Adding upstream version 5.10.209.upstream/5.10.209

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 355 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memcg_test.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memcg_test.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3f7115e07
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memcg_test.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,355 @@
+=====================================================
+Memory Resource Controller(Memcg) Implementation Memo
+=====================================================
+
+Last Updated: 2010/2
+
+Base Kernel Version: based on 2.6.33-rc7-mm(candidate for 34).
+
+Because VM is getting complex (one of reasons is memcg...), memcg's behavior
+is complex. This is a document for memcg's internal behavior.
+Please note that implementation details can be changed.
+
+(*) Topics on API should be in Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst)
+
+0. How to record usage ?
+========================
+
+   2 objects are used.
+
+   page_cgroup ....an object per page.
+
+	Allocated at boot or memory hotplug. Freed at memory hot removal.
+
+   swap_cgroup ... an entry per swp_entry.
+
+	Allocated at swapon(). Freed at swapoff().
+
+   The page_cgroup has USED bit and double count against a page_cgroup never
+   occurs. swap_cgroup is used only when a charged page is swapped-out.
+
+1. Charge
+=========
+
+   a page/swp_entry may be charged (usage += PAGE_SIZE) at
+
+	mem_cgroup_try_charge()
+
+2. Uncharge
+===========
+
+  a page/swp_entry may be uncharged (usage -= PAGE_SIZE) by
+
+	mem_cgroup_uncharge()
+	  Called when a page's refcount goes down to 0.
+
+	mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap()
+	  Called when swp_entry's refcnt goes down to 0. A charge against swap
+	  disappears.
+
+3. charge-commit-cancel
+=======================
+
+	Memcg pages are charged in two steps:
+
+		- mem_cgroup_try_charge()
+		- mem_cgroup_commit_charge() or mem_cgroup_cancel_charge()
+
+	At try_charge(), there are no flags to say "this page is charged".
+	at this point, usage += PAGE_SIZE.
+
+	At commit(), the page is associated with the memcg.
+
+	At cancel(), simply usage -= PAGE_SIZE.
+
+Under below explanation, we assume CONFIG_MEM_RES_CTRL_SWAP=y.
+
+4. Anonymous
+============
+
+	Anonymous page is newly allocated at
+		  - page fault into MAP_ANONYMOUS mapping.
+		  - Copy-On-Write.
+
+	4.1 Swap-in.
+	At swap-in, the page is taken from swap-cache. There are 2 cases.
+
+	(a) If the SwapCache is newly allocated and read, it has no charges.
+	(b) If the SwapCache has been mapped by processes, it has been
+	    charged already.
+
+	4.2 Swap-out.
+	At swap-out, typical state transition is below.
+
+	(a) add to swap cache. (marked as SwapCache)
+	    swp_entry's refcnt += 1.
+	(b) fully unmapped.
+	    swp_entry's refcnt += # of ptes.
+	(c) write back to swap.
+	(d) delete from swap cache. (remove from SwapCache)
+	    swp_entry's refcnt -= 1.
+
+
+	Finally, at task exit,
+	(e) zap_pte() is called and swp_entry's refcnt -=1 -> 0.
+
+5. Page Cache
+=============
+
+	Page Cache is charged at
+	- add_to_page_cache_locked().
+
+	The logic is very clear. (About migration, see below)
+
+	Note:
+	  __remove_from_page_cache() is called by remove_from_page_cache()
+	  and __remove_mapping().
+
+6. Shmem(tmpfs) Page Cache
+===========================
+
+	The best way to understand shmem's page state transition is to read
+	mm/shmem.c.
+
+	But brief explanation of the behavior of memcg around shmem will be
+	helpful to understand the logic.
+
+	Shmem's page (just leaf page, not direct/indirect block) can be on
+
+		- radix-tree of shmem's inode.
+		- SwapCache.
+		- Both on radix-tree and SwapCache. This happens at swap-in
+		  and swap-out,
+
+	It's charged when...
+
+	- A new page is added to shmem's radix-tree.
+	- A swp page is read. (move a charge from swap_cgroup to page_cgroup)
+
+7. Page Migration
+=================
+
+	mem_cgroup_migrate()
+
+8. LRU
+======
+        Each memcg has its own private LRU. Now, its handling is under global
+	VM's control (means that it's handled under global pgdat->lru_lock).
+	Almost all routines around memcg's LRU is called by global LRU's
+	list management functions under pgdat->lru_lock.
+
+	A special function is mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(). This scans
+	memcg's private LRU and call __isolate_lru_page() to extract a page
+	from LRU.
+
+	(By __isolate_lru_page(), the page is removed from both of global and
+	private LRU.)
+
+
+9. Typical Tests.
+=================
+
+ Tests for racy cases.
+
+9.1 Small limit to memcg.
+-------------------------
+
+	When you do test to do racy case, it's good test to set memcg's limit
+	to be very small rather than GB. Many races found in the test under
+	xKB or xxMB limits.
+
+	(Memory behavior under GB and Memory behavior under MB shows very
+	different situation.)
+
+9.2 Shmem
+---------
+
+	Historically, memcg's shmem handling was poor and we saw some amount
+	of troubles here. This is because shmem is page-cache but can be
+	SwapCache. Test with shmem/tmpfs is always good test.
+
+9.3 Migration
+-------------
+
+	For NUMA, migration is an another special case. To do easy test, cpuset
+	is useful. Following is a sample script to do migration::
+
+		mount -t cgroup -o cpuset none /opt/cpuset
+
+		mkdir /opt/cpuset/01
+		echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/01/cpuset.cpus
+		echo 0 > /opt/cpuset/01/cpuset.mems
+		echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/01/cpuset.memory_migrate
+		mkdir /opt/cpuset/02
+		echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/02/cpuset.cpus
+		echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/02/cpuset.mems
+		echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/02/cpuset.memory_migrate
+
+	In above set, when you moves a task from 01 to 02, page migration to
+	node 0 to node 1 will occur. Following is a script to migrate all
+	under cpuset.::
+
+		--
+		move_task()
+		{
+		for pid in $1
+		do
+			/bin/echo $pid >$2/tasks 2>/dev/null
+			echo -n $pid
+			echo -n " "
+		done
+		echo END
+		}
+
+		G1_TASK=`cat ${G1}/tasks`
+		G2_TASK=`cat ${G2}/tasks`
+		move_task "${G1_TASK}" ${G2} &
+		--
+
+9.4 Memory hotplug
+------------------
+
+	memory hotplug test is one of good test.
+
+	to offline memory, do following::
+
+		# echo offline > /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXXX/state
+
+	(XXX is the place of memory)
+
+	This is an easy way to test page migration, too.
+
+9.5 mkdir/rmdir
+---------------
+
+	When using hierarchy, mkdir/rmdir test should be done.
+	Use tests like the following::
+
+		echo 1 >/opt/cgroup/01/memory/use_hierarchy
+		mkdir /opt/cgroup/01/child_a
+		mkdir /opt/cgroup/01/child_b
+
+		set limit to 01.
+		add limit to 01/child_b
+		run jobs under child_a and child_b
+
+	create/delete following groups at random while jobs are running::
+
+		/opt/cgroup/01/child_a/child_aa
+		/opt/cgroup/01/child_b/child_bb
+		/opt/cgroup/01/child_c
+
+	running new jobs in new group is also good.
+
+9.6 Mount with other subsystems
+-------------------------------
+
+	Mounting with other subsystems is a good test because there is a
+	race and lock dependency with other cgroup subsystems.
+
+	example::
+
+		# mount -t cgroup none /cgroup -o cpuset,memory,cpu,devices
+
+	and do task move, mkdir, rmdir etc...under this.
+
+9.7 swapoff
+-----------
+
+	Besides management of swap is one of complicated parts of memcg,
+	call path of swap-in at swapoff is not same as usual swap-in path..
+	It's worth to be tested explicitly.
+
+	For example, test like following is good:
+
+	(Shell-A)::
+
+		# mount -t cgroup none /cgroup -o memory
+		# mkdir /cgroup/test
+		# echo 40M > /cgroup/test/memory.limit_in_bytes
+		# echo 0 > /cgroup/test/tasks
+
+	Run malloc(100M) program under this. You'll see 60M of swaps.
+
+	(Shell-B)::
+
+		# move all tasks in /cgroup/test to /cgroup
+		# /sbin/swapoff -a
+		# rmdir /cgroup/test
+		# kill malloc task.
+
+	Of course, tmpfs v.s. swapoff test should be tested, too.
+
+9.8 OOM-Killer
+--------------
+
+	Out-of-memory caused by memcg's limit will kill tasks under
+	the memcg. When hierarchy is used, a task under hierarchy
+	will be killed by the kernel.
+
+	In this case, panic_on_oom shouldn't be invoked and tasks
+	in other groups shouldn't be killed.
+
+	It's not difficult to cause OOM under memcg as following.
+
+	Case A) when you can swapoff::
+
+		#swapoff -a
+		#echo 50M > /memory.limit_in_bytes
+
+	run 51M of malloc
+
+	Case B) when you use mem+swap limitation::
+
+		#echo 50M > memory.limit_in_bytes
+		#echo 50M > memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes
+
+	run 51M of malloc
+
+9.9 Move charges at task migration
+----------------------------------
+
+	Charges associated with a task can be moved along with task migration.
+
+	(Shell-A)::
+
+		#mkdir /cgroup/A
+		#echo $$ >/cgroup/A/tasks
+
+	run some programs which uses some amount of memory in /cgroup/A.
+
+	(Shell-B)::
+
+		#mkdir /cgroup/B
+		#echo 1 >/cgroup/B/memory.move_charge_at_immigrate
+		#echo "pid of the program running in group A" >/cgroup/B/tasks
+
+	You can see charges have been moved by reading ``*.usage_in_bytes`` or
+	memory.stat of both A and B.
+
+	See 8.2 of Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst to see what value should
+	be written to move_charge_at_immigrate.
+
+9.10 Memory thresholds
+----------------------
+
+	Memory controller implements memory thresholds using cgroups notification
+	API. You can use tools/cgroup/cgroup_event_listener.c to test it.
+
+	(Shell-A) Create cgroup and run event listener::
+
+		# mkdir /cgroup/A
+		# ./cgroup_event_listener /cgroup/A/memory.usage_in_bytes 5M
+
+	(Shell-B) Add task to cgroup and try to allocate and free memory::
+
+		# echo $$ >/cgroup/A/tasks
+		# a="$(dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=10)"
+		# a=
+
+	You will see message from cgroup_event_listener every time you cross
+	the thresholds.
+
+	Use /cgroup/A/memory.memsw.usage_in_bytes to test memsw thresholds.
+
+	It's good idea to test root cgroup as well.