summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-27 10:05:51 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-27 10:05:51 +0000
commit5d1646d90e1f2cceb9f0828f4b28318cd0ec7744 (patch)
treea94efe259b9009378be6d90eb30d2b019d95c194 /Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst
parentInitial commit. (diff)
downloadlinux-5d1646d90e1f2cceb9f0828f4b28318cd0ec7744.tar.xz
linux-5d1646d90e1f2cceb9f0828f4b28318cd0ec7744.zip
Adding upstream version 5.10.209.upstream/5.10.209
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst1009
1 files changed, 1009 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7882037ac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,1009 @@
+==========================
+Memory Resource Controller
+==========================
+
+NOTE:
+ This document is hopelessly outdated and it asks for a complete
+ rewrite. It still contains a useful information so we are keeping it
+ here but make sure to check the current code if you need a deeper
+ understanding.
+
+NOTE:
+ The Memory Resource Controller has generically been referred to as the
+ memory controller in this document. Do not confuse memory controller
+ used here with the memory controller that is used in hardware.
+
+(For editors) In this document:
+ When we mention a cgroup (cgroupfs's directory) with memory controller,
+ we call it "memory cgroup". When you see git-log and source code, you'll
+ see patch's title and function names tend to use "memcg".
+ In this document, we avoid using it.
+
+Benefits and Purpose of the memory controller
+=============================================
+
+The memory controller isolates the memory behaviour of a group of tasks
+from the rest of the system. The article on LWN [12] mentions some probable
+uses of the memory controller. The memory controller can be used to
+
+a. Isolate an application or a group of applications
+ Memory-hungry applications can be isolated and limited to a smaller
+ amount of memory.
+b. Create a cgroup with a limited amount of memory; this can be used
+ as a good alternative to booting with mem=XXXX.
+c. Virtualization solutions can control the amount of memory they want
+ to assign to a virtual machine instance.
+d. A CD/DVD burner could control the amount of memory used by the
+ rest of the system to ensure that burning does not fail due to lack
+ of available memory.
+e. There are several other use cases; find one or use the controller just
+ for fun (to learn and hack on the VM subsystem).
+
+Current Status: linux-2.6.34-mmotm(development version of 2010/April)
+
+Features:
+
+ - accounting anonymous pages, file caches, swap caches usage and limiting them.
+ - pages are linked to per-memcg LRU exclusively, and there is no global LRU.
+ - optionally, memory+swap usage can be accounted and limited.
+ - hierarchical accounting
+ - soft limit
+ - moving (recharging) account at moving a task is selectable.
+ - usage threshold notifier
+ - memory pressure notifier
+ - oom-killer disable knob and oom-notifier
+ - Root cgroup has no limit controls.
+
+ Kernel memory support is a work in progress, and the current version provides
+ basically functionality. (See Section 2.7)
+
+Brief summary of control files.
+
+==================================== ==========================================
+ tasks attach a task(thread) and show list of
+ threads
+ cgroup.procs show list of processes
+ cgroup.event_control an interface for event_fd()
+ memory.usage_in_bytes show current usage for memory
+ (See 5.5 for details)
+ memory.memsw.usage_in_bytes show current usage for memory+Swap
+ (See 5.5 for details)
+ memory.limit_in_bytes set/show limit of memory usage
+ memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes set/show limit of memory+Swap usage
+ memory.failcnt show the number of memory usage hits limits
+ memory.memsw.failcnt show the number of memory+Swap hits limits
+ memory.max_usage_in_bytes show max memory usage recorded
+ memory.memsw.max_usage_in_bytes show max memory+Swap usage recorded
+ memory.soft_limit_in_bytes set/show soft limit of memory usage
+ memory.stat show various statistics
+ memory.use_hierarchy set/show hierarchical account enabled
+ memory.force_empty trigger forced page reclaim
+ memory.pressure_level set memory pressure notifications
+ memory.swappiness set/show swappiness parameter of vmscan
+ (See sysctl's vm.swappiness)
+ memory.move_charge_at_immigrate set/show controls of moving charges
+ This knob is deprecated and shouldn't be
+ used.
+ memory.oom_control set/show oom controls.
+ memory.numa_stat show the number of memory usage per numa
+ node
+ memory.kmem.limit_in_bytes set/show hard limit for kernel memory
+ This knob is deprecated and shouldn't be
+ used. It is planned that this be removed in
+ the foreseeable future.
+ memory.kmem.usage_in_bytes show current kernel memory allocation
+ memory.kmem.failcnt show the number of kernel memory usage
+ hits limits
+ memory.kmem.max_usage_in_bytes show max kernel memory usage recorded
+
+ memory.kmem.tcp.limit_in_bytes set/show hard limit for tcp buf memory
+ memory.kmem.tcp.usage_in_bytes show current tcp buf memory allocation
+ memory.kmem.tcp.failcnt show the number of tcp buf memory usage
+ hits limits
+ memory.kmem.tcp.max_usage_in_bytes show max tcp buf memory usage recorded
+==================================== ==========================================
+
+1. History
+==========
+
+The memory controller has a long history. A request for comments for the memory
+controller was posted by Balbir Singh [1]. At the time the RFC was posted
+there were several implementations for memory control. The goal of the
+RFC was to build consensus and agreement for the minimal features required
+for memory control. The first RSS controller was posted by Balbir Singh[2]
+in Feb 2007. Pavel Emelianov [3][4][5] has since posted three versions of the
+RSS controller. At OLS, at the resource management BoF, everyone suggested
+that we handle both page cache and RSS together. Another request was raised
+to allow user space handling of OOM. The current memory controller is
+at version 6; it combines both mapped (RSS) and unmapped Page
+Cache Control [11].
+
+2. Memory Control
+=================
+
+Memory is a unique resource in the sense that it is present in a limited
+amount. If a task requires a lot of CPU processing, the task can spread
+its processing over a period of hours, days, months or years, but with
+memory, the same physical memory needs to be reused to accomplish the task.
+
+The memory controller implementation has been divided into phases. These
+are:
+
+1. Memory controller
+2. mlock(2) controller
+3. Kernel user memory accounting and slab control
+4. user mappings length controller
+
+The memory controller is the first controller developed.
+
+2.1. Design
+-----------
+
+The core of the design is a counter called the page_counter. The
+page_counter tracks the current memory usage and limit of the group of
+processes associated with the controller. Each cgroup has a memory controller
+specific data structure (mem_cgroup) associated with it.
+
+2.2. Accounting
+---------------
+
+::
+
+ +--------------------+
+ | mem_cgroup |
+ | (page_counter) |
+ +--------------------+
+ / ^ \
+ / | \
+ +---------------+ | +---------------+
+ | mm_struct | |.... | mm_struct |
+ | | | | |
+ +---------------+ | +---------------+
+ |
+ + --------------+
+ |
+ +---------------+ +------+--------+
+ | page +----------> page_cgroup|
+ | | | |
+ +---------------+ +---------------+
+
+ (Figure 1: Hierarchy of Accounting)
+
+
+Figure 1 shows the important aspects of the controller
+
+1. Accounting happens per cgroup
+2. Each mm_struct knows about which cgroup it belongs to
+3. Each page has a pointer to the page_cgroup, which in turn knows the
+ cgroup it belongs to
+
+The accounting is done as follows: mem_cgroup_charge_common() is invoked to
+set up the necessary data structures and check if the cgroup that is being
+charged is over its limit. If it is, then reclaim is invoked on the cgroup.
+More details can be found in the reclaim section of this document.
+If everything goes well, a page meta-data-structure called page_cgroup is
+updated. page_cgroup has its own LRU on cgroup.
+(*) page_cgroup structure is allocated at boot/memory-hotplug time.
+
+2.2.1 Accounting details
+------------------------
+
+All mapped anon pages (RSS) and cache pages (Page Cache) are accounted.
+Some pages which are never reclaimable and will not be on the LRU
+are not accounted. We just account pages under usual VM management.
+
+RSS pages are accounted at page_fault unless they've already been accounted
+for earlier. A file page will be accounted for as Page Cache when it's
+inserted into inode (radix-tree). While it's mapped into the page tables of
+processes, duplicate accounting is carefully avoided.
+
+An RSS page is unaccounted when it's fully unmapped. A PageCache page is
+unaccounted when it's removed from radix-tree. Even if RSS pages are fully
+unmapped (by kswapd), they may exist as SwapCache in the system until they
+are really freed. Such SwapCaches are also accounted.
+A swapped-in page is accounted after adding into swapcache.
+
+Note: The kernel does swapin-readahead and reads multiple swaps at once.
+Since page's memcg recorded into swap whatever memsw enabled, the page will
+be accounted after swapin.
+
+At page migration, accounting information is kept.
+
+Note: we just account pages-on-LRU because our purpose is to control amount
+of used pages; not-on-LRU pages tend to be out-of-control from VM view.
+
+2.3 Shared Page Accounting
+--------------------------
+
+Shared pages are accounted on the basis of the first touch approach. The
+cgroup that first touches a page is accounted for the page. The principle
+behind this approach is that a cgroup that aggressively uses a shared
+page will eventually get charged for it (once it is uncharged from
+the cgroup that brought it in -- this will happen on memory pressure).
+
+But see section 8.2: when moving a task to another cgroup, its pages may
+be recharged to the new cgroup, if move_charge_at_immigrate has been chosen.
+
+2.4 Swap Extension
+--------------------------------------
+
+Swap usage is always recorded for each of cgroup. Swap Extension allows you to
+read and limit it.
+
+When CONFIG_SWAP is enabled, following files are added.
+
+ - memory.memsw.usage_in_bytes.
+ - memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes.
+
+memsw means memory+swap. Usage of memory+swap is limited by
+memsw.limit_in_bytes.
+
+Example: Assume a system with 4G of swap. A task which allocates 6G of memory
+(by mistake) under 2G memory limitation will use all swap.
+In this case, setting memsw.limit_in_bytes=3G will prevent bad use of swap.
+By using the memsw limit, you can avoid system OOM which can be caused by swap
+shortage.
+
+**why 'memory+swap' rather than swap**
+
+The global LRU(kswapd) can swap out arbitrary pages. Swap-out means
+to move account from memory to swap...there is no change in usage of
+memory+swap. In other words, when we want to limit the usage of swap without
+affecting global LRU, memory+swap limit is better than just limiting swap from
+an OS point of view.
+
+**What happens when a cgroup hits memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes**
+
+When a cgroup hits memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes, it's useless to do swap-out
+in this cgroup. Then, swap-out will not be done by cgroup routine and file
+caches are dropped. But as mentioned above, global LRU can do swapout memory
+from it for sanity of the system's memory management state. You can't forbid
+it by cgroup.
+
+2.5 Reclaim
+-----------
+
+Each cgroup maintains a per cgroup LRU which has the same structure as
+global VM. When a cgroup goes over its limit, we first try
+to reclaim memory from the cgroup so as to make space for the new
+pages that the cgroup has touched. If the reclaim is unsuccessful,
+an OOM routine is invoked to select and kill the bulkiest task in the
+cgroup. (See 10. OOM Control below.)
+
+The reclaim algorithm has not been modified for cgroups, except that
+pages that are selected for reclaiming come from the per-cgroup LRU
+list.
+
+NOTE:
+ Reclaim does not work for the root cgroup, since we cannot set any
+ limits on the root cgroup.
+
+Note2:
+ When panic_on_oom is set to "2", the whole system will panic.
+
+When oom event notifier is registered, event will be delivered.
+(See oom_control section)
+
+2.6 Locking
+-----------
+
+ lock_page_cgroup()/unlock_page_cgroup() should not be called under
+ the i_pages lock.
+
+ Other lock order is following:
+
+ PG_locked.
+ mm->page_table_lock
+ pgdat->lru_lock
+ lock_page_cgroup.
+
+ In many cases, just lock_page_cgroup() is called.
+
+ per-zone-per-cgroup LRU (cgroup's private LRU) is just guarded by
+ pgdat->lru_lock, it has no lock of its own.
+
+2.7 Kernel Memory Extension (CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM)
+-----------------------------------------------
+
+With the Kernel memory extension, the Memory Controller is able to limit
+the amount of kernel memory used by the system. Kernel memory is fundamentally
+different than user memory, since it can't be swapped out, which makes it
+possible to DoS the system by consuming too much of this precious resource.
+
+Kernel memory accounting is enabled for all memory cgroups by default. But
+it can be disabled system-wide by passing cgroup.memory=nokmem to the kernel
+at boot time. In this case, kernel memory will not be accounted at all.
+
+Kernel memory limits are not imposed for the root cgroup. Usage for the root
+cgroup may or may not be accounted. The memory used is accumulated into
+memory.kmem.usage_in_bytes, or in a separate counter when it makes sense.
+(currently only for tcp).
+
+The main "kmem" counter is fed into the main counter, so kmem charges will
+also be visible from the user counter.
+
+Currently no soft limit is implemented for kernel memory. It is future work
+to trigger slab reclaim when those limits are reached.
+
+2.7.1 Current Kernel Memory resources accounted
+-----------------------------------------------
+
+stack pages:
+ every process consumes some stack pages. By accounting into
+ kernel memory, we prevent new processes from being created when the kernel
+ memory usage is too high.
+
+slab pages:
+ pages allocated by the SLAB or SLUB allocator are tracked. A copy
+ of each kmem_cache is created every time the cache is touched by the first time
+ from inside the memcg. The creation is done lazily, so some objects can still be
+ skipped while the cache is being created. All objects in a slab page should
+ belong to the same memcg. This only fails to hold when a task is migrated to a
+ different memcg during the page allocation by the cache.
+
+sockets memory pressure:
+ some sockets protocols have memory pressure
+ thresholds. The Memory Controller allows them to be controlled individually
+ per cgroup, instead of globally.
+
+tcp memory pressure:
+ sockets memory pressure for the tcp protocol.
+
+2.7.2 Common use cases
+----------------------
+
+Because the "kmem" counter is fed to the main user counter, kernel memory can
+never be limited completely independently of user memory. Say "U" is the user
+limit, and "K" the kernel limit. There are three possible ways limits can be
+set:
+
+U != 0, K = unlimited:
+ This is the standard memcg limitation mechanism already present before kmem
+ accounting. Kernel memory is completely ignored.
+
+U != 0, K < U:
+ Kernel memory is a subset of the user memory. This setup is useful in
+ deployments where the total amount of memory per-cgroup is overcommited.
+ Overcommiting kernel memory limits is definitely not recommended, since the
+ box can still run out of non-reclaimable memory.
+ In this case, the admin could set up K so that the sum of all groups is
+ never greater than the total memory, and freely set U at the cost of his
+ QoS.
+
+WARNING:
+ In the current implementation, memory reclaim will NOT be
+ triggered for a cgroup when it hits K while staying below U, which makes
+ this setup impractical.
+
+U != 0, K >= U:
+ Since kmem charges will also be fed to the user counter and reclaim will be
+ triggered for the cgroup for both kinds of memory. This setup gives the
+ admin a unified view of memory, and it is also useful for people who just
+ want to track kernel memory usage.
+
+3. User Interface
+=================
+
+3.0. Configuration
+------------------
+
+a. Enable CONFIG_CGROUPS
+b. Enable CONFIG_MEMCG
+c. Enable CONFIG_MEMCG_SWAP (to use swap extension)
+d. Enable CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM (to use kmem extension)
+
+3.1. Prepare the cgroups (see cgroups.txt, Why are cgroups needed?)
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+::
+
+ # mount -t tmpfs none /sys/fs/cgroup
+ # mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/memory
+ # mount -t cgroup none /sys/fs/cgroup/memory -o memory
+
+3.2. Make the new group and move bash into it::
+
+ # mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/0
+ # echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/0/tasks
+
+Since now we're in the 0 cgroup, we can alter the memory limit::
+
+ # echo 4M > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/0/memory.limit_in_bytes
+
+NOTE:
+ We can use a suffix (k, K, m, M, g or G) to indicate values in kilo,
+ mega or gigabytes. (Here, Kilo, Mega, Giga are Kibibytes, Mebibytes,
+ Gibibytes.)
+
+NOTE:
+ We can write "-1" to reset the ``*.limit_in_bytes(unlimited)``.
+
+NOTE:
+ We cannot set limits on the root cgroup any more.
+
+::
+
+ # cat /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/0/memory.limit_in_bytes
+ 4194304
+
+We can check the usage::
+
+ # cat /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/0/memory.usage_in_bytes
+ 1216512
+
+A successful write to this file does not guarantee a successful setting of
+this limit to the value written into the file. This can be due to a
+number of factors, such as rounding up to page boundaries or the total
+availability of memory on the system. The user is required to re-read
+this file after a write to guarantee the value committed by the kernel::
+
+ # echo 1 > memory.limit_in_bytes
+ # cat memory.limit_in_bytes
+ 4096
+
+The memory.failcnt field gives the number of times that the cgroup limit was
+exceeded.
+
+The memory.stat file gives accounting information. Now, the number of
+caches, RSS and Active pages/Inactive pages are shown.
+
+4. Testing
+==========
+
+For testing features and implementation, see memcg_test.txt.
+
+Performance test is also important. To see pure memory controller's overhead,
+testing on tmpfs will give you good numbers of small overheads.
+Example: do kernel make on tmpfs.
+
+Page-fault scalability is also important. At measuring parallel
+page fault test, multi-process test may be better than multi-thread
+test because it has noise of shared objects/status.
+
+But the above two are testing extreme situations.
+Trying usual test under memory controller is always helpful.
+
+4.1 Troubleshooting
+-------------------
+
+Sometimes a user might find that the application under a cgroup is
+terminated by the OOM killer. There are several causes for this:
+
+1. The cgroup limit is too low (just too low to do anything useful)
+2. The user is using anonymous memory and swap is turned off or too low
+
+A sync followed by echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches will help get rid of
+some of the pages cached in the cgroup (page cache pages).
+
+To know what happens, disabling OOM_Kill as per "10. OOM Control" (below) and
+seeing what happens will be helpful.
+
+4.2 Task migration
+------------------
+
+When a task migrates from one cgroup to another, its charge is not
+carried forward by default. The pages allocated from the original cgroup still
+remain charged to it, the charge is dropped when the page is freed or
+reclaimed.
+
+You can move charges of a task along with task migration.
+See 8. "Move charges at task migration"
+
+4.3 Removing a cgroup
+---------------------
+
+A cgroup can be removed by rmdir, but as discussed in sections 4.1 and 4.2, a
+cgroup might have some charge associated with it, even though all
+tasks have migrated away from it. (because we charge against pages, not
+against tasks.)
+
+We move the stats to root (if use_hierarchy==0) or parent (if
+use_hierarchy==1), and no change on the charge except uncharging
+from the child.
+
+Charges recorded in swap information is not updated at removal of cgroup.
+Recorded information is discarded and a cgroup which uses swap (swapcache)
+will be charged as a new owner of it.
+
+About use_hierarchy, see Section 6.
+
+5. Misc. interfaces
+===================
+
+5.1 force_empty
+---------------
+ memory.force_empty interface is provided to make cgroup's memory usage empty.
+ When writing anything to this::
+
+ # echo 0 > memory.force_empty
+
+ the cgroup will be reclaimed and as many pages reclaimed as possible.
+
+ The typical use case for this interface is before calling rmdir().
+ Though rmdir() offlines memcg, but the memcg may still stay there due to
+ charged file caches. Some out-of-use page caches may keep charged until
+ memory pressure happens. If you want to avoid that, force_empty will be useful.
+
+ Also, note that when memory.kmem.limit_in_bytes is set the charges due to
+ kernel pages will still be seen. This is not considered a failure and the
+ write will still return success. In this case, it is expected that
+ memory.kmem.usage_in_bytes == memory.usage_in_bytes.
+
+ About use_hierarchy, see Section 6.
+
+5.2 stat file
+-------------
+
+memory.stat file includes following statistics
+
+per-memory cgroup local status
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+=============== ===============================================================
+cache # of bytes of page cache memory.
+rss # of bytes of anonymous and swap cache memory (includes
+ transparent hugepages).
+rss_huge # of bytes of anonymous transparent hugepages.
+mapped_file # of bytes of mapped file (includes tmpfs/shmem)
+pgpgin # of charging events to the memory cgroup. The charging
+ event happens each time a page is accounted as either mapped
+ anon page(RSS) or cache page(Page Cache) to the cgroup.
+pgpgout # of uncharging events to the memory cgroup. The uncharging
+ event happens each time a page is unaccounted from the cgroup.
+swap # of bytes of swap usage
+dirty # of bytes that are waiting to get written back to the disk.
+writeback # of bytes of file/anon cache that are queued for syncing to
+ disk.
+inactive_anon # of bytes of anonymous and swap cache memory on inactive
+ LRU list.
+active_anon # of bytes of anonymous and swap cache memory on active
+ LRU list.
+inactive_file # of bytes of file-backed memory on inactive LRU list.
+active_file # of bytes of file-backed memory on active LRU list.
+unevictable # of bytes of memory that cannot be reclaimed (mlocked etc).
+=============== ===============================================================
+
+status considering hierarchy (see memory.use_hierarchy settings)
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+========================= ===================================================
+hierarchical_memory_limit # of bytes of memory limit with regard to hierarchy
+ under which the memory cgroup is
+hierarchical_memsw_limit # of bytes of memory+swap limit with regard to
+ hierarchy under which memory cgroup is.
+
+total_<counter> # hierarchical version of <counter>, which in
+ addition to the cgroup's own value includes the
+ sum of all hierarchical children's values of
+ <counter>, i.e. total_cache
+========================= ===================================================
+
+The following additional stats are dependent on CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+========================= ========================================
+recent_rotated_anon VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)
+recent_rotated_file VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)
+recent_scanned_anon VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)
+recent_scanned_file VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)
+========================= ========================================
+
+Memo:
+ recent_rotated means recent frequency of LRU rotation.
+ recent_scanned means recent # of scans to LRU.
+ showing for better debug please see the code for meanings.
+
+Note:
+ Only anonymous and swap cache memory is listed as part of 'rss' stat.
+ This should not be confused with the true 'resident set size' or the
+ amount of physical memory used by the cgroup.
+
+ 'rss + mapped_file" will give you resident set size of cgroup.
+
+ (Note: file and shmem may be shared among other cgroups. In that case,
+ mapped_file is accounted only when the memory cgroup is owner of page
+ cache.)
+
+5.3 swappiness
+--------------
+
+Overrides /proc/sys/vm/swappiness for the particular group. The tunable
+in the root cgroup corresponds to the global swappiness setting.
+
+Please note that unlike during the global reclaim, limit reclaim
+enforces that 0 swappiness really prevents from any swapping even if
+there is a swap storage available. This might lead to memcg OOM killer
+if there are no file pages to reclaim.
+
+5.4 failcnt
+-----------
+
+A memory cgroup provides memory.failcnt and memory.memsw.failcnt files.
+This failcnt(== failure count) shows the number of times that a usage counter
+hit its limit. When a memory cgroup hits a limit, failcnt increases and
+memory under it will be reclaimed.
+
+You can reset failcnt by writing 0 to failcnt file::
+
+ # echo 0 > .../memory.failcnt
+
+5.5 usage_in_bytes
+------------------
+
+For efficiency, as other kernel components, memory cgroup uses some optimization
+to avoid unnecessary cacheline false sharing. usage_in_bytes is affected by the
+method and doesn't show 'exact' value of memory (and swap) usage, it's a fuzz
+value for efficient access. (Of course, when necessary, it's synchronized.)
+If you want to know more exact memory usage, you should use RSS+CACHE(+SWAP)
+value in memory.stat(see 5.2).
+
+5.6 numa_stat
+-------------
+
+This is similar to numa_maps but operates on a per-memcg basis. This is
+useful for providing visibility into the numa locality information within
+an memcg since the pages are allowed to be allocated from any physical
+node. One of the use cases is evaluating application performance by
+combining this information with the application's CPU allocation.
+
+Each memcg's numa_stat file includes "total", "file", "anon" and "unevictable"
+per-node page counts including "hierarchical_<counter>" which sums up all
+hierarchical children's values in addition to the memcg's own value.
+
+The output format of memory.numa_stat is::
+
+ total=<total pages> N0=<node 0 pages> N1=<node 1 pages> ...
+ file=<total file pages> N0=<node 0 pages> N1=<node 1 pages> ...
+ anon=<total anon pages> N0=<node 0 pages> N1=<node 1 pages> ...
+ unevictable=<total anon pages> N0=<node 0 pages> N1=<node 1 pages> ...
+ hierarchical_<counter>=<counter pages> N0=<node 0 pages> N1=<node 1 pages> ...
+
+The "total" count is sum of file + anon + unevictable.
+
+6. Hierarchy support
+====================
+
+The memory controller supports a deep hierarchy and hierarchical accounting.
+The hierarchy is created by creating the appropriate cgroups in the
+cgroup filesystem. Consider for example, the following cgroup filesystem
+hierarchy::
+
+ root
+ / | \
+ / | \
+ a b c
+ | \
+ | \
+ d e
+
+In the diagram above, with hierarchical accounting enabled, all memory
+usage of e, is accounted to its ancestors up until the root (i.e, c and root),
+that has memory.use_hierarchy enabled. If one of the ancestors goes over its
+limit, the reclaim algorithm reclaims from the tasks in the ancestor and the
+children of the ancestor.
+
+6.1 Enabling hierarchical accounting and reclaim
+------------------------------------------------
+
+A memory cgroup by default disables the hierarchy feature. Support
+can be enabled by writing 1 to memory.use_hierarchy file of the root cgroup::
+
+ # echo 1 > memory.use_hierarchy
+
+The feature can be disabled by::
+
+ # echo 0 > memory.use_hierarchy
+
+NOTE1:
+ Enabling/disabling will fail if either the cgroup already has other
+ cgroups created below it, or if the parent cgroup has use_hierarchy
+ enabled.
+
+NOTE2:
+ When panic_on_oom is set to "2", the whole system will panic in
+ case of an OOM event in any cgroup.
+
+7. Soft limits
+==============
+
+Soft limits allow for greater sharing of memory. The idea behind soft limits
+is to allow control groups to use as much of the memory as needed, provided
+
+a. There is no memory contention
+b. They do not exceed their hard limit
+
+When the system detects memory contention or low memory, control groups
+are pushed back to their soft limits. If the soft limit of each control
+group is very high, they are pushed back as much as possible to make
+sure that one control group does not starve the others of memory.
+
+Please note that soft limits is a best-effort feature; it comes with
+no guarantees, but it does its best to make sure that when memory is
+heavily contended for, memory is allocated based on the soft limit
+hints/setup. Currently soft limit based reclaim is set up such that
+it gets invoked from balance_pgdat (kswapd).
+
+7.1 Interface
+-------------
+
+Soft limits can be setup by using the following commands (in this example we
+assume a soft limit of 256 MiB)::
+
+ # echo 256M > memory.soft_limit_in_bytes
+
+If we want to change this to 1G, we can at any time use::
+
+ # echo 1G > memory.soft_limit_in_bytes
+
+NOTE1:
+ Soft limits take effect over a long period of time, since they involve
+ reclaiming memory for balancing between memory cgroups
+NOTE2:
+ It is recommended to set the soft limit always below the hard limit,
+ otherwise the hard limit will take precedence.
+
+8. Move charges at task migration (DEPRECATED!)
+===============================================
+
+THIS IS DEPRECATED!
+
+It's expensive and unreliable! It's better practice to launch workload
+tasks directly from inside their target cgroup. Use dedicated workload
+cgroups to allow fine-grained policy adjustments without having to
+move physical pages between control domains.
+
+Users can move charges associated with a task along with task migration, that
+is, uncharge task's pages from the old cgroup and charge them to the new cgroup.
+This feature is not supported in !CONFIG_MMU environments because of lack of
+page tables.
+
+8.1 Interface
+-------------
+
+This feature is disabled by default. It can be enabled (and disabled again) by
+writing to memory.move_charge_at_immigrate of the destination cgroup.
+
+If you want to enable it::
+
+ # echo (some positive value) > memory.move_charge_at_immigrate
+
+Note:
+ Each bits of move_charge_at_immigrate has its own meaning about what type
+ of charges should be moved. See 8.2 for details.
+Note:
+ Charges are moved only when you move mm->owner, in other words,
+ a leader of a thread group.
+Note:
+ If we cannot find enough space for the task in the destination cgroup, we
+ try to make space by reclaiming memory. Task migration may fail if we
+ cannot make enough space.
+Note:
+ It can take several seconds if you move charges much.
+
+And if you want disable it again::
+
+ # echo 0 > memory.move_charge_at_immigrate
+
+8.2 Type of charges which can be moved
+--------------------------------------
+
+Each bit in move_charge_at_immigrate has its own meaning about what type of
+charges should be moved. But in any case, it must be noted that an account of
+a page or a swap can be moved only when it is charged to the task's current
+(old) memory cgroup.
+
++---+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+|bit| what type of charges would be moved ? |
++===+==========================================================================+
+| 0 | A charge of an anonymous page (or swap of it) used by the target task. |
+| | You must enable Swap Extension (see 2.4) to enable move of swap charges. |
++---+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+| 1 | A charge of file pages (normal file, tmpfs file (e.g. ipc shared memory) |
+| | and swaps of tmpfs file) mmapped by the target task. Unlike the case of |
+| | anonymous pages, file pages (and swaps) in the range mmapped by the task |
+| | will be moved even if the task hasn't done page fault, i.e. they might |
+| | not be the task's "RSS", but other task's "RSS" that maps the same file. |
+| | And mapcount of the page is ignored (the page can be moved even if |
+| | page_mapcount(page) > 1). You must enable Swap Extension (see 2.4) to |
+| | enable move of swap charges. |
++---+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+
+8.3 TODO
+--------
+
+- All of moving charge operations are done under cgroup_mutex. It's not good
+ behavior to hold the mutex too long, so we may need some trick.
+
+9. Memory thresholds
+====================
+
+Memory cgroup implements memory thresholds using the cgroups notification
+API (see cgroups.txt). It allows to register multiple memory and memsw
+thresholds and gets notifications when it crosses.
+
+To register a threshold, an application must:
+
+- create an eventfd using eventfd(2);
+- open memory.usage_in_bytes or memory.memsw.usage_in_bytes;
+- write string like "<event_fd> <fd of memory.usage_in_bytes> <threshold>" to
+ cgroup.event_control.
+
+Application will be notified through eventfd when memory usage crosses
+threshold in any direction.
+
+It's applicable for root and non-root cgroup.
+
+10. OOM Control
+===============
+
+memory.oom_control file is for OOM notification and other controls.
+
+Memory cgroup implements OOM notifier using the cgroup notification
+API (See cgroups.txt). It allows to register multiple OOM notification
+delivery and gets notification when OOM happens.
+
+To register a notifier, an application must:
+
+ - create an eventfd using eventfd(2)
+ - open memory.oom_control file
+ - write string like "<event_fd> <fd of memory.oom_control>" to
+ cgroup.event_control
+
+The application will be notified through eventfd when OOM happens.
+OOM notification doesn't work for the root cgroup.
+
+You can disable the OOM-killer by writing "1" to memory.oom_control file, as:
+
+ #echo 1 > memory.oom_control
+
+If OOM-killer is disabled, tasks under cgroup will hang/sleep
+in memory cgroup's OOM-waitqueue when they request accountable memory.
+
+For running them, you have to relax the memory cgroup's OOM status by
+
+ * enlarge limit or reduce usage.
+
+To reduce usage,
+
+ * kill some tasks.
+ * move some tasks to other group with account migration.
+ * remove some files (on tmpfs?)
+
+Then, stopped tasks will work again.
+
+At reading, current status of OOM is shown.
+
+ - oom_kill_disable 0 or 1
+ (if 1, oom-killer is disabled)
+ - under_oom 0 or 1
+ (if 1, the memory cgroup is under OOM, tasks may be stopped.)
+
+11. Memory Pressure
+===================
+
+The pressure level notifications can be used to monitor the memory
+allocation cost; based on the pressure, applications can implement
+different strategies of managing their memory resources. The pressure
+levels are defined as following:
+
+The "low" level means that the system is reclaiming memory for new
+allocations. Monitoring this reclaiming activity might be useful for
+maintaining cache level. Upon notification, the program (typically
+"Activity Manager") might analyze vmstat and act in advance (i.e.
+prematurely shutdown unimportant services).
+
+The "medium" level means that the system is experiencing medium memory
+pressure, the system might be making swap, paging out active file caches,
+etc. Upon this event applications may decide to further analyze
+vmstat/zoneinfo/memcg or internal memory usage statistics and free any
+resources that can be easily reconstructed or re-read from a disk.
+
+The "critical" level means that the system is actively thrashing, it is
+about to out of memory (OOM) or even the in-kernel OOM killer is on its
+way to trigger. Applications should do whatever they can to help the
+system. It might be too late to consult with vmstat or any other
+statistics, so it's advisable to take an immediate action.
+
+By default, events are propagated upward until the event is handled, i.e. the
+events are not pass-through. For example, you have three cgroups: A->B->C. Now
+you set up an event listener on cgroups A, B and C, and suppose group C
+experiences some pressure. In this situation, only group C will receive the
+notification, i.e. groups A and B will not receive it. This is done to avoid
+excessive "broadcasting" of messages, which disturbs the system and which is
+especially bad if we are low on memory or thrashing. Group B, will receive
+notification only if there are no event listers for group C.
+
+There are three optional modes that specify different propagation behavior:
+
+ - "default": this is the default behavior specified above. This mode is the
+ same as omitting the optional mode parameter, preserved by backwards
+ compatibility.
+
+ - "hierarchy": events always propagate up to the root, similar to the default
+ behavior, except that propagation continues regardless of whether there are
+ event listeners at each level, with the "hierarchy" mode. In the above
+ example, groups A, B, and C will receive notification of memory pressure.
+
+ - "local": events are pass-through, i.e. they only receive notifications when
+ memory pressure is experienced in the memcg for which the notification is
+ registered. In the above example, group C will receive notification if
+ registered for "local" notification and the group experiences memory
+ pressure. However, group B will never receive notification, regardless if
+ there is an event listener for group C or not, if group B is registered for
+ local notification.
+
+The level and event notification mode ("hierarchy" or "local", if necessary) are
+specified by a comma-delimited string, i.e. "low,hierarchy" specifies
+hierarchical, pass-through, notification for all ancestor memcgs. Notification
+that is the default, non pass-through behavior, does not specify a mode.
+"medium,local" specifies pass-through notification for the medium level.
+
+The file memory.pressure_level is only used to setup an eventfd. To
+register a notification, an application must:
+
+- create an eventfd using eventfd(2);
+- open memory.pressure_level;
+- write string as "<event_fd> <fd of memory.pressure_level> <level[,mode]>"
+ to cgroup.event_control.
+
+Application will be notified through eventfd when memory pressure is at
+the specific level (or higher). Read/write operations to
+memory.pressure_level are no implemented.
+
+Test:
+
+ Here is a small script example that makes a new cgroup, sets up a
+ memory limit, sets up a notification in the cgroup and then makes child
+ cgroup experience a critical pressure::
+
+ # cd /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/
+ # mkdir foo
+ # cd foo
+ # cgroup_event_listener memory.pressure_level low,hierarchy &
+ # echo 8000000 > memory.limit_in_bytes
+ # echo 8000000 > memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes
+ # echo $$ > tasks
+ # dd if=/dev/zero | read x
+
+ (Expect a bunch of notifications, and eventually, the oom-killer will
+ trigger.)
+
+12. TODO
+========
+
+1. Make per-cgroup scanner reclaim not-shared pages first
+2. Teach controller to account for shared-pages
+3. Start reclamation in the background when the limit is
+ not yet hit but the usage is getting closer
+
+Summary
+=======
+
+Overall, the memory controller has been a stable controller and has been
+commented and discussed quite extensively in the community.
+
+References
+==========
+
+1. Singh, Balbir. RFC: Memory Controller, http://lwn.net/Articles/206697/
+2. Singh, Balbir. Memory Controller (RSS Control),
+ http://lwn.net/Articles/222762/
+3. Emelianov, Pavel. Resource controllers based on process cgroups
+ http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/6/198
+4. Emelianov, Pavel. RSS controller based on process cgroups (v2)
+ http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/9/78
+5. Emelianov, Pavel. RSS controller based on process cgroups (v3)
+ http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/30/244
+6. Menage, Paul. Control Groups v10, http://lwn.net/Articles/236032/
+7. Vaidyanathan, Srinivasan, Control Groups: Pagecache accounting and control
+ subsystem (v3), http://lwn.net/Articles/235534/
+8. Singh, Balbir. RSS controller v2 test results (lmbench),
+ http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/17/232
+9. Singh, Balbir. RSS controller v2 AIM9 results
+ http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/18/1
+10. Singh, Balbir. Memory controller v6 test results,
+ http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/19/36
+11. Singh, Balbir. Memory controller introduction (v6),
+ http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/17/69
+12. Corbet, Jonathan, Controlling memory use in cgroups,
+ http://lwn.net/Articles/243795/