | even | stringu1 | stringu2 | string4 | i
+---------+---------+-----+------+-----+--------+---------+----------+-------------+-----------+----------+-----+------+----------+----------+---------+---
+ 2 | 326 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | CAAAAA | OMAAAA | OOOOxx | 2
+(1 row)
+
+-- try VALUES in a subquery
+select * from onek
+ where (unique1,ten) in (values (1,1), (20,0), (99,9), (17,99))
+ order by unique1;
+ unique1 | unique2 | two | four | ten | twenty | hundred | thousand | twothousand | fivethous | tenthous | odd | even | stringu1 | stringu2 | string4
+---------+---------+-----+------+-----+--------+---------+----------+-------------+-----------+----------+-----+------+----------+----------+---------
+ 1 | 214 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | BAAAAA | GIAAAA | OOOOxx
+ 20 | 306 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 1 | UAAAAA | ULAAAA | OOOOxx
+ 99 | 101 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 19 | 9 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 18 | 19 | VDAAAA | XDAAAA | HHHHxx
+(3 rows)
+
+-- VALUES is also legal as a standalone query or a set-operation member
+VALUES (1,2), (3,4+4), (7,77.7);
+ column1 | column2
+---------+---------
+ 1 | 2
+ 3 | 8
+ 7 | 77.7
+(3 rows)
+
+VALUES (1,2), (3,4+4), (7,77.7)
+UNION ALL
+SELECT 2+2, 57
+UNION ALL
+TABLE int8_tbl;
+ column1 | column2
+------------------+-------------------
+ 1 | 2
+ 3 | 8
+ 7 | 77.7
+ 4 | 57
+ 123 | 456
+ 123 | 4567890123456789
+ 4567890123456789 | 123
+ 4567890123456789 | 4567890123456789
+ 4567890123456789 | -4567890123456789
+(9 rows)
+
+--
+-- Test ORDER BY options
+--
+CREATE TEMP TABLE foo (f1 int);
+INSERT INTO foo VALUES (42),(3),(10),(7),(null),(null),(1);
+SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1;
+ f1
+----
+ 1
+ 3
+ 7
+ 10
+ 42
+
+
+(7 rows)
+
+SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 ASC; -- same thing
+ f1
+----
+ 1
+ 3
+ 7
+ 10
+ 42
+
+
+(7 rows)
+
+SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 NULLS FIRST;
+ f1
+----
+
+
+ 1
+ 3
+ 7
+ 10
+ 42
+(7 rows)
+
+SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 DESC;
+ f1
+----
+
+
+ 42
+ 10
+ 7
+ 3
+ 1
+(7 rows)
+
+SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 DESC NULLS LAST;
+ f1
+----
+ 42
+ 10
+ 7
+ 3
+ 1
+
+
+(7 rows)
+
+-- check if indexscans do the right things
+CREATE INDEX fooi ON foo (f1);
+SET enable_sort = false;
+SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1;
+ f1
+----
+ 1
+ 3
+ 7
+ 10
+ 42
+
+
+(7 rows)
+
+SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 NULLS FIRST;
+ f1
+----
+
+
+ 1
+ 3
+ 7
+ 10
+ 42
+(7 rows)
+
+SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 DESC;
+ f1
+----
+
+
+ 42
+ 10
+ 7
+ 3
+ 1
+(7 rows)
+
+SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 DESC NULLS LAST;
+ f1
+----
+ 42
+ 10
+ 7
+ 3
+ 1
+
+
+(7 rows)
+
+DROP INDEX fooi;
+CREATE INDEX fooi ON foo (f1 DESC);
+SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1;
+ f1
+----
+ 1
+ 3
+ 7
+ 10
+ 42
+
+
+(7 rows)
+
+SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 NULLS FIRST;
+ f1
+----
+
+
+ 1
+ 3
+ 7
+ 10
+ 42
+(7 rows)
+
+SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 DESC;
+ f1
+----
+
+
+ 42
+ 10
+ 7
+ 3
+ 1
+(7 rows)
+
+SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 DESC NULLS LAST;
+ f1
+----
+ 42
+ 10
+ 7
+ 3
+ 1
+
+
+(7 rows)
+
+DROP INDEX fooi;
+CREATE INDEX fooi ON foo (f1 DESC NULLS LAST);
+SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1;
+ f1
+----
+ 1
+ 3
+ 7
+ 10
+ 42
+
+
+(7 rows)
+
+SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 NULLS FIRST;
+ f1
+----
+
+
+ 1
+ 3
+ 7
+ 10
+ 42
+(7 rows)
+
+SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 DESC;
+ f1
+----
+
+
+ 42
+ 10
+ 7
+ 3
+ 1
+(7 rows)
+
+SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 DESC NULLS LAST;
+ f1
+----
+ 42
+ 10
+ 7
+ 3
+ 1
+
+
+(7 rows)
+
+--
+-- Test planning of some cases with partial indexes
+--
+-- partial index is usable
+explain (costs off)
+select * from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 = 'ATAAAA';
+ QUERY PLAN
+-----------------------------------------
+ Index Scan using onek2_u2_prtl on onek2
+ Index Cond: (unique2 = 11)
+ Filter: (stringu1 = 'ATAAAA'::name)
+(3 rows)
+
+select * from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 = 'ATAAAA';
+ unique1 | unique2 | two | four | ten | twenty | hundred | thousand | twothousand | fivethous | tenthous | odd | even | stringu1 | stringu2 | string4
+---------+---------+-----+------+-----+--------+---------+----------+-------------+-----------+----------+-----+------+----------+----------+---------
+ 494 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 4 | 94 | 94 | 494 | 494 | 8 | 9 | ATAAAA | LAAAAA | VVVVxx
+(1 row)
+
+-- actually run the query with an analyze to use the partial index
+explain (costs off, analyze on, timing off, summary off)
+select * from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 = 'ATAAAA';
+ QUERY PLAN
+-----------------------------------------------------------------
+ Index Scan using onek2_u2_prtl on onek2 (actual rows=1 loops=1)
+ Index Cond: (unique2 = 11)
+ Filter: (stringu1 = 'ATAAAA'::name)
+(3 rows)
+
+explain (costs off)
+select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 = 'ATAAAA';
+ QUERY PLAN
+-----------------------------------------
+ Index Scan using onek2_u2_prtl on onek2
+ Index Cond: (unique2 = 11)
+ Filter: (stringu1 = 'ATAAAA'::name)
+(3 rows)
+
+select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 = 'ATAAAA';
+ unique2
+---------
+ 11
+(1 row)
+
+-- partial index predicate implies clause, so no need for retest
+explain (costs off)
+select * from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B';
+ QUERY PLAN
+-----------------------------------------
+ Index Scan using onek2_u2_prtl on onek2
+ Index Cond: (unique2 = 11)
+(2 rows)
+
+select * from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B';
+ unique1 | unique2 | two | four | ten | twenty | hundred | thousand | twothousand | fivethous | tenthous | odd | even | stringu1 | stringu2 | string4
+---------+---------+-----+------+-----+--------+---------+----------+-------------+-----------+----------+-----+------+----------+----------+---------
+ 494 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 4 | 94 | 94 | 494 | 494 | 8 | 9 | ATAAAA | LAAAAA | VVVVxx
+(1 row)
+
+explain (costs off)
+select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B';
+ QUERY PLAN
+----------------------------------------------
+ Index Only Scan using onek2_u2_prtl on onek2
+ Index Cond: (unique2 = 11)
+(2 rows)
+
+select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B';
+ unique2
+---------
+ 11
+(1 row)
+
+-- but if it's an update target, must retest anyway
+explain (costs off)
+select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B' for update;
+ QUERY PLAN
+-----------------------------------------------
+ LockRows
+ -> Index Scan using onek2_u2_prtl on onek2
+ Index Cond: (unique2 = 11)
+ Filter: (stringu1 < 'B'::name)
+(4 rows)
+
+select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B' for update;
+ unique2
+---------
+ 11
+(1 row)
+
+-- partial index is not applicable
+explain (costs off)
+select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'C';
+ QUERY PLAN
+-------------------------------------------------------
+ Seq Scan on onek2
+ Filter: ((stringu1 < 'C'::name) AND (unique2 = 11))
+(2 rows)
+
+select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'C';
+ unique2
+---------
+ 11
+(1 row)
+
+-- partial index implies clause, but bitmap scan must recheck predicate anyway
+SET enable_indexscan TO off;
+explain (costs off)
+select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B';
+ QUERY PLAN
+-------------------------------------------------------------
+ Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
+ Recheck Cond: ((unique2 = 11) AND (stringu1 < 'B'::name))
+ -> Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u2_prtl
+ Index Cond: (unique2 = 11)
+(4 rows)
+
+select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B';
+ unique2
+---------
+ 11
+(1 row)
+
+RESET enable_indexscan;
+-- check multi-index cases too
+explain (costs off)
+select unique1, unique2 from onek2
+ where (unique2 = 11 or unique1 = 0) and stringu1 < 'B';
+ QUERY PLAN
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
+ Recheck Cond: (((unique2 = 11) AND (stringu1 < 'B'::name)) OR (unique1 = 0))
+ Filter: (stringu1 < 'B'::name)
+ -> BitmapOr
+ -> Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u2_prtl
+ Index Cond: (unique2 = 11)
+ -> Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u1_prtl
+ Index Cond: (unique1 = 0)
+(8 rows)
+
+select unique1, unique2 from onek2
+ where (unique2 = 11 or unique1 = 0) and stringu1 < 'B';
+ unique1 | unique2
+---------+---------
+ 494 | 11
+ 0 | 998
+(2 rows)
+
+explain (costs off)
+select unique1, unique2 from onek2
+ where (unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B') or unique1 = 0;
+ QUERY PLAN
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
+ Recheck Cond: (((unique2 = 11) AND (stringu1 < 'B'::name)) OR (unique1 = 0))
+ -> BitmapOr
+ -> Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u2_prtl
+ Index Cond: (unique2 = 11)
+ -> Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u1_prtl
+ Index Cond: (unique1 = 0)
+(7 rows)
+
+select unique1, unique2 from onek2
+ where (unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B') or unique1 = 0;
+ unique1 | unique2
+---------+---------
+ 494 | 11
+ 0 | 998
+(2 rows)
+
+--
+-- Test some corner cases that have been known to confuse the planner
+--
+-- ORDER BY on a constant doesn't really need any sorting
+SELECT 1 AS x ORDER BY x;
+ x
+---
+ 1
+(1 row)
+
+-- But ORDER BY on a set-valued expression does
+create function sillysrf(int) returns setof int as
+ 'values (1),(10),(2),($1)' language sql immutable;
+select sillysrf(42);
+ sillysrf
+----------
+ 1
+ 10
+ 2
+ 42
+(4 rows)
+
+select sillysrf(-1) order by 1;
+ sillysrf
+----------
+ -1
+ 1
+ 2
+ 10
+(4 rows)
+
+drop function sillysrf(int);
+-- X = X isn't a no-op, it's effectively X IS NOT NULL assuming = is strict
+-- (see bug #5084)
+select * from (values (2),(null),(1)) v(k) where k = k order by k;
+ k
+---
+ 1
+ 2
+(2 rows)
+
+select * from (values (2),(null),(1)) v(k) where k = k;
+ k
+---
+ 2
+ 1
+(2 rows)
+
+-- Test partitioned tables with no partitions, which should be handled the
+-- same as the non-inheritance case when expanding its RTE.
+create table list_parted_tbl (a int,b int) partition by list (a);
+create table list_parted_tbl1 partition of list_parted_tbl
+ for values in (1) partition by list(b);
+explain (costs off) select * from list_parted_tbl;
+ QUERY PLAN
+--------------------------
+ Result
+ One-Time Filter: false
+(2 rows)
+
+drop table list_parted_tbl;