Adding upstream version 5.10.209.upstream/5.10.209upstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

14 files changed, 3232 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/completion.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/completion.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9f039b4f4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/completion.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,293 @@
+================================================
+Completions - "wait for completion" barrier APIs
+================================================
+
+Introduction:
+-------------
+
+If you have one or more threads that must wait for some kernel activity
+to have reached a point or a specific state, completions can provide a
+race-free solution to this problem. Semantically they are somewhat like a
+pthread_barrier() and have similar use-cases.
+
+Completions are a code synchronization mechanism which is preferable to any
+misuse of locks/semaphores and busy-loops. Any time you think of using
+yield() or some quirky msleep(1) loop to allow something else to proceed,
+you probably want to look into using one of the wait_for_completion*()
+calls and complete() instead.
+
+The advantage of using completions is that they have a well defined, focused
+purpose which makes it very easy to see the intent of the code, but they
+also result in more efficient code as all threads can continue execution
+until the result is actually needed, and both the waiting and the signalling
+is highly efficient using low level scheduler sleep/wakeup facilities.
+
+Completions are built on top of the waitqueue and wakeup infrastructure of
+the Linux scheduler. The event the threads on the waitqueue are waiting for
+is reduced to a simple flag in 'struct completion', appropriately called "done".
+
+As completions are scheduling related, the code can be found in
+kernel/sched/completion.c.
+
+
+Usage:
+------
+
+There are three main parts to using completions:
+
+ - the initialization of the 'struct completion' synchronization object
+ - the waiting part through a call to one of the variants of wait_for_completion(),
+ - the signaling side through a call to complete() or complete_all().
+
+There are also some helper functions for checking the state of completions.
+Note that while initialization must happen first, the waiting and signaling
+part can happen in any order. I.e. it's entirely normal for a thread
+to have marked a completion as 'done' before another thread checks whether
+it has to wait for it.
+
+To use completions you need to #include <linux/completion.h> and
+create a static or dynamic variable of type 'struct completion',
+which has only two fields::
+
+	struct completion {
+		unsigned int done;
+		wait_queue_head_t wait;
+	};
+
+This provides the ->wait waitqueue to place tasks on for waiting (if any), and
+the ->done completion flag for indicating whether it's completed or not.
+
+Completions should be named to refer to the event that is being synchronized on.
+A good example is::
+
+	wait_for_completion(&early_console_added);
+
+	complete(&early_console_added);
+
+Good, intuitive naming (as always) helps code readability. Naming a completion
+'complete' is not helpful unless the purpose is super obvious...
+
+
+Initializing completions:
+-------------------------
+
+Dynamically allocated completion objects should preferably be embedded in data
+structures that are assured to be alive for the life-time of the function/driver,
+to prevent races with asynchronous complete() calls from occurring.
+
+Particular care should be taken when using the _timeout() or _killable()/_interruptible()
+variants of wait_for_completion(), as it must be assured that memory de-allocation
+does not happen until all related activities (complete() or reinit_completion())
+have taken place, even if these wait functions return prematurely due to a timeout
+or a signal triggering.
+
+Initializing of dynamically allocated completion objects is done via a call to
+init_completion()::
+
+	init_completion(&dynamic_object->done);
+
+In this call we initialize the waitqueue and set ->done to 0, i.e. "not completed"
+or "not done".
+
+The re-initialization function, reinit_completion(), simply resets the
+->done field to 0 ("not done"), without touching the waitqueue.
+Callers of this function must make sure that there are no racy
+wait_for_completion() calls going on in parallel.
+
+Calling init_completion() on the same completion object twice is
+most likely a bug as it re-initializes the queue to an empty queue and
+enqueued tasks could get "lost" - use reinit_completion() in that case,
+but be aware of other races.
+
+For static declaration and initialization, macros are available.
+
+For static (or global) declarations in file scope you can use
+DECLARE_COMPLETION()::
+
+	static DECLARE_COMPLETION(setup_done);
+	DECLARE_COMPLETION(setup_done);
+
+Note that in this case the completion is boot time (or module load time)
+initialized to 'not done' and doesn't require an init_completion() call.
+
+When a completion is declared as a local variable within a function,
+then the initialization should always use DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK()
+explicitly, not just to make lockdep happy, but also to make it clear
+that limited scope had been considered and is intentional::
+
+	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(setup_done)
+
+Note that when using completion objects as local variables you must be
+acutely aware of the short life time of the function stack: the function
+must not return to a calling context until all activities (such as waiting
+threads) have ceased and the completion object is completely unused.
+
+To emphasise this again: in particular when using some of the waiting API variants
+with more complex outcomes, such as the timeout or signalling (_timeout(),
+_killable() and _interruptible()) variants, the wait might complete
+prematurely while the object might still be in use by another thread - and a return
+from the wait_on_completion*() caller function will deallocate the function
+stack and cause subtle data corruption if a complete() is done in some
+other thread. Simple testing might not trigger these kinds of races.
+
+If unsure, use dynamically allocated completion objects, preferably embedded
+in some other long lived object that has a boringly long life time which
+exceeds the life time of any helper threads using the completion object,
+or has a lock or other synchronization mechanism to make sure complete()
+is not called on a freed object.
+
+A naive DECLARE_COMPLETION() on the stack triggers a lockdep warning.
+
+Waiting for completions:
+------------------------
+
+For a thread to wait for some concurrent activity to finish, it
+calls wait_for_completion() on the initialized completion structure::
+
+	void wait_for_completion(struct completion *done)
+
+A typical usage scenario is::
+
+	CPU#1					CPU#2
+
+	struct completion setup_done;
+
+	init_completion(&setup_done);
+	initialize_work(...,&setup_done,...);
+
+	/* run non-dependent code */		/* do setup */
+
+	wait_for_completion(&setup_done);	complete(setup_done);
+
+This is not implying any particular order between wait_for_completion() and
+the call to complete() - if the call to complete() happened before the call
+to wait_for_completion() then the waiting side simply will continue
+immediately as all dependencies are satisfied; if not, it will block until
+completion is signaled by complete().
+
+Note that wait_for_completion() is calling spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq(),
+so it can only be called safely when you know that interrupts are enabled.
+Calling it from IRQs-off atomic contexts will result in hard-to-detect
+spurious enabling of interrupts.
+
+The default behavior is to wait without a timeout and to mark the task as
+uninterruptible. wait_for_completion() and its variants are only safe
+in process context (as they can sleep) but not in atomic context,
+interrupt context, with disabled IRQs, or preemption is disabled - see also
+try_wait_for_completion() below for handling completion in atomic/interrupt
+context.
+
+As all variants of wait_for_completion() can (obviously) block for a long
+time depending on the nature of the activity they are waiting for, so in
+most cases you probably don't want to call this with held mutexes.
+
+
+wait_for_completion*() variants available:
+------------------------------------------
+
+The below variants all return status and this status should be checked in
+most(/all) cases - in cases where the status is deliberately not checked you
+probably want to make a note explaining this (e.g. see
+arch/arm/kernel/smp.c:__cpu_up()).
+
+A common problem that occurs is to have unclean assignment of return types,
+so take care to assign return-values to variables of the proper type.
+
+Checking for the specific meaning of return values also has been found
+to be quite inaccurate, e.g. constructs like::
+
+	if (!wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(...))
+
+... would execute the same code path for successful completion and for the
+interrupted case - which is probably not what you want::
+
+	int wait_for_completion_interruptible(struct completion *done)
+
+This function marks the task TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE while it is waiting.
+If a signal was received while waiting it will return -ERESTARTSYS; 0 otherwise::
+
+	unsigned long wait_for_completion_timeout(struct completion *done, unsigned long timeout)
+
+The task is marked as TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE and will wait at most 'timeout'
+jiffies. If a timeout occurs it returns 0, else the remaining time in
+jiffies (but at least 1).
+
+Timeouts are preferably calculated with msecs_to_jiffies() or usecs_to_jiffies(),
+to make the code largely HZ-invariant.
+
+If the returned timeout value is deliberately ignored a comment should probably explain
+why (e.g. see drivers/mfd/wm8350-core.c wm8350_read_auxadc())::
+
+	long wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(struct completion *done, unsigned long timeout)
+
+This function passes a timeout in jiffies and marks the task as
+TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE. If a signal was received it will return -ERESTARTSYS;
+otherwise it returns 0 if the completion timed out, or the remaining time in
+jiffies if completion occurred.
+
+Further variants include _killable which uses TASK_KILLABLE as the
+designated tasks state and will return -ERESTARTSYS if it is interrupted,
+or 0 if completion was achieved.  There is a _timeout variant as well::
+
+	long wait_for_completion_killable(struct completion *done)
+	long wait_for_completion_killable_timeout(struct completion *done, unsigned long timeout)
+
+The _io variants wait_for_completion_io() behave the same as the non-_io
+variants, except for accounting waiting time as 'waiting on IO', which has
+an impact on how the task is accounted in scheduling/IO stats::
+
+	void wait_for_completion_io(struct completion *done)
+	unsigned long wait_for_completion_io_timeout(struct completion *done, unsigned long timeout)
+
+
+Signaling completions:
+----------------------
+
+A thread that wants to signal that the conditions for continuation have been
+achieved calls complete() to signal exactly one of the waiters that it can
+continue::
+
+	void complete(struct completion *done)
+
+... or calls complete_all() to signal all current and future waiters::
+
+	void complete_all(struct completion *done)
+
+The signaling will work as expected even if completions are signaled before
+a thread starts waiting. This is achieved by the waiter "consuming"
+(decrementing) the done field of 'struct completion'. Waiting threads
+wakeup order is the same in which they were enqueued (FIFO order).
+
+If complete() is called multiple times then this will allow for that number
+of waiters to continue - each call to complete() will simply increment the
+done field. Calling complete_all() multiple times is a bug though. Both
+complete() and complete_all() can be called in IRQ/atomic context safely.
+
+There can only be one thread calling complete() or complete_all() on a
+particular 'struct completion' at any time - serialized through the wait
+queue spinlock. Any such concurrent calls to complete() or complete_all()
+probably are a design bug.
+
+Signaling completion from IRQ context is fine as it will appropriately
+lock with spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_unlock_irqrestore() and it will never
+sleep.
+
+
+try_wait_for_completion()/completion_done():
+--------------------------------------------
+
+The try_wait_for_completion() function will not put the thread on the wait
+queue but rather returns false if it would need to enqueue (block) the thread,
+else it consumes one posted completion and returns true::
+
+	bool try_wait_for_completion(struct completion *done)
+
+Finally, to check the state of a completion without changing it in any way,
+call completion_done(), which returns false if there are no posted
+completions that were not yet consumed by waiters (implying that there are
+waiters) and true otherwise::
+
+	bool completion_done(struct completion *done)
+
+Both try_wait_for_completion() and completion_done() are safe to be called in
+IRQ or atomic context.
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/index.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/index.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..88900aabd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/index.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+===============
+Linux Scheduler
+===============
+
+.. toctree::
+    :maxdepth: 1
+
+
+    completion
+    sched-arch
+    sched-bwc
+    sched-deadline
+    sched-design-CFS
+    sched-domains
+    sched-capacity
+    sched-energy
+    sched-nice-design
+    sched-rt-group
+    sched-stats
+
+    text_files
+
+.. only::  subproject and html
+
+   Indices
+   =======
+
+   * :ref:`genindex`
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0eaec6697
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+=================================================================
+CPU Scheduler implementation hints for architecture specific code
+=================================================================
+
+	Nick Piggin, 2005
+
+Context switch
+==============
+1. Runqueue locking
+By default, the switch_to arch function is called with the runqueue
+locked. This is usually not a problem unless switch_to may need to
+take the runqueue lock. This is usually due to a wake up operation in
+the context switch. See arch/ia64/include/asm/switch_to.h for an example.
+
+To request the scheduler call switch_to with the runqueue unlocked,
+you must `#define __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW` in a header file
+(typically the one where switch_to is defined).
+
+Unlocked context switches introduce only a very minor performance
+penalty to the core scheduler implementation in the CONFIG_SMP case.
+
+CPU idle
+========
+Your cpu_idle routines need to obey the following rules:
+
+1. Preempt should now disabled over idle routines. Should only
+   be enabled to call schedule() then disabled again.
+
+2. need_resched/TIF_NEED_RESCHED is only ever set, and will never
+   be cleared until the running task has called schedule(). Idle
+   threads need only ever query need_resched, and may never set or
+   clear it.
+
+3. When cpu_idle finds (need_resched() == 'true'), it should call
+   schedule(). It should not call schedule() otherwise.
+
+4. The only time interrupts need to be disabled when checking
+   need_resched is if we are about to sleep the processor until
+   the next interrupt (this doesn't provide any protection of
+   need_resched, it prevents losing an interrupt):
+
+	4a. Common problem with this type of sleep appears to be::
+
+	        local_irq_disable();
+	        if (!need_resched()) {
+	                local_irq_enable();
+	                *** resched interrupt arrives here ***
+	                __asm__("sleep until next interrupt");
+	        }
+
+5. TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG can be set by idle routines that do not
+   need an interrupt to wake them up when need_resched goes high.
+   In other words, they must be periodically polling need_resched,
+   although it may be reasonable to do some background work or enter
+   a low CPU priority.
+
+      - 5a. If TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG is set, and we do decide to enter
+	an interrupt sleep, it needs to be cleared then a memory
+	barrier issued (followed by a test of need_resched with
+	interrupts disabled, as explained in 3).
+
+arch/x86/kernel/process.c has examples of both polling and
+sleeping idle functions.
+
+
+Possible arch/ problems
+=======================
+
+Possible arch problems I found (and either tried to fix or didn't):
+
+ia64 - is safe_halt call racy vs interrupts? (does it sleep?) (See #4a)
+
+sh64 - Is sleeping racy vs interrupts? (See #4a)
+
+sparc - IRQs on at this point(?), change local_irq_save to _disable.
+      - TODO: needs secondary CPUs to disable preempt (See #1)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9801d6b28
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
+=====================
+CFS Bandwidth Control
+=====================
+
+[ This document only discusses CPU bandwidth control for SCHED_NORMAL.
+  The SCHED_RT case is covered in Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.rst ]
+
+CFS bandwidth control is a CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED extension which allows the
+specification of the maximum CPU bandwidth available to a group or hierarchy.
+
+The bandwidth allowed for a group is specified using a quota and period. Within
+each given "period" (microseconds), a task group is allocated up to "quota"
+microseconds of CPU time. That quota is assigned to per-cpu run queues in
+slices as threads in the cgroup become runnable. Once all quota has been
+assigned any additional requests for quota will result in those threads being
+throttled. Throttled threads will not be able to run again until the next
+period when the quota is replenished.
+
+A group's unassigned quota is globally tracked, being refreshed back to
+cfs_quota units at each period boundary. As threads consume this bandwidth it
+is transferred to cpu-local "silos" on a demand basis. The amount transferred
+within each of these updates is tunable and described as the "slice".
+
+Management
+----------
+Quota and period are managed within the cpu subsystem via cgroupfs.
+
+cpu.cfs_quota_us: the total available run-time within a period (in microseconds)
+cpu.cfs_period_us: the length of a period (in microseconds)
+cpu.stat: exports throttling statistics [explained further below]
+
+The default values are::
+
+	cpu.cfs_period_us=100ms
+	cpu.cfs_quota=-1
+
+A value of -1 for cpu.cfs_quota_us indicates that the group does not have any
+bandwidth restriction in place, such a group is described as an unconstrained
+bandwidth group. This represents the traditional work-conserving behavior for
+CFS.
+
+Writing any (valid) positive value(s) will enact the specified bandwidth limit.
+The minimum quota allowed for the quota or period is 1ms. There is also an
+upper bound on the period length of 1s. Additional restrictions exist when
+bandwidth limits are used in a hierarchical fashion, these are explained in
+more detail below.
+
+Writing any negative value to cpu.cfs_quota_us will remove the bandwidth limit
+and return the group to an unconstrained state once more.
+
+Any updates to a group's bandwidth specification will result in it becoming
+unthrottled if it is in a constrained state.
+
+System wide settings
+--------------------
+For efficiency run-time is transferred between the global pool and CPU local
+"silos" in a batch fashion. This greatly reduces global accounting pressure
+on large systems. The amount transferred each time such an update is required
+is described as the "slice".
+
+This is tunable via procfs::
+
+	/proc/sys/kernel/sched_cfs_bandwidth_slice_us (default=5ms)
+
+Larger slice values will reduce transfer overheads, while smaller values allow
+for more fine-grained consumption.
+
+Statistics
+----------
+A group's bandwidth statistics are exported via 3 fields in cpu.stat.
+
+cpu.stat:
+
+- nr_periods: Number of enforcement intervals that have elapsed.
+- nr_throttled: Number of times the group has been throttled/limited.
+- throttled_time: The total time duration (in nanoseconds) for which entities
+  of the group have been throttled.
+
+This interface is read-only.
+
+Hierarchical considerations
+---------------------------
+The interface enforces that an individual entity's bandwidth is always
+attainable, that is: max(c_i) <= C. However, over-subscription in the
+aggregate case is explicitly allowed to enable work-conserving semantics
+within a hierarchy:
+
+  e.g. \Sum (c_i) may exceed C
+
+[ Where C is the parent's bandwidth, and c_i its children ]
+
+
+There are two ways in which a group may become throttled:
+
+	a. it fully consumes its own quota within a period
+	b. a parent's quota is fully consumed within its period
+
+In case b) above, even though the child may have runtime remaining it will not
+be allowed to until the parent's runtime is refreshed.
+
+CFS Bandwidth Quota Caveats
+---------------------------
+Once a slice is assigned to a cpu it does not expire.  However all but 1ms of
+the slice may be returned to the global pool if all threads on that cpu become
+unrunnable. This is configured at compile time by the min_cfs_rq_runtime
+variable. This is a performance tweak that helps prevent added contention on
+the global lock.
+
+The fact that cpu-local slices do not expire results in some interesting corner
+cases that should be understood.
+
+For cgroup cpu constrained applications that are cpu limited this is a
+relatively moot point because they will naturally consume the entirety of their
+quota as well as the entirety of each cpu-local slice in each period. As a
+result it is expected that nr_periods roughly equal nr_throttled, and that
+cpuacct.usage will increase roughly equal to cfs_quota_us in each period.
+
+For highly-threaded, non-cpu bound applications this non-expiration nuance
+allows applications to briefly burst past their quota limits by the amount of
+unused slice on each cpu that the task group is running on (typically at most
+1ms per cpu or as defined by min_cfs_rq_runtime).  This slight burst only
+applies if quota had been assigned to a cpu and then not fully used or returned
+in previous periods. This burst amount will not be transferred between cores.
+As a result, this mechanism still strictly limits the task group to quota
+average usage, albeit over a longer time window than a single period.  This
+also limits the burst ability to no more than 1ms per cpu.  This provides
+better more predictable user experience for highly threaded applications with
+small quota limits on high core count machines. It also eliminates the
+propensity to throttle these applications while simultanously using less than
+quota amounts of cpu. Another way to say this, is that by allowing the unused
+portion of a slice to remain valid across periods we have decreased the
+possibility of wastefully expiring quota on cpu-local silos that don't need a
+full slice's amount of cpu time.
+
+The interaction between cpu-bound and non-cpu-bound-interactive applications
+should also be considered, especially when single core usage hits 100%. If you
+gave each of these applications half of a cpu-core and they both got scheduled
+on the same CPU it is theoretically possible that the non-cpu bound application
+will use up to 1ms additional quota in some periods, thereby preventing the
+cpu-bound application from fully using its quota by that same amount. In these
+instances it will be up to the CFS algorithm (see sched-design-CFS.rst) to
+decide which application is chosen to run, as they will both be runnable and
+have remaining quota. This runtime discrepancy will be made up in the following
+periods when the interactive application idles.
+
+Examples
+--------
+1. Limit a group to 1 CPU worth of runtime::
+
+	If period is 250ms and quota is also 250ms, the group will get
+	1 CPU worth of runtime every 250ms.
+
+	# echo 250000 > cpu.cfs_quota_us /* quota = 250ms */
+	# echo 250000 > cpu.cfs_period_us /* period = 250ms */
+
+2. Limit a group to 2 CPUs worth of runtime on a multi-CPU machine
+
+   With 500ms period and 1000ms quota, the group can get 2 CPUs worth of
+   runtime every 500ms::
+
+	# echo 1000000 > cpu.cfs_quota_us /* quota = 1000ms */
+	# echo 500000 > cpu.cfs_period_us /* period = 500ms */
+
+	The larger period here allows for increased burst capacity.
+
+3. Limit a group to 20% of 1 CPU.
+
+   With 50ms period, 10ms quota will be equivalent to 20% of 1 CPU::
+
+	# echo 10000 > cpu.cfs_quota_us /* quota = 10ms */
+	# echo 50000 > cpu.cfs_period_us /* period = 50ms */
+
+   By using a small period here we are ensuring a consistent latency
+   response at the expense of burst capacity.
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9b7cbe43b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,439 @@
+=========================
+Capacity Aware Scheduling
+=========================
+
+1. CPU Capacity
+===============
+
+1.1 Introduction
+----------------
+
+Conventional, homogeneous SMP platforms are composed of purely identical
+CPUs. Heterogeneous platforms on the other hand are composed of CPUs with
+different performance characteristics - on such platforms, not all CPUs can be
+considered equal.
+
+CPU capacity is a measure of the performance a CPU can reach, normalized against
+the most performant CPU in the system. Heterogeneous systems are also called
+asymmetric CPU capacity systems, as they contain CPUs of different capacities.
+
+Disparity in maximum attainable performance (IOW in maximum CPU capacity) stems
+from two factors:
+
+- not all CPUs may have the same microarchitecture (µarch).
+- with Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling (DVFS), not all CPUs may be
+  physically able to attain the higher Operating Performance Points (OPP).
+
+Arm big.LITTLE systems are an example of both. The big CPUs are more
+performance-oriented than the LITTLE ones (more pipeline stages, bigger caches,
+smarter predictors, etc), and can usually reach higher OPPs than the LITTLE ones
+can.
+
+CPU performance is usually expressed in Millions of Instructions Per Second
+(MIPS), which can also be expressed as a given amount of instructions attainable
+per Hz, leading to::
+
+  capacity(cpu) = work_per_hz(cpu) * max_freq(cpu)
+
+1.2 Scheduler terms
+-------------------
+
+Two different capacity values are used within the scheduler. A CPU's
+``capacity_orig`` is its maximum attainable capacity, i.e. its maximum
+attainable performance level. A CPU's ``capacity`` is its ``capacity_orig`` to
+which some loss of available performance (e.g. time spent handling IRQs) is
+subtracted.
+
+Note that a CPU's ``capacity`` is solely intended to be used by the CFS class,
+while ``capacity_orig`` is class-agnostic. The rest of this document will use
+the term ``capacity`` interchangeably with ``capacity_orig`` for the sake of
+brevity.
+
+1.3 Platform examples
+---------------------
+
+1.3.1 Identical OPPs
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Consider an hypothetical dual-core asymmetric CPU capacity system where
+
+- work_per_hz(CPU0) = W
+- work_per_hz(CPU1) = W/2
+- all CPUs are running at the same fixed frequency
+
+By the above definition of capacity:
+
+- capacity(CPU0) = C
+- capacity(CPU1) = C/2
+
+To draw the parallel with Arm big.LITTLE, CPU0 would be a big while CPU1 would
+be a LITTLE.
+
+With a workload that periodically does a fixed amount of work, you will get an
+execution trace like so::
+
+ CPU0 work ^
+           |     ____                ____                ____
+           |    |    |              |    |              |    |
+           +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-> time
+
+ CPU1 work ^
+           |     _________           _________           ____
+           |    |         |         |         |         |
+           +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-> time
+
+CPU0 has the highest capacity in the system (C), and completes a fixed amount of
+work W in T units of time. On the other hand, CPU1 has half the capacity of
+CPU0, and thus only completes W/2 in T.
+
+1.3.2 Different max OPPs
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Usually, CPUs of different capacity values also have different maximum
+OPPs. Consider the same CPUs as above (i.e. same work_per_hz()) with:
+
+- max_freq(CPU0) = F
+- max_freq(CPU1) = 2/3 * F
+
+This yields:
+
+- capacity(CPU0) = C
+- capacity(CPU1) = C/3
+
+Executing the same workload as described in 1.3.1, which each CPU running at its
+maximum frequency results in::
+
+ CPU0 work ^
+           |     ____                ____                ____
+           |    |    |              |    |              |    |
+           +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-> time
+
+                            workload on CPU1
+ CPU1 work ^
+           |     ______________      ______________      ____
+           |    |              |    |              |    |
+           +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-> time
+
+1.4 Representation caveat
+-------------------------
+
+It should be noted that having a *single* value to represent differences in CPU
+performance is somewhat of a contentious point. The relative performance
+difference between two different µarchs could be X% on integer operations, Y% on
+floating point operations, Z% on branches, and so on. Still, results using this
+simple approach have been satisfactory for now.
+
+2. Task utilization
+===================
+
+2.1 Introduction
+----------------
+
+Capacity aware scheduling requires an expression of a task's requirements with
+regards to CPU capacity. Each scheduler class can express this differently, and
+while task utilization is specific to CFS, it is convenient to describe it here
+in order to introduce more generic concepts.
+
+Task utilization is a percentage meant to represent the throughput requirements
+of a task. A simple approximation of it is the task's duty cycle, i.e.::
+
+  task_util(p) = duty_cycle(p)
+
+On an SMP system with fixed frequencies, 100% utilization suggests the task is a
+busy loop. Conversely, 10% utilization hints it is a small periodic task that
+spends more time sleeping than executing. Variable CPU frequencies and
+asymmetric CPU capacities complexify this somewhat; the following sections will
+expand on these.
+
+2.2 Frequency invariance
+------------------------
+
+One issue that needs to be taken into account is that a workload's duty cycle is
+directly impacted by the current OPP the CPU is running at. Consider running a
+periodic workload at a given frequency F::
+
+  CPU work ^
+           |     ____                ____                ____
+           |    |    |              |    |              |    |
+           +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-> time
+
+This yields duty_cycle(p) == 25%.
+
+Now, consider running the *same* workload at frequency F/2::
+
+  CPU work ^
+           |     _________           _________           ____
+           |    |         |         |         |         |
+           +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-> time
+
+This yields duty_cycle(p) == 50%, despite the task having the exact same
+behaviour (i.e. executing the same amount of work) in both executions.
+
+The task utilization signal can be made frequency invariant using the following
+formula::
+
+  task_util_freq_inv(p) = duty_cycle(p) * (curr_frequency(cpu) / max_frequency(cpu))
+
+Applying this formula to the two examples above yields a frequency invariant
+task utilization of 25%.
+
+2.3 CPU invariance
+------------------
+
+CPU capacity has a similar effect on task utilization in that running an
+identical workload on CPUs of different capacity values will yield different
+duty cycles.
+
+Consider the system described in 1.3.2., i.e.::
+
+- capacity(CPU0) = C
+- capacity(CPU1) = C/3
+
+Executing a given periodic workload on each CPU at their maximum frequency would
+result in::
+
+ CPU0 work ^
+           |     ____                ____                ____
+           |    |    |              |    |              |    |
+           +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-> time
+
+ CPU1 work ^
+           |     ______________      ______________      ____
+           |    |              |    |              |    |
+           +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-> time
+
+IOW,
+
+- duty_cycle(p) == 25% if p runs on CPU0 at its maximum frequency
+- duty_cycle(p) == 75% if p runs on CPU1 at its maximum frequency
+
+The task utilization signal can be made CPU invariant using the following
+formula::
+
+  task_util_cpu_inv(p) = duty_cycle(p) * (capacity(cpu) / max_capacity)
+
+with ``max_capacity`` being the highest CPU capacity value in the
+system. Applying this formula to the above example above yields a CPU
+invariant task utilization of 25%.
+
+2.4 Invariant task utilization
+------------------------------
+
+Both frequency and CPU invariance need to be applied to task utilization in
+order to obtain a truly invariant signal. The pseudo-formula for a task
+utilization that is both CPU and frequency invariant is thus, for a given
+task p::
+
+                                     curr_frequency(cpu)   capacity(cpu)
+  task_util_inv(p) = duty_cycle(p) * ------------------- * -------------
+                                     max_frequency(cpu)    max_capacity
+
+In other words, invariant task utilization describes the behaviour of a task as
+if it were running on the highest-capacity CPU in the system, running at its
+maximum frequency.
+
+Any mention of task utilization in the following sections will imply its
+invariant form.
+
+2.5 Utilization estimation
+--------------------------
+
+Without a crystal ball, task behaviour (and thus task utilization) cannot
+accurately be predicted the moment a task first becomes runnable. The CFS class
+maintains a handful of CPU and task signals based on the Per-Entity Load
+Tracking (PELT) mechanism, one of those yielding an *average* utilization (as
+opposed to instantaneous).
+
+This means that while the capacity aware scheduling criteria will be written
+considering a "true" task utilization (using a crystal ball), the implementation
+will only ever be able to use an estimator thereof.
+
+3. Capacity aware scheduling requirements
+=========================================
+
+3.1 CPU capacity
+----------------
+
+Linux cannot currently figure out CPU capacity on its own, this information thus
+needs to be handed to it. Architectures must define arch_scale_cpu_capacity()
+for that purpose.
+
+The arm and arm64 architectures directly map this to the arch_topology driver
+CPU scaling data, which is derived from the capacity-dmips-mhz CPU binding; see
+Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpu-capacity.txt.
+
+3.2 Frequency invariance
+------------------------
+
+As stated in 2.2, capacity-aware scheduling requires a frequency-invariant task
+utilization. Architectures must define arch_scale_freq_capacity(cpu) for that
+purpose.
+
+Implementing this function requires figuring out at which frequency each CPU
+have been running at. One way to implement this is to leverage hardware counters
+whose increment rate scale with a CPU's current frequency (APERF/MPERF on x86,
+AMU on arm64). Another is to directly hook into cpufreq frequency transitions,
+when the kernel is aware of the switched-to frequency (also employed by
+arm/arm64).
+
+4. Scheduler topology
+=====================
+
+During the construction of the sched domains, the scheduler will figure out
+whether the system exhibits asymmetric CPU capacities. Should that be the
+case:
+
+- The sched_asym_cpucapacity static key will be enabled.
+- The SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY flag will be set at the lowest sched_domain level that
+  spans all unique CPU capacity values.
+
+The sched_asym_cpucapacity static key is intended to guard sections of code that
+cater to asymmetric CPU capacity systems. Do note however that said key is
+*system-wide*. Imagine the following setup using cpusets::
+
+  capacity    C/2          C
+            ________    ________
+           /        \  /        \
+  CPUs     0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7
+           \__/  \______________/
+  cpusets   cs0         cs1
+
+Which could be created via:
+
+.. code-block:: sh
+
+  mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cs0
+  echo 0-1 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cs0/cpuset.cpus
+  echo 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cs0/cpuset.mems
+
+  mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cs1
+  echo 2-7 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cs1/cpuset.cpus
+  echo 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cs1/cpuset.mems
+
+  echo 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cpuset.sched_load_balance
+
+Since there *is* CPU capacity asymmetry in the system, the
+sched_asym_cpucapacity static key will be enabled. However, the sched_domain
+hierarchy of CPUs 0-1 spans a single capacity value: SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY isn't
+set in that hierarchy, it describes an SMP island and should be treated as such.
+
+Therefore, the 'canonical' pattern for protecting codepaths that cater to
+asymmetric CPU capacities is to:
+
+- Check the sched_asym_cpucapacity static key
+- If it is enabled, then also check for the presence of SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY in
+  the sched_domain hierarchy (if relevant, i.e. the codepath targets a specific
+  CPU or group thereof)
+
+5. Capacity aware scheduling implementation
+===========================================
+
+5.1 CFS
+-------
+
+5.1.1 Capacity fitness
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+The main capacity scheduling criterion of CFS is::
+
+  task_util(p) < capacity(task_cpu(p))
+
+This is commonly called the capacity fitness criterion, i.e. CFS must ensure a
+task "fits" on its CPU. If it is violated, the task will need to achieve more
+work than what its CPU can provide: it will be CPU-bound.
+
+Furthermore, uclamp lets userspace specify a minimum and a maximum utilization
+value for a task, either via sched_setattr() or via the cgroup interface (see
+Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst). As its name imply, this can be used to
+clamp task_util() in the previous criterion.
+
+5.1.2 Wakeup CPU selection
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+CFS task wakeup CPU selection follows the capacity fitness criterion described
+above. On top of that, uclamp is used to clamp the task utilization values,
+which lets userspace have more leverage over the CPU selection of CFS
+tasks. IOW, CFS wakeup CPU selection searches for a CPU that satisfies::
+
+  clamp(task_util(p), task_uclamp_min(p), task_uclamp_max(p)) < capacity(cpu)
+
+By using uclamp, userspace can e.g. allow a busy loop (100% utilization) to run
+on any CPU by giving it a low uclamp.max value. Conversely, it can force a small
+periodic task (e.g. 10% utilization) to run on the highest-performance CPUs by
+giving it a high uclamp.min value.
+
+.. note::
+
+  Wakeup CPU selection in CFS can be eclipsed by Energy Aware Scheduling
+  (EAS), which is described in Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst.
+
+5.1.3 Load balancing
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+A pathological case in the wakeup CPU selection occurs when a task rarely
+sleeps, if at all - it thus rarely wakes up, if at all. Consider::
+
+  w == wakeup event
+
+  capacity(CPU0) = C
+  capacity(CPU1) = C / 3
+
+                           workload on CPU0
+  CPU work ^
+           |     _________           _________           ____
+           |    |         |         |         |         |
+           +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-> time
+                w                   w                   w
+
+                           workload on CPU1
+  CPU work ^
+           |     ____________________________________________
+           |    |
+           +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+->
+                w
+
+This workload should run on CPU0, but if the task either:
+
+- was improperly scheduled from the start (inaccurate initial
+  utilization estimation)
+- was properly scheduled from the start, but suddenly needs more
+  processing power
+
+then it might become CPU-bound, IOW ``task_util(p) > capacity(task_cpu(p))``;
+the CPU capacity scheduling criterion is violated, and there may not be any more
+wakeup event to fix this up via wakeup CPU selection.
+
+Tasks that are in this situation are dubbed "misfit" tasks, and the mechanism
+put in place to handle this shares the same name. Misfit task migration
+leverages the CFS load balancer, more specifically the active load balance part
+(which caters to migrating currently running tasks). When load balance happens,
+a misfit active load balance will be triggered if a misfit task can be migrated
+to a CPU with more capacity than its current one.
+
+5.2 RT
+------
+
+5.2.1 Wakeup CPU selection
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+RT task wakeup CPU selection searches for a CPU that satisfies::
+
+  task_uclamp_min(p) <= capacity(task_cpu(cpu))
+
+while still following the usual priority constraints. If none of the candidate
+CPUs can satisfy this capacity criterion, then strict priority based scheduling
+is followed and CPU capacities are ignored.
+
+5.3 DL
+------
+
+5.3.1 Wakeup CPU selection
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+DL task wakeup CPU selection searches for a CPU that satisfies::
+
+  task_bandwidth(p) < capacity(task_cpu(p))
+
+while still respecting the usual bandwidth and deadline constraints. If
+none of the candidate CPUs can satisfy this capacity criterion, then the
+task will remain on its current CPU.
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..14a2f7bf6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,888 @@
+========================
+Deadline Task Scheduling
+========================
+
+.. CONTENTS
+
+    0. WARNING
+    1. Overview
+    2. Scheduling algorithm
+      2.1 Main algorithm
+      2.2 Bandwidth reclaiming
+    3. Scheduling Real-Time Tasks
+      3.1 Definitions
+      3.2 Schedulability Analysis for Uniprocessor Systems
+      3.3 Schedulability Analysis for Multiprocessor Systems
+      3.4 Relationship with SCHED_DEADLINE Parameters
+    4. Bandwidth management
+      4.1 System-wide settings
+      4.2 Task interface
+      4.3 Default behavior
+      4.4 Behavior of sched_yield()
+    5. Tasks CPU affinity
+      5.1 SCHED_DEADLINE and cpusets HOWTO
+    6. Future plans
+    A. Test suite
+    B. Minimal main()
+
+
+0. WARNING
+==========
+
+ Fiddling with these settings can result in an unpredictable or even unstable
+ system behavior. As for -rt (group) scheduling, it is assumed that root users
+ know what they're doing.
+
+
+1. Overview
+===========
+
+ The SCHED_DEADLINE policy contained inside the sched_dl scheduling class is
+ basically an implementation of the Earliest Deadline First (EDF) scheduling
+ algorithm, augmented with a mechanism (called Constant Bandwidth Server, CBS)
+ that makes it possible to isolate the behavior of tasks between each other.
+
+
+2. Scheduling algorithm
+=======================
+
+2.1 Main algorithm
+------------------
+
+ SCHED_DEADLINE [18] uses three parameters, named "runtime", "period", and
+ "deadline", to schedule tasks. A SCHED_DEADLINE task should receive
+ "runtime" microseconds of execution time every "period" microseconds, and
+ these "runtime" microseconds are available within "deadline" microseconds
+ from the beginning of the period.  In order to implement this behavior,
+ every time the task wakes up, the scheduler computes a "scheduling deadline"
+ consistent with the guarantee (using the CBS[2,3] algorithm). Tasks are then
+ scheduled using EDF[1] on these scheduling deadlines (the task with the
+ earliest scheduling deadline is selected for execution). Notice that the
+ task actually receives "runtime" time units within "deadline" if a proper
+ "admission control" strategy (see Section "4. Bandwidth management") is used
+ (clearly, if the system is overloaded this guarantee cannot be respected).
+
+ Summing up, the CBS[2,3] algorithm assigns scheduling deadlines to tasks so
+ that each task runs for at most its runtime every period, avoiding any
+ interference between different tasks (bandwidth isolation), while the EDF[1]
+ algorithm selects the task with the earliest scheduling deadline as the one
+ to be executed next. Thanks to this feature, tasks that do not strictly comply
+ with the "traditional" real-time task model (see Section 3) can effectively
+ use the new policy.
+
+ In more details, the CBS algorithm assigns scheduling deadlines to
+ tasks in the following way:
+
+  - Each SCHED_DEADLINE task is characterized by the "runtime",
+    "deadline", and "period" parameters;
+
+  - The state of the task is described by a "scheduling deadline", and
+    a "remaining runtime". These two parameters are initially set to 0;
+
+  - When a SCHED_DEADLINE task wakes up (becomes ready for execution),
+    the scheduler checks if::
+
+                 remaining runtime                  runtime
+        ----------------------------------    >    ---------
+        scheduling deadline - current time           period
+
+    then, if the scheduling deadline is smaller than the current time, or
+    this condition is verified, the scheduling deadline and the
+    remaining runtime are re-initialized as
+
+         scheduling deadline = current time + deadline
+         remaining runtime = runtime
+
+    otherwise, the scheduling deadline and the remaining runtime are
+    left unchanged;
+
+  - When a SCHED_DEADLINE task executes for an amount of time t, its
+    remaining runtime is decreased as::
+
+         remaining runtime = remaining runtime - t
+
+    (technically, the runtime is decreased at every tick, or when the
+    task is descheduled / preempted);
+
+  - When the remaining runtime becomes less or equal than 0, the task is
+    said to be "throttled" (also known as "depleted" in real-time literature)
+    and cannot be scheduled until its scheduling deadline. The "replenishment
+    time" for this task (see next item) is set to be equal to the current
+    value of the scheduling deadline;
+
+  - When the current time is equal to the replenishment time of a
+    throttled task, the scheduling deadline and the remaining runtime are
+    updated as::
+
+         scheduling deadline = scheduling deadline + period
+         remaining runtime = remaining runtime + runtime
+
+ The SCHED_FLAG_DL_OVERRUN flag in sched_attr's sched_flags field allows a task
+ to get informed about runtime overruns through the delivery of SIGXCPU
+ signals.
+
+
+2.2 Bandwidth reclaiming
+------------------------
+
+ Bandwidth reclaiming for deadline tasks is based on the GRUB (Greedy
+ Reclamation of Unused Bandwidth) algorithm [15, 16, 17] and it is enabled
+ when flag SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM is set.
+
+ The following diagram illustrates the state names for tasks handled by GRUB::
+
+                             ------------
+                 (d)        |   Active   |
+              ------------->|            |
+              |             | Contending |
+              |              ------------
+              |                A      |
+          ----------           |      |
+         |          |          |      |
+         | Inactive |          |(b)   | (a)
+         |          |          |      |
+          ----------           |      |
+              A                |      V
+              |              ------------
+              |             |   Active   |
+              --------------|     Non    |
+                 (c)        | Contending |
+                             ------------
+
+ A task can be in one of the following states:
+
+  - ActiveContending: if it is ready for execution (or executing);
+
+  - ActiveNonContending: if it just blocked and has not yet surpassed the 0-lag
+    time;
+
+  - Inactive: if it is blocked and has surpassed the 0-lag time.
+
+ State transitions:
+
+  (a) When a task blocks, it does not become immediately inactive since its
+      bandwidth cannot be immediately reclaimed without breaking the
+      real-time guarantees. It therefore enters a transitional state called
+      ActiveNonContending. The scheduler arms the "inactive timer" to fire at
+      the 0-lag time, when the task's bandwidth can be reclaimed without
+      breaking the real-time guarantees.
+
+      The 0-lag time for a task entering the ActiveNonContending state is
+      computed as::
+
+                        (runtime * dl_period)
+             deadline - ---------------------
+                             dl_runtime
+
+      where runtime is the remaining runtime, while dl_runtime and dl_period
+      are the reservation parameters.
+
+  (b) If the task wakes up before the inactive timer fires, the task re-enters
+      the ActiveContending state and the "inactive timer" is canceled.
+      In addition, if the task wakes up on a different runqueue, then
+      the task's utilization must be removed from the previous runqueue's active
+      utilization and must be added to the new runqueue's active utilization.
+      In order to avoid races between a task waking up on a runqueue while the
+      "inactive timer" is running on a different CPU, the "dl_non_contending"
+      flag is used to indicate that a task is not on a runqueue but is active
+      (so, the flag is set when the task blocks and is cleared when the
+      "inactive timer" fires or when the task  wakes up).
+
+  (c) When the "inactive timer" fires, the task enters the Inactive state and
+      its utilization is removed from the runqueue's active utilization.
+
+  (d) When an inactive task wakes up, it enters the ActiveContending state and
+      its utilization is added to the active utilization of the runqueue where
+      it has been enqueued.
+
+ For each runqueue, the algorithm GRUB keeps track of two different bandwidths:
+
+  - Active bandwidth (running_bw): this is the sum of the bandwidths of all
+    tasks in active state (i.e., ActiveContending or ActiveNonContending);
+
+  - Total bandwidth (this_bw): this is the sum of all tasks "belonging" to the
+    runqueue, including the tasks in Inactive state.
+
+
+ The algorithm reclaims the bandwidth of the tasks in Inactive state.
+ It does so by decrementing the runtime of the executing task Ti at a pace equal
+ to
+
+           dq = -max{ Ui / Umax, (1 - Uinact - Uextra) } dt
+
+ where:
+
+  - Ui is the bandwidth of task Ti;
+  - Umax is the maximum reclaimable utilization (subjected to RT throttling
+    limits);
+  - Uinact is the (per runqueue) inactive utilization, computed as
+    (this_bq - running_bw);
+  - Uextra is the (per runqueue) extra reclaimable utilization
+    (subjected to RT throttling limits).
+
+
+ Let's now see a trivial example of two deadline tasks with runtime equal
+ to 4 and period equal to 8 (i.e., bandwidth equal to 0.5)::
+
+         A            Task T1
+         |
+         |                               |
+         |                               |
+         |--------                       |----
+         |       |                       V
+         |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|--------->t
+         0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8
+
+
+         A            Task T2
+         |
+         |                               |
+         |                               |
+         |       ------------------------|
+         |       |                       V
+         |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|--------->t
+         0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8
+
+
+         A            running_bw
+         |
+       1 -----------------               ------
+         |               |               |
+      0.5-               -----------------
+         |                               |
+         |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|--------->t
+         0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8
+
+
+  - Time t = 0:
+
+    Both tasks are ready for execution and therefore in ActiveContending state.
+    Suppose Task T1 is the first task to start execution.
+    Since there are no inactive tasks, its runtime is decreased as dq = -1 dt.
+
+  - Time t = 2:
+
+    Suppose that task T1 blocks
+    Task T1 therefore enters the ActiveNonContending state. Since its remaining
+    runtime is equal to 2, its 0-lag time is equal to t = 4.
+    Task T2 start execution, with runtime still decreased as dq = -1 dt since
+    there are no inactive tasks.
+
+  - Time t = 4:
+
+    This is the 0-lag time for Task T1. Since it didn't woken up in the
+    meantime, it enters the Inactive state. Its bandwidth is removed from
+    running_bw.
+    Task T2 continues its execution. However, its runtime is now decreased as
+    dq = - 0.5 dt because Uinact = 0.5.
+    Task T2 therefore reclaims the bandwidth unused by Task T1.
+
+  - Time t = 8:
+
+    Task T1 wakes up. It enters the ActiveContending state again, and the
+    running_bw is incremented.
+
+
+2.3 Energy-aware scheduling
+---------------------------
+
+ When cpufreq's schedutil governor is selected, SCHED_DEADLINE implements the
+ GRUB-PA [19] algorithm, reducing the CPU operating frequency to the minimum
+ value that still allows to meet the deadlines. This behavior is currently
+ implemented only for ARM architectures.
+
+ A particular care must be taken in case the time needed for changing frequency
+ is of the same order of magnitude of the reservation period. In such cases,
+ setting a fixed CPU frequency results in a lower amount of deadline misses.
+
+
+3. Scheduling Real-Time Tasks
+=============================
+
+
+
+ ..  BIG FAT WARNING ******************************************************
+
+ .. warning::
+
+   This section contains a (not-thorough) summary on classical deadline
+   scheduling theory, and how it applies to SCHED_DEADLINE.
+   The reader can "safely" skip to Section 4 if only interested in seeing
+   how the scheduling policy can be used. Anyway, we strongly recommend
+   to come back here and continue reading (once the urge for testing is
+   satisfied :P) to be sure of fully understanding all technical details.
+
+ .. ************************************************************************
+
+ There are no limitations on what kind of task can exploit this new
+ scheduling discipline, even if it must be said that it is particularly
+ suited for periodic or sporadic real-time tasks that need guarantees on their
+ timing behavior, e.g., multimedia, streaming, control applications, etc.
+
+3.1 Definitions
+------------------------
+
+ A typical real-time task is composed of a repetition of computation phases
+ (task instances, or jobs) which are activated on a periodic or sporadic
+ fashion.
+ Each job J_j (where J_j is the j^th job of the task) is characterized by an
+ arrival time r_j (the time when the job starts), an amount of computation
+ time c_j needed to finish the job, and a job absolute deadline d_j, which
+ is the time within which the job should be finished. The maximum execution
+ time max{c_j} is called "Worst Case Execution Time" (WCET) for the task.
+ A real-time task can be periodic with period P if r_{j+1} = r_j + P, or
+ sporadic with minimum inter-arrival time P is r_{j+1} >= r_j + P. Finally,
+ d_j = r_j + D, where D is the task's relative deadline.
+ Summing up, a real-time task can be described as
+
+	Task = (WCET, D, P)
+
+ The utilization of a real-time task is defined as the ratio between its
+ WCET and its period (or minimum inter-arrival time), and represents
+ the fraction of CPU time needed to execute the task.
+
+ If the total utilization U=sum(WCET_i/P_i) is larger than M (with M equal
+ to the number of CPUs), then the scheduler is unable to respect all the
+ deadlines.
+ Note that total utilization is defined as the sum of the utilizations
+ WCET_i/P_i over all the real-time tasks in the system. When considering
+ multiple real-time tasks, the parameters of the i-th task are indicated
+ with the "_i" suffix.
+ Moreover, if the total utilization is larger than M, then we risk starving
+ non- real-time tasks by real-time tasks.
+ If, instead, the total utilization is smaller than M, then non real-time
+ tasks will not be starved and the system might be able to respect all the
+ deadlines.
+ As a matter of fact, in this case it is possible to provide an upper bound
+ for tardiness (defined as the maximum between 0 and the difference
+ between the finishing time of a job and its absolute deadline).
+ More precisely, it can be proven that using a global EDF scheduler the
+ maximum tardiness of each task is smaller or equal than
+
+	((M − 1) · WCET_max − WCET_min)/(M − (M − 2) · U_max) + WCET_max
+
+ where WCET_max = max{WCET_i} is the maximum WCET, WCET_min=min{WCET_i}
+ is the minimum WCET, and U_max = max{WCET_i/P_i} is the maximum
+ utilization[12].
+
+3.2 Schedulability Analysis for Uniprocessor Systems
+----------------------------------------------------
+
+ If M=1 (uniprocessor system), or in case of partitioned scheduling (each
+ real-time task is statically assigned to one and only one CPU), it is
+ possible to formally check if all the deadlines are respected.
+ If D_i = P_i for all tasks, then EDF is able to respect all the deadlines
+ of all the tasks executing on a CPU if and only if the total utilization
+ of the tasks running on such a CPU is smaller or equal than 1.
+ If D_i != P_i for some task, then it is possible to define the density of
+ a task as WCET_i/min{D_i,P_i}, and EDF is able to respect all the deadlines
+ of all the tasks running on a CPU if the sum of the densities of the tasks
+ running on such a CPU is smaller or equal than 1:
+
+	sum(WCET_i / min{D_i, P_i}) <= 1
+
+ It is important to notice that this condition is only sufficient, and not
+ necessary: there are task sets that are schedulable, but do not respect the
+ condition. For example, consider the task set {Task_1,Task_2} composed by
+ Task_1=(50ms,50ms,100ms) and Task_2=(10ms,100ms,100ms).
+ EDF is clearly able to schedule the two tasks without missing any deadline
+ (Task_1 is scheduled as soon as it is released, and finishes just in time
+ to respect its deadline; Task_2 is scheduled immediately after Task_1, hence
+ its response time cannot be larger than 50ms + 10ms = 60ms) even if
+
+	50 / min{50,100} + 10 / min{100, 100} = 50 / 50 + 10 / 100 = 1.1
+
+ Of course it is possible to test the exact schedulability of tasks with
+ D_i != P_i (checking a condition that is both sufficient and necessary),
+ but this cannot be done by comparing the total utilization or density with
+ a constant. Instead, the so called "processor demand" approach can be used,
+ computing the total amount of CPU time h(t) needed by all the tasks to
+ respect all of their deadlines in a time interval of size t, and comparing
+ such a time with the interval size t. If h(t) is smaller than t (that is,
+ the amount of time needed by the tasks in a time interval of size t is
+ smaller than the size of the interval) for all the possible values of t, then
+ EDF is able to schedule the tasks respecting all of their deadlines. Since
+ performing this check for all possible values of t is impossible, it has been
+ proven[4,5,6] that it is sufficient to perform the test for values of t
+ between 0 and a maximum value L. The cited papers contain all of the
+ mathematical details and explain how to compute h(t) and L.
+ In any case, this kind of analysis is too complex as well as too
+ time-consuming to be performed on-line. Hence, as explained in Section
+ 4 Linux uses an admission test based on the tasks' utilizations.
+
+3.3 Schedulability Analysis for Multiprocessor Systems
+------------------------------------------------------
+
+ On multiprocessor systems with global EDF scheduling (non partitioned
+ systems), a sufficient test for schedulability can not be based on the
+ utilizations or densities: it can be shown that even if D_i = P_i task
+ sets with utilizations slightly larger than 1 can miss deadlines regardless
+ of the number of CPUs.
+
+ Consider a set {Task_1,...Task_{M+1}} of M+1 tasks on a system with M
+ CPUs, with the first task Task_1=(P,P,P) having period, relative deadline
+ and WCET equal to P. The remaining M tasks Task_i=(e,P-1,P-1) have an
+ arbitrarily small worst case execution time (indicated as "e" here) and a
+ period smaller than the one of the first task. Hence, if all the tasks
+ activate at the same time t, global EDF schedules these M tasks first
+ (because their absolute deadlines are equal to t + P - 1, hence they are
+ smaller than the absolute deadline of Task_1, which is t + P). As a
+ result, Task_1 can be scheduled only at time t + e, and will finish at
+ time t + e + P, after its absolute deadline. The total utilization of the
+ task set is U = M · e / (P - 1) + P / P = M · e / (P - 1) + 1, and for small
+ values of e this can become very close to 1. This is known as "Dhall's
+ effect"[7]. Note: the example in the original paper by Dhall has been
+ slightly simplified here (for example, Dhall more correctly computed
+ lim_{e->0}U).
+
+ More complex schedulability tests for global EDF have been developed in
+ real-time literature[8,9], but they are not based on a simple comparison
+ between total utilization (or density) and a fixed constant. If all tasks
+ have D_i = P_i, a sufficient schedulability condition can be expressed in
+ a simple way:
+
+	sum(WCET_i / P_i) <= M - (M - 1) · U_max
+
+ where U_max = max{WCET_i / P_i}[10]. Notice that for U_max = 1,
+ M - (M - 1) · U_max becomes M - M + 1 = 1 and this schedulability condition
+ just confirms the Dhall's effect. A more complete survey of the literature
+ about schedulability tests for multi-processor real-time scheduling can be
+ found in [11].
+
+ As seen, enforcing that the total utilization is smaller than M does not
+ guarantee that global EDF schedules the tasks without missing any deadline
+ (in other words, global EDF is not an optimal scheduling algorithm). However,
+ a total utilization smaller than M is enough to guarantee that non real-time
+ tasks are not starved and that the tardiness of real-time tasks has an upper
+ bound[12] (as previously noted). Different bounds on the maximum tardiness
+ experienced by real-time tasks have been developed in various papers[13,14],
+ but the theoretical result that is important for SCHED_DEADLINE is that if
+ the total utilization is smaller or equal than M then the response times of
+ the tasks are limited.
+
+3.4 Relationship with SCHED_DEADLINE Parameters
+-----------------------------------------------
+
+ Finally, it is important to understand the relationship between the
+ SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling parameters described in Section 2 (runtime,
+ deadline and period) and the real-time task parameters (WCET, D, P)
+ described in this section. Note that the tasks' temporal constraints are
+ represented by its absolute deadlines d_j = r_j + D described above, while
+ SCHED_DEADLINE schedules the tasks according to scheduling deadlines (see
+ Section 2).
+ If an admission test is used to guarantee that the scheduling deadlines
+ are respected, then SCHED_DEADLINE can be used to schedule real-time tasks
+ guaranteeing that all the jobs' deadlines of a task are respected.
+ In order to do this, a task must be scheduled by setting:
+
+  - runtime >= WCET
+  - deadline = D
+  - period <= P
+
+ IOW, if runtime >= WCET and if period is <= P, then the scheduling deadlines
+ and the absolute deadlines (d_j) coincide, so a proper admission control
+ allows to respect the jobs' absolute deadlines for this task (this is what is
+ called "hard schedulability property" and is an extension of Lemma 1 of [2]).
+ Notice that if runtime > deadline the admission control will surely reject
+ this task, as it is not possible to respect its temporal constraints.
+
+ References:
+
+  1 - C. L. Liu and J. W. Layland. Scheduling algorithms for multiprogram-
+      ming in a hard-real-time environment. Journal of the Association for
+      Computing Machinery, 20(1), 1973.
+  2 - L. Abeni , G. Buttazzo. Integrating Multimedia Applications in Hard
+      Real-Time Systems. Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Real-time Systems
+      Symposium, 1998. http://retis.sssup.it/~giorgio/paps/1998/rtss98-cbs.pdf
+  3 - L. Abeni. Server Mechanisms for Multimedia Applications. ReTiS Lab
+      Technical Report. http://disi.unitn.it/~abeni/tr-98-01.pdf
+  4 - J. Y. Leung and M.L. Merril. A Note on Preemptive Scheduling of
+      Periodic, Real-Time Tasks. Information Processing Letters, vol. 11,
+      no. 3, pp. 115-118, 1980.
+  5 - S. K. Baruah, A. K. Mok and L. E. Rosier. Preemptively Scheduling
+      Hard-Real-Time Sporadic Tasks on One Processor. Proceedings of the
+      11th IEEE Real-time Systems Symposium, 1990.
+  6 - S. K. Baruah, L. E. Rosier and R. R. Howell. Algorithms and Complexity
+      Concerning the Preemptive Scheduling of Periodic Real-Time tasks on
+      One Processor. Real-Time Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp 301-324,
+      1990.
+  7 - S. J. Dhall and C. L. Liu. On a real-time scheduling problem. Operations
+      research, vol. 26, no. 1, pp 127-140, 1978.
+  8 - T. Baker. Multiprocessor EDF and Deadline Monotonic Schedulability
+      Analysis. Proceedings of the 24th IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium, 2003.
+  9 - T. Baker. An Analysis of EDF Schedulability on a Multiprocessor.
+      IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 16, no. 8,
+      pp 760-768, 2005.
+  10 - J. Goossens, S. Funk and S. Baruah, Priority-Driven Scheduling of
+       Periodic Task Systems on Multiprocessors. Real-Time Systems Journal,
+       vol. 25, no. 2–3, pp. 187–205, 2003.
+  11 - R. Davis and A. Burns. A Survey of Hard Real-Time Scheduling for
+       Multiprocessor Systems. ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 43, no. 4, 2011.
+       http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/~robdavis/papers/MPSurveyv5.0.pdf
+  12 - U. C. Devi and J. H. Anderson. Tardiness Bounds under Global EDF
+       Scheduling on a Multiprocessor. Real-Time Systems Journal, vol. 32,
+       no. 2, pp 133-189, 2008.
+  13 - P. Valente and G. Lipari. An Upper Bound to the Lateness of Soft
+       Real-Time Tasks Scheduled by EDF on Multiprocessors. Proceedings of
+       the 26th IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium, 2005.
+  14 - J. Erickson, U. Devi and S. Baruah. Improved tardiness bounds for
+       Global EDF. Proceedings of the 22nd Euromicro Conference on
+       Real-Time Systems, 2010.
+  15 - G. Lipari, S. Baruah, Greedy reclamation of unused bandwidth in
+       constant-bandwidth servers, 12th IEEE Euromicro Conference on Real-Time
+       Systems, 2000.
+  16 - L. Abeni, J. Lelli, C. Scordino, L. Palopoli, Greedy CPU reclaiming for
+       SCHED DEADLINE. In Proceedings of the Real-Time Linux Workshop (RTLWS),
+       Dusseldorf, Germany, 2014.
+  17 - L. Abeni, G. Lipari, A. Parri, Y. Sun, Multicore CPU reclaiming: parallel
+       or sequential?. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied
+       Computing, 2016.
+  18 - J. Lelli, C. Scordino, L. Abeni, D. Faggioli, Deadline scheduling in the
+       Linux kernel, Software: Practice and Experience, 46(6): 821-839, June
+       2016.
+  19 - C. Scordino, L. Abeni, J. Lelli, Energy-Aware Real-Time Scheduling in
+       the Linux Kernel, 33rd ACM/SIGAPP Symposium On Applied Computing (SAC
+       2018), Pau, France, April 2018.
+
+
+4. Bandwidth management
+=======================
+
+ As previously mentioned, in order for -deadline scheduling to be
+ effective and useful (that is, to be able to provide "runtime" time units
+ within "deadline"), it is important to have some method to keep the allocation
+ of the available fractions of CPU time to the various tasks under control.
+ This is usually called "admission control" and if it is not performed, then
+ no guarantee can be given on the actual scheduling of the -deadline tasks.
+
+ As already stated in Section 3, a necessary condition to be respected to
+ correctly schedule a set of real-time tasks is that the total utilization
+ is smaller than M. When talking about -deadline tasks, this requires that
+ the sum of the ratio between runtime and period for all tasks is smaller
+ than M. Notice that the ratio runtime/period is equivalent to the utilization
+ of a "traditional" real-time task, and is also often referred to as
+ "bandwidth".
+ The interface used to control the CPU bandwidth that can be allocated
+ to -deadline tasks is similar to the one already used for -rt
+ tasks with real-time group scheduling (a.k.a. RT-throttling - see
+ Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.rst), and is based on readable/
+ writable control files located in procfs (for system wide settings).
+ Notice that per-group settings (controlled through cgroupfs) are still not
+ defined for -deadline tasks, because more discussion is needed in order to
+ figure out how we want to manage SCHED_DEADLINE bandwidth at the task group
+ level.
+
+ A main difference between deadline bandwidth management and RT-throttling
+ is that -deadline tasks have bandwidth on their own (while -rt ones don't!),
+ and thus we don't need a higher level throttling mechanism to enforce the
+ desired bandwidth. In other words, this means that interface parameters are
+ only used at admission control time (i.e., when the user calls
+ sched_setattr()). Scheduling is then performed considering actual tasks'
+ parameters, so that CPU bandwidth is allocated to SCHED_DEADLINE tasks
+ respecting their needs in terms of granularity. Therefore, using this simple
+ interface we can put a cap on total utilization of -deadline tasks (i.e.,
+ \Sum (runtime_i / period_i) < global_dl_utilization_cap).
+
+4.1 System wide settings
+------------------------
+
+ The system wide settings are configured under the /proc virtual file system.
+
+ For now the -rt knobs are used for -deadline admission control and the
+ -deadline runtime is accounted against the -rt runtime. We realize that this
+ isn't entirely desirable; however, it is better to have a small interface for
+ now, and be able to change it easily later. The ideal situation (see 5.) is to
+ run -rt tasks from a -deadline server; in which case the -rt bandwidth is a
+ direct subset of dl_bw.
+
+ This means that, for a root_domain comprising M CPUs, -deadline tasks
+ can be created while the sum of their bandwidths stays below:
+
+   M * (sched_rt_runtime_us / sched_rt_period_us)
+
+ It is also possible to disable this bandwidth management logic, and
+ be thus free of oversubscribing the system up to any arbitrary level.
+ This is done by writing -1 in /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us.
+
+
+4.2 Task interface
+------------------
+
+ Specifying a periodic/sporadic task that executes for a given amount of
+ runtime at each instance, and that is scheduled according to the urgency of
+ its own timing constraints needs, in general, a way of declaring:
+
+  - a (maximum/typical) instance execution time,
+  - a minimum interval between consecutive instances,
+  - a time constraint by which each instance must be completed.
+
+ Therefore:
+
+  * a new struct sched_attr, containing all the necessary fields is
+    provided;
+  * the new scheduling related syscalls that manipulate it, i.e.,
+    sched_setattr() and sched_getattr() are implemented.
+
+ For debugging purposes, the leftover runtime and absolute deadline of a
+ SCHED_DEADLINE task can be retrieved through /proc/<pid>/sched (entries
+ dl.runtime and dl.deadline, both values in ns). A programmatic way to
+ retrieve these values from production code is under discussion.
+
+
+4.3 Default behavior
+---------------------
+
+ The default value for SCHED_DEADLINE bandwidth is to have rt_runtime equal to
+ 950000. With rt_period equal to 1000000, by default, it means that -deadline
+ tasks can use at most 95%, multiplied by the number of CPUs that compose the
+ root_domain, for each root_domain.
+ This means that non -deadline tasks will receive at least 5% of the CPU time,
+ and that -deadline tasks will receive their runtime with a guaranteed
+ worst-case delay respect to the "deadline" parameter. If "deadline" = "period"
+ and the cpuset mechanism is used to implement partitioned scheduling (see
+ Section 5), then this simple setting of the bandwidth management is able to
+ deterministically guarantee that -deadline tasks will receive their runtime
+ in a period.
+
+ Finally, notice that in order not to jeopardize the admission control a
+ -deadline task cannot fork.
+
+
+4.4 Behavior of sched_yield()
+-----------------------------
+
+ When a SCHED_DEADLINE task calls sched_yield(), it gives up its
+ remaining runtime and is immediately throttled, until the next
+ period, when its runtime will be replenished (a special flag
+ dl_yielded is set and used to handle correctly throttling and runtime
+ replenishment after a call to sched_yield()).
+
+ This behavior of sched_yield() allows the task to wake-up exactly at
+ the beginning of the next period. Also, this may be useful in the
+ future with bandwidth reclaiming mechanisms, where sched_yield() will
+ make the leftoever runtime available for reclamation by other
+ SCHED_DEADLINE tasks.
+
+
+5. Tasks CPU affinity
+=====================
+
+ -deadline tasks cannot have an affinity mask smaller that the entire
+ root_domain they are created on. However, affinities can be specified
+ through the cpuset facility (Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/cpusets.rst).
+
+5.1 SCHED_DEADLINE and cpusets HOWTO
+------------------------------------
+
+ An example of a simple configuration (pin a -deadline task to CPU0)
+ follows (rt-app is used to create a -deadline task)::
+
+   mkdir /dev/cpuset
+   mount -t cgroup -o cpuset cpuset /dev/cpuset
+   cd /dev/cpuset
+   mkdir cpu0
+   echo 0 > cpu0/cpuset.cpus
+   echo 0 > cpu0/cpuset.mems
+   echo 1 > cpuset.cpu_exclusive
+   echo 0 > cpuset.sched_load_balance
+   echo 1 > cpu0/cpuset.cpu_exclusive
+   echo 1 > cpu0/cpuset.mem_exclusive
+   echo $$ > cpu0/tasks
+   rt-app -t 100000:10000:d:0 -D5 # it is now actually superfluous to specify
+				  # task affinity
+
+6. Future plans
+===============
+
+ Still missing:
+
+  - programmatic way to retrieve current runtime and absolute deadline
+  - refinements to deadline inheritance, especially regarding the possibility
+    of retaining bandwidth isolation among non-interacting tasks. This is
+    being studied from both theoretical and practical points of view, and
+    hopefully we should be able to produce some demonstrative code soon;
+  - (c)group based bandwidth management, and maybe scheduling;
+  - access control for non-root users (and related security concerns to
+    address), which is the best way to allow unprivileged use of the mechanisms
+    and how to prevent non-root users "cheat" the system?
+
+ As already discussed, we are planning also to merge this work with the EDF
+ throttling patches [https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/23/239] but we still are in
+ the preliminary phases of the merge and we really seek feedback that would
+ help us decide on the direction it should take.
+
+Appendix A. Test suite
+======================
+
+ The SCHED_DEADLINE policy can be easily tested using two applications that
+ are part of a wider Linux Scheduler validation suite. The suite is
+ available as a GitHub repository: https://github.com/scheduler-tools.
+
+ The first testing application is called rt-app and can be used to
+ start multiple threads with specific parameters. rt-app supports
+ SCHED_{OTHER,FIFO,RR,DEADLINE} scheduling policies and their related
+ parameters (e.g., niceness, priority, runtime/deadline/period). rt-app
+ is a valuable tool, as it can be used to synthetically recreate certain
+ workloads (maybe mimicking real use-cases) and evaluate how the scheduler
+ behaves under such workloads. In this way, results are easily reproducible.
+ rt-app is available at: https://github.com/scheduler-tools/rt-app.
+
+ Thread parameters can be specified from the command line, with something like
+ this::
+
+  # rt-app -t 100000:10000:d -t 150000:20000:f:10 -D5
+
+ The above creates 2 threads. The first one, scheduled by SCHED_DEADLINE,
+ executes for 10ms every 100ms. The second one, scheduled at SCHED_FIFO
+ priority 10, executes for 20ms every 150ms. The test will run for a total
+ of 5 seconds.
+
+ More interestingly, configurations can be described with a json file that
+ can be passed as input to rt-app with something like this::
+
+  # rt-app my_config.json
+
+ The parameters that can be specified with the second method are a superset
+ of the command line options. Please refer to rt-app documentation for more
+ details (`<rt-app-sources>/doc/*.json`).
+
+ The second testing application is a modification of schedtool, called
+ schedtool-dl, which can be used to setup SCHED_DEADLINE parameters for a
+ certain pid/application. schedtool-dl is available at:
+ https://github.com/scheduler-tools/schedtool-dl.git.
+
+ The usage is straightforward::
+
+  # schedtool -E -t 10000000:100000000 -e ./my_cpuhog_app
+
+ With this, my_cpuhog_app is put to run inside a SCHED_DEADLINE reservation
+ of 10ms every 100ms (note that parameters are expressed in microseconds).
+ You can also use schedtool to create a reservation for an already running
+ application, given that you know its pid::
+
+  # schedtool -E -t 10000000:100000000 my_app_pid
+
+Appendix B. Minimal main()
+==========================
+
+ We provide in what follows a simple (ugly) self-contained code snippet
+ showing how SCHED_DEADLINE reservations can be created by a real-time
+ application developer::
+
+   #define _GNU_SOURCE
+   #include <unistd.h>
+   #include <stdio.h>
+   #include <stdlib.h>
+   #include <string.h>
+   #include <time.h>
+   #include <linux/unistd.h>
+   #include <linux/kernel.h>
+   #include <linux/types.h>
+   #include <sys/syscall.h>
+   #include <pthread.h>
+
+   #define gettid() syscall(__NR_gettid)
+
+   #define SCHED_DEADLINE	6
+
+   /* XXX use the proper syscall numbers */
+   #ifdef __x86_64__
+   #define __NR_sched_setattr		314
+   #define __NR_sched_getattr		315
+   #endif
+
+   #ifdef __i386__
+   #define __NR_sched_setattr		351
+   #define __NR_sched_getattr		352
+   #endif
+
+   #ifdef __arm__
+   #define __NR_sched_setattr		380
+   #define __NR_sched_getattr		381
+   #endif
+
+   static volatile int done;
+
+   struct sched_attr {
+	__u32 size;
+
+	__u32 sched_policy;
+	__u64 sched_flags;
+
+	/* SCHED_NORMAL, SCHED_BATCH */
+	__s32 sched_nice;
+
+	/* SCHED_FIFO, SCHED_RR */
+	__u32 sched_priority;
+
+	/* SCHED_DEADLINE (nsec) */
+	__u64 sched_runtime;
+	__u64 sched_deadline;
+	__u64 sched_period;
+   };
+
+   int sched_setattr(pid_t pid,
+		  const struct sched_attr *attr,
+		  unsigned int flags)
+   {
+	return syscall(__NR_sched_setattr, pid, attr, flags);
+   }
+
+   int sched_getattr(pid_t pid,
+		  struct sched_attr *attr,
+		  unsigned int size,
+		  unsigned int flags)
+   {
+	return syscall(__NR_sched_getattr, pid, attr, size, flags);
+   }
+
+   void *run_deadline(void *data)
+   {
+	struct sched_attr attr;
+	int x = 0;
+	int ret;
+	unsigned int flags = 0;
+
+	printf("deadline thread started [%ld]\n", gettid());
+
+	attr.size = sizeof(attr);
+	attr.sched_flags = 0;
+	attr.sched_nice = 0;
+	attr.sched_priority = 0;
+
+	/* This creates a 10ms/30ms reservation */
+	attr.sched_policy = SCHED_DEADLINE;
+	attr.sched_runtime = 10 * 1000 * 1000;
+	attr.sched_period = attr.sched_deadline = 30 * 1000 * 1000;
+
+	ret = sched_setattr(0, &attr, flags);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		done = 0;
+		perror("sched_setattr");
+		exit(-1);
+	}
+
+	while (!done) {
+		x++;
+	}
+
+	printf("deadline thread dies [%ld]\n", gettid());
+	return NULL;
+   }
+
+   int main (int argc, char **argv)
+   {
+	pthread_t thread;
+
+	printf("main thread [%ld]\n", gettid());
+
+	pthread_create(&thread, NULL, run_deadline, NULL);
+
+	sleep(10);
+
+	done = 1;
+	pthread_join(thread, NULL);
+
+	printf("main dies [%ld]\n", gettid());
+	return 0;
+   }
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a96c72651
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
+=============
+CFS Scheduler
+=============
+
+
+1.  OVERVIEW
+============
+
+CFS stands for "Completely Fair Scheduler," and is the new "desktop" process
+scheduler implemented by Ingo Molnar and merged in Linux 2.6.23.  It is the
+replacement for the previous vanilla scheduler's SCHED_OTHER interactivity
+code.
+
+80% of CFS's design can be summed up in a single sentence: CFS basically models
+an "ideal, precise multi-tasking CPU" on real hardware.
+
+"Ideal multi-tasking CPU" is a (non-existent  :-)) CPU that has 100% physical
+power and which can run each task at precise equal speed, in parallel, each at
+1/nr_running speed.  For example: if there are 2 tasks running, then it runs
+each at 50% physical power --- i.e., actually in parallel.
+
+On real hardware, we can run only a single task at once, so we have to
+introduce the concept of "virtual runtime."  The virtual runtime of a task
+specifies when its next timeslice would start execution on the ideal
+multi-tasking CPU described above.  In practice, the virtual runtime of a task
+is its actual runtime normalized to the total number of running tasks.
+
+
+
+2.  FEW IMPLEMENTATION DETAILS
+==============================
+
+In CFS the virtual runtime is expressed and tracked via the per-task
+p->se.vruntime (nanosec-unit) value.  This way, it's possible to accurately
+timestamp and measure the "expected CPU time" a task should have gotten.
+
+[ small detail: on "ideal" hardware, at any time all tasks would have the same
+  p->se.vruntime value --- i.e., tasks would execute simultaneously and no task
+  would ever get "out of balance" from the "ideal" share of CPU time.  ]
+
+CFS's task picking logic is based on this p->se.vruntime value and it is thus
+very simple: it always tries to run the task with the smallest p->se.vruntime
+value (i.e., the task which executed least so far).  CFS always tries to split
+up CPU time between runnable tasks as close to "ideal multitasking hardware" as
+possible.
+
+Most of the rest of CFS's design just falls out of this really simple concept,
+with a few add-on embellishments like nice levels, multiprocessing and various
+algorithm variants to recognize sleepers.
+
+
+
+3.  THE RBTREE
+==============
+
+CFS's design is quite radical: it does not use the old data structures for the
+runqueues, but it uses a time-ordered rbtree to build a "timeline" of future
+task execution, and thus has no "array switch" artifacts (by which both the
+previous vanilla scheduler and RSDL/SD are affected).
+
+CFS also maintains the rq->cfs.min_vruntime value, which is a monotonic
+increasing value tracking the smallest vruntime among all tasks in the
+runqueue.  The total amount of work done by the system is tracked using
+min_vruntime; that value is used to place newly activated entities on the left
+side of the tree as much as possible.
+
+The total number of running tasks in the runqueue is accounted through the
+rq->cfs.load value, which is the sum of the weights of the tasks queued on the
+runqueue.
+
+CFS maintains a time-ordered rbtree, where all runnable tasks are sorted by the
+p->se.vruntime key. CFS picks the "leftmost" task from this tree and sticks to it.
+As the system progresses forwards, the executed tasks are put into the tree
+more and more to the right --- slowly but surely giving a chance for every task
+to become the "leftmost task" and thus get on the CPU within a deterministic
+amount of time.
+
+Summing up, CFS works like this: it runs a task a bit, and when the task
+schedules (or a scheduler tick happens) the task's CPU usage is "accounted
+for": the (small) time it just spent using the physical CPU is added to
+p->se.vruntime.  Once p->se.vruntime gets high enough so that another task
+becomes the "leftmost task" of the time-ordered rbtree it maintains (plus a
+small amount of "granularity" distance relative to the leftmost task so that we
+do not over-schedule tasks and trash the cache), then the new leftmost task is
+picked and the current task is preempted.
+
+
+
+4.  SOME FEATURES OF CFS
+========================
+
+CFS uses nanosecond granularity accounting and does not rely on any jiffies or
+other HZ detail.  Thus the CFS scheduler has no notion of "timeslices" in the
+way the previous scheduler had, and has no heuristics whatsoever.  There is
+only one central tunable (you have to switch on CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG):
+
+   /proc/sys/kernel/sched_min_granularity_ns
+
+which can be used to tune the scheduler from "desktop" (i.e., low latencies) to
+"server" (i.e., good batching) workloads.  It defaults to a setting suitable
+for desktop workloads.  SCHED_BATCH is handled by the CFS scheduler module too.
+
+Due to its design, the CFS scheduler is not prone to any of the "attacks" that
+exist today against the heuristics of the stock scheduler: fiftyp.c, thud.c,
+chew.c, ring-test.c, massive_intr.c all work fine and do not impact
+interactivity and produce the expected behavior.
+
+The CFS scheduler has a much stronger handling of nice levels and SCHED_BATCH
+than the previous vanilla scheduler: both types of workloads are isolated much
+more aggressively.
+
+SMP load-balancing has been reworked/sanitized: the runqueue-walking
+assumptions are gone from the load-balancing code now, and iterators of the
+scheduling modules are used.  The balancing code got quite a bit simpler as a
+result.
+
+
+
+5. Scheduling policies
+======================
+
+CFS implements three scheduling policies:
+
+  - SCHED_NORMAL (traditionally called SCHED_OTHER): The scheduling
+    policy that is used for regular tasks.
+
+  - SCHED_BATCH: Does not preempt nearly as often as regular tasks
+    would, thereby allowing tasks to run longer and make better use of
+    caches but at the cost of interactivity. This is well suited for
+    batch jobs.
+
+  - SCHED_IDLE: This is even weaker than nice 19, but its not a true
+    idle timer scheduler in order to avoid to get into priority
+    inversion problems which would deadlock the machine.
+
+SCHED_FIFO/_RR are implemented in sched/rt.c and are as specified by
+POSIX.
+
+The command chrt from util-linux-ng 2.13.1.1 can set all of these except
+SCHED_IDLE.
+
+
+
+6.  SCHEDULING CLASSES
+======================
+
+The new CFS scheduler has been designed in such a way to introduce "Scheduling
+Classes," an extensible hierarchy of scheduler modules.  These modules
+encapsulate scheduling policy details and are handled by the scheduler core
+without the core code assuming too much about them.
+
+sched/fair.c implements the CFS scheduler described above.
+
+sched/rt.c implements SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR semantics, in a simpler way than
+the previous vanilla scheduler did.  It uses 100 runqueues (for all 100 RT
+priority levels, instead of 140 in the previous scheduler) and it needs no
+expired array.
+
+Scheduling classes are implemented through the sched_class structure, which
+contains hooks to functions that must be called whenever an interesting event
+occurs.
+
+This is the (partial) list of the hooks:
+
+ - enqueue_task(...)
+
+   Called when a task enters a runnable state.
+   It puts the scheduling entity (task) into the red-black tree and
+   increments the nr_running variable.
+
+ - dequeue_task(...)
+
+   When a task is no longer runnable, this function is called to keep the
+   corresponding scheduling entity out of the red-black tree.  It decrements
+   the nr_running variable.
+
+ - yield_task(...)
+
+   This function is basically just a dequeue followed by an enqueue, unless the
+   compat_yield sysctl is turned on; in that case, it places the scheduling
+   entity at the right-most end of the red-black tree.
+
+ - check_preempt_curr(...)
+
+   This function checks if a task that entered the runnable state should
+   preempt the currently running task.
+
+ - pick_next_task(...)
+
+   This function chooses the most appropriate task eligible to run next.
+
+ - set_curr_task(...)
+
+   This function is called when a task changes its scheduling class or changes
+   its task group.
+
+ - task_tick(...)
+
+   This function is mostly called from time tick functions; it might lead to
+   process switch.  This drives the running preemption.
+
+
+
+
+7.  GROUP SCHEDULER EXTENSIONS TO CFS
+=====================================
+
+Normally, the scheduler operates on individual tasks and strives to provide
+fair CPU time to each task.  Sometimes, it may be desirable to group tasks and
+provide fair CPU time to each such task group.  For example, it may be
+desirable to first provide fair CPU time to each user on the system and then to
+each task belonging to a user.
+
+CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED strives to achieve exactly that.  It lets tasks to be
+grouped and divides CPU time fairly among such groups.
+
+CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED permits to group real-time (i.e., SCHED_FIFO and
+SCHED_RR) tasks.
+
+CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED permits to group CFS (i.e., SCHED_NORMAL and
+SCHED_BATCH) tasks.
+
+   These options need CONFIG_CGROUPS to be defined, and let the administrator
+   create arbitrary groups of tasks, using the "cgroup" pseudo filesystem.  See
+   Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/cgroups.rst for more information about this filesystem.
+
+When CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED is defined, a "cpu.shares" file is created for each
+group created using the pseudo filesystem.  See example steps below to create
+task groups and modify their CPU share using the "cgroups" pseudo filesystem::
+
+	# mount -t tmpfs cgroup_root /sys/fs/cgroup
+	# mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu
+	# mount -t cgroup -ocpu none /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu
+	# cd /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu
+
+	# mkdir multimedia	# create "multimedia" group of tasks
+	# mkdir browser		# create "browser" group of tasks
+
+	# #Configure the multimedia group to receive twice the CPU bandwidth
+	# #that of browser group
+
+	# echo 2048 > multimedia/cpu.shares
+	# echo 1024 > browser/cpu.shares
+
+	# firefox &	# Launch firefox and move it to "browser" group
+	# echo <firefox_pid> > browser/tasks
+
+	# #Launch gmplayer (or your favourite movie player)
+	# echo <movie_player_pid> > multimedia/tasks
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-domains.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-domains.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5c4b7f4f0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-domains.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+=================
+Scheduler Domains
+=================
+
+Each CPU has a "base" scheduling domain (struct sched_domain). The domain
+hierarchy is built from these base domains via the ->parent pointer. ->parent
+MUST be NULL terminated, and domain structures should be per-CPU as they are
+locklessly updated.
+
+Each scheduling domain spans a number of CPUs (stored in the ->span field).
+A domain's span MUST be a superset of it child's span (this restriction could
+be relaxed if the need arises), and a base domain for CPU i MUST span at least
+i. The top domain for each CPU will generally span all CPUs in the system
+although strictly it doesn't have to, but this could lead to a case where some
+CPUs will never be given tasks to run unless the CPUs allowed mask is
+explicitly set. A sched domain's span means "balance process load among these
+CPUs".
+
+Each scheduling domain must have one or more CPU groups (struct sched_group)
+which are organised as a circular one way linked list from the ->groups
+pointer. The union of cpumasks of these groups MUST be the same as the
+domain's span. The group pointed to by the ->groups pointer MUST contain the CPU
+to which the domain belongs. Groups may be shared among CPUs as they contain
+read only data after they have been set up. The intersection of cpumasks from
+any two of these groups may be non empty. If this is the case the SD_OVERLAP
+flag is set on the corresponding scheduling domain and its groups may not be
+shared between CPUs.
+
+Balancing within a sched domain occurs between groups. That is, each group
+is treated as one entity. The load of a group is defined as the sum of the
+load of each of its member CPUs, and only when the load of a group becomes
+out of balance are tasks moved between groups.
+
+In kernel/sched/core.c, trigger_load_balance() is run periodically on each CPU
+through scheduler_tick(). It raises a softirq after the next regularly scheduled
+rebalancing event for the current runqueue has arrived. The actual load
+balancing workhorse, run_rebalance_domains()->rebalance_domains(), is then run
+in softirq context (SCHED_SOFTIRQ).
+
+The latter function takes two arguments: the current CPU and whether it was idle
+at the time the scheduler_tick() happened and iterates over all sched domains
+our CPU is on, starting from its base domain and going up the ->parent chain.
+While doing that, it checks to see if the current domain has exhausted its
+rebalance interval. If so, it runs load_balance() on that domain. It then checks
+the parent sched_domain (if it exists), and the parent of the parent and so
+forth.
+
+Initially, load_balance() finds the busiest group in the current sched domain.
+If it succeeds, it looks for the busiest runqueue of all the CPUs' runqueues in
+that group. If it manages to find such a runqueue, it locks both our initial
+CPU's runqueue and the newly found busiest one and starts moving tasks from it
+to our runqueue. The exact number of tasks amounts to an imbalance previously
+computed while iterating over this sched domain's groups.
+
+Implementing sched domains
+==========================
+
+The "base" domain will "span" the first level of the hierarchy. In the case
+of SMT, you'll span all siblings of the physical CPU, with each group being
+a single virtual CPU.
+
+In SMP, the parent of the base domain will span all physical CPUs in the
+node. Each group being a single physical CPU. Then with NUMA, the parent
+of the SMP domain will span the entire machine, with each group having the
+cpumask of a node. Or, you could do multi-level NUMA or Opteron, for example,
+might have just one domain covering its one NUMA level.
+
+The implementor should read comments in include/linux/sched.h:
+struct sched_domain fields, SD_FLAG_*, SD_*_INIT to get an idea of
+the specifics and what to tune.
+
+Architectures may retain the regular override the default SD_*_INIT flags
+while using the generic domain builder in kernel/sched/core.c if they wish to
+retain the traditional SMT->SMP->NUMA topology (or some subset of that). This
+can be done by #define'ing ARCH_HASH_SCHED_TUNE.
+
+Alternatively, the architecture may completely override the generic domain
+builder by #define'ing ARCH_HASH_SCHED_DOMAIN, and exporting your
+arch_init_sched_domains function. This function will attach domains to all
+CPUs using cpu_attach_domain.
+
+The sched-domains debugging infrastructure can be enabled by enabling
+CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG. This enables an error checking parse of the sched domains
+which should catch most possible errors (described above). It also prints out
+the domain structure in a visual format.
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..001e09c95
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,422 @@
+=======================
+Energy Aware Scheduling
+=======================
+
+1. Introduction
+---------------
+
+Energy Aware Scheduling (or EAS) gives the scheduler the ability to predict
+the impact of its decisions on the energy consumed by CPUs. EAS relies on an
+Energy Model (EM) of the CPUs to select an energy efficient CPU for each task,
+with a minimal impact on throughput. This document aims at providing an
+introduction on how EAS works, what are the main design decisions behind it, and
+details what is needed to get it to run.
+
+Before going any further, please note that at the time of writing::
+
+   /!\ EAS does not support platforms with symmetric CPU topologies /!\
+
+EAS operates only on heterogeneous CPU topologies (such as Arm big.LITTLE)
+because this is where the potential for saving energy through scheduling is
+the highest.
+
+The actual EM used by EAS is _not_ maintained by the scheduler, but by a
+dedicated framework. For details about this framework and what it provides,
+please refer to its documentation (see Documentation/power/energy-model.rst).
+
+
+2. Background and Terminology
+-----------------------------
+
+To make it clear from the start:
+ - energy = [joule] (resource like a battery on powered devices)
+ - power = energy/time = [joule/second] = [watt]
+
+The goal of EAS is to minimize energy, while still getting the job done. That
+is, we want to maximize::
+
+	performance [inst/s]
+	--------------------
+	    power [W]
+
+which is equivalent to minimizing::
+
+	energy [J]
+	-----------
+	instruction
+
+while still getting 'good' performance. It is essentially an alternative
+optimization objective to the current performance-only objective for the
+scheduler. This alternative considers two objectives: energy-efficiency and
+performance.
+
+The idea behind introducing an EM is to allow the scheduler to evaluate the
+implications of its decisions rather than blindly applying energy-saving
+techniques that may have positive effects only on some platforms. At the same
+time, the EM must be as simple as possible to minimize the scheduler latency
+impact.
+
+In short, EAS changes the way CFS tasks are assigned to CPUs. When it is time
+for the scheduler to decide where a task should run (during wake-up), the EM
+is used to break the tie between several good CPU candidates and pick the one
+that is predicted to yield the best energy consumption without harming the
+system's throughput. The predictions made by EAS rely on specific elements of
+knowledge about the platform's topology, which include the 'capacity' of CPUs,
+and their respective energy costs.
+
+
+3. Topology information
+-----------------------
+
+EAS (as well as the rest of the scheduler) uses the notion of 'capacity' to
+differentiate CPUs with different computing throughput. The 'capacity' of a CPU
+represents the amount of work it can absorb when running at its highest
+frequency compared to the most capable CPU of the system. Capacity values are
+normalized in a 1024 range, and are comparable with the utilization signals of
+tasks and CPUs computed by the Per-Entity Load Tracking (PELT) mechanism. Thanks
+to capacity and utilization values, EAS is able to estimate how big/busy a
+task/CPU is, and to take this into consideration when evaluating performance vs
+energy trade-offs. The capacity of CPUs is provided via arch-specific code
+through the arch_scale_cpu_capacity() callback.
+
+The rest of platform knowledge used by EAS is directly read from the Energy
+Model (EM) framework. The EM of a platform is composed of a power cost table
+per 'performance domain' in the system (see Documentation/power/energy-model.rst
+for futher details about performance domains).
+
+The scheduler manages references to the EM objects in the topology code when the
+scheduling domains are built, or re-built. For each root domain (rd), the
+scheduler maintains a singly linked list of all performance domains intersecting
+the current rd->span. Each node in the list contains a pointer to a struct
+em_perf_domain as provided by the EM framework.
+
+The lists are attached to the root domains in order to cope with exclusive
+cpuset configurations. Since the boundaries of exclusive cpusets do not
+necessarily match those of performance domains, the lists of different root
+domains can contain duplicate elements.
+
+Example 1.
+    Let us consider a platform with 12 CPUs, split in 3 performance domains
+    (pd0, pd4 and pd8), organized as follows::
+
+	          CPUs:   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
+	          PDs:   |--pd0--|--pd4--|---pd8---|
+	          RDs:   |----rd1----|-----rd2-----|
+
+    Now, consider that userspace decided to split the system with two
+    exclusive cpusets, hence creating two independent root domains, each
+    containing 6 CPUs. The two root domains are denoted rd1 and rd2 in the
+    above figure. Since pd4 intersects with both rd1 and rd2, it will be
+    present in the linked list '->pd' attached to each of them:
+
+       * rd1->pd: pd0 -> pd4
+       * rd2->pd: pd4 -> pd8
+
+    Please note that the scheduler will create two duplicate list nodes for
+    pd4 (one for each list). However, both just hold a pointer to the same
+    shared data structure of the EM framework.
+
+Since the access to these lists can happen concurrently with hotplug and other
+things, they are protected by RCU, like the rest of topology structures
+manipulated by the scheduler.
+
+EAS also maintains a static key (sched_energy_present) which is enabled when at
+least one root domain meets all conditions for EAS to start. Those conditions
+are summarized in Section 6.
+
+
+4. Energy-Aware task placement
+------------------------------
+
+EAS overrides the CFS task wake-up balancing code. It uses the EM of the
+platform and the PELT signals to choose an energy-efficient target CPU during
+wake-up balance. When EAS is enabled, select_task_rq_fair() calls
+find_energy_efficient_cpu() to do the placement decision. This function looks
+for the CPU with the highest spare capacity (CPU capacity - CPU utilization) in
+each performance domain since it is the one which will allow us to keep the
+frequency the lowest. Then, the function checks if placing the task there could
+save energy compared to leaving it on prev_cpu, i.e. the CPU where the task ran
+in its previous activation.
+
+find_energy_efficient_cpu() uses compute_energy() to estimate what will be the
+energy consumed by the system if the waking task was migrated. compute_energy()
+looks at the current utilization landscape of the CPUs and adjusts it to
+'simulate' the task migration. The EM framework provides the em_pd_energy() API
+which computes the expected energy consumption of each performance domain for
+the given utilization landscape.
+
+An example of energy-optimized task placement decision is detailed below.
+
+Example 2.
+    Let us consider a (fake) platform with 2 independent performance domains
+    composed of two CPUs each. CPU0 and CPU1 are little CPUs; CPU2 and CPU3
+    are big.
+
+    The scheduler must decide where to place a task P whose util_avg = 200
+    and prev_cpu = 0.
+
+    The current utilization landscape of the CPUs is depicted on the graph
+    below. CPUs 0-3 have a util_avg of 400, 100, 600 and 500 respectively
+    Each performance domain has three Operating Performance Points (OPPs).
+    The CPU capacity and power cost associated with each OPP is listed in
+    the Energy Model table. The util_avg of P is shown on the figures
+    below as 'PP'::
+
+     CPU util.
+      1024                 - - - - - - -              Energy Model
+                                               +-----------+-------------+
+                                               |  Little   |     Big     |
+       768                 =============       +-----+-----+------+------+
+                                               | Cap | Pwr | Cap  | Pwr  |
+                                               +-----+-----+------+------+
+       512  ===========    - ##- - - - -       | 170 | 50  | 512  | 400  |
+                             ##     ##         | 341 | 150 | 768  | 800  |
+       341  -PP - - - -      ##     ##         | 512 | 300 | 1024 | 1700 |
+             PP              ##     ##         +-----+-----+------+------+
+       170  -## - - - -      ##     ##
+             ##     ##       ##     ##
+           ------------    -------------
+            CPU0   CPU1     CPU2   CPU3
+
+      Current OPP: =====       Other OPP: - - -     util_avg (100 each): ##
+
+
+    find_energy_efficient_cpu() will first look for the CPUs with the
+    maximum spare capacity in the two performance domains. In this example,
+    CPU1 and CPU3. Then it will estimate the energy of the system if P was
+    placed on either of them, and check if that would save some energy
+    compared to leaving P on CPU0. EAS assumes that OPPs follow utilization
+    (which is coherent with the behaviour of the schedutil CPUFreq
+    governor, see Section 6. for more details on this topic).
+
+    **Case 1. P is migrated to CPU1**::
+
+      1024                 - - - - - - -
+
+                                            Energy calculation:
+       768                 =============     * CPU0: 200 / 341 * 150 = 88
+                                             * CPU1: 300 / 341 * 150 = 131
+                                             * CPU2: 600 / 768 * 800 = 625
+       512  - - - - - -    - ##- - - - -     * CPU3: 500 / 768 * 800 = 520
+                             ##     ##          => total_energy = 1364
+       341  ===========      ##     ##
+                    PP       ##     ##
+       170  -## - - PP-      ##     ##
+             ##     ##       ##     ##
+           ------------    -------------
+            CPU0   CPU1     CPU2   CPU3
+
+
+    **Case 2. P is migrated to CPU3**::
+
+      1024                 - - - - - - -
+
+                                            Energy calculation:
+       768                 =============     * CPU0: 200 / 341 * 150 = 88
+                                             * CPU1: 100 / 341 * 150 = 43
+                                    PP       * CPU2: 600 / 768 * 800 = 625
+       512  - - - - - -    - ##- - -PP -     * CPU3: 700 / 768 * 800 = 729
+                             ##     ##          => total_energy = 1485
+       341  ===========      ##     ##
+                             ##     ##
+       170  -## - - - -      ##     ##
+             ##     ##       ##     ##
+           ------------    -------------
+            CPU0   CPU1     CPU2   CPU3
+
+
+    **Case 3. P stays on prev_cpu / CPU 0**::
+
+      1024                 - - - - - - -
+
+                                            Energy calculation:
+       768                 =============     * CPU0: 400 / 512 * 300 = 234
+                                             * CPU1: 100 / 512 * 300 = 58
+                                             * CPU2: 600 / 768 * 800 = 625
+       512  ===========    - ##- - - - -     * CPU3: 500 / 768 * 800 = 520
+                             ##     ##          => total_energy = 1437
+       341  -PP - - - -      ##     ##
+             PP              ##     ##
+       170  -## - - - -      ##     ##
+             ##     ##       ##     ##
+           ------------    -------------
+            CPU0   CPU1     CPU2   CPU3
+
+
+    From these calculations, the Case 1 has the lowest total energy. So CPU 1
+    is be the best candidate from an energy-efficiency standpoint.
+
+Big CPUs are generally more power hungry than the little ones and are thus used
+mainly when a task doesn't fit the littles. However, little CPUs aren't always
+necessarily more energy-efficient than big CPUs. For some systems, the high OPPs
+of the little CPUs can be less energy-efficient than the lowest OPPs of the
+bigs, for example. So, if the little CPUs happen to have enough utilization at
+a specific point in time, a small task waking up at that moment could be better
+of executing on the big side in order to save energy, even though it would fit
+on the little side.
+
+And even in the case where all OPPs of the big CPUs are less energy-efficient
+than those of the little, using the big CPUs for a small task might still, under
+specific conditions, save energy. Indeed, placing a task on a little CPU can
+result in raising the OPP of the entire performance domain, and that will
+increase the cost of the tasks already running there. If the waking task is
+placed on a big CPU, its own execution cost might be higher than if it was
+running on a little, but it won't impact the other tasks of the little CPUs
+which will keep running at a lower OPP. So, when considering the total energy
+consumed by CPUs, the extra cost of running that one task on a big core can be
+smaller than the cost of raising the OPP on the little CPUs for all the other
+tasks.
+
+The examples above would be nearly impossible to get right in a generic way, and
+for all platforms, without knowing the cost of running at different OPPs on all
+CPUs of the system. Thanks to its EM-based design, EAS should cope with them
+correctly without too many troubles. However, in order to ensure a minimal
+impact on throughput for high-utilization scenarios, EAS also implements another
+mechanism called 'over-utilization'.
+
+
+5. Over-utilization
+-------------------
+
+From a general standpoint, the use-cases where EAS can help the most are those
+involving a light/medium CPU utilization. Whenever long CPU-bound tasks are
+being run, they will require all of the available CPU capacity, and there isn't
+much that can be done by the scheduler to save energy without severly harming
+throughput. In order to avoid hurting performance with EAS, CPUs are flagged as
+'over-utilized' as soon as they are used at more than 80% of their compute
+capacity. As long as no CPUs are over-utilized in a root domain, load balancing
+is disabled and EAS overridess the wake-up balancing code. EAS is likely to load
+the most energy efficient CPUs of the system more than the others if that can be
+done without harming throughput. So, the load-balancer is disabled to prevent
+it from breaking the energy-efficient task placement found by EAS. It is safe to
+do so when the system isn't overutilized since being below the 80% tipping point
+implies that:
+
+    a. there is some idle time on all CPUs, so the utilization signals used by
+       EAS are likely to accurately represent the 'size' of the various tasks
+       in the system;
+    b. all tasks should already be provided with enough CPU capacity,
+       regardless of their nice values;
+    c. since there is spare capacity all tasks must be blocking/sleeping
+       regularly and balancing at wake-up is sufficient.
+
+As soon as one CPU goes above the 80% tipping point, at least one of the three
+assumptions above becomes incorrect. In this scenario, the 'overutilized' flag
+is raised for the entire root domain, EAS is disabled, and the load-balancer is
+re-enabled. By doing so, the scheduler falls back onto load-based algorithms for
+wake-up and load balance under CPU-bound conditions. This provides a better
+respect of the nice values of tasks.
+
+Since the notion of overutilization largely relies on detecting whether or not
+there is some idle time in the system, the CPU capacity 'stolen' by higher
+(than CFS) scheduling classes (as well as IRQ) must be taken into account. As
+such, the detection of overutilization accounts for the capacity used not only
+by CFS tasks, but also by the other scheduling classes and IRQ.
+
+
+6. Dependencies and requirements for EAS
+----------------------------------------
+
+Energy Aware Scheduling depends on the CPUs of the system having specific
+hardware properties and on other features of the kernel being enabled. This
+section lists these dependencies and provides hints as to how they can be met.
+
+
+6.1 - Asymmetric CPU topology
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+
+As mentioned in the introduction, EAS is only supported on platforms with
+asymmetric CPU topologies for now. This requirement is checked at run-time by
+looking for the presence of the SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY flag when the scheduling
+domains are built.
+
+See Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst for requirements to be met for this
+flag to be set in the sched_domain hierarchy.
+
+Please note that EAS is not fundamentally incompatible with SMP, but no
+significant savings on SMP platforms have been observed yet. This restriction
+could be amended in the future if proven otherwise.
+
+
+6.2 - Energy Model presence
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+EAS uses the EM of a platform to estimate the impact of scheduling decisions on
+energy. So, your platform must provide power cost tables to the EM framework in
+order to make EAS start. To do so, please refer to documentation of the
+independent EM framework in Documentation/power/energy-model.rst.
+
+Please also note that the scheduling domains need to be re-built after the
+EM has been registered in order to start EAS.
+
+
+6.3 - Energy Model complexity
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+The task wake-up path is very latency-sensitive. When the EM of a platform is
+too complex (too many CPUs, too many performance domains, too many performance
+states, ...), the cost of using it in the wake-up path can become prohibitive.
+The energy-aware wake-up algorithm has a complexity of:
+
+	C = Nd * (Nc + Ns)
+
+with: Nd the number of performance domains; Nc the number of CPUs; and Ns the
+total number of OPPs (ex: for two perf. domains with 4 OPPs each, Ns = 8).
+
+A complexity check is performed at the root domain level, when scheduling
+domains are built. EAS will not start on a root domain if its C happens to be
+higher than the completely arbitrary EM_MAX_COMPLEXITY threshold (2048 at the
+time of writing).
+
+If you really want to use EAS but the complexity of your platform's Energy
+Model is too high to be used with a single root domain, you're left with only
+two possible options:
+
+    1. split your system into separate, smaller, root domains using exclusive
+       cpusets and enable EAS locally on each of them. This option has the
+       benefit to work out of the box but the drawback of preventing load
+       balance between root domains, which can result in an unbalanced system
+       overall;
+    2. submit patches to reduce the complexity of the EAS wake-up algorithm,
+       hence enabling it to cope with larger EMs in reasonable time.
+
+
+6.4 - Schedutil governor
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+EAS tries to predict at which OPP will the CPUs be running in the close future
+in order to estimate their energy consumption. To do so, it is assumed that OPPs
+of CPUs follow their utilization.
+
+Although it is very difficult to provide hard guarantees regarding the accuracy
+of this assumption in practice (because the hardware might not do what it is
+told to do, for example), schedutil as opposed to other CPUFreq governors at
+least _requests_ frequencies calculated using the utilization signals.
+Consequently, the only sane governor to use together with EAS is schedutil,
+because it is the only one providing some degree of consistency between
+frequency requests and energy predictions.
+
+Using EAS with any other governor than schedutil is not supported.
+
+
+6.5 Scale-invariant utilization signals
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+In order to make accurate prediction across CPUs and for all performance
+states, EAS needs frequency-invariant and CPU-invariant PELT signals. These can
+be obtained using the architecture-defined arch_scale{cpu,freq}_capacity()
+callbacks.
+
+Using EAS on a platform that doesn't implement these two callbacks is not
+supported.
+
+
+6.6 Multithreading (SMT)
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+EAS in its current form is SMT unaware and is not able to leverage
+multithreaded hardware to save energy. EAS considers threads as independent
+CPUs, which can actually be counter-productive for both performance and energy.
+
+EAS on SMT is not supported.
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-nice-design.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-nice-design.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0571f1b47
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-nice-design.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+=====================
+Scheduler Nice Design
+=====================
+
+This document explains the thinking about the revamped and streamlined
+nice-levels implementation in the new Linux scheduler.
+
+Nice levels were always pretty weak under Linux and people continuously
+pestered us to make nice +19 tasks use up much less CPU time.
+
+Unfortunately that was not that easy to implement under the old
+scheduler, (otherwise we'd have done it long ago) because nice level
+support was historically coupled to timeslice length, and timeslice
+units were driven by the HZ tick, so the smallest timeslice was 1/HZ.
+
+In the O(1) scheduler (in 2003) we changed negative nice levels to be
+much stronger than they were before in 2.4 (and people were happy about
+that change), and we also intentionally calibrated the linear timeslice
+rule so that nice +19 level would be _exactly_ 1 jiffy. To better
+understand it, the timeslice graph went like this (cheesy ASCII art
+alert!)::
+
+
+                   A
+             \     | [timeslice length]
+              \    |
+               \   |
+                \  |
+                 \ |
+                  \|___100msecs
+                   |^ . _
+                   |      ^ . _
+                   |            ^ . _
+ -*----------------------------------*-----> [nice level]
+ -20               |                +19
+                   |
+                   |
+
+So that if someone wanted to really renice tasks, +19 would give a much
+bigger hit than the normal linear rule would do. (The solution of
+changing the ABI to extend priorities was discarded early on.)
+
+This approach worked to some degree for some time, but later on with
+HZ=1000 it caused 1 jiffy to be 1 msec, which meant 0.1% CPU usage which
+we felt to be a bit excessive. Excessive _not_ because it's too small of
+a CPU utilization, but because it causes too frequent (once per
+millisec) rescheduling. (and would thus trash the cache, etc. Remember,
+this was long ago when hardware was weaker and caches were smaller, and
+people were running number crunching apps at nice +19.)
+
+So for HZ=1000 we changed nice +19 to 5msecs, because that felt like the
+right minimal granularity - and this translates to 5% CPU utilization.
+But the fundamental HZ-sensitive property for nice+19 still remained,
+and we never got a single complaint about nice +19 being too _weak_ in
+terms of CPU utilization, we only got complaints about it (still) being
+too _strong_ :-)
+
+To sum it up: we always wanted to make nice levels more consistent, but
+within the constraints of HZ and jiffies and their nasty design level
+coupling to timeslices and granularity it was not really viable.
+
+The second (less frequent but still periodically occurring) complaint
+about Linux's nice level support was its assymetry around the origo
+(which you can see demonstrated in the picture above), or more
+accurately: the fact that nice level behavior depended on the _absolute_
+nice level as well, while the nice API itself is fundamentally
+"relative":
+
+   int nice(int inc);
+
+   asmlinkage long sys_nice(int increment)
+
+(the first one is the glibc API, the second one is the syscall API.)
+Note that the 'inc' is relative to the current nice level. Tools like
+bash's "nice" command mirror this relative API.
+
+With the old scheduler, if you for example started a niced task with +1
+and another task with +2, the CPU split between the two tasks would
+depend on the nice level of the parent shell - if it was at nice -10 the
+CPU split was different than if it was at +5 or +10.
+
+A third complaint against Linux's nice level support was that negative
+nice levels were not 'punchy enough', so lots of people had to resort to
+run audio (and other multimedia) apps under RT priorities such as
+SCHED_FIFO. But this caused other problems: SCHED_FIFO is not starvation
+proof, and a buggy SCHED_FIFO app can also lock up the system for good.
+
+The new scheduler in v2.6.23 addresses all three types of complaints:
+
+To address the first complaint (of nice levels being not "punchy"
+enough), the scheduler was decoupled from 'time slice' and HZ concepts
+(and granularity was made a separate concept from nice levels) and thus
+it was possible to implement better and more consistent nice +19
+support: with the new scheduler nice +19 tasks get a HZ-independent
+1.5%, instead of the variable 3%-5%-9% range they got in the old
+scheduler.
+
+To address the second complaint (of nice levels not being consistent),
+the new scheduler makes nice(1) have the same CPU utilization effect on
+tasks, regardless of their absolute nice levels. So on the new
+scheduler, running a nice +10 and a nice 11 task has the same CPU
+utilization "split" between them as running a nice -5 and a nice -4
+task. (one will get 55% of the CPU, the other 45%.) That is why nice
+levels were changed to be "multiplicative" (or exponential) - that way
+it does not matter which nice level you start out from, the 'relative
+result' will always be the same.
+
+The third complaint (of negative nice levels not being "punchy" enough
+and forcing audio apps to run under the more dangerous SCHED_FIFO
+scheduling policy) is addressed by the new scheduler almost
+automatically: stronger negative nice levels are an automatic
+side-effect of the recalibrated dynamic range of nice levels.
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-pelt.c b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-pelt.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7238b3559
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-pelt.c
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+/*
+ * The following program is used to generate the constants for
+ * computing sched averages.
+ *
+ * ==============================================================
+ *		C program (compile with -lm)
+ * ==============================================================
+ */
+
+#include <math.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+#define HALFLIFE 32
+#define SHIFT 32
+
+double y;
+
+void calc_runnable_avg_yN_inv(void)
+{
+	int i;
+	unsigned int x;
+
+	/* To silence -Wunused-but-set-variable warnings. */
+	printf("static const u32 runnable_avg_yN_inv[] __maybe_unused = {");
+	for (i = 0; i < HALFLIFE; i++) {
+		x = ((1UL<<32)-1)*pow(y, i);
+
+		if (i % 6 == 0) printf("\n\t");
+		printf("0x%8x, ", x);
+	}
+	printf("\n};\n\n");
+}
+
+int sum = 1024;
+
+void calc_runnable_avg_yN_sum(void)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	printf("static const u32 runnable_avg_yN_sum[] = {\n\t    0,");
+	for (i = 1; i <= HALFLIFE; i++) {
+		if (i == 1)
+			sum *= y;
+		else
+			sum = sum*y + 1024*y;
+
+		if (i % 11 == 0)
+			printf("\n\t");
+
+		printf("%5d,", sum);
+	}
+	printf("\n};\n\n");
+}
+
+int n = -1;
+/* first period */
+long max = 1024;
+
+void calc_converged_max(void)
+{
+	long last = 0, y_inv = ((1UL<<32)-1)*y;
+
+	for (; ; n++) {
+		if (n > -1)
+			max = ((max*y_inv)>>SHIFT) + 1024;
+			/*
+			 * This is the same as:
+			 * max = max*y + 1024;
+			 */
+
+		if (last == max)
+			break;
+
+		last = max;
+	}
+	n--;
+	printf("#define LOAD_AVG_PERIOD %d\n", HALFLIFE);
+	printf("#define LOAD_AVG_MAX %ld\n", max);
+//	printf("#define LOAD_AVG_MAX_N %d\n\n", n);
+}
+
+void calc_accumulated_sum_32(void)
+{
+	int i, x = sum;
+
+	printf("static const u32 __accumulated_sum_N32[] = {\n\t     0,");
+	for (i = 1; i <= n/HALFLIFE+1; i++) {
+		if (i > 1)
+			x = x/2 + sum;
+
+		if (i % 6 == 0)
+			printf("\n\t");
+
+		printf("%6d,", x);
+	}
+	printf("\n};\n\n");
+}
+
+void main(void)
+{
+	printf("/* Generated by Documentation/scheduler/sched-pelt; do not modify. */\n\n");
+
+	y = pow(0.5, 1/(double)HALFLIFE);
+
+	calc_runnable_avg_yN_inv();
+//	calc_runnable_avg_yN_sum();
+	calc_converged_max();
+//	calc_accumulated_sum_32();
+}
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..655a096ec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+==========================
+Real-Time group scheduling
+==========================
+
+.. CONTENTS
+
+   0. WARNING
+   1. Overview
+     1.1 The problem
+     1.2 The solution
+   2. The interface
+     2.1 System-wide settings
+     2.2 Default behaviour
+     2.3 Basis for grouping tasks
+   3. Future plans
+
+
+0. WARNING
+==========
+
+ Fiddling with these settings can result in an unstable system, the knobs are
+ root only and assumes root knows what he is doing.
+
+Most notable:
+
+ * very small values in sched_rt_period_us can result in an unstable
+   system when the period is smaller than either the available hrtimer
+   resolution, or the time it takes to handle the budget refresh itself.
+
+ * very small values in sched_rt_runtime_us can result in an unstable
+   system when the runtime is so small the system has difficulty making
+   forward progress (NOTE: the migration thread and kstopmachine both
+   are real-time processes).
+
+1. Overview
+===========
+
+
+1.1 The problem
+---------------
+
+Realtime scheduling is all about determinism, a group has to be able to rely on
+the amount of bandwidth (eg. CPU time) being constant. In order to schedule
+multiple groups of realtime tasks, each group must be assigned a fixed portion
+of the CPU time available.  Without a minimum guarantee a realtime group can
+obviously fall short. A fuzzy upper limit is of no use since it cannot be
+relied upon. Which leaves us with just the single fixed portion.
+
+1.2 The solution
+----------------
+
+CPU time is divided by means of specifying how much time can be spent running
+in a given period. We allocate this "run time" for each realtime group which
+the other realtime groups will not be permitted to use.
+
+Any time not allocated to a realtime group will be used to run normal priority
+tasks (SCHED_OTHER). Any allocated run time not used will also be picked up by
+SCHED_OTHER.
+
+Let's consider an example: a frame fixed realtime renderer must deliver 25
+frames a second, which yields a period of 0.04s per frame. Now say it will also
+have to play some music and respond to input, leaving it with around 80% CPU
+time dedicated for the graphics. We can then give this group a run time of 0.8
+* 0.04s = 0.032s.
+
+This way the graphics group will have a 0.04s period with a 0.032s run time
+limit. Now if the audio thread needs to refill the DMA buffer every 0.005s, but
+needs only about 3% CPU time to do so, it can do with a 0.03 * 0.005s =
+0.00015s. So this group can be scheduled with a period of 0.005s and a run time
+of 0.00015s.
+
+The remaining CPU time will be used for user input and other tasks. Because
+realtime tasks have explicitly allocated the CPU time they need to perform
+their tasks, buffer underruns in the graphics or audio can be eliminated.
+
+NOTE: the above example is not fully implemented yet. We still
+lack an EDF scheduler to make non-uniform periods usable.
+
+
+2. The Interface
+================
+
+
+2.1 System wide settings
+------------------------
+
+The system wide settings are configured under the /proc virtual file system:
+
+/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us:
+  The scheduling period that is equivalent to 100% CPU bandwidth
+
+/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us:
+  A global limit on how much time realtime scheduling may use.  Even without
+  CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED enabled, this will limit time reserved to realtime
+  processes. With CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED it signifies the total bandwidth
+  available to all realtime groups.
+
+  * Time is specified in us because the interface is s32. This gives an
+    operating range from 1us to about 35 minutes.
+  * sched_rt_period_us takes values from 1 to INT_MAX.
+  * sched_rt_runtime_us takes values from -1 to (INT_MAX - 1).
+  * A run time of -1 specifies runtime == period, ie. no limit.
+
+
+2.2 Default behaviour
+---------------------
+
+The default values for sched_rt_period_us (1000000 or 1s) and
+sched_rt_runtime_us (950000 or 0.95s).  This gives 0.05s to be used by
+SCHED_OTHER (non-RT tasks). These defaults were chosen so that a run-away
+realtime tasks will not lock up the machine but leave a little time to recover
+it.  By setting runtime to -1 you'd get the old behaviour back.
+
+By default all bandwidth is assigned to the root group and new groups get the
+period from /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us and a run time of 0. If you
+want to assign bandwidth to another group, reduce the root group's bandwidth
+and assign some or all of the difference to another group.
+
+Realtime group scheduling means you have to assign a portion of total CPU
+bandwidth to the group before it will accept realtime tasks. Therefore you will
+not be able to run realtime tasks as any user other than root until you have
+done that, even if the user has the rights to run processes with realtime
+priority!
+
+
+2.3 Basis for grouping tasks
+----------------------------
+
+Enabling CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED lets you explicitly allocate real
+CPU bandwidth to task groups.
+
+This uses the cgroup virtual file system and "<cgroup>/cpu.rt_runtime_us"
+to control the CPU time reserved for each control group.
+
+For more information on working with control groups, you should read
+Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/cgroups.rst as well.
+
+Group settings are checked against the following limits in order to keep the
+configuration schedulable:
+
+   \Sum_{i} runtime_{i} / global_period <= global_runtime / global_period
+
+For now, this can be simplified to just the following (but see Future plans):
+
+   \Sum_{i} runtime_{i} <= global_runtime
+
+
+3. Future plans
+===============
+
+There is work in progress to make the scheduling period for each group
+("<cgroup>/cpu.rt_period_us") configurable as well.
+
+The constraint on the period is that a subgroup must have a smaller or
+equal period to its parent. But realistically its not very useful _yet_
+as its prone to starvation without deadline scheduling.
+
+Consider two sibling groups A and B; both have 50% bandwidth, but A's
+period is twice the length of B's.
+
+* group A: period=100000us, runtime=50000us
+
+	- this runs for 0.05s once every 0.1s
+
+* group B: period= 50000us, runtime=25000us
+
+	- this runs for 0.025s twice every 0.1s (or once every 0.05 sec).
+
+This means that currently a while (1) loop in A will run for the full period of
+B and can starve B's tasks (assuming they are of lower priority) for a whole
+period.
+
+The next project will be SCHED_EDF (Earliest Deadline First scheduling) to bring
+full deadline scheduling to the linux kernel. Deadline scheduling the above
+groups and treating end of the period as a deadline will ensure that they both
+get their allocated time.
+
+Implementing SCHED_EDF might take a while to complete. Priority Inheritance is
+the biggest challenge as the current linux PI infrastructure is geared towards
+the limited static priority levels 0-99. With deadline scheduling you need to
+do deadline inheritance (since priority is inversely proportional to the
+deadline delta (deadline - now)).
+
+This means the whole PI machinery will have to be reworked - and that is one of
+the most complex pieces of code we have.
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-stats.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-stats.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..dd9b99a02
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-stats.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
+====================
+Scheduler Statistics
+====================
+
+Version 15 of schedstats dropped counters for some sched_yield:
+yld_exp_empty, yld_act_empty and yld_both_empty. Otherwise, it is
+identical to version 14.
+
+Version 14 of schedstats includes support for sched_domains, which hit the
+mainline kernel in 2.6.20 although it is identical to the stats from version
+12 which was in the kernel from 2.6.13-2.6.19 (version 13 never saw a kernel
+release).  Some counters make more sense to be per-runqueue; other to be
+per-domain.  Note that domains (and their associated information) will only
+be pertinent and available on machines utilizing CONFIG_SMP.
+
+In version 14 of schedstat, there is at least one level of domain
+statistics for each cpu listed, and there may well be more than one
+domain.  Domains have no particular names in this implementation, but
+the highest numbered one typically arbitrates balancing across all the
+cpus on the machine, while domain0 is the most tightly focused domain,
+sometimes balancing only between pairs of cpus.  At this time, there
+are no architectures which need more than three domain levels. The first
+field in the domain stats is a bit map indicating which cpus are affected
+by that domain.
+
+These fields are counters, and only increment.  Programs which make use
+of these will need to start with a baseline observation and then calculate
+the change in the counters at each subsequent observation.  A perl script
+which does this for many of the fields is available at
+
+    http://eaglet.pdxhosts.com/rick/linux/schedstat/
+
+Note that any such script will necessarily be version-specific, as the main
+reason to change versions is changes in the output format.  For those wishing
+to write their own scripts, the fields are described here.
+
+CPU statistics
+--------------
+cpu<N> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
+
+First field is a sched_yield() statistic:
+
+     1) # of times sched_yield() was called
+
+Next three are schedule() statistics:
+
+     2) This field is a legacy array expiration count field used in the O(1)
+	scheduler. We kept it for ABI compatibility, but it is always set to zero.
+     3) # of times schedule() was called
+     4) # of times schedule() left the processor idle
+
+Next two are try_to_wake_up() statistics:
+
+     5) # of times try_to_wake_up() was called
+     6) # of times try_to_wake_up() was called to wake up the local cpu
+
+Next three are statistics describing scheduling latency:
+
+     7) sum of all time spent running by tasks on this processor (in jiffies)
+     8) sum of all time spent waiting to run by tasks on this processor (in
+        jiffies)
+     9) # of timeslices run on this cpu
+
+
+Domain statistics
+-----------------
+One of these is produced per domain for each cpu described. (Note that if
+CONFIG_SMP is not defined, *no* domains are utilized and these lines
+will not appear in the output.)
+
+domain<N> <cpumask> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
+
+The first field is a bit mask indicating what cpus this domain operates over.
+
+The next 24 are a variety of load_balance() statistics in grouped into types
+of idleness (idle, busy, and newly idle):
+
+    1)  # of times in this domain load_balance() was called when the
+        cpu was idle
+    2)  # of times in this domain load_balance() checked but found
+        the load did not require balancing when the cpu was idle
+    3)  # of times in this domain load_balance() tried to move one or
+        more tasks and failed, when the cpu was idle
+    4)  sum of imbalances discovered (if any) with each call to
+        load_balance() in this domain when the cpu was idle
+    5)  # of times in this domain pull_task() was called when the cpu
+        was idle
+    6)  # of times in this domain pull_task() was called even though
+        the target task was cache-hot when idle
+    7)  # of times in this domain load_balance() was called but did
+        not find a busier queue while the cpu was idle
+    8)  # of times in this domain a busier queue was found while the
+        cpu was idle but no busier group was found
+    9)  # of times in this domain load_balance() was called when the
+        cpu was busy
+    10) # of times in this domain load_balance() checked but found the
+        load did not require balancing when busy
+    11) # of times in this domain load_balance() tried to move one or
+        more tasks and failed, when the cpu was busy
+    12) sum of imbalances discovered (if any) with each call to
+        load_balance() in this domain when the cpu was busy
+    13) # of times in this domain pull_task() was called when busy
+    14) # of times in this domain pull_task() was called even though the
+        target task was cache-hot when busy
+    15) # of times in this domain load_balance() was called but did not
+        find a busier queue while the cpu was busy
+    16) # of times in this domain a busier queue was found while the cpu
+        was busy but no busier group was found
+
+    17) # of times in this domain load_balance() was called when the
+        cpu was just becoming idle
+    18) # of times in this domain load_balance() checked but found the
+        load did not require balancing when the cpu was just becoming idle
+    19) # of times in this domain load_balance() tried to move one or more
+        tasks and failed, when the cpu was just becoming idle
+    20) sum of imbalances discovered (if any) with each call to
+        load_balance() in this domain when the cpu was just becoming idle
+    21) # of times in this domain pull_task() was called when newly idle
+    22) # of times in this domain pull_task() was called even though the
+        target task was cache-hot when just becoming idle
+    23) # of times in this domain load_balance() was called but did not
+        find a busier queue while the cpu was just becoming idle
+    24) # of times in this domain a busier queue was found while the cpu
+        was just becoming idle but no busier group was found
+
+   Next three are active_load_balance() statistics:
+
+    25) # of times active_load_balance() was called
+    26) # of times active_load_balance() tried to move a task and failed
+    27) # of times active_load_balance() successfully moved a task
+
+   Next three are sched_balance_exec() statistics:
+
+    28) sbe_cnt is not used
+    29) sbe_balanced is not used
+    30) sbe_pushed is not used
+
+   Next three are sched_balance_fork() statistics:
+
+    31) sbf_cnt is not used
+    32) sbf_balanced is not used
+    33) sbf_pushed is not used
+
+   Next three are try_to_wake_up() statistics:
+
+    34) # of times in this domain try_to_wake_up() awoke a task that
+        last ran on a different cpu in this domain
+    35) # of times in this domain try_to_wake_up() moved a task to the
+        waking cpu because it was cache-cold on its own cpu anyway
+    36) # of times in this domain try_to_wake_up() started passive balancing
+
+/proc/<pid>/schedstat
+---------------------
+schedstats also adds a new /proc/<pid>/schedstat file to include some of
+the same information on a per-process level.  There are three fields in
+this file correlating for that process to:
+
+     1) time spent on the cpu
+     2) time spent waiting on a runqueue
+     3) # of timeslices run on this cpu
+
+A program could be easily written to make use of these extra fields to
+report on how well a particular process or set of processes is faring
+under the scheduler's policies.  A simple version of such a program is
+available at
+
+    http://eaglet.pdxhosts.com/rick/linux/schedstat/v12/latency.c
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/text_files.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/text_files.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0bc50307b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/text_files.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+Scheduler pelt c program
+------------------------
+
+.. literalinclude:: sched-pelt.c
+    :language: c