summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/dangerfile.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-27 07:24:22 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-27 07:24:22 +0000
commit45d6379135504814ab723b57f0eb8be23393a51d (patch)
treed4f2ec4acca824a8446387a758b0ce4238a4dffa /dangerfile.py
parentInitial commit. (diff)
downloadbind9-45d6379135504814ab723b57f0eb8be23393a51d.tar.xz
bind9-45d6379135504814ab723b57f0eb8be23393a51d.zip
Adding upstream version 1:9.16.44.upstream/1%9.16.44
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'dangerfile.py')
-rw-r--r--dangerfile.py434
1 files changed, 434 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/dangerfile.py b/dangerfile.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d6a32e5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/dangerfile.py
@@ -0,0 +1,434 @@
+# Copyright (C) Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. ("ISC")
+#
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0
+#
+# This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
+# License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
+# file, you can obtain one at https://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
+#
+# See the COPYRIGHT file distributed with this work for additional
+# information regarding copyright ownership.
+
+import os
+import re
+
+import gitlab
+
+# Helper functions and variables
+
+
+def added_lines(target_branch, paths):
+ import subprocess
+
+ subprocess.check_output(
+ ["/usr/bin/git", "fetch", "--depth", "1", "origin", target_branch]
+ )
+ diff = subprocess.check_output(
+ ["/usr/bin/git", "diff", "FETCH_HEAD..", "--"] + paths
+ )
+ added_lines = []
+ for line in diff.splitlines():
+ if line.startswith(b"+") and not line.startswith(b"+++"):
+ added_lines.append(line)
+ return added_lines
+
+
+def lines_containing(lines, string):
+ return [l for l in lines if bytes(string, "utf-8") in l]
+
+
+changes_issue_or_mr_id_regex = re.compile(rb"\[(GL [#!]|RT #)[0-9]+\]")
+relnotes_issue_or_mr_id_regex = re.compile(rb":gl:`[#!][0-9]+`")
+release_notes_regex = re.compile(r"doc/(arm|notes)/notes-.*\.(rst|xml)")
+
+modified_files = danger.git.modified_files
+mr_labels = danger.gitlab.mr.labels
+target_branch = danger.gitlab.mr.target_branch
+is_backport = "Backport" in mr_labels or "Backport::Partial" in mr_labels
+is_full_backport = is_backport and "Backport::Partial" not in mr_labels
+
+gl = gitlab.Gitlab(
+ url=f"https://{os.environ['CI_SERVER_HOST']}",
+ private_token=os.environ["DANGER_GITLAB_API_TOKEN"],
+)
+proj = gl.projects.get(os.environ["CI_PROJECT_ID"])
+mr = proj.mergerequests.get(os.environ["CI_MERGE_REQUEST_IID"])
+
+###############################################################################
+# COMMIT MESSAGES
+###############################################################################
+#
+# - FAIL if any of the following is true for any commit on the MR branch:
+#
+# * The subject line starts with "fixup!", "amend!" or "Apply suggestion".
+#
+# * The subject line starts with a prohibited word indicating a work in
+# progress commit (e.g. "WIP").
+#
+# * The subject line contains a trailing dot.
+#
+# * There is no empty line between the subject line and the log message.
+#
+# - WARN if any of the following is true for any commit on the MR branch:
+#
+# * The length of the subject line for a non-merge commit exceeds 72
+# characters.
+#
+# * There is no log message present (i.e. commit only has a subject) and
+# the subject line does not contain any of the following strings:
+# "fixup!", " CHANGES ", " release note".
+#
+# * Any line of the log message is longer than 72 characters. This rule is
+# not evaluated for:
+#
+# - lines starting with four spaces, which allows long lines to be
+# included in the commit log message by prefixing them with four
+# spaces (useful for pasting compiler warnings, static analyzer
+# messages, log lines, etc.),
+#
+# - lines which contain references (i.e. those starting with "[1]",
+# "[2]", etc.) which allows e.g. long URLs to be included in the
+# commit log message.
+
+PROHIBITED_WORDS_RE = re.compile(
+ "^(WIP|wip|DROP|drop|DROPME|checkpoint|experiment|TODO|todo)[^a-zA-Z]"
+)
+fixup_error_logged = False
+for commit in danger.git.commits:
+ message_lines = commit.message.splitlines()
+ subject = message_lines[0]
+ if not fixup_error_logged and (
+ subject.startswith("fixup!")
+ or subject.startswith("amend!")
+ or subject.startswith("Apply suggestion")
+ ):
+ fail(
+ "Fixup commits are still present in this merge request. "
+ "Please squash them before merging."
+ )
+ fixup_error_logged = True
+ match = PROHIBITED_WORDS_RE.search(subject)
+ if match:
+ fail(
+ f"Prohibited keyword `{match.groups()[0]}` detected "
+ f"at the start of a subject line in commit {commit.sha}."
+ )
+ if len(subject) > 72 and not subject.startswith("Merge branch "):
+ warn(
+ f"Subject line for commit {commit.sha} is too long: "
+ f"```{subject}``` ({len(subject)} > 72 characters)."
+ )
+ if subject[-1] == ".":
+ fail(f"Trailing dot found in the subject of commit {commit.sha}.")
+ if len(message_lines) > 1 and message_lines[1]:
+ fail(f"No empty line after subject for commit {commit.sha}.")
+ if (
+ len(message_lines) < 3
+ and "fixup! " not in subject
+ and "CHANGES " not in subject
+ and "release note" not in subject.lower()
+ and "GL #" not in subject
+ ):
+ warn(f"Please write a log message for commit {commit.sha}.")
+ for line in message_lines[2:]:
+ if (
+ len(line) > 72
+ and not line.startswith(" ")
+ and not re.match(r"\[[0-9]+\]", line)
+ ):
+ warn(
+ f"Line too long in log message for commit {commit.sha}: "
+ f"```{line}``` ({len(line)} > 72 characters)."
+ )
+
+###############################################################################
+# MILESTONE
+###############################################################################
+#
+# FAIL if the merge request is not assigned to any milestone.
+
+if not danger.gitlab.mr.milestone:
+ fail("Please assign this merge request to a milestone.")
+
+###############################################################################
+# BACKPORT & VERSION LABELS
+###############################################################################
+#
+# FAIL if any of the following is true for the merge request:
+#
+# * The MR is marked as Backport and the number of version labels set is
+# different than 1. (For backports, the version label is used for indicating
+# its target branch. This is a rather ugly attempt to address a UI
+# deficiency - the target branch for each MR is not visible on milestone
+# dashboards.)
+#
+# * The MR is not marked as "Backport" nor any version label is set. (If the
+# merge request is not a backport, version labels are used for indicating
+# backporting preferences.)
+#
+# * The Backport MR doesn't have target branch in the merge request title.
+#
+# * The Backport MR doesn't link to the original MR is its description.
+#
+# * The original MR linked to from Backport MR hasn't been merged.
+
+BACKPORT_OF_RE = re.compile(
+ r"Backport\s+of.*(merge_requests/|!)([0-9]+)", flags=re.IGNORECASE
+)
+VERSION_LABEL_RE = re.compile(r"v9.([0-9]+)(-S)?")
+backport_desc = BACKPORT_OF_RE.search(danger.gitlab.mr.description)
+version_labels = [l for l in mr_labels if l.startswith("v9.")]
+affects_labels = [l for l in mr_labels if l.startswith("Affects v9.")]
+if is_backport:
+ if len(version_labels) != 1:
+ fail(
+ "This MR was marked as *Backport*. "
+ "Please also set exactly one version label (*v9.x*)."
+ )
+ else:
+ minor_ver, edition = VERSION_LABEL_RE.search(version_labels[0]).groups()
+ edition = "" if edition is None else edition
+ title_re = f"^\\[9.{minor_ver}{edition}\\]"
+ match = re.search(title_re, danger.gitlab.mr.title)
+ if match is None:
+ fail(
+ "Backport MRs must have their target version in the title. "
+ f"Please put `[9.{minor_ver}{edition}]` at the start of the MR title."
+ )
+ if backport_desc is None:
+ fail(
+ "Backport MRs must link to the original MR. Please put "
+ "`Backport of MR !XXXX` in the MR description."
+ )
+ else: # backport MR is linked to original MR
+ original_mr_id = backport_desc.groups()[1]
+ original_mr = proj.mergerequests.get(original_mr_id)
+ if original_mr.state != "merged":
+ fail(
+ f"Original MR !{original_mr_id} has not been merged. "
+ "Please re-run `danger` check once it's merged."
+ )
+ else: # check for commit IDs once original MR is merged
+ original_mr_commits = list(original_mr.commits(all=True))
+ backport_mr_commits = list(mr.commits(all=True))
+ for orig_commit in original_mr_commits:
+ for backport_commit in backport_mr_commits:
+ if orig_commit.id in backport_commit.message:
+ break
+ else:
+ msg = (
+ f"Commit {orig_commit.id} from original MR !{original_mr_id} "
+ "is not referenced in any of the backport commits."
+ )
+ if not is_full_backport:
+ message(msg)
+ else:
+ msg += (
+ " Please use `-x` when cherry-picking to include "
+ "the full original commit ID. Alternately, use the "
+ "`Backport::Partial` label if not all original "
+ "commits are meant to be backported."
+ )
+ fail(msg)
+else:
+ if not version_labels:
+ fail(
+ "If this merge request is a backport, set the *Backport* label and "
+ "a single version label (*v9.x*) indicating the target branch. "
+ "If not, set version labels for all targeted backport branches."
+ )
+ if not affects_labels:
+ warn(
+ "Set `Affects v9.` label(s) for all versions that are affected by "
+ "the issue which this MR addresses."
+ )
+
+###############################################################################
+# OTHER LABELS
+###############################################################################
+#
+# WARN if any of the following is true for the merge request:
+#
+# * The "Review" label is not set. (It may be intentional, but rarely is.)
+#
+# * The "Review" label is set, but the "LGTM" label is not set. (This aims to
+# remind developers about the need to set the latter on merge requests which
+# passed review.)
+
+approved = mr.approvals.get().approved
+if "Review" not in mr_labels:
+ warn(
+ "This merge request does not have the *Review* label set. "
+ "Please set it if you would like the merge request to be reviewed."
+ )
+elif not approved:
+ warn(
+ "This merge request is currently in review. "
+ "It should not be merged until it is approved."
+ )
+
+###############################################################################
+# 'CHANGES' FILE
+###############################################################################
+#
+# FAIL if any of the following is true:
+#
+# * The merge request does not update the CHANGES file, but it does not have
+# the "No CHANGES" label set. (This attempts to ensure that the author of
+# the MR did not forget about adding a CHANGES entry.)
+#
+# * The merge request updates the CHANGES file, but it has the "No CHANGES"
+# label set. (This attempts to ensure that the "No CHANGES" label is used in
+# a sane way.)
+#
+# * The merge request adds any placeholder entries to the CHANGES file, but it
+# does not target the "main" branch.
+#
+# * The merge request adds a new CHANGES entry that is not a placeholder and
+# does not contain any GitLab/RT issue/MR identifiers.
+
+changes_modified = "CHANGES" in modified_files or "CHANGES.SE" in modified_files
+no_changes_label_set = "No CHANGES" in mr_labels
+if not changes_modified and not no_changes_label_set:
+ fail(
+ "This merge request does not modify `CHANGES`. "
+ "Add a `CHANGES` entry or set the *No CHANGES* label."
+ )
+if changes_modified and no_changes_label_set:
+ fail(
+ "This merge request modifies `CHANGES`. "
+ "Revert `CHANGES` modifications or unset the *No Changes* label."
+ )
+
+changes_added_lines = added_lines(target_branch, ["CHANGES", "CHANGES.SE"])
+placeholders_added = lines_containing(changes_added_lines, "[placeholder]")
+identifiers_found = filter(changes_issue_or_mr_id_regex.search, changes_added_lines)
+if changes_added_lines:
+ if placeholders_added:
+ if target_branch != "main":
+ fail(
+ "This MR adds at least one placeholder entry to `CHANGES`. "
+ "It should be targeting the `main` branch."
+ )
+ elif not any(identifiers_found):
+ fail("No valid issue/MR identifiers found in added `CHANGES` entries.")
+
+###############################################################################
+# RELEASE NOTES
+###############################################################################
+#
+# - FAIL if any of the following is true:
+#
+# * The merge request does not update release notes and has the "Release
+# Notes" label set. (This attempts to point out missing release notes.)
+#
+# * The merge request updates release notes but does not have the "Release
+# Notes" label set. (This ensures that merge requests updating release
+# notes can be easily found using the "Release Notes" label.)
+#
+# - WARN if any of the following is true:
+#
+# * This merge request does not update release notes and has the "Customer"
+# label set. (Except for trivial changes, all merge requests which may
+# be of interest to customers should include a release note.)
+#
+# * This merge request updates release notes, but no GitLab/RT issue/MR
+# identifiers are found in the lines added to the release notes by this
+# MR.
+
+release_notes_regex = re.compile(r"doc/(arm|notes)/notes-.*\.(rst|xml)")
+release_notes_changed = list(filter(release_notes_regex.match, modified_files))
+release_notes_label_set = "Release Notes" in mr_labels
+if not release_notes_changed:
+ if release_notes_label_set:
+ fail(
+ "This merge request has the *Release Notes* label set. "
+ "Add a release note or unset the *Release Notes* label."
+ )
+ elif "Customer" in mr_labels:
+ warn(
+ "This merge request has the *Customer* label set. "
+ "Add a release note unless the changes introduced are trivial."
+ )
+if release_notes_changed and not release_notes_label_set:
+ fail(
+ "This merge request modifies release notes. "
+ "Revert release note modifications or set the *Release Notes* label."
+ )
+
+if release_notes_changed:
+ notes_added_lines = added_lines(target_branch, release_notes_changed)
+ identifiers_found = filter(relnotes_issue_or_mr_id_regex.search, notes_added_lines)
+ if notes_added_lines and not any(identifiers_found):
+ warn("No valid issue/MR identifiers found in added release notes.")
+else:
+ notes_added_lines = []
+
+###############################################################################
+# CVE IDENTIFIERS
+###############################################################################
+#
+# FAIL if the merge request adds a CHANGES entry of type [security] and a CVE
+# identifier is missing from either the added CHANGES entry or the added
+# release note.
+
+if lines_containing(changes_added_lines, "[security]"):
+ if not lines_containing(changes_added_lines, "(CVE-20"):
+ fail(
+ "This merge request fixes a security issue. "
+ "Please add a CHANGES entry which includes a CVE identifier."
+ )
+ if not lines_containing(notes_added_lines, "CVE-20"):
+ fail(
+ "This merge request fixes a security issue. "
+ "Please add a release note which includes a CVE identifier."
+ )
+
+###############################################################################
+# PAIRWISE TESTING
+###############################################################################
+#
+# FAIL if the merge request adds any new ./configure switch without an
+# associated annotation used for pairwise testing.
+
+configure_added_lines = added_lines(target_branch, ["configure.ac"])
+switches_added = lines_containing(
+ configure_added_lines, "AC_ARG_ENABLE"
+) + lines_containing(configure_added_lines, "AC_ARG_WITH")
+annotations_added = lines_containing(configure_added_lines, "# [pairwise: ")
+if switches_added:
+ if len(switches_added) > len(annotations_added):
+ fail(
+ "This merge request adds at least one new `./configure` switch that "
+ "is not annotated for pairwise testing purposes."
+ )
+ else:
+ message(
+ "**Before merging**, please start a full CI pipeline for this "
+ "branch with the `PAIRWISE_TESTING` variable set to any "
+ "non-empty value (e.g. `1`). This will cause the `pairwise` "
+ "job to exercise the new `./configure` switches."
+ )
+
+###############################################################################
+# USER-VISIBLE LOG LEVELS
+###############################################################################
+#
+# WARN if the merge request adds new user-visible log messages (INFO or above)
+
+user_visible_log_levels = [
+ "ISC_LOG_INFO",
+ "ISC_LOG_NOTICE",
+ "ISC_LOG_WARNING",
+ "ISC_LOG_ERROR",
+ "ISC_LOG_CRITICAL",
+]
+source_added_lines = added_lines(target_branch, ["*.[ch]"])
+for log_level in user_visible_log_levels:
+ if lines_containing(source_added_lines, log_level):
+ warn(
+ "This merge request adds new user-visible log messages with "
+ "level INFO or above. Please double-check log levels and make "
+ "sure none of the messages added is a leftover debug message."
+ )
+ break