diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-27 10:05:51 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-27 10:05:51 +0000 |
commit | 5d1646d90e1f2cceb9f0828f4b28318cd0ec7744 (patch) | |
tree | a94efe259b9009378be6d90eb30d2b019d95c194 /Documentation/usb/ohci.rst | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | linux-upstream/5.10.209.tar.xz linux-upstream/5.10.209.zip |
Adding upstream version 5.10.209.upstream/5.10.209upstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/usb/ohci.rst | 35 |
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/usb/ohci.rst b/Documentation/usb/ohci.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..bb3c49719 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/usb/ohci.rst @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +==== +OHCI +==== + +23-Aug-2002 + +The "ohci-hcd" driver is a USB Host Controller Driver (HCD) that is derived +from the "usb-ohci" driver from the 2.4 kernel series. The "usb-ohci" code +was written primarily by Roman Weissgaerber <weissg@vienna.at> but with +contributions from many others (read its copyright/licencing header). + +It supports the "Open Host Controller Interface" (OHCI), which standardizes +hardware register protocols used to talk to USB 1.1 host controllers. As +compared to the earlier "Universal Host Controller Interface" (UHCI) from +Intel, it pushes more intelligence into the hardware. USB 1.1 controllers +from vendors other than Intel and VIA generally use OHCI. + +Changes since the 2.4 kernel include + + - improved robustness; bugfixes; and less overhead + - supports the updated and simplified usbcore APIs + - interrupt transfers can be larger, and can be queued + - less code, by using the upper level "hcd" framework + - supports some non-PCI implementations of OHCI + - ... more + +The "ohci-hcd" driver handles all USB 1.1 transfer types. Transfers of all +types can be queued. That was also true in "usb-ohci", except for interrupt +transfers. Previously, using periods of one frame would risk data loss due +to overhead in IRQ processing. When interrupt transfers are queued, those +risks can be minimized by making sure the hardware always has transfers to +work on while the OS is getting around to the relevant IRQ processing. + +- David Brownell + <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> |