From f866ab5a13eace05b4850480663aba7f605841c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Sun, 5 May 2024 19:44:22 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 2.4.0. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- doc/tutorial_threads.dox | 203 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 203 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/tutorial_threads.dox (limited to 'doc/tutorial_threads.dox') diff --git a/doc/tutorial_threads.dox b/doc/tutorial_threads.dox new file mode 100644 index 0000000..111bbf5 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/tutorial_threads.dox @@ -0,0 +1,203 @@ +/** +@page libtalloc_threads Chapter 8: Using threads with talloc + +@section Talloc and thread safety + +The talloc library is not internally thread-safe, in that accesses +to variables on a talloc context are not controlled by mutexes or +other thread-safe primitives. + +However, so long as talloc_disable_null_tracking() is called from +the main thread to disable global variable access within talloc, +then each thread can safely use its own top level talloc context +allocated off the NULL context. + +For example: + +@code +static void *thread_fn(void *arg) +{ + const char *ctx_name = (const char *)arg; + /* + * Create a new top level talloc hierarchy in + * this thread. + */ + void *top_ctx = talloc_named_const(NULL, 0, "top"); + if (top_ctx == NULL) { + return NULL; + } + sub_ctx = talloc_named_const(top_ctx, 100, ctx_name); + if (sub_ctx == NULL) { + return NULL; + } + + /* + * Do more processing/talloc calls on top_ctx + * and its children. + */ + ...... + + talloc_free(top_ctx); + return value; +} +@endcode + +is a perfectly safe use of talloc within a thread. + +The problem comes when one thread wishes to move some +memory allocated on its local top level talloc context +to another thread. Care must be taken to add data access +exclusion to prevent memory corruption. One method would +be to lock a mutex before any talloc call on each thread, +but this would push the burden of total talloc thread-safety +on the poor user of the library. + +A much easier way to transfer talloced memory between +threads is by the use of an intermediate, mutex locked, +intermediate variable. + +An example of this is below - taken from test code inside +the talloc testsuite. + +The main thread creates 1000 sub-threads, and then accepts +the transfer of some thread-talloc'ed memory onto its top +level context from each thread in turn. + +A pthread mutex and condition variable are used to +synchronize the transfer via the intermediate_ptr +variable. + +@code +/* Required sync variables. */ +static pthread_mutex_t mtx = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; +static pthread_cond_t condvar = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER; + +/* Intermediate talloc pointer for transfer. */ +static void *intermediate_ptr; + +/* Subthread. */ +static void *thread_fn(void *arg) +{ + int ret; + const char *ctx_name = (const char *)arg; + void *sub_ctx = NULL; + /* + * Do stuff that creates a new talloc hierarchy in + * this thread. + */ + void *top_ctx = talloc_named_const(NULL, 0, "top"); + if (top_ctx == NULL) { + return NULL; + } + sub_ctx = talloc_named_const(top_ctx, 100, ctx_name); + if (sub_ctx == NULL) { + return NULL; + } + + /* + * Now transfer a pointer from our hierarchy + * onto the intermediate ptr. + */ + ret = pthread_mutex_lock(&mtx); + if (ret != 0) { + talloc_free(top_ctx); + return NULL; + } + + /* Wait for intermediate_ptr to be free. */ + while (intermediate_ptr != NULL) { + ret = pthread_cond_wait(&condvar, &mtx); + if (ret != 0) { + talloc_free(top_ctx); + return NULL; + } + } + + /* and move our memory onto it from our toplevel hierarchy. */ + intermediate_ptr = talloc_move(NULL, &sub_ctx); + + /* Tell the main thread it's ready for pickup. */ + pthread_cond_broadcast(&condvar); + pthread_mutex_unlock(&mtx); + + talloc_free(top_ctx); + return NULL; +} + +/* Main thread. */ + +#define NUM_THREADS 1000 + +static bool test_pthread_talloc_passing(void) +{ + int i; + int ret; + char str_array[NUM_THREADS][20]; + pthread_t thread_id; + void *mem_ctx; + + /* + * Important ! Null tracking breaks threaded talloc. + * It *must* be turned off. + */ + talloc_disable_null_tracking(); + + /* Main thread toplevel context. */ + mem_ctx = talloc_named_const(NULL, 0, "toplevel"); + if (mem_ctx == NULL) { + return false; + } + + /* + * Spin off NUM_THREADS threads. + * They will use their own toplevel contexts. + */ + for (i = 0; i < NUM_THREADS; i++) { + (void)snprintf(str_array[i], + 20, + "thread:%d", + i); + if (str_array[i] == NULL) { + return false; + } + ret = pthread_create(&thread_id, + NULL, + thread_fn, + str_array[i]); + if (ret != 0) { + return false; + } + } + + /* Now wait for NUM_THREADS transfers of the talloc'ed memory. */ + for (i = 0; i < NUM_THREADS; i++) { + ret = pthread_mutex_lock(&mtx); + if (ret != 0) { + talloc_free(mem_ctx); + return false; + } + + /* Wait for intermediate_ptr to have our data. */ + while (intermediate_ptr == NULL) { + ret = pthread_cond_wait(&condvar, &mtx); + if (ret != 0) { + talloc_free(mem_ctx); + return false; + } + } + + /* and move it onto our toplevel hierarchy. */ + (void)talloc_move(mem_ctx, &intermediate_ptr); + + /* Tell the sub-threads we're ready for another. */ + pthread_cond_broadcast(&condvar); + pthread_mutex_unlock(&mtx); + } + + /* Dump the hierarchy. */ + talloc_report(mem_ctx, stdout); + talloc_free(mem_ctx); + return true; +} +@endcode +*/ -- cgit v1.2.3