summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/doc/src/sgml/ref/reindex.sgml
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/src/sgml/ref/reindex.sgml')
-rw-r--r--doc/src/sgml/ref/reindex.sgml555
1 files changed, 555 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/reindex.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/reindex.sgml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..22dbb52
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/reindex.sgml
@@ -0,0 +1,555 @@
+<!--
+doc/src/sgml/ref/reindex.sgml
+PostgreSQL documentation
+-->
+
+<refentry id="sql-reindex">
+ <indexterm zone="sql-reindex">
+ <primary>REINDEX</primary>
+ </indexterm>
+
+ <refmeta>
+ <refentrytitle>REINDEX</refentrytitle>
+ <manvolnum>7</manvolnum>
+ <refmiscinfo>SQL - Language Statements</refmiscinfo>
+ </refmeta>
+
+ <refnamediv>
+ <refname>REINDEX</refname>
+ <refpurpose>rebuild indexes</refpurpose>
+ </refnamediv>
+
+ <refsynopsisdiv>
+<synopsis>
+REINDEX [ ( <replaceable class="parameter">option</replaceable> [, ...] ) ] { INDEX | TABLE | SCHEMA | DATABASE | SYSTEM } [ CONCURRENTLY ] <replaceable class="parameter">name</replaceable>
+
+<phrase>where <replaceable class="parameter">option</replaceable> can be one of:</phrase>
+
+ CONCURRENTLY [ <replaceable class="parameter">boolean</replaceable> ]
+ TABLESPACE <replaceable class="parameter">new_tablespace</replaceable>
+ VERBOSE [ <replaceable class="parameter">boolean</replaceable> ]
+</synopsis>
+ </refsynopsisdiv>
+
+ <refsect1>
+ <title>Description</title>
+
+ <para>
+ <command>REINDEX</command> rebuilds an index using the data
+ stored in the index's table, replacing the old copy of the index. There are
+ several scenarios in which to use <command>REINDEX</command>:
+
+ <itemizedlist>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ An index has become corrupted, and no longer contains valid
+ data. Although in theory this should never happen, in
+ practice indexes can become corrupted due to software bugs or
+ hardware failures. <command>REINDEX</command> provides a
+ recovery method.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ An index has become <quote>bloated</quote>, that is it contains many
+ empty or nearly-empty pages. This can occur with B-tree indexes in
+ <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> under certain uncommon access
+ patterns. <command>REINDEX</command> provides a way to reduce
+ the space consumption of the index by writing a new version of
+ the index without the dead pages. See <xref
+ linkend="routine-reindex"/> for more information.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ You have altered a storage parameter (such as fillfactor)
+ for an index, and wish to ensure that the change has taken full effect.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ If an index build fails with the <literal>CONCURRENTLY</literal> option,
+ this index is left as <quote>invalid</quote>. Such indexes are useless
+ but it can be convenient to use <command>REINDEX</command> to rebuild
+ them. Note that only <command>REINDEX INDEX</command> is able
+ to perform a concurrent build on an invalid index.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ </itemizedlist></para>
+ </refsect1>
+
+ <refsect1>
+ <title>Parameters</title>
+
+ <variablelist>
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><literal>INDEX</literal></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Recreate the specified index. This form of <command>REINDEX</command>
+ cannot be executed inside a transaction block when used with a
+ partitioned index.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><literal>TABLE</literal></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Recreate all indexes of the specified table. If the table has a
+ secondary <quote>TOAST</quote> table, that is reindexed as well.
+ This form of <command>REINDEX</command> cannot be executed inside a
+ transaction block when used with a partitioned table.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><literal>SCHEMA</literal></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Recreate all indexes of the specified schema. If a table of this
+ schema has a secondary <quote>TOAST</quote> table, that is reindexed as
+ well. Indexes on shared system catalogs are also processed.
+ This form of <command>REINDEX</command> cannot be executed inside a
+ transaction block.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><literal>DATABASE</literal></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Recreate all indexes within the current database.
+ Indexes on shared system catalogs are also processed.
+ This form of <command>REINDEX</command> cannot be executed inside a
+ transaction block.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><literal>SYSTEM</literal></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Recreate all indexes on system catalogs within the current database.
+ Indexes on shared system catalogs are included.
+ Indexes on user tables are not processed.
+ This form of <command>REINDEX</command> cannot be executed inside a
+ transaction block.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><replaceable class="parameter">name</replaceable></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ The name of the specific index, table, or database to be
+ reindexed. Index and table names can be schema-qualified.
+ Presently, <command>REINDEX DATABASE</command> and <command>REINDEX SYSTEM</command>
+ can only reindex the current database, so their parameter must match
+ the current database's name.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><literal>CONCURRENTLY</literal></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ When this option is used, <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> will rebuild the
+ index without taking any locks that prevent concurrent inserts,
+ updates, or deletes on the table; whereas a standard index rebuild
+ locks out writes (but not reads) on the table until it's done.
+ There are several caveats to be aware of when using this option
+ &mdash; see <xref linkend="sql-reindex-concurrently"/> below.
+ </para>
+ <para>
+ For temporary tables, <command>REINDEX</command> is always
+ non-concurrent, as no other session can access them, and
+ non-concurrent reindex is cheaper.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><literal>TABLESPACE</literal></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Specifies that indexes will be rebuilt on a new tablespace.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><literal>VERBOSE</literal></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Prints a progress report as each index is reindexed.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><replaceable class="parameter">boolean</replaceable></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Specifies whether the selected option should be turned on or off.
+ You can write <literal>TRUE</literal>, <literal>ON</literal>, or
+ <literal>1</literal> to enable the option, and <literal>FALSE</literal>,
+ <literal>OFF</literal>, or <literal>0</literal> to disable it. The
+ <replaceable class="parameter">boolean</replaceable> value can also
+ be omitted, in which case <literal>TRUE</literal> is assumed.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><replaceable class="parameter">new_tablespace</replaceable></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ The tablespace where indexes will be rebuilt.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+ </variablelist>
+ </refsect1>
+
+ <refsect1>
+ <title>Notes</title>
+
+ <para>
+ If you suspect corruption of an index on a user table, you can
+ simply rebuild that index, or all indexes on the table, using
+ <command>REINDEX INDEX</command> or <command>REINDEX TABLE</command>.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Things are more difficult if you need to recover from corruption of
+ an index on a system table. In this case it's important for the
+ system to not have used any of the suspect indexes itself.
+ (Indeed, in this sort of scenario you might find that server
+ processes are crashing immediately at start-up, due to reliance on
+ the corrupted indexes.) To recover safely, the server must be started
+ with the <option>-P</option> option, which prevents it from using
+ indexes for system catalog lookups.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ One way to do this is to shut down the server and start a single-user
+ <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> server
+ with the <option>-P</option> option included on its command line.
+ Then, <command>REINDEX DATABASE</command>, <command>REINDEX SYSTEM</command>,
+ <command>REINDEX TABLE</command>, or <command>REINDEX INDEX</command> can be
+ issued, depending on how much you want to reconstruct. If in
+ doubt, use <command>REINDEX SYSTEM</command> to select
+ reconstruction of all system indexes in the database. Then quit
+ the single-user server session and restart the regular server.
+ See the <xref linkend="app-postgres"/> reference page for more
+ information about how to interact with the single-user server
+ interface.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Alternatively, a regular server session can be started with
+ <option>-P</option> included in its command line options.
+ The method for doing this varies across clients, but in all
+ <application>libpq</application>-based clients, it is possible to set
+ the <envar>PGOPTIONS</envar> environment variable to <literal>-P</literal>
+ before starting the client. Note that while this method does not
+ require locking out other clients, it might still be wise to prevent
+ other users from connecting to the damaged database until repairs
+ have been completed.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ <command>REINDEX</command> is similar to a drop and recreate of the index
+ in that the index contents are rebuilt from scratch. However, the locking
+ considerations are rather different. <command>REINDEX</command> locks out writes
+ but not reads of the index's parent table. It also takes an
+ <literal>ACCESS EXCLUSIVE</literal> lock on the specific index being processed,
+ which will block reads that attempt to use that index. In contrast,
+ <command>DROP INDEX</command> momentarily takes an
+ <literal>ACCESS EXCLUSIVE</literal> lock on the parent table, blocking both
+ writes and reads. The subsequent <command>CREATE INDEX</command> locks out
+ writes but not reads; since the index is not there, no read will attempt to
+ use it, meaning that there will be no blocking but reads might be forced
+ into expensive sequential scans.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Reindexing a single index or table requires being the owner of that
+ index or table. Reindexing a schema or database requires being the
+ owner of that schema or database. Note specifically that it's thus
+ possible for non-superusers to rebuild indexes of tables owned by
+ other users. However, as a special exception, when
+ <command>REINDEX DATABASE</command>, <command>REINDEX SCHEMA</command>
+ or <command>REINDEX SYSTEM</command> is issued by a non-superuser,
+ indexes on shared catalogs will be skipped unless the user owns the
+ catalog (which typically won't be the case). Of course, superusers
+ can always reindex anything.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Reindexing partitioned indexes or partitioned tables is supported
+ with <command>REINDEX INDEX</command> or <command>REINDEX TABLE</command>,
+ respectively. Each partition of the specified partitioned relation is
+ reindexed in a separate transaction. Those commands cannot be used inside
+ a transaction block when working on a partitioned table or index.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ When using the <literal>TABLESPACE</literal> clause with
+ <command>REINDEX</command> on a partitioned index or table, only the
+ tablespace references of the leaf partitions are updated. As partitioned
+ indexes are not updated, it is recommended to separately use
+ <command>ALTER TABLE ONLY</command> on them so as any new partitions
+ attached inherit the new tablespace. On failure, it may not have moved
+ all the indexes to the new tablespace. Re-running the command will rebuild
+ all the leaf partitions and move previously-unprocessed indexes to the new
+ tablespace.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ If <literal>SCHEMA</literal>, <literal>DATABASE</literal> or
+ <literal>SYSTEM</literal> is used with <literal>TABLESPACE</literal>,
+ system relations are skipped and a single <literal>WARNING</literal>
+ will be generated. Indexes on TOAST tables are rebuilt, but not moved
+ to the new tablespace.
+ </para>
+
+ <refsect2 id="sql-reindex-concurrently" xreflabel="Rebuilding Indexes Concurrently">
+ <title>Rebuilding Indexes Concurrently</title>
+
+ <indexterm zone="sql-reindex-concurrently">
+ <primary>index</primary>
+ <secondary>rebuilding concurrently</secondary>
+ </indexterm>
+
+ <para>
+ Rebuilding an index can interfere with regular operation of a database.
+ Normally <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> locks the table whose index is rebuilt
+ against writes and performs the entire index build with a single scan of the
+ table. Other transactions can still read the table, but if they try to
+ insert, update, or delete rows in the table they will block until the
+ index rebuild is finished. This could have a severe effect if the system is
+ a live production database. Very large tables can take many hours to be
+ indexed, and even for smaller tables, an index rebuild can lock out writers
+ for periods that are unacceptably long for a production system.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> supports rebuilding indexes with minimum locking
+ of writes. This method is invoked by specifying the
+ <literal>CONCURRENTLY</literal> option of <command>REINDEX</command>. When this option
+ is used, <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> must perform two scans of the table
+ for each index that needs to be rebuilt and wait for termination of
+ all existing transactions that could potentially use the index.
+ This method requires more total work than a standard index
+ rebuild and takes significantly longer to complete as it needs to wait
+ for unfinished transactions that might modify the index. However, since
+ it allows normal operations to continue while the index is being rebuilt, this
+ method is useful for rebuilding indexes in a production environment. Of
+ course, the extra CPU, memory and I/O load imposed by the index rebuild
+ may slow down other operations.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ The following steps occur in a concurrent reindex. Each step is run in a
+ separate transaction. If there are multiple indexes to be rebuilt, then
+ each step loops through all the indexes before moving to the next step.
+
+ <orderedlist>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ A new transient index definition is added to the catalog
+ <literal>pg_index</literal>. This definition will be used to replace
+ the old index. A <literal>SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE</literal> lock at
+ session level is taken on the indexes being reindexed as well as their
+ associated tables to prevent any schema modification while processing.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ A first pass to build the index is done for each new index. Once the
+ index is built, its flag <literal>pg_index.indisready</literal> is
+ switched to <quote>true</quote> to make it ready for inserts, making it
+ visible to other sessions once the transaction that performed the build
+ is finished. This step is done in a separate transaction for each
+ index.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Then a second pass is performed to add tuples that were added while the
+ first pass was running. This step is also done in a separate
+ transaction for each index.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ All the constraints that refer to the index are changed to refer to the
+ new index definition, and the names of the indexes are changed. At
+ this point, <literal>pg_index.indisvalid</literal> is switched to
+ <quote>true</quote> for the new index and to <quote>false</quote> for
+ the old, and a cache invalidation is done causing all sessions that
+ referenced the old index to be invalidated.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ The old indexes have <literal>pg_index.indisready</literal> switched to
+ <quote>false</quote> to prevent any new tuple insertions, after waiting
+ for running queries that might reference the old index to complete.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ The old indexes are dropped. The <literal>SHARE UPDATE
+ EXCLUSIVE</literal> session locks for the indexes and the table are
+ released.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </orderedlist>
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ If a problem arises while rebuilding the indexes, such as a
+ uniqueness violation in a unique index, the <command>REINDEX</command>
+ command will fail but leave behind an <quote>invalid</quote> new index in addition to
+ the pre-existing one. This index will be ignored for querying purposes
+ because it might be incomplete; however it will still consume update
+ overhead. The <application>psql</application> <command>\d</command> command will report
+ such an index as <literal>INVALID</literal>:
+
+<programlisting>
+postgres=# \d tab
+ Table "public.tab"
+ Column | Type | Modifiers
+--------+---------+-----------
+ col | integer |
+Indexes:
+ "idx" btree (col)
+ "idx_ccnew" btree (col) INVALID
+</programlisting>
+
+ If the index marked <literal>INVALID</literal> is suffixed
+ <literal>ccnew</literal>, then it corresponds to the transient
+ index created during the concurrent operation, and the recommended
+ recovery method is to drop it using <literal>DROP INDEX</literal>,
+ then attempt <command>REINDEX CONCURRENTLY</command> again.
+ If the invalid index is instead suffixed <literal>ccold</literal>,
+ it corresponds to the original index which could not be dropped;
+ the recommended recovery method is to just drop said index, since the
+ rebuild proper has been successful.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Regular index builds permit other regular index builds on the same table
+ to occur simultaneously, but only one concurrent index build can occur on a
+ table at a time. In both cases, no other types of schema modification on
+ the table are allowed meanwhile. Another difference is that a regular
+ <command>REINDEX TABLE</command> or <command>REINDEX INDEX</command>
+ command can be performed within a transaction block, but <command>REINDEX
+ CONCURRENTLY</command> cannot.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Like any long-running transaction, <command>REINDEX</command> on a table
+ can affect which tuples can be removed by concurrent
+ <command>VACUUM</command> on any other table.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ <command>REINDEX SYSTEM</command> does not support
+ <command>CONCURRENTLY</command> since system catalogs cannot be reindexed
+ concurrently.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Furthermore, indexes for exclusion constraints cannot be reindexed
+ concurrently. If such an index is named directly in this command, an
+ error is raised. If a table or database with exclusion constraint indexes
+ is reindexed concurrently, those indexes will be skipped. (It is possible
+ to reindex such indexes without the <command>CONCURRENTLY</command> option.)
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Each backend running <command>REINDEX</command> will report its progress
+ in the <structname>pg_stat_progress_create_index</structname> view. See
+ <xref linkend="create-index-progress-reporting"/> for details.
+ </para>
+ </refsect2>
+ </refsect1>
+
+ <refsect1>
+ <title>Examples</title>
+
+ <para>
+ Rebuild a single index:
+
+<programlisting>
+REINDEX INDEX my_index;
+</programlisting>
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Rebuild all the indexes on the table <literal>my_table</literal>:
+
+<programlisting>
+REINDEX TABLE my_table;
+</programlisting>
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Rebuild all indexes in a particular database, without trusting the
+ system indexes to be valid already:
+
+<programlisting>
+$ <userinput>export PGOPTIONS="-P"</userinput>
+$ <userinput>psql broken_db</userinput>
+...
+broken_db=&gt; REINDEX DATABASE broken_db;
+broken_db=&gt; \q
+</programlisting></para>
+
+ <para>
+ Rebuild indexes for a table, without blocking read and write operations
+ on involved relations while reindexing is in progress:
+
+<programlisting>
+REINDEX TABLE CONCURRENTLY my_broken_table;
+</programlisting></para>
+ </refsect1>
+
+ <refsect1>
+ <title>Compatibility</title>
+
+ <para>
+ There is no <command>REINDEX</command> command in the SQL standard.
+ </para>
+ </refsect1>
+
+ <refsect1>
+ <title>See Also</title>
+
+ <simplelist type="inline">
+ <member><xref linkend="sql-createindex"/></member>
+ <member><xref linkend="sql-dropindex"/></member>
+ <member><xref linkend="app-reindexdb"/></member>
+ <member><xref linkend="create-index-progress-reporting"/></member>
+ </simplelist>
+ </refsect1>
+</refentry>