Adding upstream version 5.10.209.upstream/5.10.209upstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 382 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..192871608
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -0,0 +1,382 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2004, 2007-2010, 2011-2012 Synopsys, Inc. (www.synopsys.com)
+ */
+
+#ifndef __ASM_SPINLOCK_H
+#define __ASM_SPINLOCK_H
+
+#include <asm/spinlock_types.h>
+#include <asm/processor.h>
+#include <asm/barrier.h>
+
+#define arch_spin_is_locked(x)	((x)->slock != __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED__)
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LLSC
+
+static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	unsigned int val;
+
+	__asm__ __volatile__(
+	"1:	llock	%[val], [%[slock]]	\n"
+	"	breq	%[val], %[LOCKED], 1b	\n"	/* spin while LOCKED */
+	"	scond	%[LOCKED], [%[slock]]	\n"	/* acquire */
+	"	bnz	1b			\n"
+	"					\n"
+	: [val]		"=&r"	(val)
+	: [slock]	"r"	(&(lock->slock)),
+	  [LOCKED]	"r"	(__ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_LOCKED__)
+	: "memory", "cc");
+
+	/*
+	 * ACQUIRE barrier to ensure load/store after taking the lock
+	 * don't "bleed-up" out of the critical section (leak-in is allowed)
+	 * http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2010409.html
+	 *
+	 * ARCv2 only has load-load, store-store and all-all barrier
+	 * thus need the full all-all barrier
+	 */
+	smp_mb();
+}
+
+/* 1 - lock taken successfully */
+static inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	unsigned int val, got_it = 0;
+
+	__asm__ __volatile__(
+	"1:	llock	%[val], [%[slock]]	\n"
+	"	breq	%[val], %[LOCKED], 4f	\n"	/* already LOCKED, just bail */
+	"	scond	%[LOCKED], [%[slock]]	\n"	/* acquire */
+	"	bnz	1b			\n"
+	"	mov	%[got_it], 1		\n"
+	"4:					\n"
+	"					\n"
+	: [val]		"=&r"	(val),
+	  [got_it]	"+&r"	(got_it)
+	: [slock]	"r"	(&(lock->slock)),
+	  [LOCKED]	"r"	(__ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_LOCKED__)
+	: "memory", "cc");
+
+	smp_mb();
+
+	return got_it;
+}
+
+static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	smp_mb();
+
+	WRITE_ONCE(lock->slock, __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED__);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers but only one writer.
+ * Unfair locking as Writers could be starved indefinitely by Reader(s)
+ */
+
+static inline void arch_read_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	unsigned int val;
+
+	/*
+	 * zero means writer holds the lock exclusively, deny Reader.
+	 * Otherwise grant lock to first/subseq reader
+	 *
+	 * 	if (rw->counter > 0) {
+	 *		rw->counter--;
+	 *		ret = 1;
+	 *	}
+	 */
+
+	__asm__ __volatile__(
+	"1:	llock	%[val], [%[rwlock]]	\n"
+	"	brls	%[val], %[WR_LOCKED], 1b\n"	/* <= 0: spin while write locked */
+	"	sub	%[val], %[val], 1	\n"	/* reader lock */
+	"	scond	%[val], [%[rwlock]]	\n"
+	"	bnz	1b			\n"
+	"					\n"
+	: [val]		"=&r"	(val)
+	: [rwlock]	"r"	(&(rw->counter)),
+	  [WR_LOCKED]	"ir"	(0)
+	: "memory", "cc");
+
+	smp_mb();
+}
+
+/* 1 - lock taken successfully */
+static inline int arch_read_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	unsigned int val, got_it = 0;
+
+	__asm__ __volatile__(
+	"1:	llock	%[val], [%[rwlock]]	\n"
+	"	brls	%[val], %[WR_LOCKED], 4f\n"	/* <= 0: already write locked, bail */
+	"	sub	%[val], %[val], 1	\n"	/* counter-- */
+	"	scond	%[val], [%[rwlock]]	\n"
+	"	bnz	1b			\n"	/* retry if collided with someone */
+	"	mov	%[got_it], 1		\n"
+	"					\n"
+	"4: ; --- done ---			\n"
+
+	: [val]		"=&r"	(val),
+	  [got_it]	"+&r"	(got_it)
+	: [rwlock]	"r"	(&(rw->counter)),
+	  [WR_LOCKED]	"ir"	(0)
+	: "memory", "cc");
+
+	smp_mb();
+
+	return got_it;
+}
+
+static inline void arch_write_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	unsigned int val;
+
+	/*
+	 * If reader(s) hold lock (lock < __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__),
+	 * deny writer. Otherwise if unlocked grant to writer
+	 * Hence the claim that Linux rwlocks are unfair to writers.
+	 * (can be starved for an indefinite time by readers).
+	 *
+	 *	if (rw->counter == __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__) {
+	 *		rw->counter = 0;
+	 *		ret = 1;
+	 *	}
+	 */
+
+	__asm__ __volatile__(
+	"1:	llock	%[val], [%[rwlock]]	\n"
+	"	brne	%[val], %[UNLOCKED], 1b	\n"	/* while !UNLOCKED spin */
+	"	mov	%[val], %[WR_LOCKED]	\n"
+	"	scond	%[val], [%[rwlock]]	\n"
+	"	bnz	1b			\n"
+	"					\n"
+	: [val]		"=&r"	(val)
+	: [rwlock]	"r"	(&(rw->counter)),
+	  [UNLOCKED]	"ir"	(__ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__),
+	  [WR_LOCKED]	"ir"	(0)
+	: "memory", "cc");
+
+	smp_mb();
+}
+
+/* 1 - lock taken successfully */
+static inline int arch_write_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	unsigned int val, got_it = 0;
+
+	__asm__ __volatile__(
+	"1:	llock	%[val], [%[rwlock]]	\n"
+	"	brne	%[val], %[UNLOCKED], 4f	\n"	/* !UNLOCKED, bail */
+	"	mov	%[val], %[WR_LOCKED]	\n"
+	"	scond	%[val], [%[rwlock]]	\n"
+	"	bnz	1b			\n"	/* retry if collided with someone */
+	"	mov	%[got_it], 1		\n"
+	"					\n"
+	"4: ; --- done ---			\n"
+
+	: [val]		"=&r"	(val),
+	  [got_it]	"+&r"	(got_it)
+	: [rwlock]	"r"	(&(rw->counter)),
+	  [UNLOCKED]	"ir"	(__ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__),
+	  [WR_LOCKED]	"ir"	(0)
+	: "memory", "cc");
+
+	smp_mb();
+
+	return got_it;
+}
+
+static inline void arch_read_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	unsigned int val;
+
+	smp_mb();
+
+	/*
+	 * rw->counter++;
+	 */
+	__asm__ __volatile__(
+	"1:	llock	%[val], [%[rwlock]]	\n"
+	"	add	%[val], %[val], 1	\n"
+	"	scond	%[val], [%[rwlock]]	\n"
+	"	bnz	1b			\n"
+	"					\n"
+	: [val]		"=&r"	(val)
+	: [rwlock]	"r"	(&(rw->counter))
+	: "memory", "cc");
+}
+
+static inline void arch_write_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	smp_mb();
+
+	WRITE_ONCE(rw->counter, __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__);
+}
+
+#else	/* !CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LLSC */
+
+static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	unsigned int val = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_LOCKED__;
+
+	/*
+	 * Per lkmm, smp_mb() is only required after _lock (and before_unlock)
+	 * for ACQ and REL semantics respectively. However EX based spinlocks
+	 * need the extra smp_mb to workaround a hardware quirk.
+	 */
+	smp_mb();
+
+	__asm__ __volatile__(
+	"1:	ex  %0, [%1]		\n"
+	"	breq  %0, %2, 1b	\n"
+	: "+&r" (val)
+	: "r"(&(lock->slock)), "ir"(__ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_LOCKED__)
+	: "memory");
+
+	smp_mb();
+}
+
+/* 1 - lock taken successfully */
+static inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	unsigned int val = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_LOCKED__;
+
+	smp_mb();
+
+	__asm__ __volatile__(
+	"1:	ex  %0, [%1]		\n"
+	: "+r" (val)
+	: "r"(&(lock->slock))
+	: "memory");
+
+	smp_mb();
+
+	return (val == __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED__);
+}
+
+static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	unsigned int val = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED__;
+
+	/*
+	 * RELEASE barrier: given the instructions avail on ARCv2, full barrier
+	 * is the only option
+	 */
+	smp_mb();
+
+	/*
+	 * EX is not really required here, a simple STore of 0 suffices.
+	 * However this causes tasklist livelocks in SystemC based SMP virtual
+	 * platforms where the systemc core scheduler uses EX as a cue for
+	 * moving to next core. Do a git log of this file for details
+	 */
+	__asm__ __volatile__(
+	"	ex  %0, [%1]		\n"
+	: "+r" (val)
+	: "r"(&(lock->slock))
+	: "memory");
+
+	/*
+	 * see pairing version/comment in arch_spin_lock above
+	 */
+	smp_mb();
+}
+
+/*
+ * Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers but only one writer.
+ * Unfair locking as Writers could be starved indefinitely by Reader(s)
+ *
+ * The spinlock itself is contained in @counter and access to it is
+ * serialized with @lock_mutex.
+ */
+
+/* 1 - lock taken successfully */
+static inline int arch_read_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	local_irq_save(flags);
+	arch_spin_lock(&(rw->lock_mutex));
+
+	/*
+	 * zero means writer holds the lock exclusively, deny Reader.
+	 * Otherwise grant lock to first/subseq reader
+	 */
+	if (rw->counter > 0) {
+		rw->counter--;
+		ret = 1;
+	}
+
+	arch_spin_unlock(&(rw->lock_mutex));
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/* 1 - lock taken successfully */
+static inline int arch_write_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	local_irq_save(flags);
+	arch_spin_lock(&(rw->lock_mutex));
+
+	/*
+	 * If reader(s) hold lock (lock < __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__),
+	 * deny writer. Otherwise if unlocked grant to writer
+	 * Hence the claim that Linux rwlocks are unfair to writers.
+	 * (can be starved for an indefinite time by readers).
+	 */
+	if (rw->counter == __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__) {
+		rw->counter = 0;
+		ret = 1;
+	}
+	arch_spin_unlock(&(rw->lock_mutex));
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static inline void arch_read_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	while (!arch_read_trylock(rw))
+		cpu_relax();
+}
+
+static inline void arch_write_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	while (!arch_write_trylock(rw))
+		cpu_relax();
+}
+
+static inline void arch_read_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	local_irq_save(flags);
+	arch_spin_lock(&(rw->lock_mutex));
+	rw->counter++;
+	arch_spin_unlock(&(rw->lock_mutex));
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+
+static inline void arch_write_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	local_irq_save(flags);
+	arch_spin_lock(&(rw->lock_mutex));
+	rw->counter = __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__;
+	arch_spin_unlock(&(rw->lock_mutex));
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+
+#endif
+
+#endif /* __ASM_SPINLOCK_H */