diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking/qspinlock.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 591 |
1 files changed, 591 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..cbff6ba53 --- /dev/null +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c @@ -0,0 +1,591 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later +/* + * Queued spinlock + * + * (C) Copyright 2013-2015 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. + * (C) Copyright 2013-2014,2018 Red Hat, Inc. + * (C) Copyright 2015 Intel Corp. + * (C) Copyright 2015 Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Development LP + * + * Authors: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> + * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> + */ + +#ifndef _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH + +#include <linux/smp.h> +#include <linux/bug.h> +#include <linux/cpumask.h> +#include <linux/percpu.h> +#include <linux/hardirq.h> +#include <linux/mutex.h> +#include <linux/prefetch.h> +#include <asm/byteorder.h> +#include <asm/qspinlock.h> + +/* + * Include queued spinlock statistics code + */ +#include "qspinlock_stat.h" + +/* + * The basic principle of a queue-based spinlock can best be understood + * by studying a classic queue-based spinlock implementation called the + * MCS lock. A copy of the original MCS lock paper ("Algorithms for Scalable + * Synchronization on Shared-Memory Multiprocessors by Mellor-Crummey and + * Scott") is available at + * + * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206115 + * + * This queued spinlock implementation is based on the MCS lock, however to + * make it fit the 4 bytes we assume spinlock_t to be, and preserve its + * existing API, we must modify it somehow. + * + * In particular; where the traditional MCS lock consists of a tail pointer + * (8 bytes) and needs the next pointer (another 8 bytes) of its own node to + * unlock the next pending (next->locked), we compress both these: {tail, + * next->locked} into a single u32 value. + * + * Since a spinlock disables recursion of its own context and there is a limit + * to the contexts that can nest; namely: task, softirq, hardirq, nmi. As there + * are at most 4 nesting levels, it can be encoded by a 2-bit number. Now + * we can encode the tail by combining the 2-bit nesting level with the cpu + * number. With one byte for the lock value and 3 bytes for the tail, only a + * 32-bit word is now needed. Even though we only need 1 bit for the lock, + * we extend it to a full byte to achieve better performance for architectures + * that support atomic byte write. + * + * We also change the first spinner to spin on the lock bit instead of its + * node; whereby avoiding the need to carry a node from lock to unlock, and + * preserving existing lock API. This also makes the unlock code simpler and + * faster. + * + * N.B. The current implementation only supports architectures that allow + * atomic operations on smaller 8-bit and 16-bit data types. + * + */ + +#include "mcs_spinlock.h" +#define MAX_NODES 4 + +/* + * On 64-bit architectures, the mcs_spinlock structure will be 16 bytes in + * size and four of them will fit nicely in one 64-byte cacheline. For + * pvqspinlock, however, we need more space for extra data. To accommodate + * that, we insert two more long words to pad it up to 32 bytes. IOW, only + * two of them can fit in a cacheline in this case. That is OK as it is rare + * to have more than 2 levels of slowpath nesting in actual use. We don't + * want to penalize pvqspinlocks to optimize for a rare case in native + * qspinlocks. + */ +struct qnode { + struct mcs_spinlock mcs; +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS + long reserved[2]; +#endif +}; + +/* + * The pending bit spinning loop count. + * This heuristic is used to limit the number of lockword accesses + * made by atomic_cond_read_relaxed when waiting for the lock to + * transition out of the "== _Q_PENDING_VAL" state. We don't spin + * indefinitely because there's no guarantee that we'll make forward + * progress. + */ +#ifndef _Q_PENDING_LOOPS +#define _Q_PENDING_LOOPS 1 +#endif + +/* + * Per-CPU queue node structures; we can never have more than 4 nested + * contexts: task, softirq, hardirq, nmi. + * + * Exactly fits one 64-byte cacheline on a 64-bit architecture. + * + * PV doubles the storage and uses the second cacheline for PV state. + */ +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct qnode, qnodes[MAX_NODES]); + +/* + * We must be able to distinguish between no-tail and the tail at 0:0, + * therefore increment the cpu number by one. + */ + +static inline __pure u32 encode_tail(int cpu, int idx) +{ + u32 tail; + + tail = (cpu + 1) << _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET; + tail |= idx << _Q_TAIL_IDX_OFFSET; /* assume < 4 */ + + return tail; +} + +static inline __pure struct mcs_spinlock *decode_tail(u32 tail) +{ + int cpu = (tail >> _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET) - 1; + int idx = (tail & _Q_TAIL_IDX_MASK) >> _Q_TAIL_IDX_OFFSET; + + return per_cpu_ptr(&qnodes[idx].mcs, cpu); +} + +static inline __pure +struct mcs_spinlock *grab_mcs_node(struct mcs_spinlock *base, int idx) +{ + return &((struct qnode *)base + idx)->mcs; +} + +#define _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK (_Q_LOCKED_MASK | _Q_PENDING_MASK) + +#if _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8 +/** + * clear_pending - clear the pending bit. + * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure + * + * *,1,* -> *,0,* + */ +static __always_inline void clear_pending(struct qspinlock *lock) +{ + WRITE_ONCE(lock->pending, 0); +} + +/** + * clear_pending_set_locked - take ownership and clear the pending bit. + * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure + * + * *,1,0 -> *,0,1 + * + * Lock stealing is not allowed if this function is used. + */ +static __always_inline void clear_pending_set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock) +{ + WRITE_ONCE(lock->locked_pending, _Q_LOCKED_VAL); +} + +/* + * xchg_tail - Put in the new queue tail code word & retrieve previous one + * @lock : Pointer to queued spinlock structure + * @tail : The new queue tail code word + * Return: The previous queue tail code word + * + * xchg(lock, tail), which heads an address dependency + * + * p,*,* -> n,*,* ; prev = xchg(lock, node) + */ +static __always_inline u32 xchg_tail(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 tail) +{ + /* + * We can use relaxed semantics since the caller ensures that the + * MCS node is properly initialized before updating the tail. + */ + return (u32)xchg_relaxed(&lock->tail, + tail >> _Q_TAIL_OFFSET) << _Q_TAIL_OFFSET; +} + +#else /* _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8 */ + +/** + * clear_pending - clear the pending bit. + * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure + * + * *,1,* -> *,0,* + */ +static __always_inline void clear_pending(struct qspinlock *lock) +{ + atomic_andnot(_Q_PENDING_VAL, &lock->val); +} + +/** + * clear_pending_set_locked - take ownership and clear the pending bit. + * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure + * + * *,1,0 -> *,0,1 + */ +static __always_inline void clear_pending_set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock) +{ + atomic_add(-_Q_PENDING_VAL + _Q_LOCKED_VAL, &lock->val); +} + +/** + * xchg_tail - Put in the new queue tail code word & retrieve previous one + * @lock : Pointer to queued spinlock structure + * @tail : The new queue tail code word + * Return: The previous queue tail code word + * + * xchg(lock, tail) + * + * p,*,* -> n,*,* ; prev = xchg(lock, node) + */ +static __always_inline u32 xchg_tail(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 tail) +{ + u32 old, new, val = atomic_read(&lock->val); + + for (;;) { + new = (val & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK) | tail; + /* + * We can use relaxed semantics since the caller ensures that + * the MCS node is properly initialized before updating the + * tail. + */ + old = atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(&lock->val, val, new); + if (old == val) + break; + + val = old; + } + return old; +} +#endif /* _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8 */ + +/** + * queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire - fetch the whole lock value and set pending + * @lock : Pointer to queued spinlock structure + * Return: The previous lock value + * + * *,*,* -> *,1,* + */ +#ifndef queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire +static __always_inline u32 queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire(struct qspinlock *lock) +{ + return atomic_fetch_or_acquire(_Q_PENDING_VAL, &lock->val); +} +#endif + +/** + * set_locked - Set the lock bit and own the lock + * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure + * + * *,*,0 -> *,0,1 + */ +static __always_inline void set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock) +{ + WRITE_ONCE(lock->locked, _Q_LOCKED_VAL); +} + + +/* + * Generate the native code for queued_spin_unlock_slowpath(); provide NOPs for + * all the PV callbacks. + */ + +static __always_inline void __pv_init_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node) { } +static __always_inline void __pv_wait_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node, + struct mcs_spinlock *prev) { } +static __always_inline void __pv_kick_node(struct qspinlock *lock, + struct mcs_spinlock *node) { } +static __always_inline u32 __pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct qspinlock *lock, + struct mcs_spinlock *node) + { return 0; } + +#define pv_enabled() false + +#define pv_init_node __pv_init_node +#define pv_wait_node __pv_wait_node +#define pv_kick_node __pv_kick_node +#define pv_wait_head_or_lock __pv_wait_head_or_lock + +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS +#define queued_spin_lock_slowpath native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath +#endif + +#endif /* _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH */ + +/** + * queued_spin_lock_slowpath - acquire the queued spinlock + * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure + * @val: Current value of the queued spinlock 32-bit word + * + * (queue tail, pending bit, lock value) + * + * fast : slow : unlock + * : : + * uncontended (0,0,0) -:--> (0,0,1) ------------------------------:--> (*,*,0) + * : | ^--------.------. / : + * : v \ \ | : + * pending : (0,1,1) +--> (0,1,0) \ | : + * : | ^--' | | : + * : v | | : + * uncontended : (n,x,y) +--> (n,0,0) --' | : + * queue : | ^--' | : + * : v | : + * contended : (*,x,y) +--> (*,0,0) ---> (*,0,1) -' : + * queue : ^--' : + */ +void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val) +{ + struct mcs_spinlock *prev, *next, *node; + u32 old, tail; + int idx; + + BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_NR_CPUS >= (1U << _Q_TAIL_CPU_BITS)); + + if (pv_enabled()) + goto pv_queue; + + if (virt_spin_lock(lock)) + return; + + /* + * Wait for in-progress pending->locked hand-overs with a bounded + * number of spins so that we guarantee forward progress. + * + * 0,1,0 -> 0,0,1 + */ + if (val == _Q_PENDING_VAL) { + int cnt = _Q_PENDING_LOOPS; + val = atomic_cond_read_relaxed(&lock->val, + (VAL != _Q_PENDING_VAL) || !cnt--); + } + + /* + * If we observe any contention; queue. + */ + if (val & ~_Q_LOCKED_MASK) + goto queue; + + /* + * trylock || pending + * + * 0,0,* -> 0,1,* -> 0,0,1 pending, trylock + */ + val = queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire(lock); + + /* + * If we observe contention, there is a concurrent locker. + * + * Undo and queue; our setting of PENDING might have made the + * n,0,0 -> 0,0,0 transition fail and it will now be waiting + * on @next to become !NULL. + */ + if (unlikely(val & ~_Q_LOCKED_MASK)) { + + /* Undo PENDING if we set it. */ + if (!(val & _Q_PENDING_MASK)) + clear_pending(lock); + + goto queue; + } + + /* + * We're pending, wait for the owner to go away. + * + * 0,1,1 -> 0,1,0 + * + * this wait loop must be a load-acquire such that we match the + * store-release that clears the locked bit and create lock + * sequentiality; this is because not all + * clear_pending_set_locked() implementations imply full + * barriers. + */ + if (val & _Q_LOCKED_MASK) + atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val, !(VAL & _Q_LOCKED_MASK)); + + /* + * take ownership and clear the pending bit. + * + * 0,1,0 -> 0,0,1 + */ + clear_pending_set_locked(lock); + lockevent_inc(lock_pending); + return; + + /* + * End of pending bit optimistic spinning and beginning of MCS + * queuing. + */ +queue: + lockevent_inc(lock_slowpath); +pv_queue: + node = this_cpu_ptr(&qnodes[0].mcs); + idx = node->count++; + tail = encode_tail(smp_processor_id(), idx); + + /* + * 4 nodes are allocated based on the assumption that there will + * not be nested NMIs taking spinlocks. That may not be true in + * some architectures even though the chance of needing more than + * 4 nodes will still be extremely unlikely. When that happens, + * we fall back to spinning on the lock directly without using + * any MCS node. This is not the most elegant solution, but is + * simple enough. + */ + if (unlikely(idx >= MAX_NODES)) { + lockevent_inc(lock_no_node); + while (!queued_spin_trylock(lock)) + cpu_relax(); + goto release; + } + + node = grab_mcs_node(node, idx); + + /* + * Keep counts of non-zero index values: + */ + lockevent_cond_inc(lock_use_node2 + idx - 1, idx); + + /* + * Ensure that we increment the head node->count before initialising + * the actual node. If the compiler is kind enough to reorder these + * stores, then an IRQ could overwrite our assignments. + */ + barrier(); + + node->locked = 0; + node->next = NULL; + pv_init_node(node); + + /* + * We touched a (possibly) cold cacheline in the per-cpu queue node; + * attempt the trylock once more in the hope someone let go while we + * weren't watching. + */ + if (queued_spin_trylock(lock)) + goto release; + + /* + * Ensure that the initialisation of @node is complete before we + * publish the updated tail via xchg_tail() and potentially link + * @node into the waitqueue via WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node) below. + */ + smp_wmb(); + + /* + * Publish the updated tail. + * We have already touched the queueing cacheline; don't bother with + * pending stuff. + * + * p,*,* -> n,*,* + */ + old = xchg_tail(lock, tail); + next = NULL; + + /* + * if there was a previous node; link it and wait until reaching the + * head of the waitqueue. + */ + if (old & _Q_TAIL_MASK) { + prev = decode_tail(old); + + /* Link @node into the waitqueue. */ + WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node); + + pv_wait_node(node, prev); + arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(&node->locked); + + /* + * While waiting for the MCS lock, the next pointer may have + * been set by another lock waiter. We optimistically load + * the next pointer & prefetch the cacheline for writing + * to reduce latency in the upcoming MCS unlock operation. + */ + next = READ_ONCE(node->next); + if (next) + prefetchw(next); + } + + /* + * we're at the head of the waitqueue, wait for the owner & pending to + * go away. + * + * *,x,y -> *,0,0 + * + * this wait loop must use a load-acquire such that we match the + * store-release that clears the locked bit and create lock + * sequentiality; this is because the set_locked() function below + * does not imply a full barrier. + * + * The PV pv_wait_head_or_lock function, if active, will acquire + * the lock and return a non-zero value. So we have to skip the + * atomic_cond_read_acquire() call. As the next PV queue head hasn't + * been designated yet, there is no way for the locked value to become + * _Q_SLOW_VAL. So both the set_locked() and the + * atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed() calls will be safe. + * + * If PV isn't active, 0 will be returned instead. + * + */ + if ((val = pv_wait_head_or_lock(lock, node))) + goto locked; + + val = atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val, !(VAL & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK)); + +locked: + /* + * claim the lock: + * + * n,0,0 -> 0,0,1 : lock, uncontended + * *,*,0 -> *,*,1 : lock, contended + * + * If the queue head is the only one in the queue (lock value == tail) + * and nobody is pending, clear the tail code and grab the lock. + * Otherwise, we only need to grab the lock. + */ + + /* + * In the PV case we might already have _Q_LOCKED_VAL set, because + * of lock stealing; therefore we must also allow: + * + * n,0,1 -> 0,0,1 + * + * Note: at this point: (val & _Q_PENDING_MASK) == 0, because of the + * above wait condition, therefore any concurrent setting of + * PENDING will make the uncontended transition fail. + */ + if ((val & _Q_TAIL_MASK) == tail) { + if (atomic_try_cmpxchg_relaxed(&lock->val, &val, _Q_LOCKED_VAL)) + goto release; /* No contention */ + } + + /* + * Either somebody is queued behind us or _Q_PENDING_VAL got set + * which will then detect the remaining tail and queue behind us + * ensuring we'll see a @next. + */ + set_locked(lock); + + /* + * contended path; wait for next if not observed yet, release. + */ + if (!next) + next = smp_cond_load_relaxed(&node->next, (VAL)); + + arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended(&next->locked); + pv_kick_node(lock, next); + +release: + /* + * release the node + */ + __this_cpu_dec(qnodes[0].mcs.count); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_spin_lock_slowpath); + +/* + * Generate the paravirt code for queued_spin_unlock_slowpath(). + */ +#if !defined(_GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH) && defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS) +#define _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH + +#undef pv_enabled +#define pv_enabled() true + +#undef pv_init_node +#undef pv_wait_node +#undef pv_kick_node +#undef pv_wait_head_or_lock + +#undef queued_spin_lock_slowpath +#define queued_spin_lock_slowpath __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath + +#include "qspinlock_paravirt.h" +#include "qspinlock.c" + +bool nopvspin __initdata; +static __init int parse_nopvspin(char *arg) +{ + nopvspin = true; + return 0; +} +early_param("nopvspin", parse_nopvspin); +#endif |