diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/hugetlb.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/hugetlb.rst | 131 |
1 files changed, 131 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/hugetlb.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/hugetlb.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..338f2c7d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/hugetlb.rst @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ +================== +HugeTLB Controller +================== + +HugeTLB controller can be created by first mounting the cgroup filesystem. + +# mount -t cgroup -o hugetlb none /sys/fs/cgroup + +With the above step, the initial or the parent HugeTLB group becomes +visible at /sys/fs/cgroup. At bootup, this group includes all the tasks in +the system. /sys/fs/cgroup/tasks lists the tasks in this cgroup. + +New groups can be created under the parent group /sys/fs/cgroup:: + + # cd /sys/fs/cgroup + # mkdir g1 + # echo $$ > g1/tasks + +The above steps create a new group g1 and move the current shell +process (bash) into it. + +Brief summary of control files:: + + hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.limit_in_bytes # set/show limit of "hugepagesize" hugetlb reservations + hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes # show max "hugepagesize" hugetlb reservations and no-reserve faults + hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.usage_in_bytes # show current reservations and no-reserve faults for "hugepagesize" hugetlb + hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.failcnt # show the number of allocation failure due to HugeTLB reservation limit + hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.limit_in_bytes # set/show limit of "hugepagesize" hugetlb faults + hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.max_usage_in_bytes # show max "hugepagesize" hugetlb usage recorded + hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.usage_in_bytes # show current usage for "hugepagesize" hugetlb + hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.failcnt # show the number of allocation failure due to HugeTLB usage limit + +For a system supporting three hugepage sizes (64k, 32M and 1G), the control +files include:: + + hugetlb.1GB.limit_in_bytes + hugetlb.1GB.max_usage_in_bytes + hugetlb.1GB.usage_in_bytes + hugetlb.1GB.failcnt + hugetlb.1GB.rsvd.limit_in_bytes + hugetlb.1GB.rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes + hugetlb.1GB.rsvd.usage_in_bytes + hugetlb.1GB.rsvd.failcnt + hugetlb.64KB.limit_in_bytes + hugetlb.64KB.max_usage_in_bytes + hugetlb.64KB.usage_in_bytes + hugetlb.64KB.failcnt + hugetlb.64KB.rsvd.limit_in_bytes + hugetlb.64KB.rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes + hugetlb.64KB.rsvd.usage_in_bytes + hugetlb.64KB.rsvd.failcnt + hugetlb.32MB.limit_in_bytes + hugetlb.32MB.max_usage_in_bytes + hugetlb.32MB.usage_in_bytes + hugetlb.32MB.failcnt + hugetlb.32MB.rsvd.limit_in_bytes + hugetlb.32MB.rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes + hugetlb.32MB.rsvd.usage_in_bytes + hugetlb.32MB.rsvd.failcnt + + +1. Page fault accounting + +hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.limit_in_bytes +hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.max_usage_in_bytes +hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.usage_in_bytes +hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.failcnt + +The HugeTLB controller allows users to limit the HugeTLB usage (page fault) per +control group and enforces the limit during page fault. Since HugeTLB +doesn't support page reclaim, enforcing the limit at page fault time implies +that, the application will get SIGBUS signal if it tries to fault in HugeTLB +pages beyond its limit. Therefore the application needs to know exactly how many +HugeTLB pages it uses before hand, and the sysadmin needs to make sure that +there are enough available on the machine for all the users to avoid processes +getting SIGBUS. + + +2. Reservation accounting + +hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.limit_in_bytes +hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes +hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.usage_in_bytes +hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.failcnt + +The HugeTLB controller allows to limit the HugeTLB reservations per control +group and enforces the controller limit at reservation time and at the fault of +HugeTLB memory for which no reservation exists. Since reservation limits are +enforced at reservation time (on mmap or shget), reservation limits never causes +the application to get SIGBUS signal if the memory was reserved before hand. For +MAP_NORESERVE allocations, the reservation limit behaves the same as the fault +limit, enforcing memory usage at fault time and causing the application to +receive a SIGBUS if it's crossing its limit. + +Reservation limits are superior to page fault limits described above, since +reservation limits are enforced at reservation time (on mmap or shget), and +never causes the application to get SIGBUS signal if the memory was reserved +before hand. This allows for easier fallback to alternatives such as +non-HugeTLB memory for example. In the case of page fault accounting, it's very +hard to avoid processes getting SIGBUS since the sysadmin needs precisely know +the HugeTLB usage of all the tasks in the system and make sure there is enough +pages to satisfy all requests. Avoiding tasks getting SIGBUS on overcommited +systems is practically impossible with page fault accounting. + + +3. Caveats with shared memory + +For shared HugeTLB memory, both HugeTLB reservation and page faults are charged +to the first task that causes the memory to be reserved or faulted, and all +subsequent uses of this reserved or faulted memory is done without charging. + +Shared HugeTLB memory is only uncharged when it is unreserved or deallocated. +This is usually when the HugeTLB file is deleted, and not when the task that +caused the reservation or fault has exited. + + +4. Caveats with HugeTLB cgroup offline. + +When a HugeTLB cgroup goes offline with some reservations or faults still +charged to it, the behavior is as follows: + +- The fault charges are charged to the parent HugeTLB cgroup (reparented), +- the reservation charges remain on the offline HugeTLB cgroup. + +This means that if a HugeTLB cgroup gets offlined while there is still HugeTLB +reservations charged to it, that cgroup persists as a zombie until all HugeTLB +reservations are uncharged. HugeTLB reservations behave in this manner to match +the memory controller whose cgroups also persist as zombie until all charged +memory is uncharged. Also, the tracking of HugeTLB reservations is a bit more +complex compared to the tracking of HugeTLB faults, so it is significantly +harder to reparent reservations at offline time. |