From 107d3592a1c9a7ad71756a29d2cc0d7192498c43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:12:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 017/323] sched/proc: Print accurate cpumask vs migrate_disable() Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/older/patches-5.10.215-rt107.tar.xz Ensure /proc/*/status doesn't print 'random' cpumasks due to migrate_disable(). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior --- fs/proc/array.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c index 18a4588c35be6..decaa77680448 100644 --- a/fs/proc/array.c +++ b/fs/proc/array.c @@ -384,9 +384,9 @@ static inline void task_context_switch_counts(struct seq_file *m, static void task_cpus_allowed(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *task) { seq_printf(m, "Cpus_allowed:\t%*pb\n", - cpumask_pr_args(task->cpus_ptr)); + cpumask_pr_args(&task->cpus_mask)); seq_printf(m, "Cpus_allowed_list:\t%*pbl\n", - cpumask_pr_args(task->cpus_ptr)); + cpumask_pr_args(&task->cpus_mask)); } static inline void task_core_dumping(struct seq_file *m, struct mm_struct *mm) -- 2.44.0