diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/subscription/t/100_bugs.pl')
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/subscription/t/100_bugs.pl | 308 |
1 files changed, 308 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/subscription/t/100_bugs.pl b/src/test/subscription/t/100_bugs.pl new file mode 100644 index 0000000..424ffb7 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/subscription/t/100_bugs.pl @@ -0,0 +1,308 @@ + +# Copyright (c) 2021, PostgreSQL Global Development Group + +# Tests for various bugs found over time +use strict; +use warnings; +use PostgresNode; +use TestLib; +use Test::More tests => 7; + +# Bug #15114 + +# The bug was that determining which columns are part of the replica +# identity index using RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap() would run +# eval_const_expressions() on index expressions and predicates across +# all indexes of the table, which in turn might require a snapshot, +# but there wasn't one set, so it crashes. There were actually two +# separate bugs, one on the publisher and one on the subscriber. The +# fix was to avoid the constant expressions simplification in +# RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap(), so it's safe to call in more contexts. + +my $node_publisher = get_new_node('publisher'); +$node_publisher->init(allows_streaming => 'logical'); +$node_publisher->start; + +my $node_subscriber = get_new_node('subscriber'); +$node_subscriber->init(allows_streaming => 'logical'); +$node_subscriber->start; + +my $publisher_connstr = $node_publisher->connstr . ' dbname=postgres'; + +$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE TABLE tab1 (a int PRIMARY KEY, b int)"); + +$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE FUNCTION double(x int) RETURNS int IMMUTABLE LANGUAGE SQL AS 'select x * 2'" +); + +# an index with a predicate that lends itself to constant expressions +# evaluation +$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE INDEX ON tab1 (b) WHERE a > double(1)"); + +# and the same setup on the subscriber +$node_subscriber->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE TABLE tab1 (a int PRIMARY KEY, b int)"); + +$node_subscriber->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE FUNCTION double(x int) RETURNS int IMMUTABLE LANGUAGE SQL AS 'select x * 2'" +); + +$node_subscriber->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE INDEX ON tab1 (b) WHERE a > double(1)"); + +$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE PUBLICATION pub1 FOR ALL TABLES"); + +$node_subscriber->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE SUBSCRIPTION sub1 CONNECTION '$publisher_connstr' PUBLICATION pub1" +); + +$node_publisher->wait_for_catchup('sub1'); + +# This would crash, first on the publisher, and then (if the publisher +# is fixed) on the subscriber. +$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres', "INSERT INTO tab1 VALUES (1, 2)"); + +$node_publisher->wait_for_catchup('sub1'); + +pass('index predicates do not cause crash'); + +$node_publisher->stop('fast'); +$node_subscriber->stop('fast'); + + +# Handling of temporary and unlogged tables with FOR ALL TABLES publications + +# If a FOR ALL TABLES publication exists, temporary and unlogged +# tables are ignored for publishing changes. The bug was that we +# would still check in that case that such a table has a replica +# identity set before accepting updates. If it did not it would cause +# an error when an update was attempted. + +$node_publisher = get_new_node('publisher2'); +$node_publisher->init(allows_streaming => 'logical'); +$node_publisher->start; + +$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE PUBLICATION pub FOR ALL TABLES"); + +is( $node_publisher->psql( + 'postgres', + "CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE tt1 AS SELECT 1 AS a; UPDATE tt1 SET a = 2;"), + 0, + 'update to temporary table without replica identity with FOR ALL TABLES publication' +); + +is( $node_publisher->psql( + 'postgres', + "CREATE UNLOGGED TABLE tu1 AS SELECT 1 AS a; UPDATE tu1 SET a = 2;"), + 0, + 'update to unlogged table without replica identity with FOR ALL TABLES publication' +); + +$node_publisher->stop('fast'); + +# Bug #16643 - https://postgr.es/m/16643-eaadeb2a1a58d28c@postgresql.org +# +# Initial sync doesn't complete; the protocol was not being followed per +# expectations after commit 07082b08cc5d. +my $node_twoways = get_new_node('twoways'); +$node_twoways->init(allows_streaming => 'logical'); +$node_twoways->start; +for my $db (qw(d1 d2)) +{ + $node_twoways->safe_psql('postgres', "CREATE DATABASE $db"); + $node_twoways->safe_psql($db, "CREATE TABLE t (f int)"); + $node_twoways->safe_psql($db, "CREATE TABLE t2 (f int)"); +} + +my $rows = 3000; +$node_twoways->safe_psql( + 'd1', qq{ + INSERT INTO t SELECT * FROM generate_series(1, $rows); + INSERT INTO t2 SELECT * FROM generate_series(1, $rows); + CREATE PUBLICATION testpub FOR TABLE t; + SELECT pg_create_logical_replication_slot('testslot', 'pgoutput'); + }); + +$node_twoways->safe_psql('d2', + "CREATE SUBSCRIPTION testsub CONNECTION \$\$" + . $node_twoways->connstr('d1') + . "\$\$ PUBLICATION testpub WITH (create_slot=false, " + . "slot_name='testslot')"); +$node_twoways->safe_psql( + 'd1', qq{ + INSERT INTO t SELECT * FROM generate_series(1, $rows); + INSERT INTO t2 SELECT * FROM generate_series(1, $rows); + }); +$node_twoways->safe_psql('d1', 'ALTER PUBLICATION testpub ADD TABLE t2'); +$node_twoways->safe_psql('d2', + 'ALTER SUBSCRIPTION testsub REFRESH PUBLICATION'); + +# We cannot rely solely on wait_for_catchup() here; it isn't sufficient +# when tablesync workers might still be running. So in addition to that, +# verify that tables are synced. +# XXX maybe this should be integrated in wait_for_catchup() itself. +$node_twoways->wait_for_catchup('testsub'); +my $synced_query = + "SELECT count(1) = 0 FROM pg_subscription_rel WHERE srsubstate NOT IN ('r', 's');"; +$node_twoways->poll_query_until('d2', $synced_query) + or die "Timed out while waiting for subscriber to synchronize data"; + +is($node_twoways->safe_psql('d2', "SELECT count(f) FROM t"), + $rows * 2, "2x$rows rows in t"); +is($node_twoways->safe_psql('d2', "SELECT count(f) FROM t2"), + $rows * 2, "2x$rows rows in t2"); + +# Verify table data is synced with cascaded replication setup. This is mainly +# to test whether the data written by tablesync worker gets replicated. +my $node_pub = get_new_node('testpublisher1'); +$node_pub->init(allows_streaming => 'logical'); +$node_pub->start; + +my $node_pub_sub = get_new_node('testpublisher_subscriber'); +$node_pub_sub->init(allows_streaming => 'logical'); +$node_pub_sub->start; + +my $node_sub = get_new_node('testsubscriber1'); +$node_sub->init(allows_streaming => 'logical'); +$node_sub->start; + +# Create the tables in all nodes. +$node_pub->safe_psql('postgres', "CREATE TABLE tab1 (a int)"); +$node_pub_sub->safe_psql('postgres', "CREATE TABLE tab1 (a int)"); +$node_sub->safe_psql('postgres', "CREATE TABLE tab1 (a int)"); + +# Create a cascaded replication setup like: +# N1 - Create publication testpub1. +# N2 - Create publication testpub2 and also include subscriber which subscribes +# to testpub1. +# N3 - Create subscription testsub2 subscribes to testpub2. +# +# Note that subscription on N3 needs to be created before subscription on N2 to +# test whether the data written by tablesync worker of N2 gets replicated. +$node_pub->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE PUBLICATION testpub1 FOR TABLE tab1"); + +$node_pub_sub->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE PUBLICATION testpub2 FOR TABLE tab1"); + +my $publisher1_connstr = $node_pub->connstr . ' dbname=postgres'; +my $publisher2_connstr = $node_pub_sub->connstr . ' dbname=postgres'; + +$node_sub->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE SUBSCRIPTION testsub2 CONNECTION '$publisher2_connstr' PUBLICATION testpub2" +); + +$node_pub_sub->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE SUBSCRIPTION testsub1 CONNECTION '$publisher1_connstr' PUBLICATION testpub1" +); + +$node_pub->safe_psql('postgres', + "INSERT INTO tab1 values(generate_series(1,10))"); + +# Verify that the data is cascaded from testpub1 to testsub1 and further from +# testpub2 (which had testsub1) to testsub2. +$node_pub->wait_for_catchup('testsub1'); +$node_pub_sub->wait_for_catchup('testsub2'); + +# Drop subscriptions as we don't need them anymore +$node_pub_sub->safe_psql('postgres', "DROP SUBSCRIPTION testsub1"); +$node_sub->safe_psql('postgres', "DROP SUBSCRIPTION testsub2"); + +# Drop publications as we don't need them anymore +$node_pub->safe_psql('postgres', "DROP PUBLICATION testpub1"); +$node_pub_sub->safe_psql('postgres', "DROP PUBLICATION testpub2"); + +# Clean up the tables on both publisher and subscriber as we don't need them +$node_pub->safe_psql('postgres', "DROP TABLE tab1"); +$node_pub_sub->safe_psql('postgres', "DROP TABLE tab1"); +$node_sub->safe_psql('postgres', "DROP TABLE tab1"); + +$node_pub->stop('fast'); +$node_pub_sub->stop('fast'); +$node_sub->stop('fast'); + +# https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB61133CA11630DAE45BC6AD95FB939%40OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com + +# The bug was that when changing the REPLICA IDENTITY INDEX to another one, the +# target table's relcache was not being invalidated. This leads to skipping +# UPDATE/DELETE operations during apply on the subscriber side as the columns +# required to search corresponding rows won't get logged. +$node_publisher = get_new_node('publisher3'); +$node_publisher->init(allows_streaming => 'logical'); +$node_publisher->start; + +$node_subscriber = get_new_node('subscriber3'); +$node_subscriber->init(allows_streaming => 'logical'); +$node_subscriber->start; + +$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE TABLE tab_replidentity_index(a int not null, b int not null)"); +$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx_replidentity_index_a ON tab_replidentity_index(a)" +); +$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx_replidentity_index_b ON tab_replidentity_index(b)" +); + +# use index idx_replidentity_index_a as REPLICA IDENTITY on publisher. +$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres', + "ALTER TABLE tab_replidentity_index REPLICA IDENTITY USING INDEX idx_replidentity_index_a" +); + +$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres', + "INSERT INTO tab_replidentity_index VALUES(1, 1),(2, 2)"); + +$node_subscriber->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE TABLE tab_replidentity_index(a int not null, b int not null)"); +$node_subscriber->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx_replidentity_index_a ON tab_replidentity_index(a)" +); +$node_subscriber->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx_replidentity_index_b ON tab_replidentity_index(b)" +); +# use index idx_replidentity_index_b as REPLICA IDENTITY on subscriber because +# it reflects the future scenario we are testing: changing REPLICA IDENTITY +# INDEX. +$node_subscriber->safe_psql('postgres', + "ALTER TABLE tab_replidentity_index REPLICA IDENTITY USING INDEX idx_replidentity_index_b" +); + +$publisher_connstr = $node_publisher->connstr . ' dbname=postgres'; +$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE PUBLICATION tap_pub FOR TABLE tab_replidentity_index"); +$node_subscriber->safe_psql('postgres', + "CREATE SUBSCRIPTION tap_sub CONNECTION '$publisher_connstr' PUBLICATION tap_pub" +); + +$node_publisher->wait_for_catchup('tap_sub'); + +# Also wait for initial table sync to finish +$node_subscriber->poll_query_until('postgres', $synced_query) + or die "Timed out while waiting for subscriber to synchronize data"; + +is( $node_subscriber->safe_psql( + 'postgres', "SELECT * FROM tab_replidentity_index"), + qq(1|1 +2|2), + "check initial data on subscriber"); + +# Set REPLICA IDENTITY to idx_replidentity_index_b on publisher, then run UPDATE and DELETE. +$node_publisher->safe_psql( + 'postgres', qq[ + ALTER TABLE tab_replidentity_index REPLICA IDENTITY USING INDEX idx_replidentity_index_b; + UPDATE tab_replidentity_index SET a = -a WHERE a = 1; + DELETE FROM tab_replidentity_index WHERE a = 2; +]); + +$node_publisher->wait_for_catchup('tap_sub'); +is( $node_subscriber->safe_psql( + 'postgres', "SELECT * FROM tab_replidentity_index"), + qq(-1|1), + "update works with REPLICA IDENTITY"); + +$node_publisher->stop('fast'); +$node_subscriber->stop('fast'); |