diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-27 10:05:51 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-27 10:05:51 +0000 |
commit | 5d1646d90e1f2cceb9f0828f4b28318cd0ec7744 (patch) | |
tree | a94efe259b9009378be6d90eb30d2b019d95c194 /Documentation/filesystems/automount-support.rst | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | linux-upstream/5.10.209.tar.xz linux-upstream/5.10.209.zip |
Adding upstream version 5.10.209.upstream/5.10.209upstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/filesystems/automount-support.rst | 98 |
1 files changed, 98 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/automount-support.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/automount-support.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..430f0b407 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/automount-support.rst @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +================= +Automount Support +================= + + +Support is available for filesystems that wish to do automounting +support (such as kAFS which can be found in fs/afs/ and NFS in +fs/nfs/). This facility includes allowing in-kernel mounts to be +performed and mountpoint degradation to be requested. The latter can +also be requested by userspace. + + +In-Kernel Automounting +====================== + +See section "Mount Traps" of Documentation/filesystems/autofs.rst + +Then from userspace, you can just do something like:: + + [root@andromeda root]# mount -t afs \#root.afs. /afs + [root@andromeda root]# ls /afs + asd cambridge cambridge.redhat.com grand.central.org + [root@andromeda root]# ls /afs/cambridge + afsdoc + [root@andromeda root]# ls /afs/cambridge/afsdoc/ + ChangeLog html LICENSE pdf RELNOTES-1.2.2 + +And then if you look in the mountpoint catalogue, you'll see something like:: + + [root@andromeda root]# cat /proc/mounts + ... + #root.afs. /afs afs rw 0 0 + #root.cell. /afs/cambridge.redhat.com afs rw 0 0 + #afsdoc. /afs/cambridge.redhat.com/afsdoc afs rw 0 0 + + +Automatic Mountpoint Expiry +=========================== + +Automatic expiration of mountpoints is easy, provided you've mounted the +mountpoint to be expired in the automounting procedure outlined separately. + +To do expiration, you need to follow these steps: + + (1) Create at least one list off which the vfsmounts to be expired can be + hung. + + (2) When a new mountpoint is created in the ->d_automount method, add + the mnt to the list using mnt_set_expiry():: + + mnt_set_expiry(newmnt, &afs_vfsmounts); + + (3) When you want mountpoints to be expired, call mark_mounts_for_expiry() + with a pointer to this list. This will process the list, marking every + vfsmount thereon for potential expiry on the next call. + + If a vfsmount was already flagged for expiry, and if its usage count is 1 + (it's only referenced by its parent vfsmount), then it will be deleted + from the namespace and thrown away (effectively unmounted). + + It may prove simplest to simply call this at regular intervals, using + some sort of timed event to drive it. + +The expiration flag is cleared by calls to mntput. This means that expiration +will only happen on the second expiration request after the last time the +mountpoint was accessed. + +If a mountpoint is moved, it gets removed from the expiration list. If a bind +mount is made on an expirable mount, the new vfsmount will not be on the +expiration list and will not expire. + +If a namespace is copied, all mountpoints contained therein will be copied, +and the copies of those that are on an expiration list will be added to the +same expiration list. + + +Userspace Driven Expiry +======================= + +As an alternative, it is possible for userspace to request expiry of any +mountpoint (though some will be rejected - the current process's idea of the +rootfs for example). It does this by passing the MNT_EXPIRE flag to +umount(). This flag is considered incompatible with MNT_FORCE and MNT_DETACH. + +If the mountpoint in question is in referenced by something other than +umount() or its parent mountpoint, an EBUSY error will be returned and the +mountpoint will not be marked for expiration or unmounted. + +If the mountpoint was not already marked for expiry at that time, an EAGAIN +error will be given and it won't be unmounted. + +Otherwise if it was already marked and it wasn't referenced, unmounting will +take place as usual. + +Again, the expiration flag is cleared every time anything other than umount() +looks at a mountpoint. |