From 822739997ff16caa50f619a00344655f21d65a4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 21:36:51 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 267/323] tty/serial/pl011: Make the locking work on RT Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/older/patches-5.10.204-rt100.tar.xz The lock is a sleeping lock and local_irq_save() is not the optimsation we are looking for. Redo it to make it work on -RT and non-RT. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c | 17 +++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c index d4a93a94b4ca..275c625e3eb9 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c @@ -2207,18 +2207,24 @@ pl011_console_write(struct console *co, const char *s, unsigned int count) { struct uart_amba_port *uap = amba_ports[co->index]; unsigned int old_cr = 0, new_cr; - unsigned long flags; + unsigned long flags = 0; int locked = 1; clk_enable(uap->clk); - local_irq_save(flags); + /* + * local_irq_save(flags); + * + * This local_irq_save() is nonsense. If we come in via sysrq + * handling then interrupts are already disabled. Aside of + * that the port.sysrq check is racy on SMP regardless. + */ if (uap->port.sysrq) locked = 0; else if (oops_in_progress) - locked = spin_trylock(&uap->port.lock); + locked = spin_trylock_irqsave(&uap->port.lock, flags); else - spin_lock(&uap->port.lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&uap->port.lock, flags); /* * First save the CR then disable the interrupts @@ -2244,8 +2250,7 @@ pl011_console_write(struct console *co, const char *s, unsigned int count) pl011_write(old_cr, uap, REG_CR); if (locked) - spin_unlock(&uap->port.lock); - local_irq_restore(flags); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uap->port.lock, flags); clk_disable(uap->clk); } -- 2.43.0