diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/googletest/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc | 1228 |
1 files changed, 1228 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/googletest/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc b/src/googletest/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc new file mode 100644 index 00000000..5ca5bc78 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/googletest/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc @@ -0,0 +1,1228 @@ +// Copyright 2007, Google Inc. +// All rights reserved. +// +// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +// met: +// +// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +// distribution. +// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +// this software without specific prior written permission. +// +// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. +// +// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) + +// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes. +// +// This file tests the built-in actions generated by a script. + +#include "gmock/gmock-generated-actions.h" + +#include <functional> +#include <sstream> +#include <string> +#include "gmock/gmock.h" +#include "gtest/gtest.h" + +namespace testing { +namespace gmock_generated_actions_test { + +using ::std::plus; +using ::std::string; +using testing::get; +using testing::make_tuple; +using testing::tuple; +using testing::tuple_element; +using testing::_; +using testing::Action; +using testing::ActionInterface; +using testing::ByRef; +using testing::DoAll; +using testing::Invoke; +using testing::Return; +using testing::ReturnNew; +using testing::SetArgPointee; +using testing::StaticAssertTypeEq; +using testing::Unused; +using testing::WithArgs; + +// For suppressing compiler warnings on conversion possibly losing precision. +inline short Short(short n) { return n; } // NOLINT +inline char Char(char ch) { return ch; } + +// Sample functions and functors for testing various actions. +int Nullary() { return 1; } + +class NullaryFunctor { + public: + int operator()() { return 2; } +}; + +bool g_done = false; + +bool Unary(int x) { return x < 0; } + +const char* Plus1(const char* s) { return s + 1; } + +bool ByConstRef(const string& s) { return s == "Hi"; } + +const double g_double = 0; +bool ReferencesGlobalDouble(const double& x) { return &x == &g_double; } + +string ByNonConstRef(string& s) { return s += "+"; } // NOLINT + +struct UnaryFunctor { + int operator()(bool x) { return x ? 1 : -1; } +}; + +const char* Binary(const char* input, short n) { return input + n; } // NOLINT + +void VoidBinary(int, char) { g_done = true; } + +int Ternary(int x, char y, short z) { return x + y + z; } // NOLINT + +void VoidTernary(int, char, bool) { g_done = true; } + +int SumOf4(int a, int b, int c, int d) { return a + b + c + d; } + +string Concat4(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4) { + return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4; +} + +int SumOf5(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) { return a + b + c + d + e; } + +struct SumOf5Functor { + int operator()(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) { + return a + b + c + d + e; + } +}; + +string Concat5(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5) { + return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5; +} + +int SumOf6(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) { + return a + b + c + d + e + f; +} + +struct SumOf6Functor { + int operator()(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) { + return a + b + c + d + e + f; + } +}; + +string Concat6(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6) { + return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6; +} + +string Concat7(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, + const char* s7) { + return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7; +} + +string Concat8(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, + const char* s7, const char* s8) { + return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8; +} + +string Concat9(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, + const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9) { + return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9; +} + +string Concat10(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, + const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9, + const char* s10) { + return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9 + s10; +} + +// A helper that turns the type of a C-string literal from const +// char[N] to const char*. +inline const char* CharPtr(const char* s) { return s; } + +// Tests InvokeArgument<N>(...). + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a nullary function. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function0) { + Action<int(int, int(*)())> a = InvokeArgument<1>(); // NOLINT + EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple(2, &Nullary))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a unary function. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor1) { + Action<int(UnaryFunctor)> a = InvokeArgument<0>(true); // NOLINT + EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple(UnaryFunctor()))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 5-ary function. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function5) { + Action<int(int(*)(int, int, int, int, int))> a = // NOLINT + InvokeArgument<0>(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5); + EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(make_tuple(&SumOf5))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 5-ary functor. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor5) { + Action<int(SumOf5Functor)> a = // NOLINT + InvokeArgument<0>(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5); + EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(make_tuple(SumOf5Functor()))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 6-ary function. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function6) { + Action<int(int(*)(int, int, int, int, int, int))> a = // NOLINT + InvokeArgument<0>(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6); + EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(make_tuple(&SumOf6))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 6-ary functor. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor6) { + Action<int(SumOf6Functor)> a = // NOLINT + InvokeArgument<0>(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6); + EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(make_tuple(SumOf6Functor()))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 7-ary function. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function7) { + Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*))> a = + InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7"); + EXPECT_EQ("1234567", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat7))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 8-ary function. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function8) { + Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*))> a = + InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8"); + EXPECT_EQ("12345678", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat8))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 9-ary function. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function9) { + Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*))> a = + InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9"); + EXPECT_EQ("123456789", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat9))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 10-ary function. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function10) { + Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*))> a = + InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "0"); + EXPECT_EQ("1234567890", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat10))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a pointer argument. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByPointerFunction) { + Action<const char*(const char*(*)(const char* input, short n))> a = // NOLINT + InvokeArgument<0>(static_cast<const char*>("Hi"), Short(1)); + EXPECT_STREQ("i", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Binary))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a const char* +// by passing it a C-string literal. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, FunctionWithCStringLiteral) { + Action<const char*(const char*(*)(const char* input, short n))> a = // NOLINT + InvokeArgument<0>("Hi", Short(1)); + EXPECT_STREQ("i", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Binary))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a const reference. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByConstReferenceFunction) { + Action<bool(bool(*function)(const string& s))> a = // NOLINT + InvokeArgument<0>(string("Hi")); + // When action 'a' is constructed, it makes a copy of the temporary + // string object passed to it, so it's OK to use 'a' later, when the + // temporary object has already died. + EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(&ByConstRef))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with ByRef() and a function that takes a +// const reference. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByExplicitConstReferenceFunction) { + Action<bool(bool(*)(const double& x))> a = // NOLINT + InvokeArgument<0>(ByRef(g_double)); + // The above line calls ByRef() on a const value. + EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(&ReferencesGlobalDouble))); + + double x = 0; + a = InvokeArgument<0>(ByRef(x)); // This calls ByRef() on a non-const. + EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(make_tuple(&ReferencesGlobalDouble))); +} + +// Tests using WithArgs and with an action that takes 1 argument. +TEST(WithArgsTest, OneArg) { + Action<bool(double x, int n)> a = WithArgs<1>(Invoke(Unary)); // NOLINT + EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, -1))); + EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, 1))); +} + +// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 2 arguments. +TEST(WithArgsTest, TwoArgs) { + Action<const char*(const char* s, double x, short n)> a = + WithArgs<0, 2>(Invoke(Binary)); + const char s[] = "Hello"; + EXPECT_EQ(s + 2, a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr(s), 0.5, Short(2)))); +} + +// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 3 arguments. +TEST(WithArgsTest, ThreeArgs) { + Action<int(int, double, char, short)> a = // NOLINT + WithArgs<0, 2, 3>(Invoke(Ternary)); + EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(100, 6.5, Char(20), Short(3)))); +} + +// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 4 arguments. +TEST(WithArgsTest, FourArgs) { + Action<string(const char*, const char*, double, const char*, const char*)> a = + WithArgs<4, 3, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat4)); + EXPECT_EQ("4310", a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), 2.5, + CharPtr("3"), CharPtr("4")))); +} + +// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 5 arguments. +TEST(WithArgsTest, FiveArgs) { + Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*)> a = + WithArgs<4, 3, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat5)); + EXPECT_EQ("43210", + a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), + CharPtr("3"), CharPtr("4")))); +} + +// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 6 arguments. +TEST(WithArgsTest, SixArgs) { + Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*)> a = + WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat6)); + EXPECT_EQ("012210", + a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2")))); +} + +// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 7 arguments. +TEST(WithArgsTest, SevenArgs) { + Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a = + WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat7)); + EXPECT_EQ("0123210", + a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), + CharPtr("3")))); +} + +// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 8 arguments. +TEST(WithArgsTest, EightArgs) { + Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a = + WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 0, 1, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat8)); + EXPECT_EQ("01230123", + a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), + CharPtr("3")))); +} + +// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 9 arguments. +TEST(WithArgsTest, NineArgs) { + Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a = + WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat9)); + EXPECT_EQ("012312323", + a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), + CharPtr("3")))); +} + +// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 10 arguments. +TEST(WithArgsTest, TenArgs) { + Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a = + WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat10)); + EXPECT_EQ("0123210123", + a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), + CharPtr("3")))); +} + +// Tests using WithArgs with an action that is not Invoke(). +class SubstractAction : public ActionInterface<int(int, int)> { // NOLINT + public: + virtual int Perform(const tuple<int, int>& args) { + return get<0>(args) - get<1>(args); + } +}; + +TEST(WithArgsTest, NonInvokeAction) { + Action<int(const string&, int, int)> a = // NOLINT + WithArgs<2, 1>(MakeAction(new SubstractAction)); + string s("hello"); + EXPECT_EQ(8, a.Perform(tuple<const string&, int, int>(s, 2, 10))); +} + +// Tests using WithArgs to pass all original arguments in the original order. +TEST(WithArgsTest, Identity) { + Action<int(int x, char y, short z)> a = // NOLINT + WithArgs<0, 1, 2>(Invoke(Ternary)); + EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(100, Char(20), Short(3)))); +} + +// Tests using WithArgs with repeated arguments. +TEST(WithArgsTest, RepeatedArguments) { + Action<int(bool, int m, int n)> a = // NOLINT + WithArgs<1, 1, 1, 1>(Invoke(SumOf4)); + EXPECT_EQ(4, a.Perform(make_tuple(false, 1, 10))); +} + +// Tests using WithArgs with reversed argument order. +TEST(WithArgsTest, ReversedArgumentOrder) { + Action<const char*(short n, const char* input)> a = // NOLINT + WithArgs<1, 0>(Invoke(Binary)); + const char s[] = "Hello"; + EXPECT_EQ(s + 2, a.Perform(make_tuple(Short(2), CharPtr(s)))); +} + +// Tests using WithArgs with compatible, but not identical, argument types. +TEST(WithArgsTest, ArgsOfCompatibleTypes) { + Action<long(short x, char y, double z, char c)> a = // NOLINT + WithArgs<0, 1, 3>(Invoke(Ternary)); + EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(Short(100), Char(20), 5.6, Char(3)))); +} + +// Tests using WithArgs with an action that returns void. +TEST(WithArgsTest, VoidAction) { + Action<void(double x, char c, int n)> a = WithArgs<2, 1>(Invoke(VoidBinary)); + g_done = false; + a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, 'a', 3)); + EXPECT_TRUE(g_done); +} + +// Tests DoAll(a1, a2). +TEST(DoAllTest, TwoActions) { + int n = 0; + Action<int(int*)> a = DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), // NOLINT + Return(2)); + EXPECT_EQ(2, a.Perform(make_tuple(&n))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, n); +} + +// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3). +TEST(DoAllTest, ThreeActions) { + int m = 0, n = 0; + Action<int(int*, int*)> a = DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), // NOLINT + SetArgPointee<1>(2), + Return(3)); + EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, m); + EXPECT_EQ(2, n); +} + +// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3, a4). +TEST(DoAllTest, FourActions) { + int m = 0, n = 0; + char ch = '\0'; + Action<int(int*, int*, char*)> a = // NOLINT + DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), + SetArgPointee<1>(2), + SetArgPointee<2>('a'), + Return(3)); + EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &ch))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, m); + EXPECT_EQ(2, n); + EXPECT_EQ('a', ch); +} + +// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5). +TEST(DoAllTest, FiveActions) { + int m = 0, n = 0; + char a = '\0', b = '\0'; + Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*)> action = // NOLINT + DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), + SetArgPointee<1>(2), + SetArgPointee<2>('a'), + SetArgPointee<3>('b'), + Return(3)); + EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, m); + EXPECT_EQ(2, n); + EXPECT_EQ('a', a); + EXPECT_EQ('b', b); +} + +// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a6). +TEST(DoAllTest, SixActions) { + int m = 0, n = 0; + char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0'; + Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*)> action = // NOLINT + DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), + SetArgPointee<1>(2), + SetArgPointee<2>('a'), + SetArgPointee<3>('b'), + SetArgPointee<4>('c'), + Return(3)); + EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, m); + EXPECT_EQ(2, n); + EXPECT_EQ('a', a); + EXPECT_EQ('b', b); + EXPECT_EQ('c', c); +} + +// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a7). +TEST(DoAllTest, SevenActions) { + int m = 0, n = 0; + char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0'; + Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*)> action = // NOLINT + DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), + SetArgPointee<1>(2), + SetArgPointee<2>('a'), + SetArgPointee<3>('b'), + SetArgPointee<4>('c'), + SetArgPointee<5>('d'), + Return(3)); + EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, m); + EXPECT_EQ(2, n); + EXPECT_EQ('a', a); + EXPECT_EQ('b', b); + EXPECT_EQ('c', c); + EXPECT_EQ('d', d); +} + +// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a8). +TEST(DoAllTest, EightActions) { + int m = 0, n = 0; + char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0', e = '\0'; + Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*, // NOLINT + char*)> action = + DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), + SetArgPointee<1>(2), + SetArgPointee<2>('a'), + SetArgPointee<3>('b'), + SetArgPointee<4>('c'), + SetArgPointee<5>('d'), + SetArgPointee<6>('e'), + Return(3)); + EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, m); + EXPECT_EQ(2, n); + EXPECT_EQ('a', a); + EXPECT_EQ('b', b); + EXPECT_EQ('c', c); + EXPECT_EQ('d', d); + EXPECT_EQ('e', e); +} + +// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a9). +TEST(DoAllTest, NineActions) { + int m = 0, n = 0; + char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0', e = '\0', f = '\0'; + Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*, // NOLINT + char*, char*)> action = + DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), + SetArgPointee<1>(2), + SetArgPointee<2>('a'), + SetArgPointee<3>('b'), + SetArgPointee<4>('c'), + SetArgPointee<5>('d'), + SetArgPointee<6>('e'), + SetArgPointee<7>('f'), + Return(3)); + EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e, &f))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, m); + EXPECT_EQ(2, n); + EXPECT_EQ('a', a); + EXPECT_EQ('b', b); + EXPECT_EQ('c', c); + EXPECT_EQ('d', d); + EXPECT_EQ('e', e); + EXPECT_EQ('f', f); +} + +// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a10). +TEST(DoAllTest, TenActions) { + int m = 0, n = 0; + char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0'; + char e = '\0', f = '\0', g = '\0'; + Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*, // NOLINT + char*, char*, char*)> action = + DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), + SetArgPointee<1>(2), + SetArgPointee<2>('a'), + SetArgPointee<3>('b'), + SetArgPointee<4>('c'), + SetArgPointee<5>('d'), + SetArgPointee<6>('e'), + SetArgPointee<7>('f'), + SetArgPointee<8>('g'), + Return(3)); + EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e, &f, &g))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, m); + EXPECT_EQ(2, n); + EXPECT_EQ('a', a); + EXPECT_EQ('b', b); + EXPECT_EQ('c', c); + EXPECT_EQ('d', d); + EXPECT_EQ('e', e); + EXPECT_EQ('f', f); + EXPECT_EQ('g', g); +} + +// The ACTION*() macros trigger warning C4100 (unreferenced formal +// parameter) in MSVC with -W4. Unfortunately they cannot be fixed in +// the macro definition, as the warnings are generated when the macro +// is expanded and macro expansion cannot contain #pragma. Therefore +// we suppress them here. +#ifdef _MSC_VER +# pragma warning(push) +# pragma warning(disable:4100) +#endif + +// Tests the ACTION*() macro family. + +// Tests that ACTION() can define an action that doesn't reference the +// mock function arguments. +ACTION(Return5) { return 5; } + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksWhenNotReferencingArguments) { + Action<double()> a1 = Return5(); + EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(5, a1.Perform(make_tuple())); + + Action<int(double, bool)> a2 = Return5(); + EXPECT_EQ(5, a2.Perform(make_tuple(1, true))); +} + +// Tests that ACTION() can define an action that returns void. +ACTION(IncrementArg1) { (*arg1)++; } + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksWhenReturningVoid) { + Action<void(int, int*)> a1 = IncrementArg1(); + int n = 0; + a1.Perform(make_tuple(5, &n)); + EXPECT_EQ(1, n); +} + +// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the type of the +// argument. +ACTION(IncrementArg2) { + StaticAssertTypeEq<int*, arg2_type>(); + arg2_type temp = arg2; + (*temp)++; +} + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentType) { + Action<void(int, bool, int*)> a1 = IncrementArg2(); + int n = 0; + a1.Perform(make_tuple(5, false, &n)); + EXPECT_EQ(1, n); +} + +// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the argument tuple +// via args_type and args. +ACTION(Sum2) { + StaticAssertTypeEq<tuple<int, char, int*>, args_type>(); + args_type args_copy = args; + return get<0>(args_copy) + get<1>(args_copy); +} + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentTuple) { + Action<int(int, char, int*)> a1 = Sum2(); + int dummy = 0; + EXPECT_EQ(11, a1.Perform(make_tuple(5, Char(6), &dummy))); +} + +// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the mock function +// type. +int Dummy(bool flag) { return flag? 1 : 0; } + +ACTION(InvokeDummy) { + StaticAssertTypeEq<int(bool), function_type>(); + function_type* fp = &Dummy; + return (*fp)(true); +} + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceMockFunctionType) { + Action<int(bool)> a1 = InvokeDummy(); + EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(true))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false))); +} + +// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the mock function's +// return type. +ACTION(InvokeDummy2) { + StaticAssertTypeEq<int, return_type>(); + return_type result = Dummy(true); + return result; +} + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceMockFunctionReturnType) { + Action<int(bool)> a1 = InvokeDummy2(); + EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(true))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false))); +} + +// Tests that ACTION() works for arguments passed by const reference. +ACTION(ReturnAddrOfConstBoolReferenceArg) { + StaticAssertTypeEq<const bool&, arg1_type>(); + return &arg1; +} + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForConstReferenceArg) { + Action<const bool*(int, const bool&)> a = ReturnAddrOfConstBoolReferenceArg(); + const bool b = false; + EXPECT_EQ(&b, a.Perform(tuple<int, const bool&>(0, b))); +} + +// Tests that ACTION() works for arguments passed by non-const reference. +ACTION(ReturnAddrOfIntReferenceArg) { + StaticAssertTypeEq<int&, arg0_type>(); + return &arg0; +} + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForNonConstReferenceArg) { + Action<int*(int&, bool, int)> a = ReturnAddrOfIntReferenceArg(); + int n = 0; + EXPECT_EQ(&n, a.Perform(tuple<int&, bool, int>(n, true, 1))); +} + +// Tests that ACTION() can be used in a namespace. +namespace action_test { +ACTION(Sum) { return arg0 + arg1; } +} // namespace action_test + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksInNamespace) { + Action<int(int, int)> a1 = action_test::Sum(); + EXPECT_EQ(3, a1.Perform(make_tuple(1, 2))); +} + +// Tests that the same ACTION definition works for mock functions with +// different argument numbers. +ACTION(PlusTwo) { return arg0 + 2; } + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForDifferentArgumentNumbers) { + Action<int(int)> a1 = PlusTwo(); + EXPECT_EQ(4, a1.Perform(make_tuple(2))); + + Action<double(float, void*)> a2 = PlusTwo(); + int dummy; + EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(6, a2.Perform(make_tuple(4.0f, &dummy))); +} + +// Tests that ACTION_P can define a parameterized action. +ACTION_P(Plus, n) { return arg0 + n; } + +TEST(ActionPMacroTest, DefinesParameterizedAction) { + Action<int(int m, bool t)> a1 = Plus(9); + EXPECT_EQ(10, a1.Perform(make_tuple(1, true))); +} + +// Tests that the body of ACTION_P can reference the argument types +// and the parameter type. +ACTION_P(TypedPlus, n) { + arg0_type t1 = arg0; + n_type t2 = n; + return t1 + t2; +} + +TEST(ActionPMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentAndParameterTypes) { + Action<int(char m, bool t)> a1 = TypedPlus(9); + EXPECT_EQ(10, a1.Perform(make_tuple(Char(1), true))); +} + +// Tests that a parameterized action can be used in any mock function +// whose type is compatible. +TEST(ActionPMacroTest, WorksInCompatibleMockFunction) { + Action<std::string(const std::string& s)> a1 = Plus("tail"); + const std::string re = "re"; + EXPECT_EQ("retail", a1.Perform(tuple<const std::string&>(re))); +} + +// Tests that we can use ACTION*() to define actions overloaded on the +// number of parameters. + +ACTION(OverloadedAction) { return arg0 ? arg1 : "hello"; } + +ACTION_P(OverloadedAction, default_value) { + return arg0 ? arg1 : default_value; +} + +ACTION_P2(OverloadedAction, true_value, false_value) { + return arg0 ? true_value : false_value; +} + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanDefineOverloadedActions) { + typedef Action<const char*(bool, const char*)> MyAction; + + const MyAction a1 = OverloadedAction(); + EXPECT_STREQ("hello", a1.Perform(make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world")))); + EXPECT_STREQ("world", a1.Perform(make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world")))); + + const MyAction a2 = OverloadedAction("hi"); + EXPECT_STREQ("hi", a2.Perform(make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world")))); + EXPECT_STREQ("world", a2.Perform(make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world")))); + + const MyAction a3 = OverloadedAction("hi", "you"); + EXPECT_STREQ("hi", a3.Perform(make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world")))); + EXPECT_STREQ("you", a3.Perform(make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world")))); +} + +// Tests ACTION_Pn where n >= 3. + +ACTION_P3(Plus, m, n, k) { return arg0 + m + n + k; } + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor3Parameters) { + Action<double(int m, bool t)> a1 = Plus(100, 20, 3.4); + EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(3123.4, a1.Perform(make_tuple(3000, true))); + + Action<std::string(const std::string& s)> a2 = Plus("tail", "-", ">"); + const std::string re = "re"; + EXPECT_EQ("retail->", a2.Perform(tuple<const std::string&>(re))); +} + +ACTION_P4(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3) { return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3; } + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor4Parameters) { + Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4); + EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10))); +} + +ACTION_P5(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4) { return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4; } + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor5Parameters) { + Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5); + EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10))); +} + +ACTION_P6(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5) { + return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5; +} + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor6Parameters) { + Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6); + EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10))); +} + +ACTION_P7(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6) { + return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6; +} + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor7Parameters) { + Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7); + EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10))); +} + +ACTION_P8(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7) { + return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7; +} + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor8Parameters) { + Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8); + EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10))); +} + +ACTION_P9(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8) { + return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8; +} + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor9Parameters) { + Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9); + EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10))); +} + +ACTION_P10(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8, last_param) { + arg0_type t0 = arg0; + last_param_type t9 = last_param; + return t0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + t9; +} + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor10Parameters) { + Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10); + EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10, + a1.Perform(make_tuple(10))); +} + +// Tests that the action body can promote the parameter types. + +ACTION_P2(PadArgument, prefix, suffix) { + // The following lines promote the two parameters to desired types. + std::string prefix_str(prefix); + char suffix_char = static_cast<char>(suffix); + return prefix_str + arg0 + suffix_char; +} + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, SimpleTypePromotion) { + Action<std::string(const char*)> no_promo = + PadArgument(std::string("foo"), 'r'); + Action<std::string(const char*)> promo = + PadArgument("foo", static_cast<int>('r')); + EXPECT_EQ("foobar", no_promo.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("ba")))); + EXPECT_EQ("foobar", promo.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("ba")))); +} + +// Tests that we can partially restrict parameter types using a +// straight-forward pattern. + +// Defines a generic action that doesn't restrict the types of its +// parameters. +ACTION_P3(ConcatImpl, a, b, c) { + std::stringstream ss; + ss << a << b << c; + return ss.str(); +} + +// Next, we try to restrict that either the first parameter is a +// string, or the second parameter is an int. + +// Defines a partially specialized wrapper that restricts the first +// parameter to std::string. +template <typename T1, typename T2> +// ConcatImplActionP3 is the class template ACTION_P3 uses to +// implement ConcatImpl. We shouldn't change the name as this +// pattern requires the user to use it directly. +ConcatImplActionP3<std::string, T1, T2> +Concat(const std::string& a, T1 b, T2 c) { + GTEST_INTENTIONAL_CONST_COND_PUSH_() + if (true) { + GTEST_INTENTIONAL_CONST_COND_POP_() + // This branch verifies that ConcatImpl() can be invoked without + // explicit template arguments. + return ConcatImpl(a, b, c); + } else { + // This branch verifies that ConcatImpl() can also be invoked with + // explicit template arguments. It doesn't really need to be + // executed as this is a compile-time verification. + return ConcatImpl<std::string, T1, T2>(a, b, c); + } +} + +// Defines another partially specialized wrapper that restricts the +// second parameter to int. +template <typename T1, typename T2> +ConcatImplActionP3<T1, int, T2> +Concat(T1 a, int b, T2 c) { + return ConcatImpl(a, b, c); +} + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, CanPartiallyRestrictParameterTypes) { + Action<const std::string()> a1 = Concat("Hello", "1", 2); + EXPECT_EQ("Hello12", a1.Perform(make_tuple())); + + a1 = Concat(1, 2, 3); + EXPECT_EQ("123", a1.Perform(make_tuple())); +} + +// Verifies the type of an ACTION*. + +ACTION(DoFoo) {} +ACTION_P(DoFoo, p) {} +ACTION_P2(DoFoo, p0, p1) {} + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, TypesAreCorrect) { + // DoFoo() must be assignable to a DoFooAction variable. + DoFooAction a0 = DoFoo(); + + // DoFoo(1) must be assignable to a DoFooActionP variable. + DoFooActionP<int> a1 = DoFoo(1); + + // DoFoo(p1, ..., pk) must be assignable to a DoFooActionPk + // variable, and so on. + DoFooActionP2<int, char> a2 = DoFoo(1, '2'); + PlusActionP3<int, int, char> a3 = Plus(1, 2, '3'); + PlusActionP4<int, int, int, char> a4 = Plus(1, 2, 3, '4'); + PlusActionP5<int, int, int, int, char> a5 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, '5'); + PlusActionP6<int, int, int, int, int, char> a6 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, '6'); + PlusActionP7<int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a7 = + Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, '7'); + PlusActionP8<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a8 = + Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, '8'); + PlusActionP9<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a9 = + Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, '9'); + PlusActionP10<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a10 = + Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, '0'); + + // Avoid "unused variable" warnings. + (void)a0; + (void)a1; + (void)a2; + (void)a3; + (void)a4; + (void)a5; + (void)a6; + (void)a7; + (void)a8; + (void)a9; + (void)a10; +} + +// Tests that an ACTION_P*() action can be explicitly instantiated +// with reference-typed parameters. + +ACTION_P(Plus1, x) { return x; } +ACTION_P2(Plus2, x, y) { return x + y; } +ACTION_P3(Plus3, x, y, z) { return x + y + z; } +ACTION_P10(Plus10, a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9) { + return a0 + a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + a5 + a6 + a7 + a8 + a9; +} + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, CanExplicitlyInstantiateWithReferenceTypes) { + int x = 1, y = 2, z = 3; + const tuple<> empty = make_tuple(); + + Action<int()> a = Plus1<int&>(x); + EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(empty)); + + a = Plus2<const int&, int&>(x, y); + EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(empty)); + + a = Plus3<int&, const int&, int&>(x, y, z); + EXPECT_EQ(6, a.Perform(empty)); + + int n[10] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 }; + a = Plus10<const int&, int&, const int&, int&, const int&, int&, const int&, + int&, const int&, int&>(n[0], n[1], n[2], n[3], n[4], n[5], n[6], n[7], + n[8], n[9]); + EXPECT_EQ(55, a.Perform(empty)); +} + +class NullaryConstructorClass { + public: + NullaryConstructorClass() : value_(123) {} + int value_; +}; + +// Tests using ReturnNew() with a nullary constructor. +TEST(ReturnNewTest, NoArgs) { + Action<NullaryConstructorClass*()> a = ReturnNew<NullaryConstructorClass>(); + NullaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple()); + EXPECT_EQ(123, c->value_); + delete c; +} + +class UnaryConstructorClass { + public: + explicit UnaryConstructorClass(int value) : value_(value) {} + int value_; +}; + +// Tests using ReturnNew() with a unary constructor. +TEST(ReturnNewTest, Unary) { + Action<UnaryConstructorClass*()> a = ReturnNew<UnaryConstructorClass>(4000); + UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple()); + EXPECT_EQ(4000, c->value_); + delete c; +} + +TEST(ReturnNewTest, UnaryWorksWhenMockMethodHasArgs) { + Action<UnaryConstructorClass*(bool, int)> a = + ReturnNew<UnaryConstructorClass>(4000); + UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple(false, 5)); + EXPECT_EQ(4000, c->value_); + delete c; +} + +TEST(ReturnNewTest, UnaryWorksWhenMockMethodReturnsPointerToConst) { + Action<const UnaryConstructorClass*()> a = + ReturnNew<UnaryConstructorClass>(4000); + const UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple()); + EXPECT_EQ(4000, c->value_); + delete c; +} + +class TenArgConstructorClass { + public: + TenArgConstructorClass(int a1, int a2, int a3, int a4, int a5, + int a6, int a7, int a8, int a9, int a10) + : value_(a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + a5 + a6 + a7 + a8 + a9 + a10) { + } + int value_; +}; + +// Tests using ReturnNew() with a 10-argument constructor. +TEST(ReturnNewTest, ConstructorThatTakes10Arguments) { + Action<TenArgConstructorClass*()> a = + ReturnNew<TenArgConstructorClass>(1000000000, 200000000, 30000000, + 4000000, 500000, 60000, + 7000, 800, 90, 0); + TenArgConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple()); + EXPECT_EQ(1234567890, c->value_); + delete c; +} + +// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works when there is no value parameter. +ACTION_TEMPLATE(CreateNew, + HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, T), + AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS()) { + return new T; +} + +TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksWithoutValueParam) { + const Action<int*()> a = CreateNew<int>(); + int* p = a.Perform(make_tuple()); + delete p; +} + +// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works when there are value parameters. +ACTION_TEMPLATE(CreateNew, + HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, T), + AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(a0)) { + return new T(a0); +} + +TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksWithValueParams) { + const Action<int*()> a = CreateNew<int>(42); + int* p = a.Perform(make_tuple()); + EXPECT_EQ(42, *p); + delete p; +} + +// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for integral template parameters. +ACTION_TEMPLATE(MyDeleteArg, + HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(int, k), + AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS()) { + delete get<k>(args); +} + +// Resets a bool variable in the destructor. +class BoolResetter { + public: + explicit BoolResetter(bool* value) : value_(value) {} + ~BoolResetter() { *value_ = false; } + private: + bool* value_; +}; + +TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksForIntegralTemplateParams) { + const Action<void(int*, BoolResetter*)> a = MyDeleteArg<1>(); + int n = 0; + bool b = true; + BoolResetter* resetter = new BoolResetter(&b); + a.Perform(make_tuple(&n, resetter)); + EXPECT_FALSE(b); // Verifies that resetter is deleted. +} + +// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATES works for template template parameters. +ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSmartPointer, + HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(template <typename Pointee> class, + Pointer), + AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(pointee)) { + return Pointer<pointee_type>(new pointee_type(pointee)); +} + +TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksForTemplateTemplateParameters) { + using ::testing::internal::linked_ptr; + const Action<linked_ptr<int>()> a = ReturnSmartPointer<linked_ptr>(42); + linked_ptr<int> p = a.Perform(make_tuple()); + EXPECT_EQ(42, *p); +} + +// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for 10 template parameters. +template <typename T1, typename T2, typename T3, int k4, bool k5, + unsigned int k6, typename T7, typename T8, typename T9> +struct GiantTemplate { + public: + explicit GiantTemplate(int a_value) : value(a_value) {} + int value; +}; + +ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnGiant, + HAS_10_TEMPLATE_PARAMS( + typename, T1, + typename, T2, + typename, T3, + int, k4, + bool, k5, + unsigned int, k6, + class, T7, + class, T8, + class, T9, + template <typename T> class, T10), + AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(value)) { + return GiantTemplate<T10<T1>, T2, T3, k4, k5, k6, T7, T8, T9>(value); +} + +TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksFor10TemplateParameters) { + using ::testing::internal::linked_ptr; + typedef GiantTemplate<linked_ptr<int>, bool, double, 5, + true, 6, char, unsigned, int> Giant; + const Action<Giant()> a = ReturnGiant< + int, bool, double, 5, true, 6, char, unsigned, int, linked_ptr>(42); + Giant giant = a.Perform(make_tuple()); + EXPECT_EQ(42, giant.value); +} + +// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for 10 value parameters. +ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum, + HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number), + AND_10_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3, v4, v5, v6, v7, v8, v9, v10)) { + return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3 + v4 + v5 + v6 + v7 + v8 + v9 + v10; +} + +TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksFor10ValueParameters) { + const Action<int()> a = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10); + EXPECT_EQ(55, a.Perform(make_tuple())); +} + +// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE and ACTION/ACTION_P* can be overloaded +// on the number of value parameters. + +ACTION(ReturnSum) { return 0; } + +ACTION_P(ReturnSum, x) { return x; } + +ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum, + HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number), + AND_2_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2)) { + return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2; +} + +ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum, + HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number), + AND_3_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3)) { + return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3; +} + +ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum, + HAS_2_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number, int, k), + AND_4_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3, v4)) { + return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3 + v4 + k; +} + +TEST(ActionTemplateTest, CanBeOverloadedOnNumberOfValueParameters) { + const Action<int()> a0 = ReturnSum(); + const Action<int()> a1 = ReturnSum(1); + const Action<int()> a2 = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2); + const Action<int()> a3 = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2, 3); + const Action<int()> a4 = ReturnSum<int, 10000>(2000, 300, 40, 5); + EXPECT_EQ(0, a0.Perform(make_tuple())); + EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple())); + EXPECT_EQ(3, a2.Perform(make_tuple())); + EXPECT_EQ(6, a3.Perform(make_tuple())); + EXPECT_EQ(12345, a4.Perform(make_tuple())); +} + +#ifdef _MSC_VER +# pragma warning(pop) +#endif + +} // namespace gmock_generated_actions_test +} // namespace testing |