Adding upstream version 14.2.21.upstream/14.2.21upstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 169 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/doc/radosgw/multitenancy.rst b/doc/radosgw/multitenancy.rst
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0cca50d9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/radosgw/multitenancy.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+.. _rgw-multitenancy:
+
+=================
+RGW Multi-tenancy
+=================
+
+.. versionadded:: Jewel
+
+The multi-tenancy feature allows to use buckets and users of the same
+name simultaneously by segregating them under so-called ``tenants``.
+This may be useful, for instance, to permit users of Swift API to
+create buckets with easily conflicting names such as "test" or "trove".
+
+From the Jewel release onward, each user and bucket lies under a tenant.
+For compatibility, a "legacy" tenant with an empty name is provided.
+Whenever a bucket is referred without an explicit tenant, an implicit
+tenant is used, taken from the user performing the operation. Since
+the pre-existing users are under the legacy tenant, they continue
+to create and access buckets as before. The layout of objects in RADOS
+is extended in a compatible way, ensuring a smooth upgrade to Jewel.
+
+Administering Users With Explicit Tenants
+=========================================
+
+Tenants as such do not have any operations on them. They appear and
+disappear as needed, when users are administered. In order to create,
+modify, and remove users with explicit tenants, either an additional
+option --tenant is supplied, or a syntax "<tenant>$<user>" is used
+in the parameters of the radosgw-admin command.
+
+Examples
+--------
+
+Create a user testx$tester to be accessed with S3::
+
+  # radosgw-admin --tenant testx --uid tester --display-name "Test User" --access_key TESTER --secret test123 user create
+
+Create a user testx$tester to be accessed with Swift::
+
+  # radosgw-admin --tenant testx --uid tester --display-name "Test User" --subuser tester:test --key-type swift --access full user create
+  # radosgw-admin --subuser 'testx$tester:test' --key-type swift --secret test123
+
+.. note:: The subuser with explicit tenant has to be quoted in the shell.
+
+   Tenant names may contain only alphanumeric characters and underscores.
+
+Accessing Buckets with Explicit Tenants
+=======================================
+
+When a client application accesses buckets, it always operates with
+credentials of a particular user. As mentioned above, every user belongs
+to a tenant. Therefore, every operation has an implicit tenant in its
+context, to be used if no tenant is specified explicitly. Thus a complete
+compatibility is maintained with previous releases, as long as the
+referred buckets and referring user belong to the same tenant.
+In other words, anything unusual occurs when accessing another tenant's
+buckets *only*.
+
+Extensions employed to specify an explicit tenant differ according
+to the protocol and authentication system used.
+
+S3
+--
+
+In case of S3, a colon character is used to separate tenant and bucket.
+Thus a sample URL would be::
+
+  https://ep.host.dom/tenant:bucket
+
+Here's a simple Python sample:
+
+.. code-block:: python
+   :linenos:
+
+	from boto.s3.connection import S3Connection, OrdinaryCallingFormat
+	c = S3Connection(
+		aws_access_key_id="TESTER",
+		aws_secret_access_key="test123",
+		host="ep.host.dom",
+		calling_format = OrdinaryCallingFormat())
+	bucket = c.get_bucket("test5b:testbucket")
+
+Note that it's not possible to supply an explicit tenant using
+a hostname. Hostnames cannot contain colons, or any other separators
+that are not already valid in bucket names. Using a period creates an
+ambiguous syntax. Therefore, the bucket-in-URL-path format has to be
+used.
+
+Due to the fact that the native S3 API does not deal with
+multi-tenancy and radosgw's implementation does, things get a bit
+involved when dealing with signed URLs and public read ACLs.
+
+* A **signed URL** does contain the ``AWSAccessKeyId`` query
+  parameters, from which radosgw is able to discern the correct user
+  and tenant owning the bucket. In other words, an application
+  generating signed URLs should be able to take just the un-prefixed
+  bucket name, and produce a signed URL that itself contains the
+  bucket name without the tenant prefix. However, it is *possible* to
+  include the prefix if you so choose.
+
+  Thus, accessing a signed URL of an object ``bar`` in a container
+  ``foo`` belonging to the tenant ``7188e165c0ae4424ac68ae2e89a05c50``
+  would be possible either via
+  ``http://<host>:<port>/foo/bar?AWSAccessKeyId=b200fb6634c547199e436a0f93c0c46e&Expires=1542890806&Signature=eok6CYQC%2FDwmQQmqvY5jTg6ehXU%3D``,
+  or via
+  ``http://<host>:<port>/7188e165c0ae4424ac68ae2e89a05c50:foo/bar?AWSAccessKeyId=b200fb6634c547199e436a0f93c0c46e&Expires=1542890806&Signature=eok6CYQC%2FDwmQQmqvY5jTg6ehXU%3D``,
+  depending on whether or not the tenant prefix was passed in on
+  signature generation.
+
+* A bucket with a **public read ACL** is meant to be read by an HTTP
+  client *without* including any query parameters that would allow
+  radosgw to discern tenants. Thus, publicly readable objects must
+  always be accessed using the bucket name with the tenant prefix.
+
+  Thus, if you set a public read ACL on an object ``bar`` in a
+  container ``foo`` belonging to the tenant
+  ``7188e165c0ae4424ac68ae2e89a05c50``, you would need to access that
+  object via the public URL
+  ``http://<host>:<port>/7188e165c0ae4424ac68ae2e89a05c50:foo/bar``.
+
+Swift with built-in authenticator
+---------------------------------
+
+TBD -- not in test_multen.py yet
+
+Swift with Keystone
+-------------------
+
+In the default configuration, although native Swift has inherent
+multi-tenancy, radosgw does not enable multi-tenancy for the Swift
+API. This is to ensure that a setup with legacy buckets --- that is,
+buckets that were created before radosgw supported multitenancy ---,
+those buckets retain their dual-API capability to be queried and
+modified using either S3 or Swift.
+
+If you want to enable multitenancy for Swift, particularly if your
+users only ever authenticate against OpenStack Keystone, you should
+enable Keystone-based multitenancy with the following ``ceph.conf``
+configuration option::
+
+  rgw keystone implicit tenants = true
+
+Once you enable this option, any newly connecting user (whether they
+are using the Swift API, or Keystone-authenticated S3) will prompt
+radosgw to create a user named ``<tenant_id>$<tenant_id``, where
+``<tenant_id>`` is a Keystone tenant (project) UUID --- for example,
+``7188e165c0ae4424ac68ae2e89a05c50$7188e165c0ae4424ac68ae2e89a05c50``.
+
+Whenever that user then creates an Swift container, radosgw internally
+translates the given container name into
+``<tenant_id>/<container_name>``, such as
+``7188e165c0ae4424ac68ae2e89a05c50/foo``. This ensures that if there
+are two or more different tenants all creating a container named
+``foo``, radosgw is able to transparently discern them by their tenant
+prefix.
+
+It is also possible to limit the effects of implicit tenants
+to only apply to swift or s3, by setting ``rgw keystone implicit tenants``
+to either ``s3`` or ``swift``.  This will likely primarily
+be of use to users who had previously used implicit tenants
+with older versions of ceph, where implicit tenants
+only applied to the swift protocol.
+
+Notes and known issues
+----------------------
+
+Just to be clear, it is not possible to create buckets in other
+tenants at present. The owner of newly created bucket is extracted
+from authentication information.