Adding upstream version 5.10.209.upstream/5.10.209

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 564 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/security/credentials.rst b/Documentation/security/credentials.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..357328d56
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/security/credentials.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,564 @@
+====================
+Credentials in Linux
+====================
+
+By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
+
+.. contents:: :local:
+
+Overview
+========
+
+There are several parts to the security check performed by Linux when one
+object acts upon another:
+
+ 1. Objects.
+
+     Objects are things in the system that may be acted upon directly by
+     userspace programs.  Linux has a variety of actionable objects, including:
+
+	- Tasks
+	- Files/inodes
+	- Sockets
+	- Message queues
+	- Shared memory segments
+	- Semaphores
+	- Keys
+
+     As a part of the description of all these objects there is a set of
+     credentials.  What's in the set depends on the type of object.
+
+ 2. Object ownership.
+
+     Amongst the credentials of most objects, there will be a subset that
+     indicates the ownership of that object.  This is used for resource
+     accounting and limitation (disk quotas and task rlimits for example).
+
+     In a standard UNIX filesystem, for instance, this will be defined by the
+     UID marked on the inode.
+
+ 3. The objective context.
+
+     Also amongst the credentials of those objects, there will be a subset that
+     indicates the 'objective context' of that object.  This may or may not be
+     the same set as in (2) - in standard UNIX files, for instance, this is the
+     defined by the UID and the GID marked on the inode.
+
+     The objective context is used as part of the security calculation that is
+     carried out when an object is acted upon.
+
+ 4. Subjects.
+
+     A subject is an object that is acting upon another object.
+
+     Most of the objects in the system are inactive: they don't act on other
+     objects within the system.  Processes/tasks are the obvious exception:
+     they do stuff; they access and manipulate things.
+
+     Objects other than tasks may under some circumstances also be subjects.
+     For instance an open file may send SIGIO to a task using the UID and EUID
+     given to it by a task that called ``fcntl(F_SETOWN)`` upon it.  In this case,
+     the file struct will have a subjective context too.
+
+ 5. The subjective context.
+
+     A subject has an additional interpretation of its credentials.  A subset
+     of its credentials forms the 'subjective context'.  The subjective context
+     is used as part of the security calculation that is carried out when a
+     subject acts.
+
+     A Linux task, for example, has the FSUID, FSGID and the supplementary
+     group list for when it is acting upon a file - which are quite separate
+     from the real UID and GID that normally form the objective context of the
+     task.
+
+ 6. Actions.
+
+     Linux has a number of actions available that a subject may perform upon an
+     object.  The set of actions available depends on the nature of the subject
+     and the object.
+
+     Actions include reading, writing, creating and deleting files; forking or
+     signalling and tracing tasks.
+
+ 7. Rules, access control lists and security calculations.
+
+     When a subject acts upon an object, a security calculation is made.  This
+     involves taking the subjective context, the objective context and the
+     action, and searching one or more sets of rules to see whether the subject
+     is granted or denied permission to act in the desired manner on the
+     object, given those contexts.
+
+     There are two main sources of rules:
+
+     a. Discretionary access control (DAC):
+
+	 Sometimes the object will include sets of rules as part of its
+	 description.  This is an 'Access Control List' or 'ACL'.  A Linux
+	 file may supply more than one ACL.
+
+	 A traditional UNIX file, for example, includes a permissions mask that
+	 is an abbreviated ACL with three fixed classes of subject ('user',
+	 'group' and 'other'), each of which may be granted certain privileges
+	 ('read', 'write' and 'execute' - whatever those map to for the object
+	 in question).  UNIX file permissions do not allow the arbitrary
+	 specification of subjects, however, and so are of limited use.
+
+	 A Linux file might also sport a POSIX ACL.  This is a list of rules
+	 that grants various permissions to arbitrary subjects.
+
+     b. Mandatory access control (MAC):
+
+	 The system as a whole may have one or more sets of rules that get
+	 applied to all subjects and objects, regardless of their source.
+	 SELinux and Smack are examples of this.
+
+	 In the case of SELinux and Smack, each object is given a label as part
+	 of its credentials.  When an action is requested, they take the
+	 subject label, the object label and the action and look for a rule
+	 that says that this action is either granted or denied.
+
+
+Types of Credentials
+====================
+
+The Linux kernel supports the following types of credentials:
+
+ 1. Traditional UNIX credentials.
+
+	- Real User ID
+	- Real Group ID
+
+     The UID and GID are carried by most, if not all, Linux objects, even if in
+     some cases it has to be invented (FAT or CIFS files for example, which are
+     derived from Windows).  These (mostly) define the objective context of
+     that object, with tasks being slightly different in some cases.
+
+	- Effective, Saved and FS User ID
+	- Effective, Saved and FS Group ID
+	- Supplementary groups
+
+     These are additional credentials used by tasks only.  Usually, an
+     EUID/EGID/GROUPS will be used as the subjective context, and real UID/GID
+     will be used as the objective.  For tasks, it should be noted that this is
+     not always true.
+
+ 2. Capabilities.
+
+	- Set of permitted capabilities
+	- Set of inheritable capabilities
+	- Set of effective capabilities
+	- Capability bounding set
+
+     These are only carried by tasks.  They indicate superior capabilities
+     granted piecemeal to a task that an ordinary task wouldn't otherwise have.
+     These are manipulated implicitly by changes to the traditional UNIX
+     credentials, but can also be manipulated directly by the ``capset()``
+     system call.
+
+     The permitted capabilities are those caps that the process might grant
+     itself to its effective or permitted sets through ``capset()``.  This
+     inheritable set might also be so constrained.
+
+     The effective capabilities are the ones that a task is actually allowed to
+     make use of itself.
+
+     The inheritable capabilities are the ones that may get passed across
+     ``execve()``.
+
+     The bounding set limits the capabilities that may be inherited across
+     ``execve()``, especially when a binary is executed that will execute as
+     UID 0.
+
+ 3. Secure management flags (securebits).
+
+     These are only carried by tasks.  These govern the way the above
+     credentials are manipulated and inherited over certain operations such as
+     execve().  They aren't used directly as objective or subjective
+     credentials.
+
+ 4. Keys and keyrings.
+
+     These are only carried by tasks.  They carry and cache security tokens
+     that don't fit into the other standard UNIX credentials.  They are for
+     making such things as network filesystem keys available to the file
+     accesses performed by processes, without the necessity of ordinary
+     programs having to know about security details involved.
+
+     Keyrings are a special type of key.  They carry sets of other keys and can
+     be searched for the desired key.  Each process may subscribe to a number
+     of keyrings:
+
+	Per-thread keying
+	Per-process keyring
+	Per-session keyring
+
+     When a process accesses a key, if not already present, it will normally be
+     cached on one of these keyrings for future accesses to find.
+
+     For more information on using keys, see ``Documentation/security/keys/*``.
+
+ 5. LSM
+
+     The Linux Security Module allows extra controls to be placed over the
+     operations that a task may do.  Currently Linux supports several LSM
+     options.
+
+     Some work by labelling the objects in a system and then applying sets of
+     rules (policies) that say what operations a task with one label may do to
+     an object with another label.
+
+ 6. AF_KEY
+
+     This is a socket-based approach to credential management for networking
+     stacks [RFC 2367].  It isn't discussed by this document as it doesn't
+     interact directly with task and file credentials; rather it keeps system
+     level credentials.
+
+
+When a file is opened, part of the opening task's subjective context is
+recorded in the file struct created.  This allows operations using that file
+struct to use those credentials instead of the subjective context of the task
+that issued the operation.  An example of this would be a file opened on a
+network filesystem where the credentials of the opened file should be presented
+to the server, regardless of who is actually doing a read or a write upon it.
+
+
+File Markings
+=============
+
+Files on disk or obtained over the network may have annotations that form the
+objective security context of that file.  Depending on the type of filesystem,
+this may include one or more of the following:
+
+ * UNIX UID, GID, mode;
+ * Windows user ID;
+ * Access control list;
+ * LSM security label;
+ * UNIX exec privilege escalation bits (SUID/SGID);
+ * File capabilities exec privilege escalation bits.
+
+These are compared to the task's subjective security context, and certain
+operations allowed or disallowed as a result.  In the case of execve(), the
+privilege escalation bits come into play, and may allow the resulting process
+extra privileges, based on the annotations on the executable file.
+
+
+Task Credentials
+================
+
+In Linux, all of a task's credentials are held in (uid, gid) or through
+(groups, keys, LSM security) a refcounted structure of type 'struct cred'.
+Each task points to its credentials by a pointer called 'cred' in its
+task_struct.
+
+Once a set of credentials has been prepared and committed, it may not be
+changed, barring the following exceptions:
+
+ 1. its reference count may be changed;
+
+ 2. the reference count on the group_info struct it points to may be changed;
+
+ 3. the reference count on the security data it points to may be changed;
+
+ 4. the reference count on any keyrings it points to may be changed;
+
+ 5. any keyrings it points to may be revoked, expired or have their security
+    attributes changed; and
+
+ 6. the contents of any keyrings to which it points may be changed (the whole
+    point of keyrings being a shared set of credentials, modifiable by anyone
+    with appropriate access).
+
+To alter anything in the cred struct, the copy-and-replace principle must be
+adhered to.  First take a copy, then alter the copy and then use RCU to change
+the task pointer to make it point to the new copy.  There are wrappers to aid
+with this (see below).
+
+A task may only alter its _own_ credentials; it is no longer permitted for a
+task to alter another's credentials.  This means the ``capset()`` system call
+is no longer permitted to take any PID other than the one of the current
+process. Also ``keyctl_instantiate()`` and ``keyctl_negate()`` functions no
+longer permit attachment to process-specific keyrings in the requesting
+process as the instantiating process may need to create them.
+
+
+Immutable Credentials
+---------------------
+
+Once a set of credentials has been made public (by calling ``commit_creds()``
+for example), it must be considered immutable, barring two exceptions:
+
+ 1. The reference count may be altered.
+
+ 2. While the keyring subscriptions of a set of credentials may not be
+    changed, the keyrings subscribed to may have their contents altered.
+
+To catch accidental credential alteration at compile time, struct task_struct
+has _const_ pointers to its credential sets, as does struct file.  Furthermore,
+certain functions such as ``get_cred()`` and ``put_cred()`` operate on const
+pointers, thus rendering casts unnecessary, but require to temporarily ditch
+the const qualification to be able to alter the reference count.
+
+
+Accessing Task Credentials
+--------------------------
+
+A task being able to alter only its own credentials permits the current process
+to read or replace its own credentials without the need for any form of locking
+-- which simplifies things greatly.  It can just call::
+
+	const struct cred *current_cred()
+
+to get a pointer to its credentials structure, and it doesn't have to release
+it afterwards.
+
+There are convenience wrappers for retrieving specific aspects of a task's
+credentials (the value is simply returned in each case)::
+
+	uid_t current_uid(void)		Current's real UID
+	gid_t current_gid(void)		Current's real GID
+	uid_t current_euid(void)	Current's effective UID
+	gid_t current_egid(void)	Current's effective GID
+	uid_t current_fsuid(void)	Current's file access UID
+	gid_t current_fsgid(void)	Current's file access GID
+	kernel_cap_t current_cap(void)	Current's effective capabilities
+	struct user_struct *current_user(void)  Current's user account
+
+There are also convenience wrappers for retrieving specific associated pairs of
+a task's credentials::
+
+	void current_uid_gid(uid_t *, gid_t *);
+	void current_euid_egid(uid_t *, gid_t *);
+	void current_fsuid_fsgid(uid_t *, gid_t *);
+
+which return these pairs of values through their arguments after retrieving
+them from the current task's credentials.
+
+
+In addition, there is a function for obtaining a reference on the current
+process's current set of credentials::
+
+	const struct cred *get_current_cred(void);
+
+and functions for getting references to one of the credentials that don't
+actually live in struct cred::
+
+	struct user_struct *get_current_user(void);
+	struct group_info *get_current_groups(void);
+
+which get references to the current process's user accounting structure and
+supplementary groups list respectively.
+
+Once a reference has been obtained, it must be released with ``put_cred()``,
+``free_uid()`` or ``put_group_info()`` as appropriate.
+
+
+Accessing Another Task's Credentials
+------------------------------------
+
+While a task may access its own credentials without the need for locking, the
+same is not true of a task wanting to access another task's credentials.  It
+must use the RCU read lock and ``rcu_dereference()``.
+
+The ``rcu_dereference()`` is wrapped by::
+
+	const struct cred *__task_cred(struct task_struct *task);
+
+This should be used inside the RCU read lock, as in the following example::
+
+	void foo(struct task_struct *t, struct foo_data *f)
+	{
+		const struct cred *tcred;
+		...
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		tcred = __task_cred(t);
+		f->uid = tcred->uid;
+		f->gid = tcred->gid;
+		f->groups = get_group_info(tcred->groups);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+		...
+	}
+
+Should it be necessary to hold another task's credentials for a long period of
+time, and possibly to sleep while doing so, then the caller should get a
+reference on them using::
+
+	const struct cred *get_task_cred(struct task_struct *task);
+
+This does all the RCU magic inside of it.  The caller must call put_cred() on
+the credentials so obtained when they're finished with.
+
+.. note::
+   The result of ``__task_cred()`` should not be passed directly to
+   ``get_cred()`` as this may race with ``commit_cred()``.
+
+There are a couple of convenience functions to access bits of another task's
+credentials, hiding the RCU magic from the caller::
+
+	uid_t task_uid(task)		Task's real UID
+	uid_t task_euid(task)		Task's effective UID
+
+If the caller is holding the RCU read lock at the time anyway, then::
+
+	__task_cred(task)->uid
+	__task_cred(task)->euid
+
+should be used instead.  Similarly, if multiple aspects of a task's credentials
+need to be accessed, RCU read lock should be used, ``__task_cred()`` called,
+the result stored in a temporary pointer and then the credential aspects called
+from that before dropping the lock.  This prevents the potentially expensive
+RCU magic from being invoked multiple times.
+
+Should some other single aspect of another task's credentials need to be
+accessed, then this can be used::
+
+	task_cred_xxx(task, member)
+
+where 'member' is a non-pointer member of the cred struct.  For instance::
+
+	uid_t task_cred_xxx(task, suid);
+
+will retrieve 'struct cred::suid' from the task, doing the appropriate RCU
+magic.  This may not be used for pointer members as what they point to may
+disappear the moment the RCU read lock is dropped.
+
+
+Altering Credentials
+--------------------
+
+As previously mentioned, a task may only alter its own credentials, and may not
+alter those of another task.  This means that it doesn't need to use any
+locking to alter its own credentials.
+
+To alter the current process's credentials, a function should first prepare a
+new set of credentials by calling::
+
+	struct cred *prepare_creds(void);
+
+this locks current->cred_replace_mutex and then allocates and constructs a
+duplicate of the current process's credentials, returning with the mutex still
+held if successful.  It returns NULL if not successful (out of memory).
+
+The mutex prevents ``ptrace()`` from altering the ptrace state of a process
+while security checks on credentials construction and changing is taking place
+as the ptrace state may alter the outcome, particularly in the case of
+``execve()``.
+
+The new credentials set should be altered appropriately, and any security
+checks and hooks done.  Both the current and the proposed sets of credentials
+are available for this purpose as current_cred() will return the current set
+still at this point.
+
+When replacing the group list, the new list must be sorted before it
+is added to the credential, as a binary search is used to test for
+membership.  In practice, this means groups_sort() should be
+called before set_groups() or set_current_groups().
+groups_sort() must not be called on a ``struct group_list`` which
+is shared as it may permute elements as part of the sorting process
+even if the array is already sorted.
+
+When the credential set is ready, it should be committed to the current process
+by calling::
+
+	int commit_creds(struct cred *new);
+
+This will alter various aspects of the credentials and the process, giving the
+LSM a chance to do likewise, then it will use ``rcu_assign_pointer()`` to
+actually commit the new credentials to ``current->cred``, it will release
+``current->cred_replace_mutex`` to allow ``ptrace()`` to take place, and it
+will notify the scheduler and others of the changes.
+
+This function is guaranteed to return 0, so that it can be tail-called at the
+end of such functions as ``sys_setresuid()``.
+
+Note that this function consumes the caller's reference to the new credentials.
+The caller should _not_ call ``put_cred()`` on the new credentials afterwards.
+
+Furthermore, once this function has been called on a new set of credentials,
+those credentials may _not_ be changed further.
+
+
+Should the security checks fail or some other error occur after
+``prepare_creds()`` has been called, then the following function should be
+invoked::
+
+	void abort_creds(struct cred *new);
+
+This releases the lock on ``current->cred_replace_mutex`` that
+``prepare_creds()`` got and then releases the new credentials.
+
+
+A typical credentials alteration function would look something like this::
+
+	int alter_suid(uid_t suid)
+	{
+		struct cred *new;
+		int ret;
+
+		new = prepare_creds();
+		if (!new)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		new->suid = suid;
+		ret = security_alter_suid(new);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			abort_creds(new);
+			return ret;
+		}
+
+		return commit_creds(new);
+	}
+
+
+Managing Credentials
+--------------------
+
+There are some functions to help manage credentials:
+
+ - ``void put_cred(const struct cred *cred);``
+
+     This releases a reference to the given set of credentials.  If the
+     reference count reaches zero, the credentials will be scheduled for
+     destruction by the RCU system.
+
+ - ``const struct cred *get_cred(const struct cred *cred);``
+
+     This gets a reference on a live set of credentials, returning a pointer to
+     that set of credentials.
+
+ - ``struct cred *get_new_cred(struct cred *cred);``
+
+     This gets a reference on a set of credentials that is under construction
+     and is thus still mutable, returning a pointer to that set of credentials.
+
+
+Open File Credentials
+=====================
+
+When a new file is opened, a reference is obtained on the opening task's
+credentials and this is attached to the file struct as ``f_cred`` in place of
+``f_uid`` and ``f_gid``.  Code that used to access ``file->f_uid`` and
+``file->f_gid`` should now access ``file->f_cred->fsuid`` and
+``file->f_cred->fsgid``.
+
+It is safe to access ``f_cred`` without the use of RCU or locking because the
+pointer will not change over the lifetime of the file struct, and nor will the
+contents of the cred struct pointed to, barring the exceptions listed above
+(see the Task Credentials section).
+
+To avoid "confused deputy" privilege escalation attacks, access control checks
+during subsequent operations on an opened file should use these credentials
+instead of "current"'s credentials, as the file may have been passed to a more
+privileged process.
+
+Overriding the VFS's Use of Credentials
+=======================================
+
+Under some circumstances it is desirable to override the credentials used by
+the VFS, and that can be done by calling into such as ``vfs_mkdir()`` with a
+different set of credentials.  This is done in the following places:
+
+ * ``sys_faccessat()``.
+ * ``do_coredump()``.
+ * nfs4recover.c.