diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-27 10:06:00 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-27 10:06:00 +0000 |
commit | b15a952c52a6825376d3e7f6c1bf5c886c6d8b74 (patch) | |
tree | 1500f2f8f276908a36d8126cb632c0d6b1276764 /debian/patches-rt/0157-locking-rtmutex-Remove-output-from-deadlock-detector.patch | |
parent | Adding upstream version 5.10.209. (diff) | |
download | linux-b15a952c52a6825376d3e7f6c1bf5c886c6d8b74.tar.xz linux-b15a952c52a6825376d3e7f6c1bf5c886c6d8b74.zip |
Adding debian version 5.10.209-2.debian/5.10.209-2debian
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'debian/patches-rt/0157-locking-rtmutex-Remove-output-from-deadlock-detector.patch')
-rw-r--r-- | debian/patches-rt/0157-locking-rtmutex-Remove-output-from-deadlock-detector.patch | 312 |
1 files changed, 312 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/debian/patches-rt/0157-locking-rtmutex-Remove-output-from-deadlock-detector.patch b/debian/patches-rt/0157-locking-rtmutex-Remove-output-from-deadlock-detector.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6f0878b80 --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/patches-rt/0157-locking-rtmutex-Remove-output-from-deadlock-detector.patch @@ -0,0 +1,312 @@ +From e9b488ea6cb82e796f8d331b037cb7de76d15657 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> +Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 16:05:11 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH 157/323] locking/rtmutex: Remove output from deadlock + detector. +Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/older/patches-5.10.204-rt100.tar.xz + +In commit + f5694788ad8da ("rt_mutex: Add lockdep annotations") + +rtmutex gained lockdep annotation for rt_mutex_lock() and and related +functions. +lockdep will see the locking order and may complain about a deadlock +before rtmutex' own mechanism gets a chance to detect it. +The rtmutex deadlock detector will only complain locks with the +RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK and a waiter must be pending. That means it +works only for in-kernel locks because the futex interface always uses +RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK. +The requirement for an active waiter limits the detector to actual +deadlocks and makes it possible to report potential deadlocks like +lockdep does. +It looks like lockdep is better suited for reporting deadlocks. + +Remove rtmutex' debug print on deadlock detection. + +Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> +--- + include/linux/rtmutex.h | 7 --- + kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c | 97 --------------------------------- + kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.h | 11 ---- + kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 9 --- + kernel/locking/rtmutex.h | 7 --- + kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 4 -- + 6 files changed, 135 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/include/linux/rtmutex.h b/include/linux/rtmutex.h +index 16f974a22f51..88a0ba806066 100644 +--- a/include/linux/rtmutex.h ++++ b/include/linux/rtmutex.h +@@ -31,9 +31,6 @@ struct rt_mutex { + raw_spinlock_t wait_lock; + struct rb_root_cached waiters; + struct task_struct *owner; +-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES +- const char *name; +-#endif + #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC + struct lockdep_map dep_map; + #endif +@@ -56,8 +53,6 @@ struct hrtimer_sleeper; + #endif + + #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES +-# define __DEBUG_RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mutexname) \ +- , .name = #mutexname + + # define rt_mutex_init(mutex) \ + do { \ +@@ -67,7 +62,6 @@ do { \ + + extern void rt_mutex_debug_task_free(struct task_struct *tsk); + #else +-# define __DEBUG_RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mutexname) + # define rt_mutex_init(mutex) __rt_mutex_init(mutex, NULL, NULL) + # define rt_mutex_debug_task_free(t) do { } while (0) + #endif +@@ -83,7 +77,6 @@ do { \ + { .wait_lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(mutexname.wait_lock) \ + , .waiters = RB_ROOT_CACHED \ + , .owner = NULL \ +- __DEBUG_RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mutexname) \ + __DEP_MAP_RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mutexname)} + + #define DEFINE_RT_MUTEX(mutexname) \ +diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c +index 7e411b946d4c..fb150100335f 100644 +--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c ++++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c +@@ -32,105 +32,12 @@ + + #include "rtmutex_common.h" + +-static void printk_task(struct task_struct *p) +-{ +- if (p) +- printk("%16s:%5d [%p, %3d]", p->comm, task_pid_nr(p), p, p->prio); +- else +- printk("<none>"); +-} +- +-static void printk_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int print_owner) +-{ +- printk(" [%p] {%s}\n", lock, lock->name); +- +- if (print_owner && rt_mutex_owner(lock)) { +- printk(".. ->owner: %p\n", lock->owner); +- printk(".. held by: "); +- printk_task(rt_mutex_owner(lock)); +- printk("\n"); +- } +-} +- + void rt_mutex_debug_task_free(struct task_struct *task) + { + DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&task->pi_waiters.rb_root)); + DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(task->pi_blocked_on); + } + +-/* +- * We fill out the fields in the waiter to store the information about +- * the deadlock. We print when we return. act_waiter can be NULL in +- * case of a remove waiter operation. +- */ +-void debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk, +- struct rt_mutex_waiter *act_waiter, +- struct rt_mutex *lock) +-{ +- struct task_struct *task; +- +- if (!debug_locks || chwalk == RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK || !act_waiter) +- return; +- +- task = rt_mutex_owner(act_waiter->lock); +- if (task && task != current) { +- act_waiter->deadlock_task_pid = get_pid(task_pid(task)); +- act_waiter->deadlock_lock = lock; +- } +-} +- +-void debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) +-{ +- struct task_struct *task; +- +- if (!waiter->deadlock_lock || !debug_locks) +- return; +- +- rcu_read_lock(); +- task = pid_task(waiter->deadlock_task_pid, PIDTYPE_PID); +- if (!task) { +- rcu_read_unlock(); +- return; +- } +- +- if (!debug_locks_off()) { +- rcu_read_unlock(); +- return; +- } +- +- pr_warn("\n"); +- pr_warn("============================================\n"); +- pr_warn("WARNING: circular locking deadlock detected!\n"); +- pr_warn("%s\n", print_tainted()); +- pr_warn("--------------------------------------------\n"); +- printk("%s/%d is deadlocking current task %s/%d\n\n", +- task->comm, task_pid_nr(task), +- current->comm, task_pid_nr(current)); +- +- printk("\n1) %s/%d is trying to acquire this lock:\n", +- current->comm, task_pid_nr(current)); +- printk_lock(waiter->lock, 1); +- +- printk("\n2) %s/%d is blocked on this lock:\n", +- task->comm, task_pid_nr(task)); +- printk_lock(waiter->deadlock_lock, 1); +- +- debug_show_held_locks(current); +- debug_show_held_locks(task); +- +- printk("\n%s/%d's [blocked] stackdump:\n\n", +- task->comm, task_pid_nr(task)); +- show_stack(task, NULL, KERN_DEFAULT); +- printk("\n%s/%d's [current] stackdump:\n\n", +- current->comm, task_pid_nr(current)); +- dump_stack(); +- debug_show_all_locks(); +- rcu_read_unlock(); +- +- printk("[ turning off deadlock detection." +- "Please report this trace. ]\n\n"); +-} +- + void debug_rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock) + { + } +@@ -153,12 +60,10 @@ void debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock) + void debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) + { + memset(waiter, 0x11, sizeof(*waiter)); +- waiter->deadlock_task_pid = NULL; + } + + void debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) + { +- put_pid(waiter->deadlock_task_pid); + memset(waiter, 0x22, sizeof(*waiter)); + } + +@@ -168,10 +73,8 @@ void debug_rt_mutex_init(struct rt_mutex *lock, const char *name, struct lock_cl + * Make sure we are not reinitializing a held lock: + */ + debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)lock, sizeof(*lock)); +- lock->name = name; + + #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC + lockdep_init_map(&lock->dep_map, name, key, 0); + #endif + } +- +diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.h b/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.h +index fc549713bba3..659e93e256c6 100644 +--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.h ++++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.h +@@ -18,20 +18,9 @@ extern void debug_rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock); + extern void debug_rt_mutex_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, + struct task_struct *powner); + extern void debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock); +-extern void debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk, +- struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, +- struct rt_mutex *lock); +-extern void debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter); +-# define debug_rt_mutex_reset_waiter(w) \ +- do { (w)->deadlock_lock = NULL; } while (0) + + static inline bool debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + enum rtmutex_chainwalk walk) + { + return (waiter != NULL); + } +- +-static inline void rt_mutex_print_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *w) +-{ +- debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(w); +-} +diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +index 4792fc7abe7d..9aa4d545020a 100644 +--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c ++++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +@@ -597,7 +597,6 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, + * walk, we detected a deadlock. + */ + if (lock == orig_lock || rt_mutex_owner(lock) == top_task) { +- debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(chwalk, orig_waiter, lock); + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + ret = -EDEADLK; + goto out_unlock_pi; +@@ -1189,8 +1188,6 @@ __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, + + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); + +- debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(waiter); +- + schedule(); + + raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); +@@ -1211,10 +1208,6 @@ static void rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(int res, int detect_deadlock, + if (res != -EDEADLOCK || detect_deadlock) + return; + +- /* +- * Yell lowdly and stop the task right here. +- */ +- rt_mutex_print_deadlock(w); + while (1) { + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); + schedule(); +@@ -1763,8 +1756,6 @@ int __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, + ret = 0; + } + +- debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(waiter); +- + return ret; + } + +diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.h b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.h +index 732f96abf462..338ccd29119a 100644 +--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.h ++++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.h +@@ -19,15 +19,8 @@ + #define debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(l) do { } while (0) + #define debug_rt_mutex_unlock(l) do { } while (0) + #define debug_rt_mutex_init(m, n, k) do { } while (0) +-#define debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(d, a ,l) do { } while (0) +-#define debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(w) do { } while (0) + #define debug_rt_mutex_reset_waiter(w) do { } while (0) + +-static inline void rt_mutex_print_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *w) +-{ +- WARN(1, "rtmutex deadlock detected\n"); +-} +- + static inline bool debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *w, + enum rtmutex_chainwalk walk) + { +diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h +index e6913103d7ff..b1455dc2366f 100644 +--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h ++++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h +@@ -29,10 +29,6 @@ struct rt_mutex_waiter { + struct rb_node pi_tree_entry; + struct task_struct *task; + struct rt_mutex *lock; +-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES +- struct pid *deadlock_task_pid; +- struct rt_mutex *deadlock_lock; +-#endif + int prio; + u64 deadline; + }; +-- +2.43.0 + |