blob: 6f1a0cb21a06f0450b021f43a4fe9701b783d70e (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
|
From 09d09da2b8c97fd09f50deb278f9d4a25b99ad55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:14:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 022/323] sched: Fix migration_cpu_stop() WARN
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/older/patches-5.10.204-rt100.tar.xz
Oleksandr reported hitting the WARN in the 'task_rq(p) != rq' branch
of migration_cpu_stop(). Valentin noted that using cpu_of(rq) in that
case is just plain wrong to begin with, since per the earlier branch
that isn't the actual CPU of the task.
Replace both instances of is_cpu_allowed() by a direct p->cpus_mask
test using task_cpu().
Reported-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Debugged-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index d12d91510789..7d67a0e03f9a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1929,7 +1929,7 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data)
* and we should be valid again. Nothing to do.
*/
if (!pending) {
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_cpu_allowed(p, cpu_of(rq)));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_test_cpu(task_cpu(p), &p->cpus_mask));
goto out;
}
@@ -1957,7 +1957,7 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data)
* valid again. Nothing to do.
*/
if (!pending) {
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_cpu_allowed(p, cpu_of(rq)));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_test_cpu(task_cpu(p), &p->cpus_mask));
goto out;
}
--
2.43.0
|
