summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/doc/src/sgml/html/ddl-depend.html
blob: 598dd112c3eb8fcf3b7fe21514621cddfff39d39 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /><title>5.14. Dependency Tracking</title><link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="stylesheet.css" /><link rev="made" href="pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org" /><meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets V1.79.1" /><link rel="prev" href="ddl-others.html" title="5.13. Other Database Objects" /><link rel="next" href="dml.html" title="Chapter 6. Data Manipulation" /></head><body id="docContent" class="container-fluid col-10"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/transitional" class="navheader"><table width="100%" summary="Navigation header"><tr><th colspan="5" align="center">5.14. Dependency Tracking</th></tr><tr><td width="10%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="ddl-others.html" title="5.13. Other Database Objects">Prev</a> </td><td width="10%" align="left"><a accesskey="u" href="ddl.html" title="Chapter 5. Data Definition">Up</a></td><th width="60%" align="center">Chapter 5. Data Definition</th><td width="10%" align="right"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html" title="PostgreSQL 13.4 Documentation">Home</a></td><td width="10%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="dml.html" title="Chapter 6. Data Manipulation">Next</a></td></tr></table><hr></hr></div><div class="sect1" id="DDL-DEPEND"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">5.14. Dependency Tracking</h2></div></div></div><a id="id-1.5.4.16.2" class="indexterm"></a><a id="id-1.5.4.16.3" class="indexterm"></a><p>
   When you create complex database structures involving many tables
   with foreign key constraints, views, triggers, functions, etc. you
   implicitly create a net of dependencies between the objects.
   For instance, a table with a foreign key constraint depends on the
   table it references.
  </p><p>
   To ensure the integrity of the entire database structure,
   <span class="productname">PostgreSQL</span> makes sure that you cannot
   drop objects that other objects still depend on.  For example,
   attempting to drop the products table we considered in <a class="xref" href="ddl-constraints.html#DDL-CONSTRAINTS-FK" title="5.4.5. Foreign Keys">Section 5.4.5</a>, with the orders table depending on
   it, would result in an error message like this:
</p><pre class="screen">
DROP TABLE products;

ERROR:  cannot drop table products because other objects depend on it
DETAIL:  constraint orders_product_no_fkey on table orders depends on table products
HINT:  Use DROP ... CASCADE to drop the dependent objects too.
</pre><p>
   The error message contains a useful hint: if you do not want to
   bother deleting all the dependent objects individually, you can run:
</p><pre class="screen">
DROP TABLE products CASCADE;
</pre><p>
   and all the dependent objects will be removed, as will any objects
   that depend on them, recursively.  In this case, it doesn't remove
   the orders table, it only removes the foreign key constraint.
   It stops there because nothing depends on the foreign key constraint.
   (If you want to check what <code class="command">DROP ... CASCADE</code> will do,
   run <code class="command">DROP</code> without <code class="literal">CASCADE</code> and read the
   <code class="literal">DETAIL</code> output.)
  </p><p>
   Almost all <code class="command">DROP</code> commands in <span class="productname">PostgreSQL</span> support
   specifying <code class="literal">CASCADE</code>.  Of course, the nature of
   the possible dependencies varies with the type of the object.  You
   can also write <code class="literal">RESTRICT</code> instead of
   <code class="literal">CASCADE</code> to get the default behavior, which is to
   prevent dropping objects that any other objects depend on.
  </p><div class="note"><h3 class="title">Note</h3><p>
    According to the SQL standard, specifying either
    <code class="literal">RESTRICT</code> or <code class="literal">CASCADE</code> is
    required in a <code class="command">DROP</code> command.  No database system actually
    enforces that rule, but whether the default behavior
    is <code class="literal">RESTRICT</code> or <code class="literal">CASCADE</code> varies
    across systems.
   </p></div><p>
   If a <code class="command">DROP</code> command lists multiple
   objects, <code class="literal">CASCADE</code> is only required when there are
   dependencies outside the specified group.  For example, when saying
   <code class="literal">DROP TABLE tab1, tab2</code> the existence of a foreign
   key referencing <code class="literal">tab1</code> from <code class="literal">tab2</code> would not mean
   that <code class="literal">CASCADE</code> is needed to succeed.
  </p><p>
   For user-defined functions, <span class="productname">PostgreSQL</span> tracks
   dependencies associated with a function's externally-visible properties,
   such as its argument and result types, but <span class="emphasis"><em>not</em></span> dependencies
   that could only be known by examining the function body.  As an example,
   consider this situation:

</p><pre class="programlisting">
CREATE TYPE rainbow AS ENUM ('red', 'orange', 'yellow',
                             'green', 'blue', 'purple');

CREATE TABLE my_colors (color rainbow, note text);

CREATE FUNCTION get_color_note (rainbow) RETURNS text AS
  'SELECT note FROM my_colors WHERE color = $1'
  LANGUAGE SQL;
</pre><p>

   (See <a class="xref" href="xfunc-sql.html" title="37.5. Query Language (SQL) Functions">Section 37.5</a> for an explanation of SQL-language
   functions.)  <span class="productname">PostgreSQL</span> will be aware that
   the <code class="function">get_color_note</code> function depends on the <code class="type">rainbow</code>
   type: dropping the type would force dropping the function, because its
   argument type would no longer be defined.  But <span class="productname">PostgreSQL</span>
   will not consider <code class="function">get_color_note</code> to depend on
   the <code class="structname">my_colors</code> table, and so will not drop the function if
   the table is dropped.  While there are disadvantages to this approach,
   there are also benefits.  The function is still valid in some sense if the
   table is missing, though executing it would cause an error; creating a new
   table of the same name would allow the function to work again.
  </p></div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/transitional" class="navfooter"><hr></hr><table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer"><tr><td width="40%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="ddl-others.html" title="5.13. Other Database Objects">Prev</a> </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="u" href="ddl.html" title="Chapter 5. Data Definition">Up</a></td><td width="40%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="dml.html" title="Chapter 6. Data Manipulation">Next</a></td></tr><tr><td width="40%" align="left" valign="top">5.13. Other Database Objects </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html" title="PostgreSQL 13.4 Documentation">Home</a></td><td width="40%" align="right" valign="top"> Chapter 6. Data Manipulation</td></tr></table></div></body></html>