summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/doc/radosgw/layout.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/radosgw/layout.rst')
-rw-r--r--doc/radosgw/layout.rst208
1 files changed, 208 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/radosgw/layout.rst b/doc/radosgw/layout.rst
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..04a525b6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/radosgw/layout.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+===========================
+ Rados Gateway Data Layout
+===========================
+
+Although the source code is the ultimate guide, this document helps
+new developers to get up to speed with the implementation details.
+
+Introduction
+------------
+
+Swift offers something called a container, that we use interchangeably with
+the term bucket. One may say that RGW's buckets implement Swift containers.
+
+This document does not consider how RGW operates on these structures,
+e.g. the use of encode() and decode() methods for serialization and so on.
+
+Conceptual View
+---------------
+
+Although RADOS only knows about pools and objects with their xattrs and
+omap[1], conceptually RGW organizes its data into three different kinds:
+metadata, bucket index, and data.
+
+Metadata
+^^^^^^^^
+
+We have 3 'sections' of metadata: 'user', 'bucket', and 'bucket.instance'.
+You can use the following commands to introspect metadata entries: ::
+
+ $ radosgw-admin metadata list
+ $ radosgw-admin metadata list bucket
+ $ radosgw-admin metadata list bucket.instance
+ $ radosgw-admin metadata list user
+
+ $ radosgw-admin metadata get bucket:<bucket>
+ $ radosgw-admin metadata get bucket.instance:<bucket>:<bucket_id>
+ $ radosgw-admin metadata get user:<user> # get or set
+
+Some variables have been used in above commands, they are:
+
+- user: Holds user information
+- bucket: Holds a mapping between bucket name and bucket instance id
+- bucket.instance: Holds bucket instance information[2]
+
+Every metadata entry is kept on a single rados object.
+See below for implementation defails.
+
+Note that the metadata is not indexed. When listing a metadata section we do a
+rados pgls operation on the containing pool.
+
+Bucket Index
+^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+It's a different kind of metadata, and kept separately. The bucket index holds
+a key-value map in rados objects. By default it is a single rados object per
+bucket, but it is possible since Hammer to shard that map over multiple rados
+objects. The map itself is kept in omap, associated with each rados object.
+The key of each omap is the name of the objects, and the value holds some basic
+metadata of that object -- metadata that shows up when listing the bucket.
+Also, each omap holds a header, and we keep some bucket accounting metadata
+in that header (number of objects, total size, etc.).
+
+Note that we also hold other information in the bucket index, and it's kept in
+other key namespaces. We can hold the bucket index log there, and for versioned
+objects there is more information that we keep on other keys.
+
+Data
+^^^^
+
+Objects data is kept in one or more rados objects for each rgw object.
+
+Object Lookup Path
+------------------
+
+When accessing objects, ReST APIs come to RGW with three parameters:
+account information (access key in S3 or account name in Swift),
+bucket or container name, and object name (or key). At present, RGW only
+uses account information to find out the user ID and for access control.
+Only the bucket name and object key are used to address the object in a pool.
+
+The user ID in RGW is a string, typically the actual user name from the user
+credentials and not a hashed or mapped identifier.
+
+When accessing a user's data, the user record is loaded from an object
+"<user_id>" in pool "default.rgw.meta" with namespace "users.uid".
+
+Bucket names are represented in the pool "default.rgw.meta" with namespace
+"root". Bucket record is
+loaded in order to obtain so-called marker, which serves as a bucket ID.
+
+The object is located in pool "default.rgw.buckets.data".
+Object name is "<marker>_<key>",
+for example "default.7593.4_image.png", where the marker is "default.7593.4"
+and the key is "image.png". Since these concatenated names are not parsed,
+only passed down to RADOS, the choice of the separator is not important and
+causes no ambiguity. For the same reason, slashes are permitted in object
+names (keys).
+
+It is also possible to create multiple data pools and make it so that
+different users buckets will be created in different rados pools by default,
+thus providing the necessary scaling. The layout and naming of these pools
+is controlled by a 'policy' setting.[3]
+
+An RGW object may consist of several RADOS objects, the first of which
+is the head that contains the metadata, such as manifest, ACLs, content type,
+ETag, and user-defined metadata. The metadata is stored in xattrs.
+The head may also contain up to 512 kilobytes of object data, for efficiency
+and atomicity. The manifest describes how each object is laid out in RADOS
+objects.
+
+Bucket and Object Listing
+-------------------------
+
+Buckets that belong to a given user are listed in an omap of an object named
+"<user_id>.buckets" (for example, "foo.buckets") in pool "default.rgw.meta"
+with namespace "users.uid".
+These objects are accessed when listing buckets, when updating bucket
+contents, and updating and retrieving bucket statistics (e.g. for quota).
+
+See the user-visible, encoded class 'cls_user_bucket_entry' and its
+nested class 'cls_user_bucket' for the values of these omap entires.
+
+These listings are kept consistent with buckets in pool ".rgw".
+
+Objects that belong to a given bucket are listed in a bucket index,
+as discussed in sub-section 'Bucket Index' above. The default naming
+for index objects is ".dir.<marker>" in pool "default.rgw.buckets.index".
+
+Footnotes
+---------
+
+[1] Omap is a key-value store, associated with an object, in a way similar
+to how Extended Attributes associate with a POSIX file. An object's omap
+is not physically located in the object's storage, but its precise
+implementation is invisible and immaterial to RADOS Gateway.
+In Hammer, one LevelDB is used to store omap in each OSD.
+
+[2] Before the Dumpling release, the 'bucket.instance' metadata did not
+exist and the 'bucket' metadata contained its information. It is possible
+to encounter such buckets in old installations.
+
+[3] The pool names have been changed starting with the Infernalis release.
+If you are looking at an older setup, some details may be different. In
+particular there was a different pool for each of the namespaces that are
+now being used inside the default.root.meta pool.
+
+Appendix: Compendium
+--------------------
+
+Known pools:
+
+.rgw.root
+ Unspecified region, zone, and global information records, one per object.
+
+<zone>.rgw.control
+ notify.<N>
+
+<zone>.rgw.meta
+ Multiple namespaces with different kinds of metadata:
+
+ namespace: root
+ <bucket>
+ .bucket.meta.<bucket>:<marker> # see put_bucket_instance_info()
+
+ The tenant is used to disambiguate buckets, but not bucket instances.
+ Example::
+
+ .bucket.meta.prodtx:test%25star:default.84099.6
+ .bucket.meta.testcont:default.4126.1
+ .bucket.meta.prodtx:testcont:default.84099.4
+ prodtx/testcont
+ prodtx/test%25star
+ testcont
+
+ namespace: users.uid
+ Contains _both_ per-user information (RGWUserInfo) in "<user>" objects
+ and per-user lists of buckets in omaps of "<user>.buckets" objects.
+ The "<user>" may contain the tenant if non-empty, for example::
+
+ prodtx$prodt
+ test2.buckets
+ prodtx$prodt.buckets
+ test2
+
+ namespace: users.email
+ Unimportant
+
+ namespace: users.keys
+ 47UA98JSTJZ9YAN3OS3O
+
+ This allows radosgw to look up users by their access keys during authentication.
+
+ namespace: users.swift
+ test:tester
+
+<zone>.rgw.buckets.index
+ Objects are named ".dir.<marker>", each contains a bucket index.
+ If the index is sharded, each shard appends the shard index after
+ the marker.
+
+<zone>.rgw.buckets.data
+ default.7593.4__shadow_.488urDFerTYXavx4yAd-Op8mxehnvTI_1
+ <marker>_<key>
+
+An example of a marker would be "default.16004.1" or "default.7593.4".
+The current format is "<zone>.<instance_id>.<bucket_id>". But once
+generated, a marker is not parsed again, so its format may change
+freely in the future.