blob: 8908254e0447391ea639d3336a44122c5dd845b5 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
|
From 8127bb05947dbb12f9537095932d6a7a7a07d09e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:42:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 132/323] tasklets: Replace barrier() with cpu_relax() in
tasklet_unlock_wait()
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/older/patches-5.10.204-rt100.tar.xz
A barrier() in a tight loop which waits for something to happen on a remote
CPU is a pointless exercise. Replace it with cpu_relax() which allows HT
siblings to make progress.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
include/linux/interrupt.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
index 0652b4858ba6..fad0eb9d42ab 100644
--- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
+++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
@@ -672,7 +672,8 @@ static inline void tasklet_unlock(struct tasklet_struct *t)
static inline void tasklet_unlock_wait(struct tasklet_struct *t)
{
- while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &(t)->state)) { barrier(); }
+ while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &t->state))
+ cpu_relax();
}
#else
#define tasklet_trylock(t) 1
--
2.43.0
|
