diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-27 10:05:51 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-27 10:05:51 +0000 |
commit | 5d1646d90e1f2cceb9f0828f4b28318cd0ec7744 (patch) | |
tree | a94efe259b9009378be6d90eb30d2b019d95c194 /arch/parisc/include/asm/ldcw.h | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | linux-5d1646d90e1f2cceb9f0828f4b28318cd0ec7744.tar.xz linux-5d1646d90e1f2cceb9f0828f4b28318cd0ec7744.zip |
Adding upstream version 5.10.209.upstream/5.10.209upstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/parisc/include/asm/ldcw.h')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/parisc/include/asm/ldcw.h | 62 |
1 files changed, 62 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/parisc/include/asm/ldcw.h b/arch/parisc/include/asm/ldcw.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000..10a061d68 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/parisc/include/asm/ldcw.h @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef __PARISC_LDCW_H +#define __PARISC_LDCW_H + +/* Because kmalloc only guarantees 8-byte alignment for kmalloc'd data, + and GCC only guarantees 8-byte alignment for stack locals, we can't + be assured of 16-byte alignment for atomic lock data even if we + specify "__attribute ((aligned(16)))" in the type declaration. So, + we use a struct containing an array of four ints for the atomic lock + type and dynamically select the 16-byte aligned int from the array + for the semaphore. */ + +/* From: "Jim Hull" <jim.hull of hp.com> + I've attached a summary of the change, but basically, for PA 2.0, as + long as the ",CO" (coherent operation) completer is implemented, then the + 16-byte alignment requirement for ldcw and ldcd is relaxed, and instead + they only require "natural" alignment (4-byte for ldcw, 8-byte for + ldcd). + + Although the cache control hint is accepted by all PA 2.0 processors, + it is only implemented on PA8800/PA8900 CPUs. Prior PA8X00 CPUs still + require 16-byte alignment. If the address is unaligned, the operation + of the instruction is undefined. The ldcw instruction does not generate + unaligned data reference traps so misaligned accesses are not detected. + This hid the problem for years. So, restore the 16-byte alignment dropped + by Kyle McMartin in "Remove __ldcw_align for PA-RISC 2.0 processors". */ + +#define __PA_LDCW_ALIGNMENT 16 +#define __PA_LDCW_ALIGN_ORDER 4 +#define __ldcw_align(a) ({ \ + unsigned long __ret = (unsigned long) &(a)->lock[0]; \ + __ret = (__ret + __PA_LDCW_ALIGNMENT - 1) \ + & ~(__PA_LDCW_ALIGNMENT - 1); \ + (volatile unsigned int *) __ret; \ +}) + +#ifdef CONFIG_PA20 +#define __LDCW "ldcw,co" +#else +#define __LDCW "ldcw" +#endif + +/* LDCW, the only atomic read-write operation PA-RISC has. *sigh*. + We don't explicitly expose that "*a" may be written as reload + fails to find a register in class R1_REGS when "a" needs to be + reloaded when generating 64-bit PIC code. Instead, we clobber + memory to indicate to the compiler that the assembly code reads + or writes to items other than those listed in the input and output + operands. This may pessimize the code somewhat but __ldcw is + usually used within code blocks surrounded by memory barriers. */ +#define __ldcw(a) ({ \ + unsigned __ret; \ + __asm__ __volatile__(__LDCW " 0(%1),%0" \ + : "=r" (__ret) : "r" (a) : "memory"); \ + __ret; \ +}) + +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP +# define __lock_aligned __section(".data..lock_aligned") +#endif + +#endif /* __PARISC_LDCW_H */ |