diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/objtool/Documentation')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/objtool/Documentation/stack-validation.txt | 360 |
1 files changed, 360 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/objtool/Documentation/stack-validation.txt b/tools/objtool/Documentation/stack-validation.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000..30f38fdc0 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/objtool/Documentation/stack-validation.txt @@ -0,0 +1,360 @@ +Compile-time stack metadata validation +====================================== + + +Overview +-------- + +The kernel CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION option enables a host tool named +objtool which runs at compile time. It has a "check" subcommand which +analyzes every .o file and ensures the validity of its stack metadata. +It enforces a set of rules on asm code and C inline assembly code so +that stack traces can be reliable. + +For each function, it recursively follows all possible code paths and +validates the correct frame pointer state at each instruction. + +It also follows code paths involving special sections, like +.altinstructions, __jump_table, and __ex_table, which can add +alternative execution paths to a given instruction (or set of +instructions). Similarly, it knows how to follow switch statements, for +which gcc sometimes uses jump tables. + +(Objtool also has an 'orc generate' subcommand which generates debuginfo +for the ORC unwinder. See Documentation/x86/orc-unwinder.rst in the +kernel tree for more details.) + + +Why do we need stack metadata validation? +----------------------------------------- + +Here are some of the benefits of validating stack metadata: + +a) More reliable stack traces for frame pointer enabled kernels + + Frame pointers are used for debugging purposes. They allow runtime + code and debug tools to be able to walk the stack to determine the + chain of function call sites that led to the currently executing + code. + + For some architectures, frame pointers are enabled by + CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER. For some other architectures they may be + required by the ABI (sometimes referred to as "backchain pointers"). + + For C code, gcc automatically generates instructions for setting up + frame pointers when the -fno-omit-frame-pointer option is used. + + But for asm code, the frame setup instructions have to be written by + hand, which most people don't do. So the end result is that + CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is honored for C code but not for most asm code. + + For stack traces based on frame pointers to be reliable, all + functions which call other functions must first create a stack frame + and update the frame pointer. If a first function doesn't properly + create a stack frame before calling a second function, the *caller* + of the first function will be skipped on the stack trace. + + For example, consider the following example backtrace with frame + pointers enabled: + + [<ffffffff81812584>] dump_stack+0x4b/0x63 + [<ffffffff812d6dc2>] cmdline_proc_show+0x12/0x30 + [<ffffffff8127f568>] seq_read+0x108/0x3e0 + [<ffffffff812cce62>] proc_reg_read+0x42/0x70 + [<ffffffff81256197>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x100 + [<ffffffff81256b16>] vfs_read+0x86/0x130 + [<ffffffff81257898>] SyS_read+0x58/0xd0 + [<ffffffff8181c1f2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76 + + It correctly shows that the caller of cmdline_proc_show() is + seq_read(). + + If we remove the frame pointer logic from cmdline_proc_show() by + replacing the frame pointer related instructions with nops, here's + what it looks like instead: + + [<ffffffff81812584>] dump_stack+0x4b/0x63 + [<ffffffff812d6dc2>] cmdline_proc_show+0x12/0x30 + [<ffffffff812cce62>] proc_reg_read+0x42/0x70 + [<ffffffff81256197>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x100 + [<ffffffff81256b16>] vfs_read+0x86/0x130 + [<ffffffff81257898>] SyS_read+0x58/0xd0 + [<ffffffff8181c1f2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76 + + Notice that cmdline_proc_show()'s caller, seq_read(), has been + skipped. Instead the stack trace seems to show that + cmdline_proc_show() was called by proc_reg_read(). + + The benefit of objtool here is that because it ensures that *all* + functions honor CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER, no functions will ever[*] be + skipped on a stack trace. + + [*] unless an interrupt or exception has occurred at the very + beginning of a function before the stack frame has been created, + or at the very end of the function after the stack frame has been + destroyed. This is an inherent limitation of frame pointers. + +b) ORC (Oops Rewind Capability) unwind table generation + + An alternative to frame pointers and DWARF, ORC unwind data can be + used to walk the stack. Unlike frame pointers, ORC data is out of + band. So it doesn't affect runtime performance and it can be + reliable even when interrupts or exceptions are involved. + + For more details, see Documentation/x86/orc-unwinder.rst. + +c) Higher live patching compatibility rate + + Livepatch has an optional "consistency model", which is needed for + more complex patches. In order for the consistency model to work, + stack traces need to be reliable (or an unreliable condition needs to + be detectable). Objtool makes that possible. + + For more details, see the livepatch documentation in the Linux kernel + source tree at Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst. + +Rules +----- + +To achieve the validation, objtool enforces the following rules: + +1. Each callable function must be annotated as such with the ELF + function type. In asm code, this is typically done using the + ENTRY/ENDPROC macros. If objtool finds a return instruction + outside of a function, it flags an error since that usually indicates + callable code which should be annotated accordingly. + + This rule is needed so that objtool can properly identify each + callable function in order to analyze its stack metadata. + +2. Conversely, each section of code which is *not* callable should *not* + be annotated as an ELF function. The ENDPROC macro shouldn't be used + in this case. + + This rule is needed so that objtool can ignore non-callable code. + Such code doesn't have to follow any of the other rules. + +3. Each callable function which calls another function must have the + correct frame pointer logic, if required by CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER or + the architecture's back chain rules. This can by done in asm code + with the FRAME_BEGIN/FRAME_END macros. + + This rule ensures that frame pointer based stack traces will work as + designed. If function A doesn't create a stack frame before calling + function B, the _caller_ of function A will be skipped on the stack + trace. + +4. Dynamic jumps and jumps to undefined symbols are only allowed if: + + a) the jump is part of a switch statement; or + + b) the jump matches sibling call semantics and the frame pointer has + the same value it had on function entry. + + This rule is needed so that objtool can reliably analyze all of a + function's code paths. If a function jumps to code in another file, + and it's not a sibling call, objtool has no way to follow the jump + because it only analyzes a single file at a time. + +5. A callable function may not execute kernel entry/exit instructions. + The only code which needs such instructions is kernel entry code, + which shouldn't be be in callable functions anyway. + + This rule is just a sanity check to ensure that callable functions + return normally. + + +Objtool warnings +---------------- + +For asm files, if you're getting an error which doesn't make sense, +first make sure that the affected code follows the above rules. + +For C files, the common culprits are inline asm statements and calls to +"noreturn" functions. See below for more details. + +Another possible cause for errors in C code is if the Makefile removes +-fno-omit-frame-pointer or adds -fomit-frame-pointer to the gcc options. + +Here are some examples of common warnings reported by objtool, what +they mean, and suggestions for how to fix them. + + +1. file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x128: call without frame pointer save/setup + + The func() function made a function call without first saving and/or + updating the frame pointer, and CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled. + + If the error is for an asm file, and func() is indeed a callable + function, add proper frame pointer logic using the FRAME_BEGIN and + FRAME_END macros. Otherwise, if it's not a callable function, remove + its ELF function annotation by changing ENDPROC to END, and instead + use the manual unwind hint macros in asm/unwind_hints.h. + + If it's a GCC-compiled .c file, the error may be because the function + uses an inline asm() statement which has a "call" instruction. An + asm() statement with a call instruction must declare the use of the + stack pointer in its output operand. On x86_64, this means adding + the ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT as an output constraint: + + asm volatile("call func" : ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT); + + Otherwise the stack frame may not get created before the call. + + +2. file.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x53: unreachable instruction + + Objtool couldn't find a code path to reach the instruction. + + If the error is for an asm file, and the instruction is inside (or + reachable from) a callable function, the function should be annotated + with the ENTRY/ENDPROC macros (ENDPROC is the important one). + Otherwise, the code should probably be annotated with the unwind hint + macros in asm/unwind_hints.h so objtool and the unwinder can know the + stack state associated with the code. + + If you're 100% sure the code won't affect stack traces, or if you're + a just a bad person, you can tell objtool to ignore it. See the + "Adding exceptions" section below. + + If it's not actually in a callable function (e.g. kernel entry code), + change ENDPROC to END. + + +4. file.o: warning: objtool: func(): can't find starting instruction + or + file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x11dd: can't decode instruction + + Does the file have data in a text section? If so, that can confuse + objtool's instruction decoder. Move the data to a more appropriate + section like .data or .rodata. + + +5. file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x6: unsupported instruction in callable function + + This is a kernel entry/exit instruction like sysenter or iret. Such + instructions aren't allowed in a callable function, and are most + likely part of the kernel entry code. They should usually not have + the callable function annotation (ENDPROC) and should always be + annotated with the unwind hint macros in asm/unwind_hints.h. + + +6. file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x26: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame + + This is a dynamic jump or a jump to an undefined symbol. Objtool + assumed it's a sibling call and detected that the frame pointer + wasn't first restored to its original state. + + If it's not really a sibling call, you may need to move the + destination code to the local file. + + If the instruction is not actually in a callable function (e.g. + kernel entry code), change ENDPROC to END and annotate manually with + the unwind hint macros in asm/unwind_hints.h. + + +7. file: warning: objtool: func()+0x5c: stack state mismatch + + The instruction's frame pointer state is inconsistent, depending on + which execution path was taken to reach the instruction. + + Make sure that, when CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled, the function + pushes and sets up the frame pointer (for x86_64, this means rbp) at + the beginning of the function and pops it at the end of the function. + Also make sure that no other code in the function touches the frame + pointer. + + Another possibility is that the code has some asm or inline asm which + does some unusual things to the stack or the frame pointer. In such + cases it's probably appropriate to use the unwind hint macros in + asm/unwind_hints.h. + + +8. file.o: warning: objtool: funcA() falls through to next function funcB() + + This means that funcA() doesn't end with a return instruction or an + unconditional jump, and that objtool has determined that the function + can fall through into the next function. There could be different + reasons for this: + + 1) funcA()'s last instruction is a call to a "noreturn" function like + panic(). In this case the noreturn function needs to be added to + objtool's hard-coded global_noreturns array. Feel free to bug the + objtool maintainer, or you can submit a patch. + + 2) funcA() uses the unreachable() annotation in a section of code + that is actually reachable. + + 3) If funcA() calls an inline function, the object code for funcA() + might be corrupt due to a gcc bug. For more details, see: + https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646 + +9. file.o: warning: objtool: funcA() call to funcB() with UACCESS enabled + + This means that an unexpected call to a non-whitelisted function exists + outside of arch-specific guards. + X86: SMAP (stac/clac): __uaccess_begin()/__uaccess_end() + ARM: PAN: uaccess_enable()/uaccess_disable() + + These functions should be called to denote a minimal critical section around + access to __user variables. See also: https://lwn.net/Articles/517475/ + + The intention of the warning is to prevent calls to funcB() from eventually + calling schedule(), potentially leaking the AC flags state, and not + restoring them correctly. + + It also helps verify that there are no unexpected calls to funcB() which may + access user space pages with protections against doing so disabled. + + To fix, either: + 1) remove explicit calls to funcB() from funcA(). + 2) add the correct guards before and after calls to low level functions like + __get_user_size()/__put_user_size(). + 3) add funcB to uaccess_safe_builtin whitelist in tools/objtool/check.c, if + funcB obviously does not call schedule(), and is marked notrace (since + function tracing inserts additional calls, which is not obvious from the + sources). + +10. file.o: warning: func()+0x5c: stack layout conflict in alternatives + + This means that in the use of the alternative() or ALTERNATIVE() + macro, the code paths have conflicting modifications to the stack. + The problem is that there is only one ORC unwind table, which means + that the ORC unwind entries must be consistent for all possible + instruction boundaries regardless of which code has been patched. + This limitation can be overcome by massaging the alternatives with + NOPs to shift the stack changes around so they no longer conflict. + +11. file.o: warning: unannotated intra-function call + + This warning means that a direct call is done to a destination which + is not at the beginning of a function. If this is a legit call, you + can remove this warning by putting the ANNOTATE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL + directive right before the call. + + +If the error doesn't seem to make sense, it could be a bug in objtool. +Feel free to ask the objtool maintainer for help. + + +Adding exceptions +----------------- + +If you _really_ need objtool to ignore something, and are 100% sure +that it won't affect kernel stack traces, you can tell objtool to +ignore it: + +- To skip validation of a function, use the STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD + macro. + +- To skip validation of a file, add + + OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD_filename.o := y + + to the Makefile. + +- To skip validation of a directory, add + + OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD := y + + to the Makefile. |